Author
|
Topic: I don't believe it! Peavey did it!
|
BobbeSeymour Member From: Hendersonville TN USA
|
posted 27 August 2003 07:45 PM
profile
, , A truly good amp, service, weight, price, and most of all great tone! [This message was edited by BobbeSeymour on 01 September 2003 at 02:02 PM.] |
b0b Sysop From: Cloverdale, California, USA
|
posted 27 August 2003 08:04 PM
profile
moved to Electronics section |
BobbeSeymour Member From: Hendersonville TN USA
|
posted 28 August 2003 07:49 AM
profile
We will have more to report on this amp soon as we are doing a lot of research on it at this moment, but it looks like the amp that is going to be the monster of all time. |
Earnest Bovine Member From: Los Angeles CA USA
|
posted 28 August 2003 08:16 AM
profile
quote: it looks like the amp that is going to be the monster of all time.
Even bigger than a 12-string Franklin guitar?
|
BobbeSeymour Member From: Hendersonville TN USA
|
posted 28 August 2003 12:00 PM
profile
I don't know if it will be "bigger" or not but it will make a Franklin sound pretty cotton pickin' good, as good as anything will. (I did get the humor here though Earnest). [This message was edited by BobbeSeymour on 28 August 2003 at 12:01 PM.] |
Steven Welborn Member From: Ojai,CA USA
|
posted 28 August 2003 12:13 PM
profile
Bobbe, a couple questions:I got the big amp covered (Webb614-E) And the smaller amp...Peavey's answer to the fender twin tube(Classic 50/212) I love both these amps. 1. Does this mean I have to buy another amp now? 2. the 112 has a blue Marvel 12" right. Must be a pretty dam good speaker then. Should be no need to uprade then from the TWO BM's that come with the Classic 50 then. 3. The Standels were a solid state and had there own unique "classic" sound still desired by some like BE. Specially with a Bigsby or maybe a p/p right? 4. How much are they? [This message was edited by Steven Welborn on 28 August 2003 at 12:15 PM.] |
Loren Morehouse Member From: Meadowlands, MN USA
|
posted 28 August 2003 01:25 PM
profile
For me, this amp sounds too damn good to monkey with!! I don't need no Black Widow, it sounds great just the way it is!! Peavey did good!! Loren. |
Joey Ace Sysop From: Southern Ontario, Canada
|
posted 28 August 2003 02:24 PM
profile
The definition of the ELECTRONICS section is quote: "Steel guitar amplifiers, effects, recording, etc."
These definitions are found Here. Keeping topics in the proper section is important to future search engine use. |
Steven Welborn Member From: Ojai,CA USA
|
posted 28 August 2003 02:37 PM
profile
? for mike Brown if your there...Is the 12" BM in the N112 a different version than the BM's in the Classic 50/212? Thanks. |
Eric West Member From: Portland, Oregon, USA
|
posted 28 August 2003 05:39 PM
profile
Bobbe.I need to know some real facts here as it's gonna be "time" here pretty soon I find that for performing live the Nashville 400 is all I need. It does have some small failings and like my Session 500, from 1979, it's getting bush whipped. Neither one has missed a stroke for more than ten years. I always play them til the heat sinks are hard to touch and they are always right there. OK/ How does it stack up to the Nshv400 power wise? Does it clip at outdoor levels? Does it have a Low Z line out for PAs? Is the reverb deeper than the 400? Is that Blue 12" speaker as heavy sounding as the BWs?IS a BW an option? What I'd like to do is just a 112 for most medioum club gigs. If it indeed does stack up in dou with my Nvl400, I'd use it in dou. The Session5 with the Biamp capability is always an option, but damn, it's really hard to lug. There aren't many places I can't cover with the 400/500 combo, but would like to see about a smaller duo. Thanks. I doubt SHowcase in town here has one, and I don't like doing business with them anyhow. if 599 is MSRP, could we expect 450 to be a good price? THanks for any answers. Tired out tonite ... EJL |
Kenny Foy Member From: Lynnville, KY, USA
|
posted 28 August 2003 06:45 PM
profile
How many watts from this amp Bobbe? |
BobbeSeymour Member From: Hendersonville TN USA
|
posted 28 August 2003 08:20 PM
profile
What else can be said, I love them and I am recording with them. Used two of them Sat. night on a loud job, great! [This message was edited by BobbeSeymour on 28 August 2003 at 08:39 PM.] [This message was edited by BobbeSeymour on 01 September 2003 at 02:05 PM.] |
BobbeSeymour Member From: Hendersonville TN USA
|
posted 28 August 2003 08:35 PM
profile
Kenny Foy, It's rated at 80 watts, according to the factory, [This message was edited by BobbeSeymour on 28 August 2003 at 08:35 PM.] [This message was edited by BobbeSeymour on 01 September 2003 at 02:06 PM.] |
Mike Perlowin Member From: Los Angeles CA
|
posted 29 August 2003 08:59 PM
profile
What do they weigh? |
BobbeSeymour Member From: Hendersonville TN USA
|
posted 30 August 2003 09:01 AM
profile
39 lbs. (at sea level, on a standard day) |
Joey Ace Sysop From: Southern Ontario, Canada
|
posted 30 August 2003 10:21 AM
profile
I use a Peavey EDI for direct out of a Nash 400.It sounds like it's built into this new amp. Is that correct? |
BobbeSeymour Member From: Hendersonville TN USA
|
posted 01 September 2003 02:01 PM
profile
Joey, Yes, it does, My new Christmas CD will be recorded with one, and I usually go direct. My 112 is in the studio now. Do I love it? What do ytou think. Try one Joey, you'll love it. This is all I'm saying on this subject.[This message was edited by BobbeSeymour on 01 September 2003 at 02:08 PM.] |