Steel Guitar Strings
Strings & instruction for lap steel, Hawaiian & pedal steel guitars
http://SteelGuitarShopper.com
Ray Price Shuffles
Classic country shuffle styles for Band-in-a-Box, by BIAB guru Jim Baron.
http://steelguitarmusic.com

This Forum is CLOSED.
Go to bb.steelguitarforum.com to read and post new messages.



Note: This is an archived topic. It is read-only.
  The Steel Guitar Forum
  Pedal Steel Archive
  Effects Processors of choice for Pedal Steel?

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!

profile | join | preferences | help | search



This topic was originally posted in this forum: Pedal Steel
Author Topic:   Effects Processors of choice for Pedal Steel?
Dennis Wood
Member

Posts: 102
From: Savannah, TN USA
Registered: JUN 99

posted 19 June 1999 07:23 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dennis Wood     
Which Effects processor is better for Pedal steel? I hear a lot about Profex and Tubefex from Peavey. Opinions welcomed, pros & cons. I have been a standup guitar player for many years using floor effects/stompboxes.


Jack Stoner
Sysop

Posts: 8119
From: Inverness, Florida
Registered: DEC 99

posted 19 June 1999 09:21 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jack Stoner     
I have a Transtube Fex (solid state version of the Tubefex) and love it. I had a Profex II and never could get it to sound like I wanted and sold it.

But, a lot of the guys are using the Profex II and I understand the John Lemay mod does a lot to improve the sound. The Profex II's have dropped quite a bit in resale price lately.

There are other units, such as the Digitech 2101 or it's newer version, and Alesis units. However, more seem to be using the Peavey units, as steel programs (patches) are available for them.

Many of the guitar stomp boxes tend to distort with steel so you have to be careful with them. I do use a Boss DD-5 delay when I don't use the Transtube Fex.

[This message was edited by Jack Stoner on 06-19-99]



Dennis Wood
Member

Posts: 102
From: Savannah, TN USA
Registered: JUN 99

posted 19 June 1999 02:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dennis Wood     
Thanks for the input Jack, where would one find the patches for Peavey Transfex written for steel? I am using a mid 80's Fender Twin all tube amp with cut/boost aplenty, usually play clean. I would probably opt for the solid state Transfex vs the Tubefex since i already have a tube aamp. Any advice or comments welcome. Peavey has info on their webpage concerning their new Classic 2000 amp with onboard transfex due out in Aug. Any comments on this combo? Pro/Con vs standalone effects?


Bob Hoffnar
Member

Posts: 4278
From: Brooklyn, NY
Registered:

posted 19 June 1999 04:25 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Bob Hoffnar     
If you like how your amp sounds then don't use anything. Stomp boxes work great on steel as well as guitar if you want to try different sounds. A decent steel plugged into a good tube amp played well should do it. I don't understand this facination that steel players have with consumer grade rack effects.
Bob


Jim Smith
Member

Posts: 6399
From: Plano, TX, USA
Registered:

posted 19 June 1999 04:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jim Smith     
If you have access to a MIDI dump program and MIDI cables, I can send you a SYSex dump of the steel settings modified for the preamp of the TransTubeFex or TubeFex.


Jerry Hayes
Member

Posts: 3306
From: Virginia Beach, Va.
Registered: MAR 99

posted 20 June 1999 08:37 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jerry Hayes     
Hey Dennis, I use a Zoom 1010 pedal which is very small. It's all digital with analog distortions in it. It has compression, delay, reverb, flanger, chorus, built in tuner, doubling, and wah-wah plus other things. This thing only costs about $150.00 and is very user friendly. Also it's only about 6 inches wide and about 9 inches long. It also comes with an AC adapter. It fits in my pack seat and since I play a single wide 12 string it fits between the legs of my steel to the right of my volumn pedal. The chorusing and delay is very nice and lush. I forgot how many presets it has but it's got about 12 user ones. If you can't find them in your local music store, Musician's Friend has them in their catalog.

------------------
Have a good one! JH U-12

[This message was edited by Jerry Hayes on 06-20-99]



Jon Smorada
Member

Posts: 756
From: Industry, PA USA
Registered:

posted 23 June 1999 12:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jon Smorada     
I use a Korg A3. Out of all the gazillions of effects it's capable of, I only use reverb, delay and occasionally eq. But the reverb and delay are really clean in this unit.


Herb Steiner
Member

Posts: 6119
From: Cedar Valley, Travis County TX
Registered:

posted 23 June 1999 02:46 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Herb Steiner     
Lexicon MPX100

Used to use the ProFex2, but was unhappy with 1) no bypass, 2) no mix/blend control, 3) no quick changes; you gotta program onstage, and 4) front input only.

Since I only use reverb and occasional delay, I use the Lexicon MPX100, which offers features satisfying all the above complaints, along with fantastic Lexicon reverbs. Easy to use and ready for steel right out of the box.

------------------
http://members.aol.com/herbs10178/index.htm


John Macy
Member

Posts: 2290
From: Denver, CO USA
Registered:

posted 23 June 1999 03:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for John Macy     
Lexicon MXP100. Like Herb said, easy to use, priced right, NO noise, and that classic Lexicon reverb sound. Not to mention the Tap Delay function for setting delay times. I also really like the verbs in the Roland SRV330 a lot.

[This message was edited by John Macy on 06-23-99]



Dan Tyack
Member

Posts: 3552
From: Seattle, WA USA
Registered:

posted 23 June 1999 07:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dan Tyack     
I love the Lexicon MPX-1 G2. It's way more processor than most steel players would use, but I love it. Awesome analog stomp pedal effects (compressor, univibe, mutron) with lush line level reverbs and time based effects (delay, doubling, chorus), all with a routing system that doesn't alter the sound of the steel at all.


Ron Hogan
Member

Posts: 121
From: Nashville, TN, usa
Registered:

posted 24 June 1999 10:29 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ron Hogan     
I'm using a TransTubeFex. I like it, but I'm always looking for something I like better, like the rest of us do.

Ron

Dan Tyack
Member

Posts: 3552
From: Seattle, WA USA
Registered:

posted 24 June 1999 11:14 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dan Tyack     
By the way I love the lexicon mpx100, but it's not a line level device, and I prefer to put my reverbs and echos between the pre and power amps. In my setup, the mpx100 distorted in this configuration, but your milage may vary, based on the amp you are using.


Greg Cutshaw
Member

Posts: 696
From: Corry, PA, USA
Registered: NOV 98

posted 24 June 1999 11:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Greg Cutshaw     
Dan, what did you pay for your MPX-1 G2? Are the analog effects like distortion as good as the GX-700? The weakest point with my GX-700 has been the lack of front panel tone controls and less than spectacular reverbs. I'm reluctant to sell my GX-700 because for one thing I heard they are no longer made and it's the best all around (analog + digital) effects processor I've tried at under $1000. Lexicon does have a lot of nice information on the G2 at their web site including a PDF file which I just started looking at. Also on my new steel, the GX-700 overloads on the input when the guitar is plugged direstly into it. Does the G2 have more input headroom or does the input control solve this problem at all? Otherwise I might want to get the G2 but keep the GX-700 for certain effects.


Greg


Dan Tyack
Member

Posts: 3552
From: Seattle, WA USA
Registered:

posted 24 June 1999 01:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dan Tyack     
Greg the Lexicon MPX G2 is better than the GX-700 for everything you mentioned: great reverbs/delays, much more headroom. The analog effects are much better than the digitally modeled stomp boxeffects in the GX-700. The effects in the GX-700 are good, but the Lexicon is outrageous sounding, in terms of compressors, distortion boxes (the Ibanez tube screamer emulation is better than an old TS-9), univibe, and the envelope type effects. It just sounds 'present' with the effects adding to the sound in an 'organic' way, instead of sounding like: 'oh there's an effect'. The one thing I haven't played with is the sound of the built in preamp of the Lex versus the amp models of the GX-700. This is because I use a tube preamp for my clean sounds, and my little THD tube head for overdriven sounds, so I really never use the built in preamp, either on the GX-700 or the Lex.

I kept my GX-700, it's a great peice of gear. And it costs about a grand less than the Lex (I payed something like $1300 on a list of $1500: theres a very slim markup).

John McConnell
Member

Posts: 87
From: Yuba City, CA, USA
Registered: APR 99

posted 24 June 1999 09:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for John McConnell     
I am using a GX 700 and I am kind of new to the whole thing. What do some of you GX700 users recommend for setings. I am currently playing an old Sho-Bud Proffesional Model D-10. I would appreciate any advice. E-Mail me at twobeat@succeed.net. Thanks


hhguitar
Member

Posts: 227
From: Blue Bell, PA USA
Registered: MAY 99

posted 25 June 1999 04:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for hhguitar     
There oughta be a law against fuzz being used on steel!!!!!

And these guys who play "slide guitar" riffs on a six string lap steel need a buttwhuppin'
too! At least if they say they play steel. Any time you come across a guy like that, sneak up and retune his major chord to a 6th!

HH

John Rickard
Member

Posts: 839
From: Phoenix (It's A Dry Heave) AZ
Registered: NOV 98

posted 25 June 1999 05:21 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for John Rickard     
Hey, why don't we all play the same licks, use the same steels and amps, the same tone, play the same song, live in the same town, wear the same clothes, and have the same closed mind?
JR

------------------
Slide It On Over




mike j
Member

Posts: 27
From: newberry springs ,calif
Registered: FEB 99

posted 27 June 1999 05:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for mike j     
I use a mesa boogie v twin rack unit and lexicon...real good sound it is a true tube preamp sound


Eddie K
Member

Posts: 120
From: Waverly, Pa, USA
Registered: MAR 99

posted 27 June 1999 07:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Eddie K     
I've used a Digitech 2101 since they came out, great unit. IMO, I still have not found a "do all" box that beats plugging straight into a great sounding tube amp.

------------------
What is that thing that you play?
members.aol.com/rndhd
www.oldfriendsband.com




Perry Hansen
Member

Posts: 852
From: Bismarck, N.D.
Registered:

posted 01 July 1999 09:31 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Perry Hansen     
Since All of this equipment is new to me, I use the ProFex II with the LaMay mod. I like the sound I'm getting now. As for the fuzz, that works great when playing Bob Wills stuff with one fiddle. I seems to blend right in with the fiddle.
Perry


Twayn Williams
Member

Posts: 194
From: Portland, OR
Registered: JUN 99

posted 03 July 1999 12:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Twayn Williams     
93

Effects are always a huge debate. The most important thing to remember is that the "real" effects are in your hands. After that, decide what sounds you want, then get a unit that will supply.

Something to keep in mind, especially for the PSG, is ergonomics. You usually already have both hands, both feet and both knees full, so switching effects on and off can be somewhat problematic.

Also, where do you put the controls so you're not always accidently stepping on them? Just think, you're getting ready to sweep in that sweet major sixth chord for the end of a low-key hawaiian tune, and instead of stepping on the volume pedal, you accidently hit the death metal distortion! Heh ;-)

I only use a volume pedal and a Danelectro Daddy-O overdrive on the PSG, though I have been thinking of getting a good tremelo unit as well. That's about as much as I can stand to have underfoot on the PSG. And I only have 3 pedals on the guitar! Now, my main electric guitar rig, that's another story ;-)

In general, here are the main effects types you want to consider:

1. 2 distortions, one tube-overdrive type and one fuzz-lead type. Trying to get these out of one device may or may not work. Most multi-effect rack distortions really blow. You'll probably want a pair of stomp boxes, and if you don't have room on the floor for both, decide which you need the most and just get one.

2. 1-4 second delay. You can get good delays out of almost any rack or box. Unless you plan on running a stereo signal, ping-pong and stereo delays probably won't do you much good. Zoom makes a really nice, cheap delay pedal.

3. Modulation. This means chorus, flange and leslie simulations. I would consider this effect type to be the least usefull for a PSG. All rack multi-effectors will have a large bevy of modulations types. One is usually about as good as the next.

4. Tremelo. Well, not for everyone, but I like 'em. Good for those "swampy" textures and wigged out 60's psychedelia. Yeah baby, yeah!

6. Filter effects. This means wah-wah, auto-wah, and phasers. Usually, it's either flanger or phaser, not both. Flanger is easier to control, but the phaser has its own undeniable charm. Phasers are not always found in racks, but I wouldn't let the absence of one deter my possible purchase. Wah-wah is going to have to come from the floor. If you can find a pedal that is foot-switchable between volume and wah, that would be the way to go - kill 2 birds with one stone.

7. Reverb. If your amp already has reverb, you probably don't need to worry about it. However, if playing with large reverb times is one of your things, then I would suggest (along with everyone else) a Lexicon if you have the bucks. If you don't have the bucks, get the best one you can afford. I am partial to the rich sound of the Alesis myself and abhor the thin sound of the Digitech, but YMMV.

Now, out of all these types, I'd say you probably will usually only want about 3: distortion, delay and one other type (we will assume that you already have a volume pedal.) Keep in mind how much physical space you will have to keep the effects in and how much you will really use them.

------------------
93
Rev. Doubt-Goat


Earnest Bovine
Member

Posts: 4687
From: Los Angeles CA USA
Registered:

posted 04 July 1999 12:57 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Earnest Bovine     
Most multi efx boxes also include
1. equalization
2. compression/limiting
3. other wierdness such as filter with time-shifting formant center freq or whatever is the flavor of the month

all of which can be fun.

chris ivey
Member

Posts: 1105
From: sacramento, ca. usa
Registered: NOV 98

posted 05 July 1999 04:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for chris ivey     
i use a zoom with my zum.......recently got a zoom 505 stomp box for $50.(actually still new in box) presets suck for steel, but easy to reprogram basics. real clear sound.


Dan Tyack
Member

Posts: 3552
From: Seattle, WA USA
Registered:

posted 05 July 1999 05:58 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dan Tyack     
Twayne, you point out an interesting problem that guitarist have, but is much more significant on the pedal steel.

In general, stomp boxes give a better sound for analog type effects than the presets in rack units. However, if you load up a bunch of stomp boxes in your signal, your tone really suffers. This is somewhat true for guitar, but it is really true for steel (perhaps due to the high impedence of the steel pickups?). Plus then you need to worry about powering all these devices. It's a pain. For a bunch of money, you can get somebody to build you a custom switching system hooked up to a foot pedal. But I don't know of any steel player who has gone to that trouble (and it's more money if the *&^% thing ever breaks... and it will).

So we use the rack efx units, which as you point out, don't sound great. Good but not great.

Anyway, if you are really into analog stomp boxes, you should really try the Lexicon MPX G2. They have done a very excellent job on the stomp box thing. Plus it doesn't change your tone at all, the efx on or off. And these stomp box patches are very adjustable (down to the level of emulating how much battery power the device is recieving).




John Lacey
Member

Posts: 1843
From: Black Diamond, Alberta, Canada
Registered: JAN 99

posted 06 July 1999 09:29 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for John Lacey     
We opened up for Ricochet recently, and Teddy Carr had an interesting setup. He used a rack with a compressor and a Tubefex, combined with the Peavey footswitch box for his Tubefex located at right angles to the left of his steel. I'm not in favor of footswitches, but the way Teddy bops around, I'm sure that it was no problem for him to "stomp" away. The other neat arrangement was one that Buddy Emmons used in a show I put on in '82. He had a large rack with a hinged lid, 3 or 4 rack devices inside and a bunch of stomp boxes located on the lid of the box, so he had his choice.


chris ivey
Member

Posts: 1105
From: sacramento, ca. usa
Registered: NOV 98

posted 06 July 1999 09:46 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for chris ivey     
using a goodrich 10K volume pedal, which changes the line level to low impedance, really cleans up alot of the stomp box loss.


All times are Pacific (US)

This is an ARCHIVED topic. You may not reply to it!
Hop to:

Contact Us | Catalog of Pedal Steel Music Products

Note: Messages not explicitly copyrighted are in the Public Domain.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46

Our mailing address is:
The Steel Guitar Forum
148 South Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Support the Forum