Author
|
Topic: Reece´s 12 string tuning
|
MUSICO Member From: Jeremy Williams in Spain
|
posted 07 December 2005 03:23 PM
profile send email edit
Here´s the tuning Reece Anderson uses (and others are following suit) on 12 string lap.DFACEGACEGBD (low to high) Trying this out on my Carter U12 (I don´t YET have an MSA SS) leads me to suggest altering the order of the top 3 strings. Let´s go through the process. my U12 BEG#BEF#G#BEG#D#F# the lock lever passes it across to "the B6 side" by lowering 2 Es to D#s and the D# to C# BEG#BD#F#G#BD#G#C#F# transpose this up one fret to make it read easier as C6 C((FACEGACE))ADG strings 4 to 11 are identical to Reece´s tuning. On strings 1 to 3 I have 2 out of 3 of Reece´s top strings, but in another order. OK so I can easily tune that 12th string up a tone and I change Reece´s top 3 string order DFACEGACE ((B)) DG Now only the 3rd string is different. So on my E9 universal 12 string I change the 3rd string from the high G# to a string that can be tuned to the B below the 5th string C. ¡¡¡¡¡Voila!!!! In the same way that many change over from CEGACE to C#EGACE depending on the song....I now have a 12 string that can slip between Reece´s C6 12 string to a variant of F9 (E9 up a half tone) Let´s see how to go from one to the other Reece (reordered string 2+3) DFACEGACEBDG raise 8 E to F raise 4 E to F raise 3 B to D raise 2 D to E
gives DFACFGACFDEG or transposed 1/2 tone C#EG#BEF#G#BEC#D#F# It´s a wonderful E6/9..or if you prefer an E9 with an extra chromatic string just as Reece´s C6 has an extra chromatic string. It´s a wonderful tuning, specially for song accompaniment and it´s just a quick 5 string retune from Reece´s wonderful tuning. I can use a lot of my E9 PSG grips and licks, i don´t break that high 3rd string as it´s now an(other) out of order chromatic string. Jeremy Williams Barcelona Spain.[This message was edited by MUSICO on 07 December 2005 at 03:42 PM.] |
Al Marcus Member From: Cedar Springs,MI USA
|
posted 07 December 2005 07:11 PM
profile send email edit
I like that tuning that Reece is using. there is a lot of stuff there, for a non pedal. Your idea of working out of B6 is good too. so many ways to play......al:------------------ My Website..... www.cmedic.net/~almarcus/
|
MUSICO Member From: Jeremy Williams in Spain
|
posted 08 December 2005 03:20 AM
profile send email edit
I thought you would answer Al. The quick retune into F9 gives a tuning with a lot of the aspects of your E69 Universal on PSG.Reece´s tuning is pure C6 extended to the maximum, fantastic for jazz....but if you do the quick retune to F9 it´s a song accompaniment machine. I reckon I could get through a whole one man show on just the one 12 string SS.....I´d retune the 5 strings for the changeover in the interval. Swapping the high G# of the E9th tuning for another out-of-order chromatic gives so many possibilities for thumbpicking accompaniment and melody with the fingers. Jeremy Williams Barcelona Spain |
Charlie McDonald Member From: Lubbock, Texas, USA
|
posted 08 December 2005 04:25 AM
profile send email edit
Very interesting; and almost exactly the same as what I'm looking at (plus a lo A and E) for a 14-string tuning, based on PST13. Great minds, etc. |
Reece Anderson Member From: Keller Texas USA
|
posted 08 December 2005 09:36 AM
profile edit
Jeremy....Thank you for your comments concerning the tuning I use. For those who have not seen it, you will find it below.D tune 1 tone above the 5th string B tune 1/2tone below the 5th string G E C root A G E C A F D The following chords can be played without using the bar. C major G major G suspended E minor C major 7th F major 7th A minor 1 suspended 1 major 7th add 9 1 major add 9 Because of the separation of the chromatic strings its even possible to play a 4 note diminished chord on ANY fret which tunes exceptionally well. This can be accomplished by slanting the back of the bar to the right only one fret and playing strings 1, 2, 7 and 8. I appreciate your interest in the tuning I use and delighted to respond to any questions. |
Bill McCloskey Member From:
|
posted 08 December 2005 10:02 AM
profile send email edit
We are just all waiting for you to put out a transcription book using this tuning Reece. |
HowardR Member From: N.Y.C.,N.Y.
|
posted 08 December 2005 10:26 AM
profile send email edit
Reece, does 1 = C ?I'm serious....I'm not sure what the 1 is.[This message was edited by HowardR on 08 December 2005 at 01:05 PM.] |
Charlie McDonald Member From: Lubbock, Texas, USA
|
posted 08 December 2005 10:46 AM
profile send email edit
Howard.... |
Bill McCloskey Member From:
|
posted 08 December 2005 12:22 PM
profile send email edit
I'm a bit confused here. Are we talking about changing the Universal into the same tuning as Reeces's lap steel with a new E9 tuning when you switch back to E9 mode. or are we talking about changing the 12 string tuning on the Lap Steel to a F9 variant. Or both? |
Reece Anderson Member From: Keller Texas USA
|
posted 08 December 2005 04:05 PM
profile edit
Howard R....Yes "C" is the 1. (root) The tuning in intervals is............2 7 5 3 1 6 5 3 1 6 4 2 |
MUSICO Member From: Jeremy Williams in Spain
|
posted 09 December 2005 07:45 AM
profile send email edit
Bill, Good question......¿are we talking non pedal or adapting reece´s non pedal research/experience back into Pedal?My answer...BOTH. Which just shows how versatile and practical Reece´s tuning is. I at first was trying out Reece´s 12 string non pedal...and found that a quick retune would put it into a really great F9 where most of my E9 experience would work. One light MSA SS...two very different tunings. I´d take it instead of a 6 string acoustic on my one man gigs....and it would be two guitars for the weight of one. But then I found I wanted to use that extra chromatic string concept and the low note being a 2nd instead of the tonic on Pedal.....so Im looking at going 14 string PSG. That way I can add in the extra strings..not the typical 14 string idea of extended range..but adding more melodic possibilities. I can´t repeat enough...the more I play without pedals the better I get at playing both non pedal and pedal. Jeremy Williams Barcelona Spain |
Bill McCloskey Member From:
|
posted 09 December 2005 08:12 AM
profile send email edit
Well I'm snowed in so I'm going to try it out on both my SS and my MSA Universal Millennium. |
Bill McCloskey Member From:
|
posted 09 December 2005 10:35 AM
profile send email edit
Wow, nice tuning. I think you just cost me money. After playing it for a while, I thought wouldn't it be cool if I had this and Reece's tuning on my SS Double. I just put a call into Kyle about having the double 8 converted into a double 12. |
MUSICO Member From: Jeremy Williams in Spain
|
posted 09 December 2005 11:44 AM
profile send email edit
Bill,¿Couldnt it just be a single 12 and retune between songs?...it´s only 5 strings to retune. That for me is the big advantage. Jeremy Williams Barcelona Spain
|
HowardR Member From: N.Y.C.,N.Y.
|
posted 09 December 2005 04:35 PM
profile send email edit
Whew! For a moment, I thought Bill was about to order another SS......  |
Bill McCloskey Member From:
|
posted 09 December 2005 08:19 PM
profile send email edit
Well, Howard I'm tempted. I spent all day snowed in playing my SS 12 string. Boy I love that instrument and I love Reeces' tuning. |
HowardR Member From: N.Y.C.,N.Y.
|
posted 09 December 2005 08:32 PM
profile send email edit
I 4 wheeled it to midtown this morning. The snow was gone by 11am. Would have loved to have stayed home & pick.Yes, that tuning in good hands sure is wonderful. I sure hope Reece plays Malaguena on his SS again in Dallas this year...... hint hint .....  |
Reece Anderson Member From: Keller Texas USA
|
posted 10 December 2005 05:30 AM
profile edit
HowardR....Your hint is noted, so come by the MSA room and we will take all requests.Wow....a 4 wheeler in New York City, you are one brave guy. |
HowardR Member From: N.Y.C.,N.Y.
|
posted 10 December 2005 06:28 AM
profile send email edit
 |
Stanford Lane Member From: Oklahoma, USA
|
posted 10 December 2005 06:35 AM
profile send email edit
I like this tuning. How would one adapt the F9th tuning to a 10-string? |
MUSICO Member From: Jeremy Williams in Spain
|
posted 10 December 2005 03:49 PM
profile send email edit
Stanford,F9, E9 basically the same..... I only mentioned F9 because the theme started from Reece´s C6 and how to retune it to an E9th like tuning. So if we talk E9 we are just talking about replacing the high G# 3rd string with an extra chromatic string that sits tonally between the 5th (B) and the 4th (E) string. We already have a D#, so it would be a C#. Talking non pedal this gives you a 10 string (high to low) F# D# C# E B G# F# E B G# As it´s easy to do a behind the bar bend of a semitone (G# to A) on the 6th string, you have G# A B C# D# E F# to play melody on. strings 346 are a nice minor chord. a lovely progression is Dm Dm/C Dm/Bb A which you can get Dm Fret 6 strings 34 6 Dm/C Fret 6 strings 34 7 Dm/Bb Fret 6 strings 34 8 A Fret 5 56 8 To retune to a ten string "reecey" C6 (actually would be B6) tune the 2nd down a tone tune the third down a tone and a half detune the 4th and 8th a semitone F# (D#) (C#) (E) B G# F#( E) B G# F# (C#) (Bb) (D#) B G# F#( D#) B G# transpose it up a tone and you will recognize a very C6 tuning....with that "reecey" extra chromatic string G D B E C A G E C A remember 2nd string is tonally between the 4th and 5th 3rd string is tonally between the 5th and 6th Hope this helps Jeremy Williams Barcelona Spain |
BobbeSeymour Member From: Hendersonville TN USA
|
posted 10 December 2005 05:04 PM
profile send email edit
Boy, I love this! This is the most intelligent thread I have ever seen on this forum, now I'll get out and enjoy more, keep going guys! Great Thread! |
MUSICO Member From: Jeremy Williams in Spain
|
posted 11 December 2005 05:32 AM
profile send email edit
Well Reece showed the tuning as numbers...showing where each note is in the scale. A great system because then you notice musical similarities...for instance C6 tuned up a tone is D6, looks different, but plays the same. It´s not really a different tuning...more a different capo position. Reece´s C6 was (low to high) DFACEGACEGBD 246135613572 My retune to F69 is (low to high) DFACFGACFDEG 613512351672 Let´s put them in chromatic order for easier comparison Reece´s C6 was (low to high) DFACEGABCDEG 246135671235 My retune to F69 is (low to high) DFACFGACDEFG 613512356712 Let´s try and line them up ReeceC6 24(6135) (6712) 35 F69 (6135) 1235 (6712) or alternatively ReeceC6 24(6135) 67(1235) F69 (6135) (1235) 6712 These tunings are very different and at the same time very similar. They have blocks of 4 strings in common, same harmonic possibilities, shared knowledge, what you learn in one will function in the other. ¿Doesn´t this make you want to be snowed in with a MSA SS 12 string? Jeremy Williams Barcelona Spain
|
Reece Anderson Member From: Keller Texas USA
|
posted 11 December 2005 08:49 AM
profile edit
Anytime I see a tuning in which the intervals are not shown, or it is not designated to be read from top to bottom or bottom to top, it becomes unnecessarily time consuming for me, and I suspect others as well while trying to determine the tuning presented.For instance, the C6th tuning on a 6 string looks like this. TOP G I see it as 5th E ............3rd C ............1 (root) A ............6th G ............5th E ............3rd yet if the root (1) is not identified one might assume the G as being the 1, if so, it would look like this. G one might see it as 1 E ....................6 C ....................4 A ....................2 G ....................1 E ....................6 If it is not designated which is the top, one can imagine how confusing it might become because it would then be inverted. Designating which string is the root (1) and designating how the tuning is to be read, top to bottom, or bottom to top reveals everything instantly. I personally prefer to see the numbers vertically as I have presented them which is exactly as they would appear on the guitar, in which case it is not necessary to designate which is the top. As this thread will attest, the similarities of tunings can much more easily be determined, scrutinized and compared when the procedures are used which is being revealed within this thread. In the event there may be those who do not know how to convert letters to numbers there is an easy to understand procedure with which to make the determination. |
Brad Bechtel Moderator From: San Francisco, CA
|
posted 11 December 2005 09:50 AM
profile send email edit
That's why I say on my tunings page that all tunings are shown from bass to treble strings. I've been thinking about reworking that display to match what Reese says; it's more logical, but a bit of a hassle to code in HTML.------------------ Brad's Page of Steel A web site devoted to acoustic & electric lap steel guitars |
Mark Eaton Member From: Windsor, Sonoma County, CA
|
posted 11 December 2005 12:48 PM
profile send email edit
But then Brad,you list a boatload of tunings on your website. That will make for quite a vertical column, so to speak. At least you clarify it for the reader.But it sure is nice to examine a tuning and have it laid out in text as if you are looking down at the fretboard. I have seen no shortage of internet or paper documents where the writer fails to specify the "top" ot the "bottom." The steel guitar family, which has more tunings than Carter has pills (not THAT Carter), can be a bit confusing sometimes. ------------------ Mark
|
David L. Donald Member From: Koh Samui Island, Thailand
|
posted 11 December 2005 08:02 PM
profile send email edit
Brad try using "Item List", for your tunings realignmewnt, It might woirk well enough.I am gonna put this 12 string tuning on the S-14 and think about some of the changes. Very good thread, built from a very logical tuning[This message was edited by David L. Donald on 12 December 2005 at 06:16 AM.] |
HowardR Member From: N.Y.C.,N.Y.
|
posted 11 December 2005 08:53 PM
profile send email edit
quote: might woirk well
Hey David,...you're a Brooklyn boy! Fuggeddabout it... 
|
MUSICO Member From: Jeremy Williams in Spain
|
posted 12 December 2005 12:21 AM
profile send email edit
David,You say you will try this 12 string tuning on your 14 string. ¿Why not try it as 14 string? Talking E9 side of things we have replaced the high G# with a C#. Now you don´t´need to replace it...just add in the C#. Now you only have to decide if you want to add another C# as the second to lowest string so the bottom three would be B C# E....or Have it where the E9 D string goes. When tuned back to the "C9" side this 14 string also makes sense as a "Reecey" kind of C6. I am presuming you are talking about a 14 string PSG...but if someone builds a 14 string non pedal, let me know. I won´t talk about pedal possibilities as we are in no peddlers, but will comment on the fact that a lot of us are trying nonpedal stuff on our PSG´s. Jeremy Williams Barcelona Spain |
David L. Donald Member From: Koh Samui Island, Thailand
|
posted 12 December 2005 06:22 AM
profile send email edit
Jeremy, it is a 14 string PSG. I have it as a test bed for large tunings. Both pedal and non.It is still some flavor of UNI at the moment, mostly from not having found a builder for some inverted steel holders for the work station table... I like Reece's Bb6 that I played on David Wright's Millenium, and want to try that out. I am also gonna try Bill Stafords, Ed Packard's and maybe Zane Beck's too. One logic for my getting the S14, is hands on decfision making about what I need in a final longer term S-1x steel for road work. |
MUSICO Member From: Jeremy Williams in Spain
|
posted 12 December 2005 06:37 AM
profile send email edit
David, I thought you were going to try a 12 string version on your 14 string.Please keep us updated on all these experiments. Nothing like hands on experience. Jeremy Williams Barcelona Spain.
|
Al Marcus Member From: Cedar Springs,MI USA
|
posted 13 December 2005 08:52 PM
profile send email edit
This is a good post as b0b mentioned.I like the way Reece has layed out his tuning and list the 1 , 5, 3, etc.. It seems to me so understandable and correct musically....al  ------------------ My Website..... www.cmedic.net/~almarcus/
|
MUSICO Member From: Jeremy Williams in Spain
|
posted 14 December 2005 12:03 AM
profile send email edit
Al,A student of Reece's told me about Reece always using numbers a long time ago. I didn´t quite see the need. I liked notes as a way of leveraging my 6 string knowledge...."Oooh thats GDBG just like my favourite G chord on 6 string" Then I started comparing tunings. I spent so much time transposing. It was my only way of comparing. And comparing is SO neccesary. ¿What do you think of this tuning? A E B F# D B A F# D B G D ¿Looks interesting? Lower it a tone and a half and you will see it´s a great tuning. It´s standard U12 E9. ¿See what I mean? While it is great (specially if you play 6 string or piano) to look at a tuning in a new light..."wow G9 universal"....the quickest way of comparing two tunings is translating both into numbers. It´s like trying to compare international prices. Buy it in Japan for 10000 yen, or in Italy for 5000000 lira or in Spain for 94456 pesetas....translate everything into dollars and you´ll understand in an instant. Previously I was transposing Reece´s 12 string non pedal C6 down to a 12 string non pedal E6...and then transposing a 12 string uni open string configuration of E9 up to C9 to see similarities. It was ridiculous, like spending all day converting yen to lira to compare the japanese and italian price then converting lira to dollar....forget it. Everything in the same currency. The currency for non pedal tunings is the "tuning in intervals". Thank you Reece. As always I finally find that you were right all along. Jeremy Williams Barcelona Spain |
Bill Cunningham Member From: Cumming, Ga. USA
|
posted 18 December 2005 04:54 AM
profile send email edit
Here is the variation that Randy Beavers told me he used on his SuperSlide-12 at the NTSGA Superslide video jam. I think I got this right. We were chatting (more like I had him cornered ) by the water cooler at Hollanville.D-9 B-7 E-3 C-1 A-6 G-5 E-3 D-2 C-1 A-6 F-4 D-2 My Super Slide-12 arrives next week and will have Reece's 12 string tuning on it. ------------------ "Gimme a steel guitar, 2 or 3 fiddles and a Texas rhythm section that can swing"..R. Pennington |
Brad Bechtel Moderator From: San Francisco, CA
|
posted 18 December 2005 08:58 AM
profile send email edit
I've modified my tunings page to use the format that David L. Donald suggested. Before I start adding ten and twelve string tunings, I'd like to hear if anyone sees any problems with any of the tunings listed.If you do, please let me know via email rather than through the forum. Thanks! ------------------ Brad's Page of Steel A web site devoted to acoustic & electric lap steel guitars |
Reece Anderson Member From: Keller Texas USA
|
posted 18 December 2005 09:25 AM
profile edit
Brad B....I like your format, but in my opinion I believe it would be more helpful and easily understood were it to look like this. (Example, your Dobro tuning)1. D 5 2. B 3 3. G 1 4. D 5 5. B 3 6. G 1 This type display could more clearly display the tuning while revealing the interval consistency of ALL tunings when they were compared. I love your web page, very well done. |
Bill Bosler Member From: Schwenksville, Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 18 December 2005 03:23 PM
profile send email edit
Brad - I think the original format of your tunings page had the string labels in bold-face type. That would be easier for my old nearsighted eyes to handle. |