Author
|
Topic: Pro Reverb with a '15?
|
Al Moss Member From: Kent,OH,USA
|
posted 16 August 2006 06:39 AM
profile
-been thinkin about taking the plunge on a Pro Reverb as a nice tube amp for steel and saw an early 70's one on the web that has been fitted with a Weber Cali '15. I usually don't play loud enough to get a Twin to start to open up and thought that the lower wattage of the Pro might work well and the '15 may get a little sweeter/deeper in the mids and lows. Any thoughts? I suupose an amp of that vintage could be Blackfaced and that may soften the tone a bit too. |
David Doggett Member From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 16 August 2006 08:24 AM
profile
I have a silver-face Pro Reverb that I put a 4 ohm 15" JBL D130F in. It sounds just like a Twin with a 15, but not as loud. I mostly use it for practice at home, but have occassionally used it when I knew I was going to mic the amp on stage. It's a great sounding tube steel amp. It is about 15lbs lighter than a Twin; but at 60 lbs. it is still a pretty heavy amp.------------------ Student of the Steel: Zum uni, Fender tube amps, squareneck and roundneck resos, tenor sax, keyboards |
Dave Zirbel Member From: Sebastopol, CA USA
|
posted 16 August 2006 08:29 AM
profile
I say go for it if you're getting it at a fair price. I've recently started using smaller wattage Fender amps, like a Deluxe reverb with a JBL and a Super Reverb head powering a JBL 15". I used the Deluxe on a huge stage in SF the other night and it sounded great through the PA.DZ |
Donny Hinson Member From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.
|
posted 16 August 2006 08:44 AM
profile
I think the Weber "Michigan" series speaker is much better suited to steel. The "California" is rather flat sounding, IMHO, and doesn't have a lot of bottom-end response. It also isn't as efficient as the Michigan, so you lose a little volume, too, and that can be significant in a lower powered amp like the Pro. The ceramic Michigan speaker is the closest thing out there to the old EV SRO and EVM series speakers, which are my all-time favorites![This message was edited by Donny Hinson on 16 August 2006 at 08:45 AM.] |
Al Moss Member From: Kent,OH,USA
|
posted 16 August 2006 11:52 AM
profile
Thanks you guys, as usual, very useful info.. The amp that I've come across is a '74 and is priced at about $800. -seems to be in the ballpark for a 70's stock amp, but, with the '15 it gets a bit weird insofar as it's been reworked and so forth. Tubes are labeled Westinghouse, so they're either old or else NOS ? Apparently no pops or crackles, unsure of when or if filter cap changes have been made or of the other likely suspects that may need maintenance. -dunno if that's a decent price or not. |
John Billings Member From: Northfield Center, Ohio, USA
|
posted 16 August 2006 12:42 PM
profile
Al, I used a blackface Pro with a JBL when I lived in Milwaukee. It sounded GREAT as long as you didn't push it to hard, How different is a Pro Reverb from my 64 Vibroverb? |
Ken Fox Member From: Ray City, GA USA
|
posted 16 August 2006 01:01 PM
profile
A Vibroverb, Super Reverb, Bandmaster Reverb and Pro Reverb are almost identical amps, schematically. The output transformers are the big difference in them. The Pro Reverb and Bandmaster Reverb had the same 4 ohm output transformer (125A6A), very small unit! The Vibroverb had an 8 output transformer, 125A7A The Super Reverb had a massive piece of iron, the 125A9A output transformer at 2 ohms. Also where a Super Reverb and Bandmaster have a middle control the Vibrobverb and Pro Reverb did not. It is set with a fixed value resistor, 6.8K. If I had a Pro Reverb with an 8 ohm-15: speaker I would use the output transformer from a Twin Reverb! Been there and done it on several of the Vibroverb clones I built! The Twin transformer is a perfect impedance match for 2-6L6GC tubes and one 8 ohm speaker. If using the original 4 ohm trasnformer, I would go with a 4 ohm speaker, such as a Black Widow 1501-4SB or the new Eminence Commonwealth 15" speaker. |
Chick Donner Member From: North Ridgeville, OH USA
|
posted 16 August 2006 02:10 PM
profile
Al, I started sityh a PRO in 1967, and they dont have the power for steel. Thass why I went to 2 Twins, and then solid state., |
David Doggett Member From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 16 August 2006 04:13 PM
profile
I would hope that the Weber California 15 that is in the amp is a 4 ohm to match it. If not, listen to Ken, and get something that matches, or change the transformer. As far as loudness and clean headroom, there is a wide range in Pros from differnt eras. The blackface Pros of the '60s were only about 40 watts, and weren't clean past about mid volume. The early silverfaces (which a '74 would be) were about 50 watts, and clean most of the way to the top. The late silverfaces (like mine) are about 70 watts, and with the ultralinear transformer they are clean all the way to the top. These later ones have about as much clean headroom as a blackface Twin or a reissue Twin (which is more or less a pc-board copy of the blackface Twin). When Ken said the Pro has no mid, I'm not sure what he was talking about - maybe something internal. All the blackface and silverface Pros I have seen have tone controls just like a Twin, including a mid control. ------------------ Student of the Steel: Zum uni, Fender tube amps, squareneck and roundneck resos, tenor sax, keyboards[This message was edited by David Doggett on 16 August 2006 at 04:15 PM.]
|
Stephen Gambrell Member From: Ware Shoals, South Carolina, USA
|
posted 16 August 2006 04:26 PM
profile
I played a gig this past weekend, with Vern Hester, who used a Pro with a JBL D 130. Sounded GREAT! |
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 16 August 2006 07:44 PM
profile
Two quick notes:If you want to "soften" a Pro Reverb with a 15, use a 5751 tube in the V2 slot AND dump the JBL in a lake. A Weber California with a paper dust cap is better IMO - there may be other choices. Call Ted Weber and ask. Also, a common mod is to sub a Bassman output transformer - it doesn't make the amp "harder" sounding, but tightens the lows a bit and gives it much more midrange punch. Very, very common. And yes - one speaker should be 8 ohms when you pull two tubes in a Twin..but it should be 4 ohms in a Pro Reverb. "How different is a Pro Reverb from my 64 Vibroverb?" John, as Ken said the OT is the primary difference - if it's an original '64. If it's the '64 Vibroverb Custom (a newer amp...I have one) there are a ton of differences, as they went a little "SRV" crazy on it - but in stock tube rectifier mode, and with good tubes it's VERY close to the old one (which I had...don't even want to think about what I sold it for...AARRGGHH...) |
Bill Hatcher Member From: Atlanta Ga. USA
|
posted 17 August 2006 03:36 AM
profile
Jim. Please "dump" the JBL into my lake. |
Al Moss Member From: Kent,OH,USA
|
posted 17 August 2006 07:47 AM
profile
Interesting. I'm seeing some specs on the Bassman Output Transformer as a 50watt, multiple ( 2, 4, or 8) ohm transformer. And, as suggested above, a common upgrade for the Pro. Is this an increase in overall wattage and headroom (as well as a tighter bottom end and fatter mids)? |
Mike Vallandigham Member From: Concord, CA
|
posted 17 August 2006 09:45 AM
profile
I have a '80 or so Vibrosonic Reverb, I replaced the speaker that was in it (I thin it was an EV or something..it was sounding farty) with a Weber Cali 15 w/ an aluminum cap. I think it sounds great, much better then the speaker that was in there. Now that it's broken in and I'm better at setting the controls, I've got it sounding killer. Bummer thing is that by grill rattles, and I cantr seem to fix it, short of driving a few screws thru it into the cabinet (I cant do that...) Anyone have any ideas on how to quell a grille frame rattle? |
Ken Fox Member From: Ray City, GA USA
|
posted 17 August 2006 09:45 AM
profile
The Vibroverb was the one with no mid control. Also the Twin Reverb OT has more iron and can handle more wattage. That is what was used in SRV amps with an EVM15L, he ditched the JBL. A Bassman O.T. is a good choice as well, with the multiple taps. There is another OT used in the Dual Professional and Tonemaster amps with multiple taps:
13. FENDER TONE-MASTER CUSTOM SHOP "OUTPUT TRANSFORMER 100W FOR 4/8/16 OHMS", FOR AMPS WITH FOUR 6L6 OUTPUT TUBES, STANDARD UPRIGHT END BELL TYPE, 3.5" BY 2.625" MOUNTING CENTERS. SECONDARY COLOR CODE (4 WIRES): BLACK IS COMMON, THE GREEN/YELLOW STRIPED WIRE IS THE 4 OHM TAP, THE SOLID GREEN WIRE IS THE 8 OHM TAP, THE SOLID YELLOW WIRE IS THE 16 OHM TAP. PRIMARY COLOR CODE: STANDARD RED CENTER TAP WITH BROWN AND BLUE PLATE LEADS (ALSO THERE ARE ADDITIONAL WHITE AND ORANGE WIRES EXITING FROM THE PRIMARY SIDE HOLE BUT THE TONE-MASTER SCHEMATIC SHOWS NO CONNECTIONs FOR THESE-PERHAPS THIS TRANSFORMER WAS USED IN OTHER HIGH POWER FENDER AMPS?). ONE OF OUR ESTEEMED CUSTOMERS, MARK WHITNEY, WRITES: "...the Tonemaster output transformer was also used earlier in the red knob The Twin. The orange and white pair were for a low level unbalanced XLR out." Our customer ED SMITH WRITES: "Thought I would add one more point on the extra output taps. I nocited the comment from your esteemed customer stating that those taps were used for a balanced output on "The Twin". That's absolutely correct the only thing I would add is the white wire is the "in Phase" signal (pin 2 on an XLR jack) and the Orange wire is the "Out of Phase" signal (pin 3 on an XLR jack). Fender typically left pin 1 open on those. Someone might consider adding a ground lift function dependent on the application. Fender listed that connection as a +3dB level." NICE IRON FOR BUILDING POWERFUL 6L6 AMPS WITH MULTIPLE OUTPUT IMPEDANCES? GENUINE FENDER PART #026478. Here is a web page to a lot more transformer choices for Fender: http://www.angela.com/catalog/guitar-amp-parts/GUITAR_AMP_TRANSFORMER.html
|
Al Moss Member From: Kent,OH,USA
|
posted 17 August 2006 10:07 AM
profile
About the '15 in the amp in this thread... it's a 4ohm Cali ceramic -another question, Speaking of the Bassman Output Transformer, Does a rectifier tube in the circuit affect the substitution to a different transformer? BTW- Thanks for the info. |
Ken Fox Member From: Ray City, GA USA
|
posted 17 August 2006 10:35 AM
profile
The recifier tube has nothing to do with the speaker output transformer. The power transformer would be more concerned with that.[This message was edited by Ken Fox on 17 August 2006 at 10:36 AM.] |