Steel Guitar Strings
Strings & instruction for lap steel, Hawaiian & pedal steel guitars
http://SteelGuitarShopper.com
Ray Price Shuffles
Classic country shuffle styles for Band-in-a-Box, by BIAB guru Jim Baron.
http://steelguitarmusic.com

This Forum is CLOSED.
Go to bb.steelguitarforum.com to read and post new messages.


  The Steel Guitar Forum
  Pedal Steel
  A, B, C & D with only 8 strings ?

Post New Topic  
your profile | join | preferences | help | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   A, B, C & D with only 8 strings ?
db
Member

From: Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA

posted 08 April 2005 04:09 PM     profile     
If you had an 8 string PSG with A, B & C pedals and D lever . . . .
(w/o the option of other functions)
What would the tuning be?
Have a 9th ?
One or two chromatics on top?
Or something else all together?

------------------
Dan Balde
U-12/8&5, S-7/D 3&1, S-6/E,A & G3


Donny Hinson
Member

From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.

posted 08 April 2005 07:59 PM     profile     
What kind of music would you be playing? (That might affect our recommendations.)
db
Member

From: Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA

posted 08 April 2005 08:06 PM     profile     
C & W, Blues & Jazz!
All of the "Modern Music"!
Maybe not "Swing" or "Big Band".
------------------
Dan Balde
U-12/8&5, S-7/D 3&1, S-6/E,A & G3

[This message was edited by db on 08 April 2005 at 08:14 PM.]

Andy Greatrix
Member

From: Edmonton Alberta

posted 09 April 2005 01:03 AM     profile     
This would be my suggestion.
high to low
F#
G#
E
B
G#
F#
E
D
The A peddle would raise the B and lower the D to C#
The B peddle would raise the G#s to A
The C peddle would raise the E and B a whole tone
The knee lever would lower the E's to D# and lower the D to B
Perhaps Bobbe Seymoure could add to this.

[This message was edited by Andy Greatrix on 09 April 2005 at 01:04 AM.]

[This message was edited by Andy Greatrix on 09 April 2005 at 01:05 AM.]

Dave Ristrim
Member

From: Whites Creek, TN

posted 09 April 2005 06:57 AM     profile     
I'm sorry, but it drives me nuts when you guys refer to the A,B,C, D pedals, knees. Is it a Jeff Newman thing or am I just out of touch, or out of my mind? I'm not trying to step on anyone's toes but, if A is the first pedal in an Emmons setup, why does it work the B string? If B is the second pedal, why does it raise to an A? What is D, an Eb or an F? One of these days we should come up with a better way to describe pedals/knees. Maybe "raise 5&10, raise 3&6, raise 4&5, lower 4&8? Until then, carry on my brothers
Dave
Scott Henderson
Member

From: Eldon, Missouri, USA

posted 09 April 2005 07:26 AM     profile     
I like andy's analogy with the exception of one thing I would have the C or 3rd Pedal raise the the E or 4th string just a half step.(E TO F)That way I could still have the option of playing for example a G major chord on the 6 th fret with strings 4,5,&6.

------------------
Steelin' away in the ozarks and life,
Scott
www.scottyhenderson.com

Andy Greatrix
Member

From: Edmonton Alberta

posted 09 April 2005 09:07 AM     profile     
Another thing would be to move the A and B peddles over and Scrap the C peddle. Then have the first peddle set up to raise the E's to F.
Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 09 April 2005 10:18 AM     profile     
I'd think about converting one of the pedals to a knee lever.
    knee   p1   p2   knee 
D# -D/C#
G# +A
E +F/F#
B +C#
G# +A
E -D#
B +C#
db
Member

From: Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA

posted 15 April 2005 08:16 PM     profile     
This project will be a "lap guitar" with Bigsby Palm Pedals for the 'A', 'B' & "B&C"
(combined) + ONLY ONE "lever".
So, it will have individual pedals for each string pull . . .
except for the root-lower-lever, that can operate two strings.
(Only one "combined" lower function can be made.)
The big question for me is the 9th or chromatic strings.
I am partial to having the root on the lowest string . . .
But, I could give up my personal preference for a more conventional setup.

------------------
Dan Balde
U-12/8&5, S-7/D 3&1, S-6/E,A & G3

[This message was edited by db on 15 April 2005 at 08:24 PM.]

db
Member

From: Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA

posted 20 April 2005 07:07 PM     profile     
Yea,
The mechanical limitations are a brain teaser!
That's why I am asking for help here!

------------------
Dan Balde
U-12/8&5, S-7/D 3&1, S-6/E,A & G3


Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 20 April 2005 08:41 PM     profile     
Are you saying that each of the palm pedals can only operate one string?
db
Member

From: Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA

posted 22 April 2005 02:55 PM     profile     
Yes, One string raise - One Pedal
However, the "knee-lever" can do "two lower"
or "one lower - one raise".
I know it sound complicated . . .
But, it is the limitation of the basic design.
If you read the "Where's The Steel" article found on the website,
you will get a better understanding of a multiple palm pedal assembly.
I trying do the same thing as the PS-67F - "root raise" 7-string slide.
But, with a "root-lower" lever on an 8-string lap - a PS-68D .
------------------
Dan Balde
U-12/8&5, S-7/D 3&1, S-6/E,A & G3

[This message was edited by db on 07 May 2005 at 05:55 PM.]

John Poston
Member

From: Albuquerque, NM, USA

posted 22 April 2005 03:42 PM     profile     
I don't really understand the palm pedal setup too well, but maybe you could do a rudimentary C6

1 2 3 knee
E F
C D
A B
G F#
E Eb
C
A
F

b0b
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, California, USA

posted 22 April 2005 05:00 PM     profile     
Yeah, John Poston's C6th idea would be the best.
db
Member

From: Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA

posted 26 April 2005 05:30 PM     profile     
John,
Ooops . . .
2-"lowers"
I can do the 3-"raises" . . .
But,I can only do 1-"lower".
Could this tuning be "moved up" a knotch?
With a 'G' on top . . .
'E' on the 2nd string . . .
loose the low 'F' . . .
What are some of the STD pedal combinations here?
I may like to work up a C6th "setup" as an option.
Thanks,
------------------
Dan Balde
U-12/8&5, S-7/D 3&1, S-6/E,A & G3

[This message was edited by db on 27 April 2005 at 07:04 PM.]

db
Member

From: Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA

posted 27 April 2005 06:27 PM     profile     
So far, I am thinking along these lines:

A B C* D-KL
----------------------------
1 F#
2 G# +A
3 E +F#
4 B +C#
5 G# +A
6 E -D#
7 B +C#
8 E

Sort of a "Compressed - Extended - E9th".

*The 3rd string 'C' pedal is depressed along with:
2nd 'A' & 4th 'B' pedals for the STD 'B&C' combination.

The middle "9th"(F#) has to be pulled out because of "Palm Pedal" limitations.

The 3rd string 'D' lower could be added with great engineering effort . . .
Would it work if missing? (I noticed it was missing on B0B's chart.)

The 1st string could be alternately tuned to D# or other preference.
The 8th string could be alternately tuned to D or other preference.
They could both have a "Hipshot" De-Tuner machine for a quick change option.

What do you guys think about this?
Any suggestions on the 1st or 8th string pitches?

Thanks,
------------------
Dan Balde
U-12/8&5, S-7/D 3&1, S-6/E,A & G3

[This message was edited by db on 06 May 2005 at 06:18 PM.]

John Poston
Member

From: Albuquerque, NM, USA

posted 29 April 2005 01:38 PM     profile     
This looks pretty good. I didn't realize you could put 2 raises on one pedal.

That's a nice basic E9 you got going. You could also retune the E to F# to E to F and try that, too.

Regarding the C6 setup I had before, you could actually combine the 2 raises A->B and C->D on one pedal. You also could certainly drop the low F and stick a G on top - maybe even add a 1/2 or whole step raise on that top G since you open up a pedal with the combination. Having the major triad right there is nice for old country stuff.

Regarding the lowers, I would keep the G->F# lower, and add the low E->F to the knee lever - but you would really be missing that E->Eb quite a bit in the long run.

Your E9 setup looks as useful - maybe more depending on what you like.

Have fun!!!!

db
Member

From: Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA

posted 29 April 2005 07:14 PM     profile     
Hey John,
Thanks for the response.

The "multiple raises" are all "individual pedals" for each string . . .
to be used only when necessary for the strings that are to be picked.

Which "E" changes are you speaking of here?
The lowest "E"? . . . (I was thinking of a "D" as an alternate here).

Yes. . .
Alternate tunings for the 1st and 8th strings make it accessible for different applications.
This is the area of concern for recommendations.
As well as the 3rd string lower to D#.

BTW, I am having difficulty understanding the aspects of the C6th application.
I am an E (9th or major) guy.
------------------
Dan Balde
U-12/8&5, S-7/D 3&1, S-6/E,A & G3

[This message was edited by db on 02 May 2005 at 07:51 PM.]

db
Member

From: Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA

posted 02 May 2005 08:18 PM     profile     
delete

[This message was edited by db on 11 May 2005 at 06:28 PM.]

db
Member

From: Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA

posted 06 May 2005 06:08 PM     profile     
After viewing the last proposed copedant chart . . .
I see that the F# is already there for the equivalent 'B&C' pedal function notes.
It might be better to add another "root-lower" on the 3rd string.

I am now thinking along these lines:

A B D-KL
-----------------------
1 F#
2 G# +A
3 E -D#
4 B +C#
5 G# +A
6 E -D#
7 B +C#
8 E

Sort of a "Compressed - Extended - E9th".
Again . . .
The 1st & 8th strings could be alternately tuned to D or other preference.
They could both have a "Hipshot" De-Tuner machine for a quick change option.

What do you guys think about this revision?
Any other suggestions on the 1st or 8th string pitches?

Thanks,
------------------
Dan Balde
U-12/8&5, S-7/D 3&1, S-6/E,A & G3

[This message was edited by db on 06 May 2005 at 06:31 PM.]

Dean Parks
Member

From: Sherman Oaks, California, USA

posted 06 May 2005 07:30 PM     profile     
Dan-

After reading this thread, I'm not sure about what's possible with your mechanics. But I have a Fender 400 that I have rigged thusly, and there's a lot of music in this (especially the bottom 6 strings):


1 2 3 4
1 F#
2 D
3 E D#
4 B C#
5 G# A F#
6 E D#
7 B C#
8 E

When played together, 2 and 3 split accidentally to a pretty good G, so you have a major or minor strummer. I think it is very handy to have the G# drop to the F#, so you can scoop into the 'third' of the root chord.

So, pedals 1+2 are A chord over an E bass.
Pedals 3+4 are a B chord over an E bass.
Pedal 4 = major 7th chord.
Strings 4,5 with pedal 3 down, transitioning to pedal 3 up/pedal 1 down, then add string 3 = Honky Tonk Women lick.

Ideal on this guitar of mine would be knees for 3 and 4 rather than pedals.

-d-

Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 07 May 2005 09:55 AM     profile     
To make good use of a middle D#, you need to have a middle F# too. Just a thought.
Fred Shannon
Member

From: Rocking "S" Ranch, Comancheria, Texas

posted 07 May 2005 10:11 AM     profile     
Dan, take the last setup you have posted above and move those pedals to the right one space and add the G#'s to G on the pedal next to the B's to C#....the two pedals used together give you a powerful off chord... the G#'s to G will give you a no pedal minor. I have this pull on my SD10. Works for me.
Phred

------------------
"From Truth, Justice is Born"--Quanah Parker-1904

db
Member

From: Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA

posted 07 May 2005 05:22 PM     profile     
Dean . . .
I can't do a raise and lower on the same (5th) string to get the middle F#.
------------------
Dan Balde
U-12/8&5, S-7/D 3&1, S-6/E,A & G3

[This message was edited by db on 09 May 2005 at 06:09 AM.]

db
Member

From: Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA

posted 07 May 2005 05:23 PM     profile     
Bobby Lee . . .
To add a "lower-middle" F#, (between 5th & 6th strings).
I would have to loose a top or bottom string.
Which one would you suggest?

Your last chart suggestion did not have a "lower-middle" F# . . .
Only the "higher" F# , that I already have on the first string here.
Have you changed your mind ? ! ?

Would you suggest that I make it a 9 string instrument with two F#s!
------------------
Dan Balde
U-12/8&5, S-7/D 3&1, S-6/E,A & G3

[This message was edited by db on 07 May 2005 at 05:59 PM.]

db
Member

From: Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA

posted 07 May 2005 05:29 PM     profile     
Fred . . .
I do not understand your proposal . . .
Could you do a "tab" chart for me?
------------------
Dan Balde
U-12/8&5, S-7/D 3&1, S-6/E,A & G3

[This message was edited by db on 07 May 2005 at 05:57 PM.]

Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 10 May 2005 09:24 AM     profile     
I'm just saying that the main reason for the E lower is to get the B6th chord, which really requires the middle F#. I included the E lower in my chart above (it didn't hurt anything) but I really don't think it's necessary.

I always consider E-F to be more useful than E-D#. Many people disagree with me on that because they use the E-D# to get their V7 chord. I usually drop back two frets and use E-F (or the bar slant on slow tunes)instead.

I really like the C6th that John Poston posted. I think it gives you more than the various E9th proposals.

------------------
Bobby Lee - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts
Sierra SD-12 (Ext E9), Williams D-12 Crossover, Sierra S-12 (F Diatonic)
Sierra Laptop 8 (E6add9), Fender Stringmaster (E13, C6, A6)

Ray Minich
Member

From: Limestone, New York, USA

posted 10 May 2005 10:48 AM     profile     
Hey Dave R., I think the A B C pedal nomenclature has more to do with when it happened chronologically (i.e. in history) that with what the pedal accomplishes. Then the vertical knee levers came about and who knows what to call them?
db
Member

From: Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA

posted 10 May 2005 06:05 PM     profile     
Hey b0b,

I really did not have a question about the low ‘E’ . . .
I know that ‘lap-steel’ players would just prefer to have the familiar 'low root' here.

The question was, "is the 'one' higher “F#” sufficient here", as it was in your chart.

I prefer the F “root lower” function (as did Jim Day) . . .
That is not in question here.
I already make the PS-67F that covers that.
I am after perfecting a workable copendant/tuning for and 8-String “Lap-Steel”
with palm pedals, for those that may prefer the D “root lower” function.

Unfortunately,
I cannot do Johns' C6th charts . . .
There is 'second' lower function on the 1st chart.
I can do only 'one' lower function.
At best, I can lower an octave pair together with a lever.
The 2nd chart has both a raise & a lower on the same (5th) string.
No can do!
------------------
Dan Balde
U-12/8&5, S-7/D 3&1, S-6/E,A & G3

[This message was edited by db on 10 May 2005 at 09:12 PM.]

db
Member

From: Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA

posted 10 May 2005 06:35 PM     profile     
This chart might make the 'Palm Pedal' aspect
of the copedant more understandable:

Palm - Knee-
Pedals: 1 2 3 4 Lever:
B-1 A-1 B-2 A-2 D
---------------------------------
1 F#
2 G# +A
3 E -D#
4 B +C#
5 G# +A
6 E -D#
7 B +C#
8 E

------------------
Dan Balde
U-12/8&5, S-7/D 3&1, S-6/E,A & G3

[This message was edited by db on 12 May 2005 at 06:30 PM.]

Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 11 May 2005 08:45 PM     profile     
Okay then, how about this "Sacred Steel" variation:
Palm -                     Knee- 
Pedals: 1 2 3 4 Lever:
---------------------------------
1 E
2 D +D#
3 B +C#
4 G# +A
5 E +F#
6 E -D#/D
7 B
8 E
Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 11 May 2005 09:13 PM     profile     
Here's a D9th that has a lot of the standard C6th stuff in it:
Palm -                     Knee- 
Pedals: 1 2 3 4 Lever:
---------------------------------
1 E +F
2 C +D
3 A +B
4 F# +G
5 E -Eb
6 C
7 A
8 F# -F
Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 11 May 2005 09:21 PM     profile     
Can you do half stops?
Palm -                     Knee- 
Pedals: 1 2 3 4 Lever:
---------------------------------
1 D# -D
2 G# +A
3 E +F/F#
4 B +C#
5 G# +A
6 F#
7 E -D#/D
8 B

------------------
Bobby Lee - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts
Sierra SD-12 (Ext E9), Williams D-12 Crossover, Sierra S-12 (F Diatonic)
Sierra Laptop 8 (E6add9), Fender Stringmaster (E13, C6, A6)

db
Member

From: Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA

posted 12 May 2005 06:03 PM     profile     
Hey b0b,
Thanks for the multiple suggestions.

The “Sacred Steel” copedant is “do-able”.
However, I would need to come up with a half-step "stop" for the 6th string D# lever.
That would be an easier thing to do here with a pedal rather than with the knee lever.
BTW . . . Are those two E’s unison on 5 & 6 ?

The other two charts have changes on the 1st and/or 8th strings . . .
As I have said before, the 1st & 8th strings cannot have change functions.
Can either of those other two charts be shifted/adjusted?
So that the 1st and 8th strings are “fixed”?

Yes, "half-pedals" are possible . . .
But, the E to F would be very difficult to execute in combination with any other pedals.
------------------
Dan Balde
U-12/8&5, S-7/D 3&1, S-6/E,A & G3

[This message was edited by db on 12 May 2005 at 06:33 PM.]

db
Member

From: Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA

posted 12 May 2005 06:15 PM     profile     
BTW . . .
Here is the chart for the seven-string PS-67F.

Palm - Knee-
Pedals: 1 2 3 4 5 Lever:
B-1 'C-1' A-1 B-2 A-2 F
-------------------------------------------
1 G# +A
2 E +F# +F
3 B +C#
4 G# +A
5 E +F
6 B +C#
7 E

The 'C-1' pedal is cut back so that it is out of the way to operate the adjacent pedals and is only depressed along with the B-1 & A-1 for the STD "B&C" combination.

It is best to design an assembly that:
Has a "lever" function "in-between" the two "top" & "bottom" pairs of palm pedals . . .
The top B-1 & A-1 pedals are spaced apart, as well as the bottom B-2 & A-2 pedals.
This allows for independant operation.
This might explain my copedant preferences.

A top string can be added for the 8-string version here . . .
What would be your suggestion for the most usable pitch?
------------------
Dan Balde
U-12/8&5, S-7/D 3&1, S-6/E,A & G3

[This message was edited by db on 13 May 2005 at 08:45 PM.]

Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 12 May 2005 08:59 PM     profile     
Yes, the sacred steel tuning has unison E strings.

I didn't realize that the outside strings had to be static. Darn!

I don't think that any of these is 'better' than any other. they're just different, that's all.
db
Member

From: Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA

posted 14 May 2005 06:16 PM     profile     
Another other variation would be to have only one "root-lower" function on the 6th string.
With a "C" - W / B-1 & A-1 for the STD 'B&C" combination function on the 3rd string, instead of the second "root-lower".

Palm - Knee-
Pedals: 1 2 3 4 5 Lever:
B-1 'C-1' A-1 B-2 A-2 D
-------------------------------------------
1 D#
2 G# +A
3 E +F#
4 B +C#
5 G# +A
6 E -D#
7 B +C#
8 E

Again, the 1st & 8th strings can be alternately tuned to another preferred pitch.
------------------
Dan Balde
U-12/8&5, S-7/D 3&1, S-6/E,A & G3

[This message was edited by db on 14 May 2005 at 06:22 PM.]

Bob Hoffnar
Member

From: Brooklyn, NY

posted 28 August 2005 05:01 PM     profile     
Db,
That tuning looks pretty weak to me when it comes to any modern altered voicings. You have almost no tri tones available. Also for scale work you are going to need quite a bit of bar movement with your ideas.

I would tune it to a C6 like John Poston said. Maybe add a half step raise to the lower E string to get a country sound or simple sus when you want it.

Bob

All times are Pacific (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Pedal Steel Pages

Note: Messages not explicitly copyrighted are in the Public Domain.

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46

Our mailing address is:
The Steel Guitar Forum
148 South Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Support the Forum