|
Author
|
Topic: Recommend knee levers for C6th - technical
|
David Mason
Member From: Cambridge, MD, USA
|
posted 11 March 2003 01:15 PM
profile
I have a single neck C6th Carter professional - yes, I bought it that way because my interest is more in writing and recording music than in playing in a bar band. I have five foot pedals and four knee levers installed. I have changed pedal 1 (4, on a doubleneck) to give me Bb's instead of B's. Jeff Lampert and some other posters recommend that you put this change on a knee lever, so that it can be combined with pedal changes. What would you recommend for the changes to be put on LKL, LKR, and RKR? I want to keep the RKL and the last four pedals standard so that I can still use tab. I could add a L vertical pedal if it seems worthy (I almost certainly will be sending her off to Carter to do the mechanics, unless there is a better alternative). Currently my LKL drops the middle G to F, the LKR drops the high E to D, the RKL is standard (C to B) and the RKR drops both A's to Ab. I have a G on top and want to keep that, and the second pedal (5 on a doubleneck) raises the top G to a Ab as well as doing the standard things. I don't think I could handle the complexity and oddity of Paul Franklin's tuning.
P.S. (I LOVE bar bands, I'm just too old and settled to DO that anymore....) |
C Dixon
Member From: Duluth, GA USA
|
posted 11 March 2003 01:29 PM
profile
Put the standard 4th pedal back as it was and raise and lower the 3rd string on the right knee; raise and lower the 4th string on the left knee. Then install an up knee lever and lower the 5th string a whole tone from G to F. carl |
Bobby Lee
Sysop From: Cloverdale, North California, USA
|
posted 11 March 2003 02:22 PM
profile
I think that Buddy Emmons' C6th pretty much covers all the bases:
------------------
 Bobby Lee - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs
Sierra Session 12 (E9), Williams 400X (Emaj9, D6), Sierra Olympic 12 (C6add9), Sierra Laptop 8 (D13), Fender Stringmaster (E13, A6),
Roland Handsonic, Line 6 Variax |
David L. Donald
Member From: Koh Samui Island, Thailand
|
posted 11 March 2003 02:35 PM
profile
I have been in discussion with Crowbear about this till the phone died and he needed sleep.
Trying to find that
G to C9 C#m7b5 D9 classic passing chord thang.
I think on the BE C6 that could be
RKR w P4 or am also asleep?
(Next morning...) I think C#dim would be a correct passing chord here also. P5 for 1st inversion? But for 2nd or 3rd inversion I am at a loss still.[This message was edited by David L. Donald on 12 March 2003 at 02:30 AM.] |
Sam Minnitti
Member From: New Rochelle, NY
|
posted 11 March 2003 02:37 PM
profile
I am in the process of contemplating additional knees for my C6 neck as well, but would like to keep it to 4 knee levers total for that neck. I have to make the decision to either raise string 3 or lower string 5 on RKR. I see Buddy does not have the string 5 whole tone drop. Comments invitedAlso, can someone give examples of how they might use the ½ step raise on string 1 (pedal 8) as shown in Buddy’s setup. Thanks |
Al Marcus
Member From: Cedar Springs,MI USA
|
posted 19 March 2003 09:20 PM
profile
David-You are thinking! That LKL middle G to F (5thstring)is an important pull if you want to get deep into chords. Reece used that on his Bb6 tuning about 30years ago. I use it on my E6 tuning , on mine it is B to A. resolves down to the subdominant. Your LKR E to D(2nd string) is also very good, gives the D top for your D7-9 chord and also a sus. chord. But on that knee lever I would also put the 6th string E to D and that with the LKL would give you a full F6 Subdominant for one thing. Reece used all these pulls to get his very modern jazz sounds. I won't go into a full explanation of other things you can do with it for now. Going to bed...al  |
Jeff Lampert
Member From: queens, new york city
|
posted 20 March 2003 12:07 PM
profile
David M.,
I agree with everyone who suggests using BE's setup as sort of a 4-knee lever C6 standard. However, it should be noted that the 3rd string C->C# raise was developed in the context of having a D note on the 1st string. It provided a way to get the first string G note (and C6 chord inversion with G on top) for those players that opt to have a first string D note instead, by simply moving up 3 frets and engaging the C->C# pull. However, since you are keeping the G note on top, the C->C# pull is less useful, although any pull obviously has value. Also keep in mind that you can get the 3rd string C# note by split-tuning pedal 7 with RKL which lowers string 3 from C->B. It's clumsy, and you have to be aware of the 4th string being pulled, but the note is there. On the other hand, there is no F note available. I agree with Carl and feel that the G->F pull has tremendous use, providing an otherwise unavailable note. Another option is to lower the E to D to provide another unavailable note, but the harmonies are much less interesting with the D note than they are with the F note. With all that being said, it probably is still best to use BE's setup as a launching pad from which to figure out what else you want and what you don't need. .. Jeff------------------
Jeff's Jazz
|
Buck Dilly
Member From: Branchville, NJ, USA
|
posted 21 March 2003 11:29 AM
profile
Dave-I resisted changing the hi G to a D for a while. Adding the C to C#change helps resolve that. The hi D gives so many other new options that is it is really worth trying. I like the basic Emmons changes but have recently decided adding 3 knees. Adding low E up to F rather than G down to F, either is good. I have also opted for raising the low C to D rather than lowering the E to that D. Both are useful but different. If you have only 4 knees perhaps you should consider adding a few more, as long as you are having some work done? I worked with 4 knees for 2 years before deciding on changes. I tuned up those string to the new changes to see how useful they would really be. |
The Steel Guitar Forum
