Author
|
Topic: Ideas?
|
Mike Brown Member From: Meridian, Mississippi USA
|
posted 22 February 2006 02:31 PM
profile
Mike Brown Member From: Meridian, Mississippi USA posted 22 February 2006 02:29 PM profile send email edit -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hartley Peavey and I frequently discuss what subjects are generated on this forum and we are very interested in what you want to see in a steel amplifier. How much power? What features? How should it be voiced, etc.? We already know that it should be lightweight. We know that a 15" speaker used to be known as the "holy grail" for steel guitar applications. But, we also know that players have overwhelmingly approved the use of the 12" speaker that is used in the Nashville 112 amplifier. So, that tells us that there may be some other myths that can be proven false. What we would like to know is what other features do you suggest that we include in a future amp? Any reasonable thoughts and suggestions can be taken into consideration for future projects so dream away, but don't get carried away. But, we do wish to hear from you. If you wish to send me a personal e-mail, my address is mikebrown@peavey.com Don't think that your ideas or suggestions are unreasonable. Fire away! Mike Brown Peavey Electronics Corporation |
Steve Hitsman Member From: Waterloo, IL
|
posted 22 February 2006 02:44 PM
profile
Tubes. |
Jim Cohen Member From: Philadelphia, PA
|
posted 22 February 2006 02:47 PM
profile
How about building in a strobe tuner somewhere? (Of course, when the amp is set back behind you, it won't help much, but I'll let you figure that out, I'm too busy dreaming...)Or... how about built in tilt-back legs so I don't need to carry a separate amp stand?[This message was edited by Jim Cohen on 22 February 2006 at 02:48 PM.] |
Gary Steele Member From: Orient, Ohio, USA
|
posted 22 February 2006 02:54 PM
profile
Jim, Just get a big spot mirror like the ones on the big trucks. I used to drive the big ones. Just a little humor!! |
Jerry Roller Member From: Van Buren, Arkansas USA
|
posted 22 February 2006 03:00 PM
profile
Mike, the Nashville 112 is very good just the way it is. The only thing I would have changed on it would be to add a ground reversing switch. Jerry |
Joey Ace Sysop From: Southern Ontario, Canada
|
posted 22 February 2006 03:05 PM
profile
Line out; tuner out with mute switch; two channels (switchable with different EQ).Thanks for asking. |
Marlin Smoot Member From: Atlanta,Georgia, USA
|
posted 22 February 2006 03:10 PM
profile
Re-Issue the Session 400 and the LTD (Chrome knob)with 15's. Tube versions as an option would also be very cool. Built in SM-57 behind the grill. Offer a few custom colors too, like White, Blonde, Red, Green, Blue...maybe even offer in custon color Mica. Make an option where the amp top part can come off for recording sessions with direct recording outputs. XLR & 1/4 outputs. Add a matching extension power cabinet for stereo. Offer a built-in SM-57 and 1/4 & XLR outs too. Offer Brads Steel Guitar Black Box installed but able to switch on and off. Offer the Mod kit also able to switch off and on. Tilt Legs would be cool or something like that to tilt the amp but not on the outside, make them on the inside to hide them and keep the classic look. Make sure it has the old style chrome knobs and don't make it look goofy with fake snake skin coverings. Offer a matching Road Case. Thanks for reading. |
John Cox Member From: Bryan, Texas, USA
|
posted 22 February 2006 03:27 PM
profile
The two things that would do it for me, built in tuner and delay of some sort. J.C. |
Skip Edwards Member From: LA,CA
|
posted 22 February 2006 03:39 PM
profile
That clip-on remote control that came with the Session 500 was a nice touch. Maybe something like that again... it could control EQ, or FX, or maybe the whole shebang could be programmable?How about a one-space rack mount stereo amp ...lightweight, of course, and speaker cabs tuned for steel...with a choice of either 12" or 15" spkrs, and open or closed backs. [This message was edited by Skip Edwards on 22 February 2006 at 03:45 PM.] |
Bryan Knox Member From: Gardendale, Alabama...Ya'll come
|
posted 22 February 2006 03:53 PM
profile
I'm with Skip on the rack mount idea. Buy that man a coke. bigB ------------------ Prevent Juvenile delinquecy...teach children to STEELMr. DJ, can you please play a real country song? - Dale Watson
[This message was edited by Bryan Knox on 22 February 2006 at 03:54 PM.]
|
Keith Cordell Member From: Atlanta
|
posted 22 February 2006 04:09 PM
profile
A Session 400 in a smaller chassis, or in Head form, and with a tube power section! |
George Macdonald Member From: Lantzville, BC, Canada
|
posted 22 February 2006 04:13 PM
profile
Charge $25.00 dollars more and include a cover. I'm still waiting for one I ordered [and paid for]on Jan. 6th. George |
Ben Jones Member From: Washington, USA
|
posted 22 February 2006 04:16 PM
profile
lightweight, all tube 100 watt amp head with reverb and nothing else, voiced for steel NO GAIN, lotsa headroom, for under $400. Like that new jcm800 clone peavy rock head, cept for steel If you cant do an all tube power section how bout a built in tube pre? Slap a black box type thing in there? In general: I like things that do ONE thing well rather than 100 things poorly. |
Jerry Van Hoose Member From:
|
posted 22 February 2006 04:17 PM
profile
How about an amp with a empty single rack space for the effect or preamp of choice such as the new Dual Deltafex, Lexicon, etc? ....or.... a Nashville 112 or 1000 with added delay? |
Michael Barone Member From: Downingtown, Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 22 February 2006 04:32 PM
profile
Make an input channel with much higher input impedance, and increase the impedance of the Pre-EQ Patch return. Like on a NV112, from 220K to about 500K or higher.Mike |
Mark Metdker Member From: North Central Texas, USA
|
posted 22 February 2006 04:58 PM
profile
Thanks Mike for giving us this opportunity to do this.I'll give you my wish list. First off, I love the size and weight of the NV112, so it would be great to keep that approximate size. Next, The main effects I use are Reverb and delay. But it would very very cool if several effects were built into the amp, not unlike some of the new Line 6 amps. It would be really cool if we could preset different settings and use a remote switch (either footswitch or something that could attach to a steel leg) to change our sound on the fly. This would all but do away with rack stuff, and stomp boxes. Flange, delay, reverb, chorus, leslie....on and on, you get the idea. That would be about the only amp that could replace my NV112 and RV-3 setup. Small, loud and versatile with great tone.....should be easy, right! ------------------ Zum U-12 w/True Tone pickup thru a Nashville 112 Strats thru a VHT Super 30 http://community.webshots.com/album/176544894AuXSmi jonchristopherdavis.com www.lonestarattitude.net |
Mark Edwards Member From: Weatherford,Texas, USA
|
posted 22 February 2006 05:06 PM
profile
I like the idea of a built in tuner also, how bout preset amp controls, just dial in what you want or use a card. You could have the Lloyd Green, or Buddy Emmons or whoever on a card or chip or preset your own, no more knobs. Thanx Mike for the oportunity to let us dream. |
Roger Francis Member From: Indiana, USA
|
posted 22 February 2006 05:23 PM
profile
I like the 112 just the way it is except the knobs need a little more protection and come with a cover. |
Don LaCourse Member From: Spring Hill, FL, USA
|
posted 22 February 2006 05:53 PM
profile
an updated tube fex with cache card and like newman settings with a px300 cab.im using a profex and a px300 with my sho-bud pro three and it sounds real good, DON. |
Paddy Long Member From: Christchurch, New Zealand
|
posted 22 February 2006 05:59 PM
profile
Yeah the consensus seems to be for a small Profex II type effects processor built into the N112 with a tuner, and remote controller which displays the effects and the tuner, which attaches to the leg of the steel!! And the amp should have balanced outputs for DI and studio applications.Thanks for the opportunity for some input Mike - bewdy.[This message was edited by Paddy Long on 22 February 2006 at 08:06 PM.] |
Chris LeDrew Member From: Newfoundland, Canada
|
posted 22 February 2006 06:23 PM
profile
A 112 with tubes and a nice, classic look to it - maybe a silver grill cloth with a funky script logo and chrome knobs. It could be the new vintage style steel amp that has lots of guts as well as aesthetic appeal. |
Bill Moran Member From: Marion, Virginia, USA
|
posted 22 February 2006 06:35 PM
profile
Re issue the Vegas 400. If only on special order I think it would sell. In my opinion, I have never had a better steel amp. I have owned the Nashville,Session 400, Session 500, as well as other brands. I wish I had never sold my Vegas. Bill |
Jim Peters Member From: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
|
posted 22 February 2006 06:43 PM
profile
I use mine just like it is, but if your askin...Double the headroom and build in effects. Even the cheapeast practice amps have effects. Better knob protection. Thanks, JimP |
Michael Hartz Member From: Decorah, Iowa, USA
|
posted 22 February 2006 06:45 PM
profile
Modeling seems to be the thing anymore. Lots of players like myself are using Line 6 products(Pod,PodXT).How about designing a modeling amp with a 15" speaker that models classic Peavey steel amps like the old session 400, LTD 400, and even current amps such as the Nashville 400, Vegas 400, Session 500, Nashville 1000, and Nashville 112. You could even model other amps like the Shobud, Webb, Randall Steelman, Evans, and others. Put XLR direct outs on it, a host of modeled effects, and an optional extension cab for stereo. I should stop now, I'm starting to drool over the keyboard. |
Al Terhune Member From: Newcastle, WA
|
posted 22 February 2006 07:17 PM
profile
Include a cover. I'm such a Peavey fanatic, but to not include a slip cover to protect it from rain going to and from gigs or the studio is like selling a guitar with no case. Protect the knobs better. Both of these have been said, but I second and third them. I'm not into effects, and I don't want to turn my neck back to tune from a built-in tuner, so adding them would take me off the list to pay extra for an amp that had them. You know, the 112 is about perfect (except protecting the knobs and including a cover). Al |
Eric West Member From: Portland, Oregon, USA
|
posted 22 February 2006 07:51 PM
profile
Eliminate top venting of the Nvl 112, replaced with two convective channels inside the cabinet, or merely vents under the chassis, vented to the outside through the sides. The top vent catched any falling particles, or liquids way too easily.If nothing else, on the 112, make the knobs a trifle shorter, as they get bent and broken easily. Eliminate the inset relief of the top of the 112 further protecting them. Totally can the spring reverb, replacing it with digital models, and a couple different digital delays.
All the XLR and line plugs are GREAT ideas and features. So is the DDT comp. Keep it up Mike. Any ideas you pass on from here are worth much more than they are paying you for them. EJL |
Jim Whitaker Member From: Hamilton, Ohio, USA
|
posted 22 February 2006 09:28 PM
profile
I would like to see this 112 amp in a two channel model so it could be used for a steel & six string.(That would be my main improvement) I like the idea of tilt back legs & also all the xlr & tuner inputs. The ground switch would be handy at times. I also think this reverb is better than my nashville 400 but still a couple of steps down from the classic twin sounding reverb. Something close to that sound would be great!!! One more is maybe adding a few more watts with impedence change on the speaker so maybe another extension cabinet could be added. Sometimes the xtra cabinet is preferable over a few more watts.Mike I think peavey is doing a great service to the steel guitar. In my honest opinion this little amp is a great addition to the peavey stable of great STEEL amps.
------------------ JIM "Zum SD10 3/6 """ "74" LTD & mashville112, Pod xt, BB , Nasville 400, Profex II "53" Esquire, "63 Epiphone, "63" Precision, "77" Jazz |
Jerry Erickson Member From: Atlanta,IL 61723
|
posted 22 February 2006 09:45 PM
profile
I'd vote for a simple digital reverb. Just a knob for reverb level and maybe one for decay/reverb time. |
Robby Springfield Member From: Viola, AR, USA
|
posted 22 February 2006 10:03 PM
profile
Tubes, tubes, and more tubes. I love the idea of doing away with the spring verb and going high quality digital with the remote. Whoever came up with the idea to ask the players should have a pay raise...thanks Mike. |
Boo Bernstein Member From: Los Angeles, CA
|
posted 22 February 2006 10:15 PM
profile
Mike, let me preface this by saying I love the sound of the 112! IMHO I think a tube pre-amp would be a no-brainer -- the same power as a Peavey steel amp with a tube pre-amp would be killer. I also like the idea of a tuner out with a mute switch. Thanks, Boo |
Jack Francis Member From: Mesa, Arizona, USA
|
posted 22 February 2006 10:35 PM
profile
Nice thought of asking here for input...How about a head and cab version of the Nv112.Then we would have the option of using a 15" or 12" in a cab. Since you asked LOSE that logo! I just purchased a 100W Valveking head, and the first thing I did was pull the logo off and replaced it with my band logo, w/the wings it looks kinda cool. By the way, I play a lot of classic rock on 6 string and the amp is voiced just right, nice clean channel and a very nice distortion channel that can be kept nice and smooth..also reasonably priced....GOOD JOB! [This message was edited by Jack Francis on 22 February 2006 at 10:40 PM.] |
Jim Phelps Member From: just out of Mexico City
|
posted 22 February 2006 11:10 PM
profile
I confess I haven't got a Peavey amp and therefore can't offer any good ideas for improvement, but I wanted anyway to commend Mike Brown and Hartley Peavey. I've never seen any other company openly ask for ideas to improve their products and I suspect they would not have asked if they sincerely didn't want our input (no pun intended!) on their amps. That's very impressive. Thanks. |
Billy Murdoch Member From: Glasgow, Scotland, U.K.
|
posted 23 February 2006 12:25 AM
profile
Hi Mike, Thanks for the opportunity to offer suggestions.This proves beyond a doubt that Peavey really do care about their customers. I have over the years owned 5 or 6 peavey amps. The worst thing I ever did was to sell mt Vegas.the best thing I ever did was to buy a Nash 112. I use a little delay only and am quite satisfied with the sound of the amp,I cannot however get a good sound for my (Peavey)six stringer and have to use a different amp.I would welcome a modified version which allows both guitars to be played thru' the amp. Keep up the good work Mike we all appreciate your efforts. I look forward to seeing you in Dallas. Best regards Billy |
James Stewart Jr Member From: St. Clair Shores, Michigan, USA
|
posted 23 February 2006 12:59 AM
profile
Mike ----As a lot of people said -TUBES !!!! Bring out an amp for steel but keep it light,stick with the 15 inch speaker (if you can) but ---I'll tell you what ----- TUBES give a very warm and rich sound. But then again in as much as the people rave about the Nashville 112-- Tweek that up to a tube amp. A lot of us diehards prefer the analog--tube sound from the 60's. PLEASE CONSIDER ------and I'll buy the first one off the production line.... Thanks !!!! James Stewart Jr Then you will have a true winner. ------------------ 1975 Sho~Bud Pro III Custom (8-7) 1981 Peavey Session 500
[This message was edited by James Stewart Jr on 23 February 2006 at 01:09 AM.]
|
Roger Rettig Member From: NAPLES, FL
|
posted 23 February 2006 03:34 AM
profile
Tilt-back legs, please (and maybe you could make them available as a retro-fit item).Otherwise, I love the amp as it is - the headphone option is super, and that XLR 'out' has been an absolute boon for my theatre work. Thanks for asking us what we want!!! RR |
Ian Finlay Member From: Kenton, UK
|
posted 23 February 2006 03:55 AM
profile
Built in wheels and an extendable handle, so it becomes its own cart. Tilt legs. A wide dispersion speaker so it doesn't just fire forwards (like I feel a Twin does). Metal grill e. Bungee hooks on the side so I can strap an accessories case on the top when loading/unloading. Controls with click detents so I can easily reproduce settings. Agree on the guitar channel, and built in Tubefex. Headphone socket (really). Proper balanced DI output with speaker simulator with a dual jack/XLR socket.Euro version!!! And no more than $100 please Ian |
David Mason Member From: Cambridge, MD, USA
|
posted 23 February 2006 03:59 AM
profile
How hard is it on a two-channel amp to run both channels back into the power amp with reverb on one channel only? I very much like to keep my time delay functions like reverb and chorus separate from my overdrive functions, as do most rock guitarists who now run multiple amps to do so. This also lets you run a clean signal to mix with your modeled or overdriven signal. I am now forced to go to a rack, or multiple amps, even though everything within a single amp is right there, it just doesn't have enough connective options. Thank you for your question, too - yor level of attention to customers is unmatched. Maybe you guys need to start making cars, too, I'm about due.... |
Bill Ferguson Member From: Norcross, GA USA
|
posted 23 February 2006 04:21 AM
profile
Well Mike, I responded yesterday in Tommy Butler's post. I did not know you had started a new thread also. So here's what I wrote yesterday "Well Mike, Personally I don't think you could do much to improve over the NV112. I have 2 NV112's, 2 NV1000's, 1 NV400 w/Peavey Mod and an Evans HV preamp - Lexicon MPX100 - World 1.2 - 2 15" Black Widow Cabinets Rig.I play 2 nights a week, plus outside radio remotes and about 7 steel guitar shows a year. I use the NV112 (sometimes 1, sometimes 2) almost exclusively. My band likes my sound better with the 112's and they cut right through all the other instruments that seem to muddy a steels sound on stage. You know that I am one to shoot straight from the hip (I've sure done it with you many times). So please take everything I say as a compliment for this, what I think, is the best amp Peavey makes. Now just talk Hartley into handling covers again. hehe Bill Ferguson"
|
John Daugherty Member From: Rolla, Missouri, USA
|
posted 23 February 2006 04:48 AM
profile
I would like to have all controls where I can reach them. This suggests a separate head and speaker or a remote control box. I now use a rack on the floor,on my right side. It contains an FX unit and a tuner. Since we have different preferences for FX units, adding FX to the amp may not be a good selling point. To get around this,It might be feasible to mount a light weight amp(switching pwr sup)in the speaker box. Then offer the preamp/EQ in a rackmount case. It would be about the size of the profex. If I had this coniguration, I could mount the amp control head,FX unit and tuner in a 3 space rack. All controls would be at my fingertips. ........... JD ------------------ www.home.earthlink.net/~johnd37
|
Larry Behm Member From: Oregon City, Oregon
|
posted 23 February 2006 05:01 AM
profile
Mike make this new amp in a head only option. Many players like to have their controls next to them and their speaker behind them. Some players like two speakers, one speaker, a 12 or a 15 etc etc, they have options here too.Put your efforts into the pre amp/power amp, leave the effects and tuners to other external units. This keeps the cost of the amp down and the quality of the amp up. Thanks for asking, this is why PV has been the steel amp leader for 30 years, they cared enough. Larry Behm |