INSTRUCTION STRINGS CDs & TAPES LINKS MAGAZINES

  The Steel Guitar Forum
  No Peddlers
  Low to High or Vice Versa? a Poll.. (Page 1)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
your profile | join | preferences | help | search


This topic is 3 pages long:   1  2  3 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Low to High or Vice Versa? a Poll..
basilh
Member

From: United Kingdom

posted 05 February 2006 08:20 PM     profile   send email     edit
Say which way you do it and why..
I am puzzled by the use of two absolutely opposite systems.
Which is the correct way to describe a lap steel tuning, Low to High or High to Low ?
I always thought it was first string downwards (High to Low)

------------------

quote:
Steel players do it without fretting

John Bushouse
Member

From:

posted 05 February 2006 08:30 PM     profile   send email     edit
Low to high for me, as with standard guitar.

[This message was edited by John Bushouse on 05 February 2006 at 08:31 PM.]

Max Laine
Member

From: Pori, Finland

posted 05 February 2006 08:37 PM     profile   send email     edit
Low to high, when you flip that left to a vertical position it's like looking at your guitar's nut. You say the notes of a chord from low to high, then why not a tuning?
Travis Bernhardt
Member

From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

posted 05 February 2006 08:39 PM     profile   send email     edit
Low to high makes sense to me. If I ask you to spell a six note C6 chord (not in an inversion), you'll probably say C-E-G-A-C-E. Why confuse things?

-Travis

Gerald Ross
Member

From: Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

posted 05 February 2006 08:39 PM     profile   send email     edit
Low to High.

Steering wheel on the left.

------------------
Gerald Ross
'Northwest Ann Arbor, Michigan's King Of The Hawaiian Steel Guitar'



CEO, CIO, CFO - UkeTone Records
Gerald's Fingerstyle Guitar Website
Board of Directors Hawaiian Steel Guitar Association

Ron Bednar
Member

From: Rancho Cordova, California, USA

posted 05 February 2006 08:47 PM     profile   send email     edit
Low to high...
Loni Specter
Member

From: West Hills, CA, USA

posted 05 February 2006 08:51 PM     profile   send email     edit
Low to high, the only way to slide!
Jesse Pearson
Member

From: San Diego , CA

posted 05 February 2006 09:06 PM     profile   send email     edit
The old way to discribe a tuning was high to low, why this was never questioned is beyond me? You spell chords low to high, so why not describe a tuning the same why you spell chords that aren't inverted? I can only guess that maybe there were a great number of steel players in the old days who didn't know how chords were spelled, why else would they have gone along with such a back wards way of learning their tunings?
Stephan Miller
Member

From: Silver Spring, Maryland, USA

posted 05 February 2006 09:57 PM     profile   send email     edit
Low to high. If someone spells a tuning high to low I read it right to left to make sense of it. In the steel guitar world, I guess it figures that there's no standard way to spell the many non-standard tunings.

Bill McCloskey
Member

From:

posted 05 February 2006 10:08 PM     profile   send email     edit
Low to High. I always think in terms of the closest string to me.
wt golden
Member

From: Houston, Texas, USA

posted 05 February 2006 10:27 PM     profile   send email     edit
Low to High

Another reason is that piano keyboards are low to high. Music theory is a visualized nicely on a keyboard as there is only one of any note. We spell chords low to high - we number our chord changes and scale positions low to high... Low to High just makes sense

Ray Montee
Member

From: Portland, OR, USA

posted 05 February 2006 11:08 PM     profile   send email     edit
Still trying to RE-INVENT THE WHEEL? Eh?
Well now, your highly biased remarks have not gone unnoticed by the old guard here on the Forum. Many of the older players that have emailed me or telephoned and who have chosen to no longer engage in this imature silliness... are waiting for your next baseless question and/or opinion to display the exact measure of your musical ineptness.

"Credentials" have been mentioned, only as a means for everyone to know WHO it is that's giving all of the advice; as to whether it's well founded or merely someone's misguided personal opinion, lacking both in substance and/or real experience. WHAT a blow-up that created!

NEVER was that word "credentials" offered as a means of eliminating ANYONE from the FORUM. You know, if someone was going to perform open-heart surgery on one of your loved ones, would you want a really qualified surgeon or just someone, that went half-way thro' medical school and talked-up a big storm to impress everyone? I wonder...

It's NOT a case of OLD GUYS "this" or OLD GUYS "that", as another post would have you believe. It's NOT stubborness. It's NOT OLD GEEZERS being ignorant or unable to know the chords or not being arm pit deep into theory like a few of you late-bloomers that still don't know what strings to use for an E6 or E7th or A6th or C6th tuning change; or guys that change an entire set of new strings because the G# string broke on the first tune-up. It's not a bunch of fearful old men afraid of a bunch of fella's that think among themselves that they have ALL of THE ANSWERS needed to reinvent the wheel or the steel guitar and country or any other type of steel guitar music that exists today.

For those of you that just can't seem to get it after several years of posts here on the Forum on this same subject, regardless if your an olde, tiring Rock & Roller or not, the following might be one relatively solid, SIMPLE explanation of WHY tuning down from the top "E" might have had some legitimacy. WITH WHAT SOME OF YOU are smoking these days, it's doubtful you'll be able to absorb the true meaning of what this post is attempting to put across to you.

THE STANDARD FOR MANY A DECADE whether you were on the Grand Ole Opry or not, was to make sure everyone had the same "E" note to start out with. By tuning "E" from the top-DOWNWARD, any errors that might result during tuning would be at the lower end of the scale. In other words, nearly everyone would start out the first song and hopefully end up with the last song, AT THE SAME IDENTICAL PITCH. This was particularly advantageous when a vocalist was involved in the formula.

NOW, to muddy up the scenario, was when some yahoo would join the country band with an olde out-of-shape accordian; or, the band leader would allow someone to pound away on the very olde antique stage-piano that hadn't been tuned in more than forty years. Therein was a different problem.

But for a few of the standard guitar players that have only recently entered the arena of the long standing steel guitar community, let's say, since the era of good old "classic country rock", you know, in about the 1980's, give or take. For clarification, that was about the same time that the DISTORTION/Fuzz stomp box, tuning machines, Du-Wah pedals, compressors, analog-delays, choruses, RED standard GUITARS,etc., came into being. About the same time the phrase "anybody can play bass" became popular
Said another way, that's about the time that nice, clean, classy band uniforms went by the way and was replaced by often unwashed, smelly, shaggy haired, unshaven, drunken or doped up wanna-be musicians arrived on the scene. Oh, they often brought along non-functioning instruments as they often didn't deem that to be too awfully important either.

Another way of looking at it, "E" from the top down, was the way it was LONG BEFORE the new breed of short-cut takers started DE-TUNING guitars to be out of tune so that everyone that was out of tune, would blend more nicely with one another. That was about the time that electric, amplified, LEAD DRUMS became a popularity in the newly discovered 2 and 3 piece country-rock groups.

That was before a musician had to rely on tab in order to play Steel Guitar Rag or any of the other 100 or so popular steel guitar tunes of the day. That was before the time when some steelers had to ask what five or six tunes they should expect to be asked to play in a country band at the dance hall; or, when a play list consisted of not more than twenty tunes rearranged in order for sets two, three and four. Gee's!
Before you unbiased "players" start jumping all over the older players that made the industry and the steel guitar as popular as it was BEFORE MANY OF YOU WERE EVEN BORN ......; or, before you attempt to rewrite the standards that held firm and true for so many years.....for live radio and television programs and/or "one-take" recording sessions, why not attempt to LEARN from your elders rather than still trying to rebel against them like an imature teen-ager?
After all, this is a FORUM of differing opinions, isn't it?

Loni Specter
Member

From: West Hills, CA, USA

posted 05 February 2006 11:38 PM     profile   send email     edit
Yea! What Ray Said. Now drop and give him 20, then give him 2 laps.

Personally, I always tune to the A first.

Jim Phelps
Member

From: Mexico City

posted 05 February 2006 11:50 PM     profile     edit

Probably high to low, though I don't talk tunings a lot and have no set way of describing them.

FWIW, I tune from high to low.

(damn RED GUITARS...!)

[This message was edited by Jim Phelps on 06 February 2006 at 12:23 AM.]

Loni Specter
Member

From: West Hills, CA, USA

posted 06 February 2006 12:03 AM     profile   send email     edit
Jim, What do you expect after SuperBowl?
Jim Phelps
Member

From: Mexico City

posted 06 February 2006 12:07 AM     profile     edit
Bill McCloskey
Member

From:

posted 06 February 2006 03:26 AM     profile   send email     edit
edited.

[This message was edited by Bill McCloskey on 06 February 2006 at 07:13 AM.]

c c johnson
Member

From: killeen,tx usa

posted 06 February 2006 03:28 AM     profile   send email     edit
you guys tune?
Andy Sandoval
Member

From: Bakersfield, California, USA

posted 06 February 2006 03:43 AM     profile   send email     edit
Low to high, because that's just the way I learned it.
Gene Jones
Member

From: Oklahoma City, OK USA

posted 06 February 2006 04:29 AM     profile     edit
*

[This message was edited by Gene Jones on 05 April 2006 at 04:08 AM.]

Bill McCloskey
Member

From:

posted 06 February 2006 04:39 AM     profile   send email     edit
"why not attempt to LEARN from your elders rather than still trying to rebel against them like an imature teen-ager"

Unfortunately, most of my elders have alzheimer's.

Max Laine
Member

From: Pori, Finland

posted 06 February 2006 05:04 AM     profile   send email     edit
Still, low to high makes more sense to me. Maybe even more now.
Jim Phelps
Member

From: Mexico City

posted 06 February 2006 05:08 AM     profile     edit
quote:
Would someone give me an "E"?

E!!!


By the way, Chet Atkins played plenty of nice tasty stuff on a BRIGHT ORANGE GUITAR in the '50's.

[This message was edited by Jim Phelps on 06 February 2006 at 05:10 AM.]

basilh
Member

From: United Kingdom

posted 06 February 2006 05:28 AM     profile   send email     edit
Ray said
quote:
That was about the time that electric, amplified, LEAD DRUMS

Whilst I must admit that he has heard same concerts as me, I tend to ignore musical imbalance at live events (it seems to be the 'norm')
Now to the crux of the matter, It seems that by far the majority have opted for what us "Olde Tymers" would consider wrong..
Lets continue and see just how many do it 'Back to Front' !!!
BTW I notice when drummers do a sound check they tend to work from Low to High... could it be their influence on the younger generation that's changed things ?
basilh
Member

From: United Kingdom

posted 06 February 2006 06:03 AM     profile   send email     edit
One of the reasons I've posed this point is that lately when conversing with regular guitarists, when I've referred to their top string the have assumed that I mean the one at the nearest point to the top of the guitar as it's held.
This is the Bottom string as far as I'm concerned, when saying top or bottom, I understood one was referring to PITCH not their orientation !!
Now
I also think the logic of 1st in the order = 1st string etc.
Jude Reinhardt
Member

From: Ironton, Ohio, USA

posted 06 February 2006 06:09 AM     profile   send email     edit
Low to high for me. Back in the "Dark Ages" when I got my first guitar around 1953 my only instructor was a book "You Can Play Guitar In 10 Minutes". They lied, but anyway I was instructed to tighten the sixth (E)string until it sounded right. Then tune the other strings to it. BTW, I had one of those orange Gretsch's like Chets. I could sing just like him. I'm new at steelin' but I figure in another fifty years I can sing like (insert name of your favorite steeler here).

Jude

Jim Phelps
Member

From: Mexico City

posted 06 February 2006 06:11 AM     profile     edit
"Top string" to me has always meant the 1st string, meaning the highest in pitch. You're right though, it seems to be reversed now with many players.
basilh
Member

From: United Kingdom

posted 06 February 2006 06:18 AM     profile   send email     edit
If you think that this is a little controversial, you should see the sparks flying here at home between Pat, Mike and myself !!
Does anyone remember the orientation used by the BMG ?
David Doggett
Member

From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

posted 06 February 2006 06:20 AM     profile   send email     edit
If you just state which it is, then it doesn't matter which way you do it. We can then all figure it out, no matter what our rage...I mean age.

Oh yeah, and if you want to see opposite systems, look at the number pad of your phone, and the number pad of your calculator or computer.

[This message was edited by David Doggett on 06 February 2006 at 06:23 AM.]

Max Laine
Member

From: Pori, Finland

posted 06 February 2006 06:56 AM     profile   send email     edit
Baz, on the couple of issues of BMG that I have, Ray Higgins is using high to low.
Rick Collins
Member

From: Claremont , CA USA

posted 06 February 2006 07:07 AM     profile   send email     edit
...HIGH to LOW, without question.

I like to use a middle E tuning fork for standard. Let's see __ what would a low bass E tuning fork weigh in pounds? Of course an E, is an E, is an E. It just makes sense to tune the middle E first, if you are using a middle E note.

Max Laine
Member

From: Pori, Finland

posted 06 February 2006 07:36 AM     profile   send email     edit
I thought the original question was about describing a tuning?
Harry Dietrich
Member

From: Robesonia, Pennsylvania, USA

posted 06 February 2006 07:36 AM     profile   send email     edit
I can't believe I've been tuning the wrong way since 1948 (high to low).

Harry

Andy Volk
Member

From: Boston, MA

posted 06 February 2006 08:03 AM     profile   send email     edit
I prefer High-to-Low but I can see the logic of using the reverse. With a tuning like Dsuspended, spelling it DADGAD or DadGad is the most commomn and preferred way.
Mike Neer
Member

From: NJ

posted 06 February 2006 08:12 AM     profile   send email     edit
High to low, as in 1st string to 6th string.
Mike Neer
Member

From: NJ

posted 06 February 2006 08:18 AM     profile   send email     edit
I can only guess that maybe there were a great number of steel players in the old days who didn't know how chords were spelled, why else would they have gone along with such a back wards way of learning their tunings?

Umm, maybe because you start with the first string....I don't know, just a thought. BTW, why would you imply that the old time players were musically illiterate?

Jesse Pearson
Member

From: San Diego , CA

posted 06 February 2006 08:45 AM     profile   send email     edit
Well Ray, you assume a lot? It doesn't matter what instrument you play when it comes to spelling non inverted arpeggios, it's low to high. Why should steel be different, where’s the reasoning? C6 is a major 6th chord and a popular tuning, spelling it from high to low is "reinventing the wheel" when compared to spelling chords on other instruments? Spelling chords from low to high was around long before steel guitar was even invented, so who is really reinventing the wheel here and why was it done this way in the first place? Steel guitar is a secondary instrument for me and came long after other instruments and styles were under my belt, I make no secret of this. The ability to instantly play arpeggios is a big deal, especially if you’re into polytonal substitution. And to tell you the truth, I don't find you to be so old? I love the way you play and study your country playing when I'm lucky enough to come across one of your recordings. I don't tune my E to 440 when tuning to C6 because I have a tuner that lets me tune the root and fifth one click sharp and the thirds and sixth one click flat, it puts me in a great position relative to the equal tempered instruments. It looks like to me Steel guitar reinvented the wheel when it comes to spelling tunings/chords and not many people questioned it back in the day? I play music that goes back to before you were born. I record copy things from the beginning of recorded music. There has always been hacks in music and always will be, no era is immune from this. Your statements about getting buzzed is a real hoot, it shows you have no idea about how alot of the stars you no doubt studied in the country world, would party/self medicate themselves. People have always dealt with depression thru the ages this way? Pure natural facts, you can't ignore them. Your explanation answers my long time question about why steel tunings used to be spelled high to low, thanks...
Steinar Gregertsen
Member

From: Arendal, Norway

posted 06 February 2006 08:50 AM     profile     edit
quote:
BTW, why would you imply that the old time players were musically illiterate?

Because there were no instructional DVDs at the time?

I always count the thinnest string as the 1st one, but for some reason it seems more natural for me to write tunings from the bass and up. Don't know why, perhaps because that's the way I see the fretboard when I look at it, as someone else suggested.
But to avoid misunderstandings I always write "(low to high)" in front of the tuning....

Steinar

------------------
www.gregertsen.com


Jesse Pearson
Member

From: San Diego , CA

posted 06 February 2006 09:01 AM     profile   send email     edit
Mike, because of induction? Alot of guys in the old days played by ear because it wasn't the information age like it is now. Your a guitar player, there was a time that tab wasn't around and all you could do was record copy. I know I did this in the beginning and didn't know half of what was going on even though I could play it. If I was teaching someone how to play steel, I would tell them about the tuning issue and also teach them how one learns to spell any chord. Pure natural facts, big deal. And Mike, don't put words in my mouth. A trained musician wouldn't spell chords in reverse unless they were taught that way and didn't question it. And yea, I know alot of old guys who are hip and they spell low to high.
Mike Neer
Member

From: NJ

posted 06 February 2006 09:07 AM     profile   send email     edit
Spelling chords and reciting the order of strings are 2 different things. You spell chords according to their inversion, don't you? When you buy a pack of strings, it clearly lists the thinnest string as the 1st. That is the logic of my argument.

Never used tab a day in my life, but I taught myself to read musical notation when I was a kid. Many old time musicians could and did read music, many didn't. The level of musicianship was not neceassarily any lower.


This topic is 3 pages long:   1  2  3 

All times are Pacific (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Catalog of Pedal Steel Music Products

Note: Messages not explicitly copyrighted are in the Public Domain.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46

The greatest musical hands in the world, now on CD!
"Legends of the Incredible Lap Steel"