Steel Guitar Strings
Strings & instruction for lap steel, Hawaiian & pedal steel guitars
http://SteelGuitarShopper.com
Ray Price Shuffles
Classic country shuffle styles for Band-in-a-Box, by BIAB guru Jim Baron.
http://steelguitarmusic.com

This Forum is CLOSED.
Go to bb.steelguitarforum.com to read and post new messages.


  The Steel Guitar Forum
  Pedal Steel
  Zane Beck's tuning revisited

Post New Topic  
your profile | join | preferences | help | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Zane Beck's tuning revisited
Graham Griffith
Member

From: Glebe, N.S.W., Australia

posted 05 October 2002 01:59 AM     profile     
I read, the recent posts started by Wayne Cox with interest. Towards the end, it all got a bit off topic and I realised that there really probably aren’t that many “Zane Beck tuning” players out there (at least on the forum).

Zane Beck talked me into taking on his tuning in 1977 after Scotty’s Convention. I’d only had a pedal steel (Sho Bud Pro II?) for about a year and a half … hadn’t even thought about the C6th! A visit to Zane’s place in Scranton and a bit of a “you can get this and you can get that on my tuning” and he gave me his guitar (I believe the one he played on “12 + 14 = Country Jazz” with Julian Tharpe) to take back home to Australia. He trusted me to send the money when I got back home! I honoured that trust as soon as I could after returning.

So I started my discovery of his tuning. Because I had all the Jeff Newman courses at the time I started exploring Zane’s tuning in terms of the E9th and was quickly able translate E9th TAB. It’s mostly all there, you know, with a few variations/compromises. Similarly, I set up tonal relationship charts for the C6th tuning & pedals/levers. They’re mostly all there as well. Zane’s tuning is probably the simplest “universal tuning” although few people realise this. Four floor pedals, for a start, is a great advantage over the cumbersome foot dancing that the “standard universal” tuning affords.

Zane knew that steel players are innately conservative when it comes to trying something different … it has to have the stamp of approval of a major player before it’s acceptable. Hence he used to call his tuning “E9th with an added 6th” … which is, in essence E13th …
“E13th pedal steel!!! … nah too hard … but I might just try Zane Beck’s E9th (with an added 6th)”

Here’s the good oil on Zane Beck’s E13th tuning:


LKL LKV LKR p1 p2 p3 p4 RKL RKR


1 G# A A
2 F# G
3 E Eb F F#
4 C# D D D#
5 B C# C
6 G# A A
7 F# F F
8 D Eb E
9 B C# Bb
10 G# G A
11 E Eb F#
12 B C# Bb

The open strings give you all the strings (bar string 8) of an E9th tuning as well as an expanded range taking you an octave lower (low B). The “chromatics” are “in line” with the equivalent to string 2 being pitched to “C#” (ZB’s string 4). When you use the 3rd floor pedal (which raises the B’s to C#) you also raise that 2nd string equivalent to “D” (this is then the equivalent of the ˝ stop found in typical E9th). You achieve the full equivalent of the E9th 2nd string when you activate RKL which raises the 4th string to “D#” while giving you the E9th equivalent to string 8 (by raising ZB’s string 8 “D” to “E”). The 2nd string equivalents are all positive stops. Because the tuning requires “grips” to achieve the equivalents to adjacent strings 3,4 and 5 on E9th, it all starts to look “alien” to a “died in the wool” E9th player.

The ABC pedal equivalents are 324 … hence a “Day” style setup. Pedal 4 emulates the C pedal of E9th but is not exact because it relies on pedal 3 to achieve the “B to C#” raise.

The B pedal equivalent is really clever! Because Zane was a thinker he didn’t just go out and raise string 10 to “A” (he left that to pedal 4). Instead, by going down one semitone he created the equivalent to the “F” string in the C6th tuning (in a different position). By activating pedal 2 & the up lever only you get the following “G” root chord (tonally): 1 3 5 7 9 3 5 6 7 9 (strings 10 to 1,) which equates to the open tuning C6th “F” chord 1 3 5 7 9 3 5 7 9 (strings 9 to 1). That big Major 9th chord (with the addition of an extra 6th tone on string 3).

The open tuning is also very clever and his choice of an 8th string “D” note instead of the “E” (opted for in the orthodox “universal tuning”) was for a very good reason and why his tuning is so elegant. In terms of tones, using “E” as a root note, Zane’s tuning is: 5 1 3 5 b7 9 3 5 6 1 9 3. Compare this to the C6th tuning with pedal 6 using “F” as a root note where you have: 5 1 3 5 b7 9 3 5 1. This is exactly the same but, (with ZB’s tuning), you also get the 13th tone (6) on string 4 and the 9th tone on string 2 without having to substitute a “D” string for the “G” string as Buddy Emmons did. Zane was thinking music as much as he was thinking tunings when he settled on his layout.

The LKL gives you B6th tuning with the tones: 1 3 6 1 3 5 6 1 9 3 5 6
whereas open C6th gives you: 1 4 6 1 3 5 6 1 3 5. Note that ZB’s tuning replaces the low 4th tone with a 3rd and gives you the rest of the C6th tones with the addition of a high 6th on string 1 but with the “intervention” of a 9th tone at string 4 (the “D” equivalent in the Emmons setup). At the same time the LKL functions the same as your 4 & 8 string semitone lower in “E9th” mode.

Pedal 1 is the rough equivalent of pedals 5 & 6 on the Jimmy Day setup. The tonal comparison using “B” & “C” respectively as root notes is. ZB: 9 4 6 1 b3 b5 6 1 9 4 #5 6
& JD C6th: 9 b5 6 1 b3 b5 6 1 4 #5. Certainly fairly close.

But, everything’s a compromise, and the tuning doesn’t make the player. It’s the other way round.

I hope there’s food for thought there.

Graham

[This message was edited by Graham Griffith on 05 October 2002 at 02:03 AM.]

Frank Parish
Member

From: Nashville,Tn. USA

posted 05 October 2002 02:55 AM     profile     
Graham,
Is this the tuning you're using now? Can you record some files to send me or post here on the forum for us to hear how it sounds?
Wayne Cox
Member

From: Chatham, Louisiana, USA

posted 05 October 2002 08:49 AM     profile     
Wow, thanks Graham! Isn't it ironic that we had to go all the way to Australia to solve a mystery that started in Arkansas,USA. I'm so glad that someone with actual,"hands on", experience finally came forth to help us with this. After I take time to study this out,I will be asking some questions. You did a great job of outlining the basics for us.I had already noticed that the setup has 25 pulls and that some of the levers and pedals have 3 and 4 pulls per pedal/lever.Nothing unreasonable about that,but it will require more rods than I currently have,in order to put the setup on my S-12U.I plan to try it,though.~~~~Do you have any thoughts on adapting this tuning/setup to a 10-string steel;maybe a S-10 or the back neck of a D-10?...One of the main problems I foresee is in the number of pulls per lever!?
W.C.
Al Marcus
Member

From: Cedar Springs,MI USA

posted 05 October 2002 02:25 PM     profile     
Graham- I must say you did a great job in breaking down Zanes tuning. I never could figure out why more players didn't go to this. It is , as you say, E9 -E6- E13 all rolled into one.

I met Zane in 1968 at Tom Bradshaw's first pedal steel show in Napa,CA. I thought he played great and I could understand a little of what he was doing, because I was playing E6 -E13, but no E9th.

He wrote out his tuning for me, and I still have it in his writing. A very nice person and a great musician. Ahead of his time. Thanks for sharing .......al

Graham Griffith
Member

From: Glebe, N.S.W., Australia

posted 05 October 2002 09:19 PM     profile     
Frank, Wayne, Al ... it's nice to have your responses & input.

After all these years playing Zane's tuning I'm still a bit of a dummy but I keep trying. You can hear some of what I do with the tuning at one of my web sites www.listen.to/outofnowhere ... my wife and I have essentially two bands ... one Hawaiian & the other like the web site. Don't be fooled by the Eharp ... I play this also but not on the recordings. I like to play swing but have to create the opportunities as there's not a lot of interest here.

As to the application on a 10 stringer, Wayne, I would suggest from (low)G# up but there'd be some things you'd miss. If you don't care so much for the "country-ability" of the tuning I can post a wonderful tuning from a local player here called Jack Richards. He owes very little to the American tradition of pedal steel tunings & is somewhat unique.He was a jazz/popular guitarist with the post war big bands/orchestras here.

Graham

[This message was edited by Graham Griffith on 05 October 2002 at 09:22 PM.]

Sonny Jenkins
Member

From: New Braunfels, Tx. 78130

posted 06 October 2002 09:50 AM     profile     
Graham, thanks for following up on my post relating to ZBs tuning. I've tried several times to get some interest started on his set-up knowing that it was very unexplored topic. I would love to try it but I'm probably too deep into standard universal. I hope someone else will post and IF there is someone else out there playing this tuning PLEASE post. Number one question!!!! is this tuning conducive to a good old Ray Price shuffle???? I like swing and jazz but also like the country steel sounds of the 60s.
Al Marcus
Member

From: Cedar Springs,MI USA

posted 06 October 2002 12:29 PM     profile     
Sonny-I don't know why you can't play those old shuffles.

RLK with LLK and Pedal 3 and 4 ought to do it. The hard part, is changing your grip spacing.

And that is the big problem for players that have been playing standard E9 for awhile.

But the results are worthwhile.Good post, Graham. Thanks.......al

Wayne Cox
Member

From: Chatham, Louisiana, USA

posted 06 October 2002 03:45 PM     profile     
SONNY, it appears to me,as AL pointed out,that you would have to change some of your standard right-hand grips. e.g. For a descending major scale that,on E9th,would begin with strings 3&4 then 1&2,you would begin with 1&3 then 2&4 with the RKL lever engaged. In other words,your grips would be similar to the grips used with a Diatonic tuning. If that's of any help.
W.C.

[This message was edited by Wayne Cox on 06 October 2002 at 03:54 PM.]

Wayne Cox
Member

From: Chatham, Louisiana, USA

posted 06 October 2002 03:51 PM     profile     
GRAHAM,please do post Jack Richards'setup,if you think he wouldn't mind. I am always open to new ideas and concepts.
W.C.
Mitch Daniels
Member

From:

posted 06 October 2002 07:19 PM     profile     
I have played (played at) Zane's tuning since 1966, but in a D. Very similar pedal set up to the the one posted above.
A
F#
E
D
B
A
F#
E
C
A
F#
D

I like the "D" because:

a) The high A on top
b) Raise 2nd, 7th,to G and lower 11th to F with a pedal, raise 5th to C with knee, and I have a C 6th.
c) Lower 4th to C# and raise 9th to C# with a knee, and I have an A 6th.

Most of all, I just like the way the whole thing sounds to my ear, but it's all in your cup of tea I suppose.

If any of you heard Don Buzard in St. Louis in 1977 I think, he had this tuning on his top neck with 13 strings, with an A on the bottom.

A 10 string with this tuning in D is cool, simple, and easy. Just omit the 1st and 12th strings.

Sorry, but I don't know how to properly post the pedal set-up thing

Fred Layman
Member

From: Springfield, Missouri USA

posted 06 October 2002 08:27 PM     profile     
I have often wished that a method book and tabs were available for this tuning. Zane King, protege of Zane's, was considering doing that at one time, but nothing ever developed. (By the way, where is Zane King now and what is he doing. The last I heard he had or worked at a recording studio in Nashville). Gary McVay, also a protge of Zane B, uses the tuning on his Flynn SD 12-string on the Smoky Jubilee show in Pigeon Forge
Wayne Cox
Member

From: Chatham, Louisiana, USA

posted 07 October 2002 12:40 AM     profile     
? for GRAHAM: What is the function of RKR? Obviously it gives you a Augmented with strings 356,but above and beyond that? I know I'm missing something important!!!
W.C.
Wayne Cox
Member

From: Chatham, Louisiana, USA

posted 07 October 2002 12:53 AM     profile     
Re:Mitch Daniels: Thanks Mitch,I like D also.
I usually tune my C6th neck to D. Thanks for the additional insights into the possibilities of this wonderful tuning.
W.C.
Graham Griffith
Member

From: Glebe, N.S.W., Australia

posted 07 October 2002 03:56 AM     profile     
Sonny,
I'm a big fan of Ray Price shuffles and I've never had difficulty playing them although it's hard to find a good country band here tha's savvy/hip to the style. If you want to check out: http://www.cdnow.com ... look up "Jason Walker" and click on track 6 you'll hear me playing "country" style with this tuning. I played all the pedal steel on Jason Walker's album.

Al's right about the lever combinations, although I might add the use of your "AB" pedals (2&3 on the ZB tuning). Similarly Wayne's wigged out the grips for the descending major scale ... spot on. "Grips" are certainly the challenge after being used to the orthodox tuning.

Wayne, here's Jack Richards' tuning ... a real serious "jazz" tuning for those big chords. Note that string 9 is around .056W & string ten has to be about .072W (Jack used a bass string). Another great thing about Jack's playing was the fact that he used an octave lower extra neck (non pedal) with the top 6 strings for soloing single string style. Jack's 82 now and has retired from playing.

Jack was a pioneer here when he did a production run of 100 "Kord King" pedal steels in 1948 here in Sydney.


LKL LKR P1 P2 P3 RKL RKR


1 G# -G +A
2 F#
3 E -Eb +F
4 C# +D
5 B +C -Bb
6 G# -G +A
7 E +F
8 C# +D
9 E +F
10 A

Graham

[This message was edited by Graham Griffith on 08 October 2002 at 05:30 PM.]

[This message was edited by Graham Griffith on 08 October 2002 at 05:32 PM.]

Graham Griffith
Member

From: Glebe, N.S.W., Australia

posted 07 October 2002 04:28 AM     profile     
Mitch,

You've mentioned some changes but, could you list any others. If you want to call them by the usual, lkl lkr 1 2 3 etc names, I'd gladly "construct" a copedant setup for you and post it. The idea of "D" sounds great ... and what it offers.

Wayne,

RKR is an odd change that I rarely use. When I spent 3 months with Zane Beck in late '78, he talked me into another knee lever, lowering string 5 only from B to Bb. I have this "alongside" the RKR listed change ... only on the other side. My actual "Zane Beck" copedant is:


LKL LKV LKR p1 p2 p3 p4 RKLa RKLb RKR


G# A A
F# G
E Eb F F#
C# D D D#
B C# Bb C
G# A A
F# F F
D Eb E
B C# Bb
G# G A
E Eb C#
B Bb

This (without the B to Bb string 5 change) was the actual copedant that Zane was playing in '77 when I met him. He was always experimenting I guess. As you can see, he later changed a few things around (as with the copedant you posted). The "new" B to Bb lower I use all the time as it gives me a great 9th chord two frets behind "open" on the upper 7 strings. It also affords a Maj 7th in the "E-Eb lower" major position. A flat 5 in open dominant position. A minor, one fret up from "open" (in combination with LKL)... and there's a few more. It also splits to "C" with the B to C# raise giving me that augmented chord. As to the original RKR question ... well, I must have missed the boat, because Zane only ever showed me a great descending chromatic chordal resolution from a V to a I chord with this ... and I can get the same thing with other pedal/string combinations. My new Anapeg pedal steel won't have this change (unless someone can show me the key to it's use).

Graham

[This message was edited by Graham Griffith on 07 October 2002 at 04:33 AM.]

Danny Bates
Member

From: Fresno,CA. USA

posted 07 October 2002 04:51 AM     profile     
That RKR should also give you a nice Bbmaj9 and Dmin7 with the 1 & 2 pedal. Bb, D, F, A, C

[This message was edited by Danny Bates on 07 October 2002 at 05:03 AM.]

pdl20
Member

From: Benton, Ar . USA,

posted 07 October 2002 06:43 AM     profile     
Graham .i doubt if you remember me but we met at Zanes house .you stayed with him and faye for a week or so and was taking some lessons from him at the time.i was playing a local club at that time.i often wondered what had happened to you.glad to have you on the forum.heard the song from the cd you play fine.take care. Rudy Osborne
Graham Griffith
Member

From: Glebe, N.S.W., Australia

posted 08 October 2002 05:37 PM     profile     
Rudy,

it's amazing you remember me ... as far as that goes ... I certainly remember you ... you were with Dottie West at one stage, right? You're a great player. I think Zane wanted to recruit you to his tuning and you may have tried it for a while.

Regards

Graham

Graham Griffith
Member

From: Glebe, N.S.W., Australia

posted 08 October 2002 08:16 PM     profile     
CORRECTION of Jack Richards' copedant

After a lengthy discussion with Jack Richards I discovered that his tuning was more like:


LKL LKV LKR P1 P2 P3 P4 RKL RKR

1 G# -G
2 F# +G
3 E -Eb +F +F
4 C# +D
5 B +B# -Bb
6 G# -G +A
7 E +F
8 C# +D
9 E
10 A


Interestingly, note the separation of pedal four from the first three. This is a leg grouping. Jack never used a volume pedal and played "guitaristically" (playing spanish guitar in big bands). He also reckons that he could play most of what he needed using just pedals 2 & 4!!! (although he didn't ever play two floor pedals with one foot.) It all came from guitar knowledge. (Hence "B#" instead of "C" to denote augmented in key of "E".)

His prototype pedal steel setup (early 40's)was:


P1 P2 P3 P4 (P5 1948 production)

1 E +F# (-F lowered from P4)
2 C# +D
3 B
4 G# +A
5 B +B#
6 E
7 C# +D
8 E


Graham

[This message was edited by Graham Griffith on 08 October 2002 at 08:17 PM.]

Wayne Cox
Member

From: Chatham, Louisiana, USA

posted 10 October 2002 06:41 PM     profile     
Well guys,I took the plunge and put the full ZB setup on my S-12. Graham and the other guys are right;it is all there. Well,actually about 90% of the standard C6 and 90% E9 with another 30% original stuff that would be very awkward on either of the other tunings! The only real obstacle I faced was one I had anticipated. The missing middle-E. Even though it is there with a lever,for me it wasn't the same thing. Two more positive things about the tuning,which really reflect Zane's genius are: 1.For the most part,there is only one raise and one lower per string. That means that it would work on almost any 12-string steel!~~2.I tried switching some things around;you can't do it,it won't work.You can completely reverse the whole setup from "Day" to "Emmons",but that's about it.You could add more pedals or levers but you would probably just duplicating something you already had.
After all was said and done, I decided not to keep it because of the amount of re-learning and re-conditioning of my reflexes,which would,in turn,foul me up on my double-10.This has been an adventure and the tuning would still be a great way to go if you are just starting out on steel guitar.
This tuning is just one more tribute to the genius of a great man...Zane Beck!
Thanks everyone for sharing your info on this thread!
W.C.
bob drawbaugh
Member

From: scottsboro, al. usa

posted 11 October 2002 06:37 AM     profile     
What if you put the E back on the eight string and got the D note with a knee lever? Would that work better for someone with years on the E9th. The only problem I see, not haveing a guitar in front of me with this tunning, is you would have to use more knee and pedal combinations.
Al Marcus
Member

From: Cedar Springs,MI USA

posted 11 October 2002 01:05 PM     profile     
Bob-That would work. I do that on my E6 tuning, which is similar to Zanes.

I raise both C# to D on a knee lever. E to F# on a knee lever.....al

Wayne Cox
Member

From: Chatham, Louisiana, USA

posted 12 October 2002 11:30 AM     profile     
Re:BOB D.&AL M.,
I tried putting on the E in place of the D and lowering it. It works on paper and works on a E6 tuning,but not on Zane's setup.I found it creates a tuning anomally I just couldn't seem to overcome.It would probably work if you had a steel with zero cabinet drop,but with a "normal"steel it creates a problem in the D6 mode.Remember,that the D string becomes the root for the D6 mode on Zane's tuning.
W.C.
Graham Griffith
Member

From: Glebe, N.S.W., Australia

posted 13 October 2002 03:26 PM     profile     
The "E" string being absent should not be a problem if you use the RKL which raises the "D" to "E" & the "C#" to "D#" (hence putting it in "E9th" mode ... Zane's intention). However, if you miss the juxtaposition of the "E" & "D" strings (8 & 9), then you have to go down 7 frets to the "two frets behind pedals AB" ("B" string root note) to get that root note with it's flatted seventh underneath sound.

Zane's tuning & pedal arrangement, as you probably realise, relies upon the 8th string being "D" & not "E" ... particularly because of the open string continuous dominant 9th chord (strings 11 through to 7) and the continuous major 9th chord (strings 10 through to 6) & minor 9th chord (strings 9 through to 4) when you use the 2nd floor pedal.

Despite my partisan situation, though, I do see the problem for the "E9th" player.

Graham

[This message was edited by Graham Griffith on 13 October 2002 at 03:28 PM.]

[This message was edited by Graham Griffith on 13 October 2002 at 03:29 PM.]

Al Marcus
Member

From: Cedar Springs,MI USA

posted 08 April 2004 08:08 PM     profile     
Graham-I agree with that. with Zanes tuning the D on the 8th string is very important as you say. That is one of other reasons why I didn't go 100% for it....al

------------------
My Website..... www.cmedic.net/~almarcus/

All times are Pacific (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Pedal Steel Pages

Note: Messages not explicitly copyrighted are in the Public Domain.

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46

Our mailing address is:
The Steel Guitar Forum
148 South Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Support the Forum