Author
|
Topic: Line 6 POD
|
Danny Bentley Member From: Hendersonville Tn
|
posted 16 August 2006 06:41 AM
profile
I am thinking of trying one of these units, however I see there's a pod 2.0, pro, xt, and xt live. Which unit for steel guitar?Dan Bentley[This message was edited by Danny Bentley on 16 August 2006 at 06:42 AM.] |
Bob Martin Member From: Madison Tn
|
posted 16 August 2006 07:34 AM
profile
Hi Danny, they will work superbly with the steel and they all basicly do the exact same thing. Mainly your wallet will dictate the one you want. A real quick overview of all of them is they have many different digital effects to many to name and they emulate different amps and amp cabs which is real nice in the studio but not so much for live except if you want to use the amp/cab emulations live to plug in thru the board so not to carry any amps or even some use them plugging into their amps.Pod 2 is a basic pod with not all of the presets and cabs and effects of the other 3 but you can buy packages from line 6 and add them if you decide you want them later it also has limited live editing no viewing window but you can still edit the main parameters so no problem and at home you can hook it up to your computer via usb and do what they call deep editing. Pod XT has a few more cabinets and effects and a viewing window so that you can edit it on the fly while playing much easier but it can still be edited on your computer via usb. The Pod XT live is a floor unit and is pretty much a Pod XT on the floor with a few extra presets and effects and cabs and hook up options. It has a volume pedal built in mostly guitar players use it but I've seen steel players put it up on a stand and use it too. The Pod XT Pro is a rack mount it's the big daddy and pretty expensive with every bell and whistle they have to offer. So there are 4 choices ranging from 199.00 to 600.00. If you're into recording the Pod Pro is nice with lots of in and out options for the studio but like I say it's pricey. I think you'll find most steel players either go with the Pod 2 or the Pod xt. If it were me I'd spend the extra 100.00 bucks its 299.00 for the pod xt just for the better editing live because I fiddle with my effects all the time during a gig especially moving from one club to another. Have fun and enjoy it if you get it. Bob |
Jay Ganz Member From: Out Behind The Barn
|
posted 16 August 2006 08:03 AM
profile
I use the PODxt, mainly since it's got whatever I need (which is a bit more that the 2.0 has) and it's smaller than the Pro or Live ones. --------------- |
Jack Stoner Sysop From: Inverness, Florida
|
posted 16 August 2006 08:39 AM
profile
I have the POD XT and it works great. The XT appears to be the one the Steel Guitar players want. The POD is more for guitar, especially rock guitar. The XT pro is a rack model. |
Roger Crawford Member From: Locust Grove, GA USA
|
posted 16 August 2006 09:35 AM
profile
If you get the XT, be sure to get Tommy Dodd's bracket to mount it on the leg of your guitar. Heck, he'll even get you set up with the POD XT !!! |
Rick Johnson Member From: Wheelwright, Ky USA
|
posted 16 August 2006 10:01 AM
profile
Danny I got a PODxt about a year ago myself. I use it to record with and I really like it. Good luck. Rick www.rickjohnsoncabs.com |
Chick Donner Member From: North Ridgeville, OH USA
|
posted 16 August 2006 02:13 PM
profile
I use the PRO XT because I didn't want to lose the 3 wire low impedance outs. Othr than that, the "kidney" pods are the same. |
Dave Mudgett Member From: Central Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 16 August 2006 03:33 PM
profile
I started using a Pod 2 well before the XT came out, but I continue using it because1. With some fiddling around with the presets, I like the Fender Deluxe and Twin Reverb models for steel. 2. I actually prefer it for 6-string guitar. I double on guitar and pedal steel most all the time, again mostly Fender blackface models. 3. It's quite a bit less expensive - I see them for <=$100 used. 4. Especially for live gigs, I like simpler designs. I also prefer the actual physical knobs - especially at outdoor gigs, those LCD readouts are real annoying, to me. To me, they all sound pretty good, and they are extremely versatile for my use. I did find, however, that I needed to deep edit some of the "features" - like extra gain, much loved for guitar - out to make it work for clean steel. BTW, on the Pod 2, the deep editing of internal parameters is done via MIDI, not USB. USB editing is definitely one of the big advantages of the XT series, IMO. On the other hand, it's not very expensive to get a USB midi connection for a computer - musicians friend has a bunch, and there are lots more besides for around $30-40. Also note that the line outs on the Pod 2 are also balanced - I use a roughly $10 balanced TRS-to-XLR adapter to run to house sound, works fine. |
basilh Member From: United Kingdom
|
posted 16 August 2006 04:28 PM
profile
This was done using a Line 6 Tone Port UX 2 Ray and Phil
[This message was edited by basilh on 16 August 2006 at 04:28 PM.] |
Ben Slaughter Member From: Madera, California
|
posted 16 August 2006 08:57 PM
profile
I think most folks find the POD 2.0 lacking for steel. There is less clean headroom in the 2.0. I have both and the 2.0 collects dust, and the XT is my main live rig. The XT also has much better effects. |
Jay Ganz Member From: Out Behind The Barn
|
posted 17 August 2006 07:51 AM
profile
Chick, I use the low impedance output on my "kidney" PODxt also. All you need to do this is use a cord with a TRS on one end & and XLR on the other. |