Steel Guitar Strings Strings & instruction for lap steel, Hawaiian & pedal steel guitars http://SteelGuitarShopper.com |
Ray Price Shuffles Classic country shuffle styles for Band-in-a-Box, by BIAB guru Jim Baron. http://steelguitarmusic.com |
This Forum is CLOSED. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
profile | join | preferences | help | search
|
This topic is 2 pages long: 1 2 This topic was originally posted in this forum: Pedal Steel |
Author | Topic: ? For you straight up tuners--how? |
Jay Jessup Member Posts: 345 |
![]() ![]() This topic is not to discuss the merits of tuning straight up(440 all across) but to ask those of you that use it How you do it. I assume you have to use a tuner but do you tune absolutely everything to 440 or do you leave the 3'rds(G# strings and the B to C# pedal 1 raise) a little flat of 440? How about the E to F raise, that has to stay a little flat doesn't it? On C6'th what do you do about the A strings, leave them a little flat or tune to 440 and grin and bear it? The C to C# (8'th pedal has to stay a little flat doesn't it? Help please!! I've got a session next week with a bunch of acoustic instruments and I might be willing to try something different from what I've been doing if I know I am doing it right, most of the tunes will be done on C6'th so answer that part to please Thanks, Jay |
C Dixon Member Posts: 5912 |
![]() ![]() Interesting question. Right after there was a heated discussion one time on this forum concerning (the 3rd's), Buddy Emmons at the 1998 ISGC wrote on a little card he had siting on his PSG: 439.5! (I believe these were the numbers. Buddy, forgive me if I am a digit or two off) Seriously, it is my understanding that those select players who do in fact tune to straight 440 do just that on all srings, pedal and knee lever changes. Some have said that due to cabinet drop, they may flatten the thirds just a tad. But for all practical purposes, it is dead on 440 reference. Go with Jesus, carl [This message was edited by C Dixon on 09 February 2000 at 07:52 AM.] |
Jerry Hayes Member Posts: 3306 |
![]() ![]() Hey Jay, I used the Jeff Newman tempered tuning chart for many years but finally got tired of sounding out of tune with the rest of the band every time I played in the open positions. About 8 years ago I switched to 440 on everything and it sounded a lot better with a band but still stung my ear a little on some things. I now tune everything to 440 except the 3rds. I play a single 12 Universal so it's 438 on my G#'s open and my B to C# on the A pedal. Also on my E raises and lowers I tune them to 438 also. On the B6 side it would be the same as tuning a C6 to 440 except the E's and A's. Remember that everyone else you're playing with has everything tuned to 440 so the more strings tuned to that the better in tune you'll be with them. I believe Bill Stafford tunes his S14 to 440 on everything and he sounds wonderful. ------------------ |
Jay Ganz Member Posts: 1626 |
![]() ![]() Well, what I usually do is tune the E,A,&B on the E9th to 440. The G# & C# are tuned a bit flat (as you say), it's just a question of how flat. Those I usually tune by ear & listen for the "beats" or "pulses" or whatever the heck you call 'em when played against another string. Anyhow, I'm sure you will get a bunch of other methods from some of the other guys as well. If not, I'll post my C6th tuning method (for what it's worth). ------------------ |
Bob Farlow Member Posts: 895 |
![]() ![]() Well, I don't tune straight up 440, but if I did, I would tune the 5ths at 3 beats/5-seconds below straight up, 4ths at 1 beat/second below straight up, and the 3rds and 6ths at 6 beats/second below straight up. All others straight up. [This message was edited by Bob Farlow on 09 February 2000 at 09:07 AM.] |
John Lacey Member Posts: 1843 |
![]() ![]() Jay, tune everything on your guitar straight up to 440, pedals, knees, I mean every change, then slowly flatten the ones that drive you up the wall, the thirds, mostly. When I first tried this method, I thought Emmons and those guys were nuts, but in time you're ear gets used to the "sharpness". We're so used to it being flat by ourselves that it sounds right to us. I also reference by my synth-keyboard beside me in my computer-studio room. It's at 440 for everything. In truth, I'm still 4 cents flat on the G#'s and C#'s and A's. The goal in tuning is not to eliminate beats, in IMHO, it's to sound in tune to yourself and whatever ensemble you're playing with. On the C6th. neck, I have no problem adapting to every change and string at 440. With reference to you're session, if you're doing C6th. stuff, I don't think you'll have trouble adapting to that change compared to E9th. The E9th. change'll take longer. [This message was edited by John Lacey on 09 February 2000 at 08:37 AM.] |
Bill Stafford Member Posts: 1347 |
![]() ![]() Thanks for the nice words, Jerry. Yes, I tune it all to 440 about once every other week whether it needs it or not. |
Sleepy John unregistered Posts: 1347 |
![]() Bill You can't tell Jerry anything. ![]() ![]() ![]() I told him the first tuner You ever used is in my guitar case and still working. You have always tuned straight up since the beginning, from what I remember and always sounded great to me. The lead guitar player was always the one out of tune in our band. ------------------ |
Bill Stafford Member Posts: 1347 |
![]() ![]() Hi John, I was wondering where that tuner went thirty years ago. I forgot they even made then then. Take care. |
Jerry Hayes Member Posts: 3306 |
![]() ![]() Hey Sleepy John, I usually tune up every now and then but I have to find my tuner for sure now. My daughter turned one of the keys on my steel the other night and she wouldn't tell me which one it was! ------------------ |
Bill cole Member Posts: 694 |
![]() ![]() I tune the 2 E'S with an E fork and the rest by ear. And it aint my fault if the reat of the band can't get in tune. They can use my fork if they want |
David Turner Member Posts: 94 |
![]() ![]() With all due respect, if you tune 440 "straight up"...you're going to be out. Simple as that! |
Lee Baucum Member Posts: 3201 |
![]() ![]() With all due respect, it ain't that simple. Over the years we've cussed and discussed this topic and I don't think Jay wanted to start that same old fight all over again. For years I used the "tempered" (tampered?) tuning, whereby the thirds had to be flattened a tad, which meant the F#'s had to be compensated, which meant the E>F lever had to be adjusted, and on and on. When I would get through tuning, my guitar sounded great - by itself. When I would play with the band I felt like my chords clashed with the guitar players' chords. Michael Douchette "converted" me to a "straght up" tuner 5 or 6 years ago and I love it. I tune the open notes to "dead center". Then I press both the A and B pedals and see how far the needle drops on the E string. That becomes the reference point for tuning the pedals. When I do this, the F#'s sound great in both the pedals up and pedals down positions. This worked well on my Emmons P/P and also on my Mullen. Everybody's ears are different and there will never be a "correct" way to tune. Lee, from South Texas |
Drew Howard Member Posts: 2390 |
![]() ![]() Carl, I remember that little card the Buddy had on the floor by his steel. Hope to see you in St. Louis, |
Michael Douchette Member Posts: 675 |
![]() ![]() Mr. Turner; I am constantly amazed at people who consider notes on pitch to be "out of tune," and notes as far as - 6 or 7 cents "in tune." If ignorance truly is bliss, you must be one unabashedly pleasant fellow to be around. Regards, ------------------ |
Sleepy John unregistered Posts: 675 |
![]() Mikey ![]() ------------------ |
C Dixon Member Posts: 5912 |
![]() ![]() David, With all due respect to you (I sincerely mean it), then Buddy Emmons and Weldon Myrick must be out of tune, because they have been tuning straight 440 for several years now after tuning "just intonation" most of their playing lives. This also applies to Bill Stafford. And I have never heard him play anything that sounded out of tune to my ears! God bless all of you, carl |
Jay Jessup Member Posts: 345 |
![]() ![]() Thanks Lee, you are exactly right. There has been loads of energetic discussion on the merits of tuning 440 that can be easily accessed buy using the forum search feature. I was looking for guidence from those of you who live with this approach at home, on stage and in the studio to see how you approach it. Thanks to those of you who fit this category and took the time to help me out. If anyone is interested in my opinion you can e-mail me next Thursday after I have done the session and I will let you know how it worked. Jay |
Greg Derksen Member Posts: 329 |
![]() ![]() Jay, Take the time to listen to your changes pedals up, pedals down and so forth, very carefully with the music, especially with keyboards, and you will find some surprises, When you have done that check your tuner and see where you are at, I have noticed that I'm recording closer to 440 all the time, not however, right on 440, but close. Take the time to listen with every change and be picky,I was surprised at how 440 or relatively close makes sense. To Dave with all due respect, check the 3 interval on a piano there is some serious vibration going on when the root and 3rd are played , if the steel is too flat to it, its going to sound sour, but I have to say if the steel is played by itself going away from 440 a bit is sweeter. It depends on who and what your playing with. Steelers need to use our ears more , If this instrument sounds out it sounds terrible. Greg |
Ernie Pollock Member Posts: 1227 |
![]() ![]() I have drifted back and forth from tuning everything 440 to the Jeff Newman way, I recently retuned my Kline D-10 to 440, that includes all pedal changes. I recently received John Hughey rhythm tracks to his new tape, My steel sounds so in tune that it scares me!! I really think to be in perfect tune, with the rest of the world, ya have to tune this way, you will get used to the sharp sounding 3rds. I can't beleive it took me 25 years to find this out!! this is not to say that everyone should do it this way, have it your way if you like, but heck, if its good enough for Buddy, its more than good enough for Ernie http://www.hereintown.net/~shobud75 ------------------ |
Tim Rowley Member Posts: 957 |
![]() ![]() All right, I've temper-tuned for years. So after reading this thread and one or two other threads about this, Thursday night at band practice I tuned up at 441 except for the thirds and sevenths which I set at 439.5. Strummed the guitar, sounded like kah-kah to my ear and there were some beats in there. But guess what, when we started to pick I sounded "in-tune" with the rest of the band! So on last night's gig I tuned up the same way, and again I sounded "in-tune" with the band. Moreover (a Biblical word having to do with dogs, Luke 16:21) an accomplished local saxophone player who happened to be in the audience complimented me on my pickin' and said the band sounded "great". Good enough for me--I believe I'm gonna tune this way for a week or so and see what happens. If Buddy, Weldon, and other pros are tuning straight up there must be something to it. Tim R. |
Joe Miraglia Member Posts: 771 |
![]() ![]() Question on tuning tenth string, C6 tuning--Why do some tuning charts show that the tenth string is tuned flat of 440, some showing as low as 435 when the other C notes are tuned to 440? Joe |
John Lacey Member Posts: 1843 |
![]() ![]() Joe, that might have to do with the fact that the 10th. string depresses more than the other strings, due to it's size. If you put bar pressure on it, it'll go all over the place. So I guess some guys detune it, to compensate for the bar pressure. |
John Steele Member Posts: 2469 |
![]() ![]() I've been tuning my E9 JI, and my C6 ET for some time now. I tried ET on the E9th, and I just couldn't take it. Why my ears can accept ET for the C6 neck and not the E9 is beyond me. I really wish I could get used to ET on the E9th, man, it would make life so much easier. -John |
Steve Schmidt Member Posts: 162 |
![]() ![]() John, this is exactly my dilemma. The more I play out the more that I realize that I am flat. I have tuned a couple of times to 440 and played gigs and I have never sounded more in tune. I just can't seem to accept it when practicing at home by myself. I am going to accept it and make it work. It would be much easier tuning on stage to just go straight up on the tuner. A big problem for me is that I cannot tell what is out of tune now by ear. I must accept the tuner as my guide. I don't like it but I hope that in time my ear will adjust. I would not like to be reliant on a mechanical device to tell me what is in tune for the long haul. What do you guys do for a permanently plugged in tuner? I have a TU-12 but it has no backlight and is really hard to use on stage. I may just spring for a korg rack tuner that is easily seen on dark stages. |
Bob Hoffnar Member Posts: 4278 |
![]() ![]() I made alot of progress with intonation this year by not using my tuner. I keep it handy but for the sake of improving my ear I do not use it on stage or when I practice.I found that the tuner was a crutch for me. Bob [This message was edited by Bob Hoffnar on 12 February 2000 at 11:48 PM.] |
John Lacey Member Posts: 1843 |
![]() ![]() Steve I would go with one of the rackmount tuners. It's AC powered, always consistant, large, easy to read scale, and usually a mute feature for silent tuning. Keep it up with the straight-up tuning, you'll get used to the thirds, just flatten them a bit and gradually you'll adapt to it. Poll you're band and see if they think you're more in tune. On second thought, don't poll them and see what comments you get naturally. If you poll them, their imaginations might go nuts. [This message was edited by John Lacey on 13 February 2000 at 07:22 AM.] |
C Dixon Member Posts: 5912 |
![]() ![]() Ed Packard may dissagree with this: I believe I may know why our beloved instrument sounds so dang bad when played by itself, tuned to straight up 440 (reference). As many of you know, what allows our ears to distinguish that it is a piano playing a middle C vs a clarinet vs a chello, etc, etc. is that particular instrument's overtones (harmonics) and how much of each is transmitted to our ears/brain. Apparently for some reason, the steel guitar (particularly the PSG) has a most unusually high amount of overtones. Just how many and which odd/even harmonics it generates would have to be determined by sophisticated test equipment. But I really believe it is here, that has caused much of the problem concerning this subject thread. It just does not seem to me that a piano sounds that bad when played alone and tuned to ET (equal temperament or close to it). And yet our instrument does. Also, for some reason, when other instruments are playing along, that same PSG does not sound nearly that bad when tuned ET. Probably only Ed Packard would be able to explain this. Remember to thank HIM on this, HIS day, carl |
Carson Leighton Member Posts: 254 |
![]() ![]() Carl, the intensity of a piano note is greatest at the first 1/10th of a second. This is one of the reasons why ET doesn't bother us so bad on a piano as opposed to a steel guitar with long sustaining notes. To prove this, play something fairly fast when tuned to ET and see if it is as bothersome. It is still noticeable, but not as bad. Another thing is, the harmonics on a piano do not produce true octaves. Each half of the string (of A-440 for instance) vibrates slightly sharp of itself. Depending on the piano, it could be as much as 4 cents or even more. (881-882) This same thing could be taking place on the steel,(I haven't checked it but I will, and I suspect it does) since it is a stringed instrument and produces harmonics. It may be necessary to tune the intervals away from -0- to be more in tune with the upper octave harmoncis for a good tempered tuning. This would definitely make you sound more in tune with other tempered intstruments. This amount is fractional, and should not exeed 6-8 cents. Regards, Carson [This message was edited by Carson Leighton on 13 February 2000 at 09:10 AM.] |
ed packard Member Posts: 1355 |
![]() ![]() I was going to stay out of this one, but since C.D. pointed to me, here is my ride on the subject. The tuner is a crutch, ..the tuning fork is a crutch, but because our ears are usually crippled one way or another, most of us need the crutches to stand up(set the first string to a particular pitch), and the rest of us need the crutches walk (tune the rest of the strings). Some are blessed/cursed with "perfect pitch", some with "relative pitch", and then there are the rest of us. Relative pitch seems to be "tautalogical?", ..trained in. If you have been brought up hearing things in a particular fashion (words, music, belief systems, et al)then that is what sounds "right" to you. Tuning a non pedal guitar by ear and by itself caused the player to compensate the 3rds a bit etc. so that that chord sounded satisfying by itself. Early lap tops were usually played "mellow", fewer upPer order harmonics, so the compensation was not so great. Then the steel got "twangy", and there were more upper harmonics beating against each other (As C.D. has said), so compensating (tweaking) became more necessary to sound in with yourself. Up till now, ..no pedals, and the background was Stand up bass and rythm guitar, ..the steel was the lead instrument, ..did not really have the "everybody else is 440" problem in extreme. If the tune was in C, then tune to sound good in C etc. The rythm player usually did the same thing. If I tuned my lap steel to A6 and tried to play along with someone recorded in C6 tuning it hurt a bit. Then came the PSG. Pushing pedals changed chords. What was a root in E became a 5th in If one "tweak tunes" to make the 3rds of the chord sound "good" what if that string becomes the root of a different chord, or the 5th of a different chord, or the b7 of a different chord when the pedals/levers are activated? The more upper harmonics in the tone, the more tweaking seems necessary. Roots and 5ths are pretty much ok straight up anyway. The 1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th,and other binary harmonics of the vibrating string are all root notes, and vibrate at exact(almost exactly)binary multiples of the 1st harmonic, that being the root for that scale. The 3rd, 6th, 12th harmonics etc. are the 5th interval notes for the scale of which the 1st, 2nd, 4th, etc. harmonics are root notes. The 5th interval is not as loud as the root in the vibrating string, but its frequencies are very much the same as those calculated using the 12th root of 2 method. The 5th, 10th, 20th etc. harmonics in the vibrating string are the 3rd(not quite) of the scale for which the 1st, 2nd, 4th etc harmonics are the root note. The frequencies of the 3rd interval are different for the vibrating string and the 12th root of 2 calculation used to "equally" (wrong word)divide the scale into 12 halftones; Which do we tune to satisfy, the actual frequencies in the string, or the "equalized" 12 halftones? A possible answer is that as long as the Steel's strings are the only source of mid to high range, and or "lingering" sound, tune for the strings and forget "straight up for all strings"; but when there are other sources of lingering/mid to high range sound, then tune to blend with them. Most fretted (the steel is not really a fretted instrument as the frets do not physically determine the pitches) instruments, and keyboards are pretty much 12th root of 2 tuned with the ref usually being A=440 or thereabouts. As instruments get more sophisticated, it is conceivable that one might pick the root note of the scale as reference, and tune the rest to the notes ratios of the vibrating string as opposed to the ratios of the 12th root of 2. Fretted instruments would be compensated via electronic pitch shift in real time. If you really want to hear the beats in the upper harmonics, attach an overdrive to the instrument. One string at a time gives the "odd" harmonics (square wave) for the root frequency (sine wave). You can get away with playing the 1 and 5 intervals(strings) together, but do not try 1 & 3 intervals unless you like real ACID stuff. Aren't you glad you asked? Pedantic again. [This message was edited by ed packard on 13 February 2000 at 11:51 AM.] |
John Steele Member Posts: 2469 |
![]() ![]() A related comment: On my gig last night, the bass player was my piano tuner. I've berated him for years with dumb questions about tuning/intervals. I related to him that I had just tuned my 8th and 4th string (e's) perfectly beatless. Then I checked them on my tuner. Before I told him the results, he said "And the higher one was 5 cents sharp from the lower one, right??" "Yes", I said... "How did you know?" After short exchange of comments, he said "Do you know what two notes tuned perfectly beatless means?" "What?" "Absolutely nothing". -John |
Steve Feldman Member Posts: 2983 |
![]() ![]() quote: I think the newer Toshibas have eliminated this problem (smiley face here...). Sorry Ed... This is an interesting thread, but my head is beginning to hurt. I think I'll go lie down for a while. |
Bill Stafford Member Posts: 1347 |
![]() ![]() Is that new Toshiba gearless? |
David Turner Member Posts: 94 |
![]() ![]() Mr. Douchette; I don't recall writing; "notes as far (off) as 6 or 7 cents". BTW...according to your post reply, there are some very well paid "concert piano tuners" who are ignorant! Regards, |
Steve Schmidt Member Posts: 162 |
![]() ![]() Well, I did it. This past weekend I decided to go for it and tune 440. All I can say is that the guitar seemed to be alive. All the years of it sounding off as compared to the other band members makes me wonder why I didn't do it earlier. I am going to make it work for me. Its like everyone says, "Sounds like dung by itself, but with the band it never sounded more intune". I recently purchased a new Boss VF-1 that has a built in tuner. I used it this weekend and just kept it on the tuner. My only comment was that the 3rd string seemed to be a bit sharp with the 5th string. I may try to flatten it a bit, other than that I was real satisfied. The only downside that I can think of is the dependance of a tuner. Hopefully someday my ear will be the judge. Signed 440 and happy with it! |
Brad Sarno Member Posts: 2398 |
![]() ![]() Some general comments on tuning and tempering. First and foremost people need to understand that when an electronic tuner says that a note is dead-on what that means is that the note is exactly on according to "Equal Temperment". Equal Temperment is a way of equally dividing the octave into twelve tones or 1200 cents. This is a system designed out of utility and convenience but it's important to know that ONLY the tonic is truly in tune and all the rest are not. Music and harmonics are laws of nature and are based on ratios, fractional divisions of an octave. A true fifth based on harmonic resonance is actually two cents sharp of what our electronic tuners say is correct. This is the closest note of all in the equal temperment scheme. If you study intonation and the harmonic nature of musical intervals you will learn that there are actually 3 quite legitimate and great sounding 3rds. The 3rd we get from our tuners is not a true musical 3rd, it's a comprimise. The one our ears like and tend to gravitate to is based on a ratio of 5/4 and on our tuners is exactly 13.69 cents flat of where the needle says is correct. This goes on and on all over the instrument. The reason that we dont use all the truly in tune notes is because the instrument cant do them ALL and also allow us to change chords and also play in tune with a band with a piano or horn or fretted instrument. Also I think people should stop using the numbers like 439.5, 438, 440, etc. because this really only refers to what "A" we are choosing as a tuning standard when we tune our tonic "E". Really the E isnt at 440 and our G# isn't at 438. We should refer to how many CENTS sharp or flat of "equal tempered" we are. On our tuners we can use the "440" or Zero mark as a reference point from which we tune sharp or flat. The units we are really dealing with are cents. There are 100 cents in an equal tempered half-step. That's our grid. This goes on and on and we need to all accept that in western music where we change chords and modulate and play with fixed and fretted instruments, we need to comprimise. Unless we are playing modal music like Indian music and the tonic is fixed and we only play intervals or maybe two chords at the most, we cant be in tune all the time. Thanks to vibrato we can smear it a little bit make it work. Brad Sarno |
Ernie Renn Member Posts: 2657 |
![]() ![]() Just to point out that Buddy's convention card, (which was actually a folded piece of paper,) said, "438.5". He later said it was weird going into the studio and tuning everything to 440, even the G#'s, but it turned out, "in-tune". I've been tuning to 440 for a number of years. I started using that method when I found I was always flat with the fixed notes on the keyboards. When I got a '66 PP, (the one that you have, John Steele,) I temper tuned it. I played it that way for quite a while, but was always avoiding certain positions and pedal combinations. I got to where I'd had enough. I re-tuned it to 440. Viola! Instantly in tune with the band. Since 1983, I have only gone about 6 months without tuning to 440. Steve; Hate to say it, but See... told ya. ------------------ |
HOWaiian Member Posts: 77 |
![]() ![]() what does everybody have against playing out of tune? I do it ALL the time, and nobody EVER notices! someday I hope to play before real, live people..... |
Tommy Detamore Member Posts: 478 |
![]() ![]() Jay, you know better than I that the further away you are from straight up, the more you have to fudge to be closer with everybody else. No matter how anyone tempers, all bets are kinda off when the bar hits the strings. It is obviously still up to the player to tune the guitar while he is playing it. I remember a comment I read or heard somewhere along time ago that I believe was attributable to Doug Jernigan. The quote was, "It takes a good ten years just to learn how to play the steel guitar in tune." Not tune the guitar, although that is certainly critical, but "play the steel guitar in tune". The frets are nothing more than rough guidelines, and I'm not convinced that there is any one "right" way to temper the steel. I really think a lot of ways can work, depending on how much the player is willing to "work" the tuning while playing it. For whatever it's worth, I usually tune in the crack somewhere between JI and ET. I don't know the numbers 'cause I do it by ear. I would guess I'm close to the Emmons "Harmonic Tuneup" tape, but I haven't heard it in a while (and I can't find it!!!) so I'm not sure how sharp he was tuning the third on that. And how you choose to tune that third dictates the tuning of the rest of the guitar in a way. You know, a LOT of people, including some great players I have known, do not really know how to properly tune a six string guitar by ear. With that, you don't have the wiggle room that we have with the steel. There is pretty much only one way to do it, although there are numerous methods that will acheive the same end result. That's really our problem, you know. All them dadgum guitar players that can't tune their guitars!!!! ![]() Tommy D PS-I've always envied keyboard and piano players because due to their lack of being able to tune the instrument while they play, they just take it the way it is and don't worry about it. Gee, they can actually think about notes and chords and making music and stuff...... |
Danny Bates Member Posts: 167 |
![]() ![]() I have been a piano tuner for over 20 years. If anybody would like To tune their E9 pedal steel to an equal temperment (like a piano) you should try this. NOTE WE ARE TUNING FROM PARTIALS OF THE NOTE Dan Bates |
This topic is 2 pages long: 1 2 All times are Pacific (US) | This is an ARCHIVED topic. You may not reply to it! |
Note: Messages not explicitly copyrighted are in the Public Domain.
Our mailing address is:
The Steel Guitar Forum
148 South Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA
Support the Forum