Author
|
Topic: Tool for Improvising
|
Bruce Burhans Member From: Bellingham, Washington, USA
|
posted 08 April 2005 05:53 AM
profile
code:
Here's an improvisation tool I use a lot, to get me started if I can't plug in something from my bag of licks (which is still very small on the pedal steel), or need something more. It helps get me oriented, if nothing else.This will be my first shot at putting it down on paper (so-to-speak). -------------------------------- At any point in a tune, there's going to be the chord happening right now. I'm calling that the "active chord". There is also the chord that preceded it, and the one after it. They are the chord's "context". Let's look at a typical chord, a major triad. Described in terms of the major scale, the intervals are: 5 3 1 In terms of the chromatic scale (1/2 steps or positions) 7 4 0 What scale to play along with this chord?
Well, you've got 3 out of the 7 notes of the scale right there... (and the notes of the melody for clues, if that's happenning) But you also have the notes of the chord before and the chord after, right in front of you. In this example, you just left an E and are on an A and will be moving to a B: --------------------------- 5| 5 5 5+2 --------------------------- 6| 5-2 5 5+2 --------------------------- 7| --------------------------- 8| 5-1 5 5+2 --------------------------- ^ E | B | G# B E | B D# F# | | | | A A C# E A-major is the chord your are on, with the nearest inversion of the previous and following chords expressed as the changes you'd need to play them from the position and strings you are on, in terms of the number of 1/2 steps up (+) or down (-). You don't NEED these changes on your instrument, only in your imagination. You can find the notes they would play in lots of ways, right? The contextual chords are shown with the previous chord lower than the active chord, and the following chord higher than it is, which is a convention useful for clarity and nothing more. The changes are also kept as small as possible. These conventions make the visualization much easier and more useful in general. The full scale you might need at the moment, and extensions to the chord if you felt a richer chord was called for at the moment (7th or 9th....), will almost always be found in in the above pattern. A B C# D# E F# G# A Those are the notes found in the above chords, which yields the A lydian mode (major with a sharped 4th) which is exactly the theoretically perfect mode/scale for this chord in this context. It's the E major scale, started on the 4th note, "A", and ending there. E F# G# A B C# D# E F# G# A B C# D# E - - - - - = - - - - Hope someone else finds this tool useful. Any feedback more than welcome. Is this approach worthy of a name? If so, got any suggestions for one? Bruce in Bellingham
|
Scott Henderson Member From: Eldon, Missouri, USA
|
posted 08 April 2005 06:43 AM
profile
Doug Jernigan describes it as "vertical IMprovisation. It works tremendously. Have been using this theory for years! Good post!------------------ Steelin' away in the ozarks and life, Scott www.scottyhenderson.com |
Leila Tuttle Member From: Wheat Ridge, Colorado, USA
|
posted 08 April 2005 10:30 AM
profile
How can a beginner in Theory understand this? Is there a resource that would explain it fully? I understand the 1-3-5 and that's where it stops. 0-4-7 in half-steps...okay...but where did the 7 come from?Am I asking too much or is it not possible? Many of the theory books I have seem to break down at a certain point that I can't get beyond because I didn't understand that certain 'point'. So far I've given up. What I'm probably asking for is a whole theory course. Does anyone have any ideas about a theory book or course that takes baby steps that make each point easily understandable? Thanks, but I'm not too hopeful there is such a thing. If I ever understand it all myself, I promise to write one for the thick-headed like myself. ![](http://steelguitarforum.com/smile.gif) |
Dave Van Allen Member From: Doylestown, PA , US , Earth
|
posted 08 April 2005 12:34 PM
profile
Leila: To answer some of your questions, the seven comes from the number of half steps from Zero you go to get to the "5" of the keyfor instance: say fret Zero is "A" that equals the "1" of the key of A so A=1 but the fret is 0 go up to the 4th fret on the same string you now have "C#" which is the "3" of the key of A major so C#=3 but the fret is 4 go up to the 7th fret on the same string you now have "E" which is the "5" of the key of A, so E=5 but the fret is 7 does that part make sense now?? ![](http://steelguitarforum.com/smile.gif) The forum's own Mike Perlowin produced a fabulous Music Theory Basics document. Perhaps if you email him he can assist you.[This message was edited by Dave Van Allen on 08 April 2005 at 12:49 PM.] |
Robert Porri Member From: Windsor, Connecticut, USA
|
posted 08 April 2005 12:59 PM
profile
Leila,You don't have to be thinking of PSG specifically when you are trying to understand basic theory. Relate what you can to your guitar, but you will find the more general theory of music applies. Any decent theory book should get you started. I have a fair understanding of theory and was a little confused at first with the half step approach presented here. Going to Bruce's profile link and then the web sight listed had me saying "Oh... OK" very quickly. You might want to check that out also. Bob P. |
Scott Henderson Member From: Eldon, Missouri, USA
|
posted 08 April 2005 02:36 PM
profile
I discovered it in Doug Jernigans book, "How to Fly" Doug is very good at explainnig things in very easy to understandterms. I like this therory of vertical improvization because the less fret movement you have the faster you can play. Not to say that fret movement isnt neccessary but it don't hurt to keep your movements short and sweet. I like working out of IV 7 scale especially. The idea is simple find the scale position whatever you want to call it that involves the notes most relative to the chords in the progression. Once you figure it out you eyes will pop out. ------------------ Steelin' away in the ozarks and life, Scott www.scottyhenderson.com |
Bruce Burhans Member From: Bellingham, Washington, USA
|
posted 09 April 2005 01:11 AM
profile
code:
Scott H: Great! I am going to find Jernigan's book.Dave VA: Good job there. I'll look for Mike Perlowin's material too. Scott H: Great! I am going to find Jernigan's book. Dave VA: Good job there. I'll look for Mike Perlowin's material too. Robert P: It's really good to here that. Leila T: Don't be discouraged. Take it one step at a time. Just always remember that good "theory" isn't really theory. It's observations on the nature of music in general reduced to convenient abstractions. If the "theory" is valid, you can _hear_ it. If you can't, it isn't. It's a mental tool we use, and nothing more or less. Creativity, which we all live for, is something different. Believe it or not, a book called "How to Play the Piano Despite Years of Lessons" (can't recall the author) is one of the best books on music "theory" and practical improvisation I've ever seen. Feel free to email me if you get stuck. You always have to anchor what you are doing/thinking on a particular pitch, but it is much more useful to think in terms of intervals for the most part. There's only one major scale WWHWWWH W = whole step H = 1/2 step or 2212221 2 = whole step (two half-steps) 1 = 1 1/2 step Really pleased with the responses here. Bruce in Bellingham
|
Scott Henderson Member From: Eldon, Missouri, USA
|
posted 09 April 2005 07:10 AM
profile
Talk to Kieth Hilton about doug's books. he was the original publisher and even tho he has closed his publishing co he may have a few copies laying around. Yes I too have enjoyed this thread. To be totally candid, I would like to see more threads like this instead of all the gossip and stuff. I try to learn something new everyday. and opinions tho they may vary are a great learning tool. I like seeing how others approach the instrument and music. Thanks for the thread Bruce------------------ Steelin' away in the ozarks and life, Scott www.scottyhenderson.com |
Bruce Burhans Member From: Bellingham, Washington, USA
|
posted 09 April 2005 08:00 PM
profile
Scott H:I spent 20 years as a "working stiff musician", playing bass and singing backup in rock, blues, folk, and country bands, and used all sorts of tools like the one I posted here. (I really need to work this one over. I used just note-names for a long time [I can rattle off the notes of any chord, in any key] and have only fairly recently been moved to focussing on intervals more than note-names to identify a note, since I discovered that this was what I was really _doing_ a lot of the time.) Practical stuff... Taking theory courses at a couple of colleges was a big help. Got emails off to Mike Perlowin and Keith Hilton. Thank you much, Bruce in Bellingham
|
Bruce Burhans Member From: Bellingham, Washington, USA
|
posted 10 April 2005 11:00 PM
profile
Here's the skinny on Mike Perlowin's basic, non-instrument-specific, theory book.It is entitled "MUSIC THEORY IN THE REAL WORLD, A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR TODAY'S MUSICIANS." And is available for $9.95, or less, from Mel Bay Publications, or your favorite bookstore, on line or off. It's one of their bestsellers. I've ordered a copy. There's a link to it on his website: www.mikeperlowin.com Mike has also written a supplement to this book for the pedal steel, which he will be self-publishing soon.
I'll write a review of the basic theory book for the Forum when I've given it good going over. Don't feel qualified to review the pedal steel supplement yet. Too green on the pedal steel. His original pedal steel theory book is out-of-print and not available. Haven't heard back from Keith about Doug Jernigan's book, and the mail didn't bounce...He's probably gone for the weekend. Bruce in Bellingham [This message was edited by Bruce Burhans on 10 April 2005 at 11:04 PM.]
|
Larry R Member From: Navasota, Tx.
|
posted 13 April 2005 07:10 AM
profile
My compliments to all for the very good posts.Larry |
Leila Tuttle Member From: Wheat Ridge, Colorado, USA
|
posted 13 April 2005 07:31 AM
profile
Thanks to Dave for that explanation (so 7 is a fret... that's sure helpful to know and thanks to everyone else for their input too. I 'lost' this thread, forgot where I posted and found it today because its on top. I've ordered Mike's book and got the suppliment for the future. Mike is very quick to help! I'm looking forward to his book and can't wait to see things coming together with music theory! |
Larry Hicks Member From: Alabama, USA
|
posted 13 April 2005 10:02 AM
profile
Leila, There is a theory book by Robert W. Ottman named “Elementary Harmony” that was the benchmark source for many college-level courses. It is the over-all best I’ve ever seen to get a beginner up and going, and is an excellent reference for seasoned players. I think you’ll be able to find it on Amazon.Be warned . . . it gets you “up and going” FAST! Any legitimate theory course is going to be daunting at first (if you don’t already have a basic understanding, or don’t read music). Don’t give up . . . the light WILL come on! If you are serious about learning some basic theory (especially scales and chord structures), I’d do it in front of a piano keyboard at first. The keyboard is much easier for your eye (and ear) to understand because it is much more graphically straight forward. This is not to say that you’ll be learning to play piano, but you’ll learn the actual theory much faster because you can "see" the intervals much easier (this will in turn train your ear to hear the intervals) . . . then you can apply that to any instrument you’re feeling froggy enough to jump on! If you cover only the first three chapters you’ll know more legit theory than 90% of the folks out there gigging. G’luck. LH |
Bruce Burhans Member From: Bellingham, Washington, USA
|
posted 13 April 2005 03:00 PM
profile
Larry Hicks wrote: Some very good advice.I wonder if it might not be worthwhile to actually take a few weeks of piano lessons to learn to read standard notation? Sure makes understanding the theory books and music in general a lot easier and isn't really that hard. Makes you focus on the structure of music and learn the names for what's going on... Almost all of the best musicians on any instrument have taken piano lessons, for the very reasons that Larry gives. If I didn't already know how to sight read I'd probably want someone to advise me to learn. Thank you, Mom, for making me practice the clarinet for a 1/2 hour every day in the 5th grade. Though I do wish that you'd known enough to make it the piano instead. :-) Bruce in Bellingham
|
Mike Perlowin Member From: Los Angeles CA
|
posted 13 April 2005 03:16 PM
profile
I've just completed negotiations with Mel Bay Publications for the supplement. They will offer it as a paid on-line download only, and I will have a license to print up 200 copies, most of which will be sold through steel guitar retailers.This will all take place within the next 2 or 3 weeks. |
Fred Shannon Member From: Rocking "S" Ranch, Comancheria, Texas
|
posted 25 April 2005 07:43 AM
profile
I just recently received the supplement from Mike as a courtesy to a former PSG teacher. I was totally unaware of the supplement and it is perfectly obvious to me that Mike's is a common sense approach to the E9th PSG tuning. I can only say my ignorance of this document, made my job much harder in teaching music sight reading for my former students. Too bad, my fault, this supplement is a valued added addition to the original book. Phred------------------ "From Truth, Justice is Born"--Quanah Parker-1904 |