Steel Guitar Strings
Strings & instruction for lap steel, Hawaiian & pedal steel guitars
http://SteelGuitarShopper.com
Ray Price Shuffles
Classic country shuffle styles for Band-in-a-Box, by BIAB guru Jim Baron.
http://steelguitarmusic.com

This Forum is CLOSED.
Go to bb.steelguitarforum.com to read and post new messages.


  The Steel Guitar Forum
  Pedal Steel
  Fender 1000 & 400 steels -- differences in model years

Post New Topic  
your profile | join | preferences | help | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Fender 1000 & 400 steels -- differences in model years
Craig Holden
Member

From: Austin, Texas

posted 06 September 2002 07:47 AM     profile     
I have a ?? year 1000 which has the changer that pulls the strings across a fixed bridge, the larger pickup, and chrome stamped-steel pedals. I've noticed in my search for parts that other 400 and 1000 models have different pickups (smaller), changers (which incorporate moving string fingers), and cast aluminum (?)pedals. What are the differences in tone, playability, etc. between the two?

I've heard that my model breaks strings something awful, but I haven't had a problem thus far....breaks strings about as often as my MSA. I also tune my Fender down a whole step, so maybe that has something to do with it as well.

Anyhow, being the weirdo that I am, I have REALLY fallen in love with my 1000, and I am eager to learn all about them, including years of production and factoids about the differences between the designs.

Thanks, y'all!

Craig

Gene Jones
Member

From: Oklahoma City, OK USA

posted 06 September 2002 09:45 AM     profile     
I owned and played two 1000's during my career and I don't remember string breakage being a problem....I didn't change my strings often because I thought they had a better tone as they got older so occasionally (after 6 months or so of not changing) one broke.

However, I was only pulling one string per pedal (ala Mooney) and it may have been different if I had been using the E9. www.genejones.com

[This message was edited by Gene Jones on 06 September 2002 at 09:46 AM.]

Doug Seymour
Member

From: Jamestown NY USA

posted 06 September 2002 04:58 PM     profile     
Where is Jody when we need him? Someone will
correct me if I'm wrong, but I think you are talking about the 1000 (D8) and the 2000 (D10). I never saw the 1000 w/anything other than the fixed bridge, while the 2000 did have the moveable bridges. The 2000 also was capable of dbl raises & lowers while the 1000 was not. How about it, you senior citizens??? Also there were S8s (the 400) & S10s (the 800)

[This message was edited by Doug Seymour on 06 September 2002 at 05:00 PM.]

Donny Hinson
Member

From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.

posted 06 September 2002 05:34 PM     profile     
Think I got this right...

Yep, when the 400/1000 came out ('57 I think, but there were very few around until early '58) it had stamped-steel pedals and a fixed (solid rod) bridge. In the early '60s, (late '63 I believe) they went to the roller bridge/cast pedals, and then in '64, they came out with the 800/2000, which were the 10-string models. I played that early 1000 model for over 7 years. Yeah, they broke the 3rd string a lot, that's why we tuned 'em to D9th.

PAUL WARNIK
Member

From: OAK LAWN,IL,USA

posted 08 September 2002 03:22 PM     profile     
Craig H-if you are wanting to play the old Fenders with cables look for the later models with the cam type changer where the ball end goes through from the left side and then loops over the bridge-these work much better than the earlier models with the roller bridge and the pullers behind it-I tried to set one of these up for a guy and even with original Bigsby/Squire strings that NEVER break-I could not get the G#-A raise-it broke the string every time!
Jim West
Member

From: Vista,CA

posted 08 September 2002 03:44 PM     profile     
1958 Fender 400

1965 Fender 400

[This message was edited by Jim West on 08 September 2002 at 03:44 PM.]

Donny Hinson
Member

From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.

posted 08 September 2002 03:51 PM     profile     
One of the problems with the early models was the "string hooks". These were little U-shaped pieces of wire (about .062") a little less than an inch long that held the ball-end of the strings. I've seen many early 1000's since then, and a lot of them with none of these little loops. Seems players just threw them out, and then fed the strings though the holes in the top of the bridge fingers. But doing this places a sharp kink near the ball-end of the string, and they'll break like crazy!. BTW, there were 2 different designs for these little hooks...one with just a hook on each end, and one with a hook on each end and a slight bend in right in the middle. (They actually reminded me of the "hog-rings" that are used the auto upholstery business.)

The main problem was that the string was all that held these hooks in place, and if you packed up the guitar with a broken string, the hook would most likely get lost. Also, almost none of these guitars still have their bridge covers still on them. These were made to cover up the hooks, and keep clothing from getting snagged on them. Fender could sure make some extra money if they could still supply these covers!

All times are Pacific (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Pedal Steel Pages

Note: Messages not explicitly copyrighted are in the Public Domain.

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46

Our mailing address is:
The Steel Guitar Forum
148 South Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Support the Forum