|
Author
|
Topic: New Information about the all new Jackson Steel
|
Nick Reed Member From: Springfield, TN
|
posted 09 November 2005 12:59 PM
profile
Here's something that just got released over the past few days. http://www.jacksonsteelguitars.com/about.aspx [This message was edited by Nick Reed on 09 November 2005 at 01:06 PM.] |
Ray Riley Member From: Des Moines, Iowa, USA
|
posted 09 November 2005 08:39 PM
profile
Thanks Nick,, Ray------------------ Sho-Bud S-12 and a brand new N112
|
Hook Moore Member From: South Charleston,West Virginia
|
posted 10 November 2005 05:00 AM
profile
quote: The Jackson Steel is capable of raising a string pitch one tone up and lower 1/2 tone down, returning to within one cent of the open note. No current manufacturer of pitch changers can make this claim.
Hook------------------ www.HookMoore.com
[This message was edited by Hook Moore on 10 November 2005 at 05:00 AM.] [This message was edited by Hook Moore on 10 November 2005 at 05:02 AM.] |
Mike Mantey Member From: Seibert, Colorado, USA
|
posted 10 November 2005 10:09 AM
profile
I see your quoting a portion of their page Hook. This information is inaccurate. I hope they will consider doing some more research before they say things like this. Our new Mullen Royal Precision will return 100% true every time. Whether raising or lowering a string, it comes back true. Precision mechanics is what our guitar is built around. We also offer guitars in exotic and lacquer finishes. I just think they should rephrase this to say most or some manufacturers today.------------------ Mike Mantey Sales & Production Manager Mullen Guitar Co., Inc. (970) 664-2518 www.mullenguitars.com
[This message was edited by Mike Mantey on 10 November 2005 at 10:14 AM.] |
Mike Vallandigham Member From: Concord, CA
|
posted 10 November 2005 10:18 AM
profile
LOL!! a half tone change, look out!My mullen returns perfect, along w/ my emmons and my old beater ZB. Can't most guitars change 1-1/2 tones and return true? That was the point of a pedal steel I thought.
|
Bobby Lee Sysop From: Cloverdale, North California, USA
|
posted 10 November 2005 10:53 AM
profile
The claim is that a string is raised, then lowered, and returns exactly to the original pitch. On most guitars, the string will return a wee bit sharp due to an effect known as hysteresis. It is most noticable on the high E string of the E9th. Keyless guitars have minimal hysteresis. Some builders of keyed guitars add "compensators" to counteract the hysteresis effect.------------------
Bobby Lee (a.k.a. b0b) - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts Williams D-12 E9, C6add9, Sierra Olympic S-12 (F Diatonic) Sierra Laptop S-8 (E6add9), Fender Stringmaster D-8 (E13, C6 or A6) My Blog |
Mark Eaton Member From: Windsor, Sonoma County, CA
|
posted 10 November 2005 11:11 AM
profile
Thanks for posting that, Nick. This latest chapter in the Jackson Steel saga will most certainly stir up the group! ------------------ Mark
|
Hook Moore Member From: South Charleston,West Virginia
|
posted 10 November 2005 06:10 PM
profile
Yes Mike that was a quote from their information. I agree that they need to research a little before making those statements. Hook------------------ www.HookMoore.com
|
Per Berner Member From: Skövde, Sweden
|
posted 10 November 2005 10:45 PM
profile
Reading that page, I didn't find much in the way of information, but quite a lot of marketing hype. Nothing that indicates anything revolutionary.I think we should wait until it's been seen and played by a number of trustworthy forumites before we decide if it's bad, so-so or really good, or maybe even the best thing to come along since sliced bread. Patience, gentlemen! ------------------ ´75 Emmons p/p D10 8+4, '96 Emmons Legrande II D10 8+5, '72 AWH Custom D10 8+3, Peavey Nashville 1000 |
Tony Prior Member From: Charlotte NC
|
posted 11 November 2005 03:22 AM
profile
I guess it comes down to this..You can TELL me what my EARS are gonna hear.. OR Just let MY EARS do there own thing... I found that statement a bit over the edge... It implies that EVERY Steel out there is inadequate. Even mine ! I tell you what.. when these Steels show up at a Trade show, they better return to 100% pitch..cuz ya know, thats the first thing we are all gonna look for... |
Jack Stoner Sysop From: Inverness, Florida
|
posted 11 November 2005 06:33 AM
profile
While I can't comment on the current production models of the Mullen guitars, ALL others that I've played, including older Mullen's, do have the "hysterisis" issue on a string that is both raised and lowered. Some guitar builders have acknowledged that it exists and some have even devised compensation devices. Others will not acknowledge it or say "my guitar" doesn't have it. There is obviously just the "salesman's hype" on the web site. The proof will be in the actual product. |
Nick Reed Member From: Springfield, TN
|
posted 11 November 2005 06:44 AM
profile
quote: The guitars of today are finished in Formica with simulated wood grain. The Jackson Steel offers exotic woods with a high-gloss lacquer finish.
I noticed in reading this, it looks like the Sho-Bud tradition of beautiful wood laquer bodies (over formica) will continue in the new Jackson Steel Guitars. Something Sho-Bud was always known for.[This message was edited by Nick Reed on 11 November 2005 at 06:49 AM.] |
Glenn Austin Member From: Montreal, Canada
|
posted 11 November 2005 07:05 AM
profile
Will they be offering a Maverick model with exotic wood grain contact paper finish? |
Robert Parent Member From: Savage, MN
|
posted 11 November 2005 11:02 AM
profile
There are lots of fine instruments on the market today so the competition will be much greater than in the Sho Bud era. Marketing hype alone is not going to take you very far in this market place. It will be interesting to see if they can even come close to the quality of lacquer finish that Williams Guitar has been producing of late, the mechanics of a Zumsteel or the mass production skills of Carter. I'll withhold judgement for now...
|
James Morehead Member From: Durant, Oklahoma, USA
|
posted 11 November 2005 01:06 PM
profile
Glen, Your the best! Your twisted! LOL |
Al Terhune Member From: Newcastle, WA
|
posted 11 November 2005 05:24 PM
profile
Mighty kind of you to hold your judgment for now, Robert. And, simply can't wait until you decree your judgement!And, no, I've not had a drop as I type this... Al |
Jerry Roller Member From: Van Buren, Arkansas USA
|
posted 11 November 2005 09:39 PM
profile
I talked with David a great deal about this new guitar and he told me a lot about it and I would not advise jumping to any conclusion that it is not all David claims it to me. He is a brilliant mind and knows what he is doing and I for one expect it to be a great guitar and certainly not one to be taken lightly. Jerry |
Bobby Boggs Member From: Pendleton SC
|
posted 11 November 2005 10:02 PM
profile
Mike Mantey quote: Our new Mullen Royal Precision will return 100% true every time. Whether raising or lowering a string, it comes back true.
If the new Mullen will do this without a lower return compensator. My hat is off to the Mullen crew. |
John Bechtel Member From: Nashville, Tennessee,U.S.A.
|
posted 11 November 2005 11:09 PM
profile
As for beautiful wood~grain Laquer finish, the Bethal Steel would be very hard to beat! Big Jim Murphy's Two~Tone Steel was one of the best looking Laquers I've ever seen!------------------ “Big John” Bechtel ’04 SD–10 Black Derby w/3 & 5 & Pad ’65 Re-Issue Fender Twin–Reverb Custom™ 15” Eminence web site |
Andy Greatrix Member From: Edmonton Alberta
|
posted 12 November 2005 12:27 AM
profile
A Fulaka guitar is a beautiful sight, not to mention a great mechanism. |
kyle reid Member From: Butte,Mt.usa
|
posted 12 November 2005 12:55 AM
profile
Robert! Not only can they come close,they can equal whatever others are doing, just about every manufacturer has spent at least 30 years copying each other when it comes to finish & all other features like, changers, rollers, pickups, ect. Just like todays Automobiles, Its a Copy Cat World! kr |
Lee Baucum Member From: McAllen, Texas (Extreme South) - The Final Frontier
|
posted 12 November 2005 07:49 AM
profile
I have a mid-90's Mullen with fresh Jagwire strings on it. On the 4th string I can play this sequence, plucking the string only once: E>F#>D#>E According to my two tuners, the last E is still in tune. Likewise, on the 5th string I can play this sequence, plucking the string only once: B>C#>A#>B Again, the final B is still in tune. Is hysteresis overcome by a better changer or by a better string? ------------------ Lee, from South Texas Down On The Rio Grande Mullen U-12, Evans FET-500, Fender Steel King |
Ricky Davis Moderator From: Spring, Texas USA
|
posted 12 November 2005 09:18 AM
profile
Try this Lee> 3. 4._0~~0L~~0~~0R~~0 5. and see what you come up with? Ricky
|
b0b Sysop From: Cloverdale, California, USA
|
posted 12 November 2005 09:41 AM
profile
I'm sure it's a fine guitar, but the web designer needs a course in English sentence structure: quote: David was a builder of Sho-Bud steels. Jackson Steel Guitar Company is founded by David Jackson. He designs and builds Jackson Steel Guitars. Sho-Bud steels have been played and owned by Buddy Emmons, Lloyd Green, Tommy white, Steve 'Rabbit Easter. Emmons Steel, Sho-Bud, Zumm, Mullen, Marlen Steel, Remington Steel Guitars, Excel Steel, Derby Steel Guitars, Fessenden Steel Guitars, Gibson guitars, Taylor guitars. Karen Peck and New River birthed the new line of Jackson Steel Guitars on July 24, 2005 at their homecoming. Southern Gospel music as well as Country Gospel music, Jazz, Soul, Rhythm and Blues, Traditional Gospel, Black Gospel, Sacred Steel all use steel guitars, lap steels, slide guitars, frypan steel. Jackson steels the ultimate sound. Jackson Steel Guitar the next generation in steel guitars. Jackson Steel Guitars, David Jackson, Harold Shot Jackson, pioneer, innovator, design, production, pedal, Sho-Bro, Grand Old Opry, instruments, dobros, Country Music Hall of Fame, Nashville, Tennessee, builder, Sho-Bud, Buddy Emmons, Lloyd Green, Tommy white, Steve 'Rabbit Easter, Zumm, Mullen, Marlen, Remington, Excel, Derby, Fessenden, Gibson, Taylor, Karen Peck and New River, homecoming, Southern Gospel, Jazz, Soul, Rhythm and Blues, Traditional, Black, Sacred, lap, slide, frypan, ultimate sound. next generation
The above is an unedited copy/paste from the bottom of the page.------------------
Bobby Lee -b0b- quasar@b0b.com System Administrator My Blog |
Al Terhune Member From: Newcastle, WA
|
posted 12 November 2005 10:09 AM
profile
Something tells me that weird paragraph is meant to be a response for search engine hits to cover all the bases and get as much traffic as possible. A bit of a mistake to include it as is...eh?Al |
David Mason Member From: Cambridge, MD, USA
|
posted 12 November 2005 10:34 AM
profile
V.D.D.: Verb Deficit Disorder. I think, therefore I are... |
Donny Hinson Member From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.
|
posted 12 November 2005 10:50 AM
profile
As an aside, I think the design of a pedal steel is far more important than who builds it. Problems in setup and build are usually easily corrected. Problems in design often remain in a steel throughout it's lifetime. I've yet to see a steel that didn't have what I consider "significant" design problems. |
Lee Baucum Member From: McAllen, Texas (Extreme South) - The Final Frontier
|
posted 12 November 2005 12:30 PM
profile
Ricky - I get the same results. |
Ricky Davis Moderator From: Spring, Texas USA
|
posted 13 November 2005 12:06 AM
profile
quote: Ricky - I get the same results.
Then Lee; you have yourself a good pedal Steel, pal. Ricky |
Jim Phelps Member From: just out of Mexico City
|
posted 13 November 2005 01:12 AM
profile
Just wondering, Lee, are you checking only the first and last E on the tuner, or the E's every time you release a pedal/lever too? |
Billy Carr Member From: Seminary, Mississippi USA
|
posted 13 November 2005 05:07 AM
profile
Personally, I'm going to give the makers/designers of the new "Jackson" guitar a chance to put there products out on the market and test them before I make a decision. When and if I have the chance to sit down to one and play it and then checkout the craftsmanship under it and the other things that make a fine guitar will I give an opinion. I seem to remember at one time, I talked to a lot of players that were negative towards the lighweight Carters that were being built in Texas. I just recieved my 4th new one Oct.5th! |
Rick Nicklas Member From: Pleasant Ridge, Mo
|
posted 13 November 2005 06:31 AM
profile
Ricky..... glad you posted that. That is the correct way to check the hysteresis hysteria. I used to always have to lower my E string to correct the previous raise. That was before I owned a Kline (problem solved).------------------ Rick Kline E9th/S-12, Session 500, Goodrich L-10k |
Erv Niehaus Member From: Litchfield, MN, USA
|
posted 13 November 2005 06:53 AM
profile
I wonder if there's going to be a problem with trademark infringement? There is already a "Jackson" guitar on the market. Erv PS: In doing a search, I find that "Jackson" is a registered trademark.  [This message was edited by Erv Niehaus on 13 November 2005 at 07:19 AM.] |
Bob Knight Member From: Bowling Green KY
|
posted 13 November 2005 07:29 AM
profile
Erv, This seems to be called Jackson "STEEL" Guitar Co.?? I don't believe you've got a case. |
Bobby Lee Sysop From: Cloverdale, North California, USA
|
posted 13 November 2005 08:34 AM
profile
Isn't mentioning competitors trademarks in their advertising ("Mullen, Marlen, Remington, Excel, Derby, Fessenden, Gibson, Taylor") also a risk, legally speaking? I'm no lawyer, but I always thought that you couldn't do that. (And why is Gibson and Taylor in that list? They don't make steel guitars!) It's probably a fine steel guitar, but they should have a lawyer go over their ad copy, IMHO. Trademark infringement lawsuits can sink a small company. Regarding raise then lower, if the last action before the experiment was a lower to D#, then E>F#>E>D#>E will bring you back to the same pitch. The middle E of the sequence will be flat of the first E, though. If the last action before the experiment was a raise to F or F#, the last E of the E>F#>E>D#>E sequence will be sharp of the first E. This "hysteresis" effect is the reason that Lloyd Green decided not to lower the 4th string in his copedent. If your guitar doesn't do this, you have an exceptional instrument!  ------------------
Bobby Lee (a.k.a. b0b) - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts Williams D-12 E9, C6add9, Sierra Olympic S-12 (F Diatonic) Sierra Laptop S-8 (E6add9), Fender Stringmaster D-8 (E13, C6 or A6) My Blog |
Larry Bell Member From: Englewood, Florida
|
posted 13 November 2005 09:26 AM
profile
Since we're off on a hysteresis tangent (and since there aren't any first hand Jackson Steel sightings that can be used to corroborate the jibberish on the website) -- I'll relate the following:Although I thought I'd seen hysteresis on the 4th string of my Fessy b4, I just tried it 4th string (Ricky's expt) E - D# - E - F - E returns to 0.0 cents (where it started) (b0b's expt) E - F# - E - D# - E also returns right on the money The main place that it bothers me is with whole tone (or more) pulls on wound strings I raise my 9th string (B same as 10 on a 10 string) to D on a lever and to C# on the A pedal. B to C# to D to C# returns with the C# about 4 cents sharp of where it started -- without 'Jerry's fix'. This consists of a knee lever stop mounted behind the bellcrank that limits the movement of the B to C# pull. You actually tune that change there. The problem is that when the lever pulls the string to D the bellcrank on the A pedal B to C# pull goes further than the pedal stop allows. Restricting the motion of that bellcrank solved the problem 100% for me. YMMV
------------------ Larry Bell - email: larry@larrybell.org - gigs - Home Page 2003 Fessenden S/D-12 8x8, 1969 Emmons S/D-12 6x6, 1984 Sho-Bud S/D-12 7x6, 1971 Dobro, Standel and Peavey Amps
|
Alan James Member From: San Francisco, CA, USA
|
posted 13 November 2005 09:38 AM
profile
Here's some information the legality of this practice: http://searchenginewatch.com/resources/article.php/2156551 http://www.nolo.com/article.cfm/ObjectID/A20673AB-676B-43D5-826517CBCE04A322/catID/D067F3DC-202E-4EF7-AAEEEFB60061533D/310/266/ART/ http://www.unc.edu/courses/pre2000fall/law357c/cyberprojects/fall01/Metatagging/meta_basics.htm
|
Bobby Lee Sysop From: Cloverdale, North California, USA
|
posted 13 November 2005 10:45 AM
profile
Geek note about the Jackson Steel page: The text I quoted is not in the invisible meta keyword tag. It is in the body of the message. Modern CSS-aware browsers render it very tiny in a 1 point font, but it displays full size in legacy and text-only browsers like lynx. It is also read aloud by programs that read web pages for blind people. I didn't quote the meta keywords for the page because they are not a part of the body content. If readers of this thread are interested in what the meta keyword tag contains, they can "view source" on the page in most browsers. Meta keywords are used by some search engines to index web pages. Steel Guitar Forum pages contain no meta keywords. |
Rodney Garrison Member From: Bowie, Texas
|
posted 13 November 2005 11:24 AM
profile
My 4 year old Carter Starter tunes true and stays tuned. Bud and John did GOOD! RG |
Curt Langston Member From: ***In the shadows of Tulsa at Bixby, USA***
|
posted 13 November 2005 02:32 PM
profile
quote: Is hysteresis overcome by a better changer or by a better string?
Hysteresis is avoidable with a keyless head!  ------------------ I'd rather be opinionated, than apathetic! |