Author
|
Topic: The Pre-History of Music Notation
|
Alan F. Brookes Member From: Brummy living in California, USA
|
posted 12 December 2006 05:31 PM
profile
A question asked in another thread about whether Eb and D# are the same note motivates me to go back into musical history.No-one knows who first adopted the letters A through G: that has been lost to antiquity. Someone at some stage arbitrarily gave the letter A to a frequency that it has more-or-less stayed at for thousands of years. Then he gave the notes of the A minor scale the letters A B C D E F G. I say "minor" scale, but the concept of major and minor as we know it was not used that early on. The ancients referred to MODES. What we know now as major and minor scales were two of the modes. To get the C major scale we take the same notes but start on the third of them, which makes C D E F G A B C. By starting the scale on any of the other notes we come up with a different mode. Nowadays two of the modes prodominate in Western music, but not everywhere. Interestingly, about 20 years ago an Egyptian flute was discovered from about 5,000 years ago. They made an identical replica, since the original was too fragile. When they played it it was in the key or C major/A minor. That key has been prevalant for millenia. I imagine the Ancient Egyptians inherited it from early civilizations. Early instruments were made to be played in the key of Amin/Cmaj. That's why there are black and white notes on the piano. The white notes create the Amin/Cmaj scale. (The black notes create the Eb scale, but that's another story !) Filling in the half-notes we get A A#/Bb B C C#/Db D D#/Eb E F F#Gb G G#Ab Now here comes the problem. Those notes are okay in the key of C, but if you play in a different key, say D, the notes are at a different frequency. So the G, for instance, in the key of D is not the same note as the G in the key of C. Ancient instruments are made to be played in C or Amin, but they use a natural scale. This caused a problem for centuries. Now enter JS Bach. He solved the problem by coming up with Equal Temperament. In Equal Temperament (tuning) every note except C is a little bit out, but not enough out to worry the average listener. The other notes are averaged out, giving equal space between the notes. To demonstrate this he wrote a piece known as the Well-Tempered Clavier (the well-tuned keyboard), which used all 24 major and minor keys in the same piece. Nowadays all organs, pianos, etc., are tuned to Equal Temperament. Unfortunately Equal Temperament has never worked well on string instruments. Have you ever noticed that if you hold down a G chord on a guitar and tune it, when you play an E chord it's out of tune ? Early string instruments had moveable frets to compensate for this, but it never worked very well. If anyone is interested I have an Excel spreadsheet where I demonstrate mathematically why it is impossible to tune a string instrument. The phenomenon was discovered by Pythagoras centuries ago. Basically, if you take a length of string and tune it to C, then you take two thirds of that length you end up with G. If you keep taking 2/3 you will work your way round all the notes, getting back to C a few octaves higher. But everyone knows that when you halve the length of string you move up an octave. The sounding length that you end up with deviates from the original length, but not by a power of 2. You eventually end up with the fraction 524288/531441. I hope this simplifies the problem. Write to me if you want to see the Excel Spreadsheet.[This message was edited by Alan F. Brookes on 12 December 2006 at 05:33 PM.] [This message was edited by Alan F. Brookes on 12 December 2006 at 05:37 PM.] |
John McGann Member From: Boston, Massachusetts, USA
|
posted 12 December 2006 06:09 PM
profile
Pianos are stringed instruments. |
Bill Duve Member From: Salamanca .New York, USA
|
posted 12 December 2006 06:17 PM
profile
Thanks Alan... Now I understand perfectly heee-hee |
Papa Joe Pollick Member From: Pontiac, Michigan, USA
|
posted 12 December 2006 07:06 PM
profile
Thank you Alan.Being,myself, quite ignorent of theory.I welcome any enlightment.Didn't understand much of what you wrote,but I have printed it out for further study. PJ |
Bill Duve Member From: Salamanca .New York, USA
|
posted 12 December 2006 07:33 PM
profile
I really do understand a lot of what Alan wrote, I was only laughing at the "You eventually end up with the fraction 524288/531441." Music is a mathematic thing, if not, Computers couldnt write music! This is fun........
|
Roy Ayres Member From: Starke, Florida, USA
|
posted 12 December 2006 08:06 PM
profile
Alan,That's as good an explanation as I have seen; it gets right to the heart of the frequency discrepancies without a lot of unnecessary verbiage. Thanks
------------------
Visit my Web Site at RoysFootprints.com Browse my Photo Album and be sure to sign my Guest Book. |
Earnest Bovine Member From: Los Angeles CA USA
|
posted 12 December 2006 09:09 PM
profile
Just a couple of corrections: equal temperament was understood well before the time of J.S.Bach, but did not become standard until long after his death. WTC was not written for equal temperament. Standard pitch 200 years ago was about a half step lower than it is today, based on playing old instruments. So Bach would have said that the old Egyptian flute was in Db major or Bb minor. |
David Mason Member From: Cambridge, MD, USA
|
posted 13 December 2006 01:54 AM
profile
I wonder how horn players got so wierd & misguided, i.e. Bb, Eb and all. All that transposing seems so complicated, fortunately now we have machines to do it - soon, we'll not ever even have to think again! |
Alan James Member From: San Francisco, CA, USA
|
posted 13 December 2006 04:46 AM
profile
And this enlightening post will help make us better steel players how?? |
Gary Rue Member From: Maryland, USA
|
posted 13 December 2006 05:25 AM
profile
MAKES ME WONDER HOW ANYONE CAN CLAIM PERFECT PITCH!------------------
|
chas smith Member From: Encino, CA, USA
|
posted 13 December 2006 10:17 AM
profile
Equal temperament was known by the Chinese 3000 years ago and rejected because it sounded out of tune. There was also a 19-tone equal temperament, in western music, from the 16th century. quote: Unfortunately Equal Temperament has never worked well on string instruments
The only time an orchestra or choir plays or sings in equal temperament is when there is a piano involved. The rest of the time, they're in Just."The ancients referred to MODES" And our understanding of modes was a misinterpretation of the original Greek modes, which, personally, I think worked out pretty good, if you're limited to 12-tone tuning systems. quote: "The black notes create the Eb scale"
The black notes create a pentatonic scale. quote: if you take a length of string and tune it to C, then you take two thirds of that length you end up with G. If you keep taking 2/3 you will work your way round all the notes, getting back to C a few octaves higher.
It's called mean tone tuning and when it gets back to C, the difference is usually thought to be, 81:80, also known as the Comma Dydamus. |
Mark Trzepacz Member From: Hamburg, New York USA
|
posted 13 December 2006 10:23 AM
profile
quote: I wonder how horn players got so wierd & misguided, i.e. Bb, Eb and all. All that transposing seems so complicated, fortunately now we have machines to do it - soon, we'll not ever even have to think again!
David, since you've mentioned it, the transposition of certain instruments has always been puzzeling to me. I've been playing trumpet (a Bb instrument) for almost 35 years now. For those who don't know, for example, when a piano plays a Bb, I have to play my C in order to match the piano's note. Therefore, trumpet music is written one step higher then piano music. What has always puzzled me is why, way back when they invented the trumpet, didn't they just say that the note played on the trumpet that matched the piano, just carry the same name? In otherwords, when a piano plays a Bb, and the trumpet plays the same matching note, why didn't they just call it a Bb on trumpet as well? The same applies to any other transposed instrument. I have yet to have anyone give me an reasonable explanation for this. As far as to what any of Alans' original post has to do with us becoming better steel players(?)...ANY extra musical knowledge, historic or theoretical, never hurts! ------------------ Sho-Bud LDG, Gretsch Syncromatic Lap Steel, Fender Steel King amp, Bach Stradivarious 37 Trumpet, Getzen Eterna Flugelhorn, Fender Precision Bass (pre-CBS)
[This message was edited by Mark Trzepacz on 13 December 2006 at 10:25 AM.] |
John McGann Member From: Boston, Massachusetts, USA
|
posted 13 December 2006 10:40 AM
profile
quote: "It's one louder"-
Nigel Tufnel |
Nathan Delacretaz Member From: Austin, Texas, USA
|
posted 13 December 2006 11:09 AM
profile
John McGann - thank you for mentioning Nigel Tufnel - that made my day! |
David Doggett Member From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 13 December 2006 12:02 PM
profile
Mark, I'm not sure the horn keys were so wierd when the horns were first invented. I have never seen this speculation confirmed, but I think the Bb instruments were originally in C, and the Ebs in F (being an interval of a fourth apart, there was no conflict between equal temper and just intonation). But over the years orchestras drifted up in their reference pitches. For the strings, this was just a matter of tuning the strings a little higher, maybe even going to different gauges. But because of the manufacturing processes, the horns were locked into their original sizes, unless one wanted to go to the expense of retooling all the molds and dies. Rather than do that, the horns just all moved up a step in the written music. This allowed horn players to play a step higher without learning to match different fingering to the written notes. But this is just my speculation. And it doesn't explain why flutes are in the key of C. Did they retool the manufacturing of flutes at some point but not other horns? In the '20s and '30s they made C melody tenor saxes, so amateurs could easily read off of popular piano sheet music. But the saxes were all of amateur quality and didn't catch on with pros. If anyone knows the real story on the horn keys, I'd love to hear it. |
Aled Rhys Jones Member From: Cambridge, MA
|
posted 13 December 2006 01:10 PM
profile
D minor, of course, is the saddest of all keys.The B flat trumpet is widely accepted over a C trumpet (as are the B flat/Eflat saxes over the C melody) because players prefer the sound/tuning/feel/juju of those particular overtone series, and there is the traditional aspect also. Oops, this is the pedal steel section. |
David Doggett Member From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 13 December 2006 04:18 PM
profile
Well, sure a horn a step lower is going to sound beefier. But then maybe a horn two steps lower would sound even better. But we don't have any Ab trumpets or tenor saxes. I can't buy that there is anything truly unique about the overtones of Bb and Eb instruments. So I'm gonna say it's tradition, and because all the music is written in Bb and Eb for those horns. Either that or the juju. Can't argue with juju. |
Alan F. Brookes Member From: Brummy living in California, USA
|
posted 13 December 2006 05:33 PM
profile
Someone asked what was the relevance, but to the steel guitarist it has a lot of relevance.Tests with opera singers showed that when made to sing without accompaniment, most sang in a natural (just) scale. The steel guitar has no frets to hold it back, so if you play on your own you are likely to revert to a natural scale without knowing it. This throws you out compared with the rest of the band. |
Pat Kelly Member From: Wentworthville, New South Wales, Australia
|
posted 13 December 2006 08:00 PM
profile
Of course this subject has been discussed ad nauseam. However for those new to the topic this would be a nice starting point. Acknowledgements to Ed Packard.Pat K[This message was edited by Pat Kelly on 13 December 2006 at 08:00 PM.] |
David Doggett Member From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 13 December 2006 10:03 PM
profile
The natural (just) scale has more juju. |
ed packard Member From: Show Low AZ
|
posted 14 December 2006 07:25 AM
profile
Pat...you shouldn't be reading that stuff...you should be playing your PSG!!! Someday I might correct that blurb.In another thread someone used the old saw = "a little knowledge is a dangerous thing"...I would add that less knowledge is more dangerous still...the more you know, the more you can do.[This message was edited by ed packard on 14 December 2006 at 10:15 AM.] |