Author
|
Topic: Tuning 440
|
Allan Thompson Member From: Scotland.
|
posted 27 December 2002 12:50 PM
profile
This is not meant to start another tuning war JI v ET. I`m just interested in how many of you guys out there tune straight 440 or very close? |
Robert Thomas Member From: Mehama, Oregon, USA
|
posted 27 December 2002 02:51 PM
profile
Hi, this topic will really strike a note, hopefully it wont go flat or be too sharp in the responses you will get. I have always tuned, E-9th and C-6th, 440 staight-up since elecronic tuners became available. I have never had a problem with that nor have I had a tuning problem with the groups that I have played with. I have only been playing for over 54 years now. I can remember the good old days when everyone was always tuning or trying to get in tune with each other by ear, what a tune time for the audience. There, you have my response, but it seems everyone else has their own way of doing it and whatever works for each person is the way it should be. You just have to figure out what is going to work best for you.
|
Frank Parish Member From: Nashville,Tn. USA
|
posted 27 December 2002 02:57 PM
profile
I tune the C6 neck to straight up 440, all the raises and lowers too. The E9 neck is another thing. I use the JI method and it works for me but it's like Robert said, it's what works for you. |
John Knight Member From: Alaska
|
posted 27 December 2002 04:21 PM
profile
I guess I like to listen to myself to much. I can not tune each string 440. Just to many beats for the thirds. I tune roots and 5ths 440 and the rest to my ear.------------------ D 10 Thomas with 8&6, '61'D-10 Sho-Bud 8&3 S12 Knight 4&4 Nashville 400 and Profex II 81' Fender Twin JBL's Asleep at the Steel
|
Jody Sanders Member From: Magnolia,Texas
|
posted 27 December 2002 08:57 PM
profile
I tune E9 open all strings to 441. All pedals and levers to 440. C6 : All strings open to 440. All pedals and levers to 440. Works for me. Jody. (Been pickin' 58 years) |
Dave Robbins Member From: Nashville, Tnn. USA
|
posted 27 December 2002 10:12 PM
profile
Allen, my response to this question is going to be in reference to your question being 440 as a "reference pitch" rather than whether a person tunes "straight up" or not. A person's tuning is really going to be subject to the "amount of cabinet drop" their guitar has (another topic rehashed over and over). For example, a guitar like the LeGrande III with the counterforce system (or any guitar "without cabinet drop") is not going to be as affected by cabinet drop like some other brand might be. It can pretty much be tuned "pedals up" or "pedals down" to reference 440. On the other hand, a guitar with cabinet drop could be tuned to 440 "pedals up", but when the pedals are applied cabinet drop will affect all the "open" strings. Granted, the pitch of the strings being changed by the pedals can be adjusted back to the 440 reference, but the open strings will be flat. The alternative in that case might be to tune the open ("pedals up") tuning to a reference higher than 440 (441, 442,etc, depending on the amount of cabinet drop) so that the "pedals down" tuning will then reference at 440. Like I said, my LeGrande III can be tuned to 440 both "pedals up and pedals down". My push/pull, on the other hand, has a bit of cabinet drop, so I tune it to reference 440 pedals down, but 441 or 442 for pedals up to make up for the cabinet drop. I prefer to tune the "pedals down" pitch to 440 since this is in reference to "A" chord (since there is now such thing as "E 440") and seems to sound better with any "open A" type playing I might do. I find that I play "pedals down" much more often than "pedals up". And, playing with E being sharp of 440 doesn't seem as offensive as playing with A being flat to 440. The amount of cabinet drop affects all this and just how close to 440 you can get. Now Allen, if your question is that of who tunes straight up and who doesn't (whether or not they tune their "thirds" flat to 440, or in other words, "tuning the beats out"), that is a completely different question and one that has been "rehashed" over and over on this forum, ad infinitum! Now, get ready for the debate, once again! Dave  |
Chick Donner Member From: North Ridgeville, OH USA
|
posted 28 December 2002 07:41 AM
profile
I tuned to a 440 fork (actually a 456 "E" fork) for about 30 years. When I finally went electronic with a DTR-1, I went to 442 open for the E's, and basically a modified Newman for the rest. Oddly enough, though Jeff has argued with me that it can't be, on C6 I tune the E's at 442 and everything else about 4 cycles high, and it's in tune! |
Bobby Lee Sysop From: Cloverdale, North California, USA
|
posted 28 December 2002 09:37 AM
profile
I tune the back neck of my D-10 straight up on the meter (equal temperment) to an A440 reference. It doesn't sound out of tune to me. I've had no complaints from band leaders or recording session producers about it. I can't tune it that way by ear, though.------------------
Bobby Lee - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs Sierra Session 12 (E9), Williams 400X (Emaj9, D6), Sierra Olympic 12 (F Diatonic), Sierra Laptop 8 (D13), Fender Stringmaster (E13, A6), Roland Handsonic |
chas smith Member From: Encino, CA, USA
|
posted 28 December 2002 11:29 AM
profile
On my Super Pro with the MIDI pickup, whenever I'm playing samples and guitar, I tune straight up. |
rhcarden Member From: Lampe,Mo / USA
|
posted 28 December 2002 11:51 AM
profile
I tune straight-up 440 as close as possible. You can only tune as good as your guitar will allow. ------------------ Bob Carden 66 Emmons P/P 8/9 BMI 13 string 7/7
|
Ernie Renn Member From: Brainerd, Minnesota USA
|
posted 28 December 2002 01:28 PM
profile
Add Buddy and me to the list of 440-ers.------------------ My best, Ernie The Official Buddy Emmons Website www.buddyemmons.com |
Donny Hinson Member From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.
|
posted 28 December 2002 08:06 PM
profile
I tune 440, or rather...I tune the A's or E's "dead on". Then, I tune out the beats on everything...but the 7th and 9th string. Those two, I just have to "compromise" on. Unless you have some sort of mechanical compensator on the guitar, those two strings will always be out of tune in either the pedals up, or the pedals down position. Once you realize that fact, though, tuning becomes a snap on the E9th. |
John Steele Member From: Renfrew, Ontario, Canada
|
posted 28 December 2002 11:23 PM
profile
I think you'll find when people speak of "tuning 440", they mean tuning every note to 12 O'Clock on the tuner, creating an equally tempered tuning, in relation to the A note at 440 hertz, without regard to the existence of beats. I'm trying to get there, as most other instruments these days are set up that way, but it's a struggle. -John |
Bill Crook Member From: Goodlettsville, TN , Spending my kid's inheritance
|
posted 29 December 2002 04:56 AM
profile
I tuned stright 440 for a number of years. The band leader keep saying I wasen't in tune,that I sounded like $#$$$. After I started to tune the 3rd and 6th strings about 10-15cents flat,the world became a wonderful place. I have also noticed that if I close/depress both pedals while tunning other strings stright 440,it does seem to have a more equal temperment across the range. Also, I have noticed that when I tune the 3rd and 6th strings a bit lower,the paralax viewing of the fretboard is somewhat better. in other words,tunning to 440,playing from the 8th to the 12th frets is O.K. viewing them stright down on top. But from the 7th back down to the 1st fret, one has the tendency to not have the bar quite on the fret marker,therefore the tone is sharp. Now lower the 3rd and 6th strings 10-15cents,and I notice that the axe seems to be more in tune with itself. And the band leader is more happy with the overall tone and sound.Again,like someone else said,the axe may have a lot to do with how we may need to tune certain strings. I guess,It's all in how well you know your axe. |
Dennis Detweiler Member From: Solon, Iowa, US
|
posted 29 December 2002 07:24 AM
profile
Not sure how this works with led readout tuners, but with the "needle" type tuners you can leave the dial set on the E note and tune the 3rd and 6th strings straight up and it is tempered with the E notes. B notes can be tuned this way also. The B notes will end up 440 with the E notes. The G# notes will end up flat to true pitch. You may have to use harmonics to get the needle to pick up the B and G# notes with the dial set on E. Dennis[This message was edited by Dennis Detweiler on 29 December 2002 at 06:05 PM.] |
Joe Smith Member From: Charlotte, NC, USA
|
posted 29 December 2002 08:24 AM
profile
Well on the C6th neck, I tune all strings and pulls straight up. Needle in the Center. On E9th, I do the same thing, but then I tweak things a little so that it sounds right to my ear. Most times I will flatten the g#s just a tad. It's funny, some days I sound in tune and other times no matter what I do, I never sound in tune. |
Reece Anderson Member From: Keller Texas USA
|
posted 29 December 2002 08:26 AM
profile
Being in tune requires a musical mathmatical compromise which may be variable between the ears of the listeners! |
SKIP MERTZ Member From: N.C
|
posted 29 December 2002 09:25 AM
profile
OH NOOOOO , MR. BILL! |
Henry Matthews Member From: Texarkana, Texas, USA
|
posted 29 December 2002 10:42 AM
profile
I've tried the 440 tuning on both my guitars. One is a p/p Emmons and the other a L Legrand and neither sound in tune to my ears or the band either. The only time they sound in tune is if I'm picking without using the bar so that tends to tell me that maybe I'm doing something with the bar that I shouldn't, to much pressure or something. Maybe some of you pro's can enlighten me on that. I have found that I sound more in tune using the old Buddy Emmons tuning. E's 440, G#'s 436 and B's 439 and I temper the other strings to get out the beats and also temper the pulls and lowers to get out the beats using a Boss chromatic tuner. I have noticed too that at times, no matter what I do, nothing sounds in tune and I believe that I have found the cause of that problem. One of the other band members is little off. My bass player has a bad habit of not tuning,LOL. |
Ron Randall Member From: Dallas, Texas, USA
|
posted 29 December 2002 02:10 PM
profile
Allan's question: quote: This is not meant to start another tuning war JI v ET. I`m just interested in how many of you guys out there tune straight 440 or very close?
|
Lee Baucum Member From: McAllen, Texas (Extreme South) - The Final Frontier
|
posted 29 December 2002 03:41 PM
profile
I do!------------------ Lee, from South Texas Down On The Rio Grande |
basilh Member From: United Kingdom
|
posted 29 December 2002 03:49 PM
profile
Ditto Baz |
Wayne Cox Member From: Chatham, Louisiana, USA
|
posted 29 December 2002 05:05 PM
profile
If I am working with an "electrified" piano player,I can tune pretty much straight up,but...if there is no keyboard,and the guitarist tunes his thirds a little flat,well...its back to the "good ole' days". Every man for himself! ~~W.C.~~ |
Henry Matthews Member From: Texarkana, Texas, USA
|
posted 29 December 2002 05:09 PM
profile
Ron, I wasn't trying to start a tuning war. It was more like asking for help from pickers about their tunings and bar pressure etc. |
Earl Foote Member From: Houston, Tx, USA
|
posted 29 December 2002 05:23 PM
profile
I've tried tuning with no offsets and it sounded very bad. I've heard other players that said they tuned without offsets and they sounded wonderful. The point I'm trying to make is I think you are going to have to blaze your own trail here and do what you feel comfortable with. For what its worth, I tune the E's straight up and the rest by ear. I then made a chart for my VS-1 so I can do the above in a very loud environment. |
Robert Thomas Member From: Mehama, Oregon, USA
|
posted 29 December 2002 06:05 PM
profile
Just a thought. I always tune 440 straight up on both necks. I assume the rest of the band tunes 440 also. If I tune any string, pedal up or down at anything other than 440, I feel I will then be out of tune with everyone in the band. Does that make sense or should everyone tune flat or sharp to how the steel player feels it should be? |
Frank Parish Member From: Nashville,Tn. USA
|
posted 29 December 2002 07:18 PM
profile
If I tune the beats out on any of my guitars the 5 and 10 string are going to be sharp by a mile. I'm currently tuning like this:F# 440---G# 436.5 D# 440--C# 436.5 G# 436.5---A 438.5 E 440 D# 440---F434.5--F# 440 B 440--Bb-440--C#436.5 G# 436.5--F# 440--A 440 F# 440--G 436.5 E 440 D# 440--F--434.5 D 440--C# 436.5 B 440--Bb 440--C#436.5 I'll start with this and then tune the beats out of the 5 and 10 strings and they'll be sharper than you see here. |
David Doggett Member From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 29 December 2002 10:28 PM
profile
On E9 I tune the Es straight up 440 (i.e. tempered to A440). Then I turn off the meter and tune everything else to sound sweet. I do it this way because it sounds better to me (and a lot of listeners), but I'm a nobody, so who cares.However, Paul Franklin says that's how he tunes, and that most other top players he knows do the same. It's the old fashioned way that is time tested. I think for some reason you are getting a lopsided response from tempered tuners here. But on the C6 neck, I think many people tune all strings straight up 440, because the intervals used create too many tempering problems otherwise. By the way, I find it helpful to tune only the Es in the open position (on E9). Everything else (including pedals and knees) I tune barred at the C fret. The reason is that the strings are now tuned to my normal bar pressure toward the middle of the playing area. I have found that perfect tuning in the open position will not be perfect with the bar, because of bar pressure and the way the different guaged strings react to bar pressure. For a little perspective, symphony orchestras tune only their A to straight up 440. Everything else is tuned to the ear (Just Intonation). There are normally no tempered instruments played in an orchestra. All fretless stringed instruments and horns have variable pitch that is played by ear to JI. Singers sing to JI (okay, not all, but we wish they all did). Only pianos, fretted stringed instruments, and other fixed pitch instruments (vibes, harps, accordions, etc.) have to tune to the tempered scale. This is not considered a good thing, but is a workable compromise, and that is why they are only wheeled onto the orchestra stage for special numbers. If you are playing along with a tempered instrument, you may need to tune even tempered or close. Guitar bands tune mostly straight up 440; however, a lot of guitar players tweak their tuning a little for different keys, typically playing the root chord and flatting the thirds a little to sound sweeter. The steel guitar is a fretless instrument with variable pitch that is played by ear (at least on held notes where there is time to adjust), so to some extent it doesn't matter whether you tune tempered or JI, because where it counts you will automatically adjust your pitch (we hope) to sound good with the vocal or lead instrument or bass, whatever is dominant at the moment. However, the intervals played as you chord may create a tempered versus JI dilemma. Thus, the straight major chords typically played on E9 will sound sweeter with JI, but minors, 7ths, 6ths, diminished, etc. (chords typically played on C6) may sound better tempered. The reason this all causes such confusion and heated argument is because there is no one correct answer for all situations. It matters what type of music you are playing and what other instruments you are playing with. Maybe we should all take a cue from symphony orchestras and tweak to JI when we can, and tune tempered when we have to. [This message was edited by David Doggett on 29 December 2002 at 10:31 PM.]
|
Dave Birkett Member From: Oxnard, CA, USA
|
posted 29 December 2002 11:15 PM
profile
When I listen to Nashville recording with Floyd Cramer or Pig Hargus, I wonder if Nashville studios don't use a different method for tuning their pianos. They sure sound sweet. |
Buck Grantham Member From: Denham Springs, LA. USA
|
posted 01 January 2003 11:43 AM
profile
I for two weeks tuned everything to 440 and played gigs with it that way. I got no complaints from the keyboard player or anyone in the band. It even sounded pretty good to me. But when I tryed to practice at home by myself it sounded so bad I had to go back to my old system of tuneing. Tune my E's open to 441, press the A & B pedals down then tune most of the beats out. I put a compensator on the 7th string. This is on a (81 model push pull emmons. My Mullen tunes about the same way. That's my story and I'm sticking to it . Ha Ha I figured that if Buddy could tune straight up , I could too,,, WRONG !!!! |
Graham Griffith Member From: Glebe, N.S.W., Australia
|
posted 06 January 2003 01:07 AM
profile
I now tune to 440 after more than 20 years of frustration (not having enough compensators). I play Zane Beck's E13th pedal steel tuning. I'm sure the sound ain't to everyone's taste but it sounds fine to me.Note this experience. I once did a session for an Hawaiian style ad here in Australia. I was called back to put an ending slide with the tonic and third up an octave. The engineer picked that I tuned the 3rd flat and made me tune up to "440" ... so maybe I'm not so crazy or tone deaf. Another anecdote is that John Ely, the great non-pedal Hawaiian music convert, gave up trying to play Eharp (tuned C# E F F# G G# A B C# E) because he couldn't use harmonics to tune it. I play this tuning and tune everything to 440 ... the result is a tuning that gives me most of those big jazz chords without the bother of lugging a heavy pedal steel around ... again everything sounds sweet. Graham |
Neil Lang Member From: Albert Lea, Minnesota, USA
|
posted 06 January 2003 05:40 AM
profile
I have used the Newman tech. with the Korg chromatic electronic tuner for around 30 years now. On C6 the C's are at 440. On E9th the E's are at 440. Everything else is to his charts. I've tryed other tuning tech.'s but this is the only thing that sounds right to my ear? Do I have an ear prob? |
Tom Hodgin Member From: greensboro, n.c. u.s.a.
|
posted 06 January 2003 06:17 AM
profile
I find that so much can change what we hear out of our amps...maybe it's our tuning or maybe it's something as simple as blowing your nose during a gig...I ask my doctor about this very thing..he told me the pressure of blowing ones nose, on the ear drum, can change the tone of what we are hearing come for the amp...until it subsides..kind of like when you get water in your ear while swimming...I thought for a long time my amp was changing tones as the night grew longer..not so.. now who would have thought ??? tom |
Larry Bell Member From: Englewood, Florida
|
posted 06 January 2003 11:21 AM
profile
Dave D, I believe I recall Paul Franklin saying he tunes his tonic E's substantially sharp -- 442 or even 443(?) -- but the rest is like you say -- basically, tuning the beats out harmonically. That's basically what I do -- tune the E's with A+B pedals down and it usually turns out about 442 (that's 8 cents cabinet drop -- on my Fessy at any rate) without the pedals.I'm with you, Buck. I tried 440, but didn't like it. Made the little hairs on the back of my neck stand up.  Neil, Which Newman charts? The ones on his website sharp the E's (442.5). Tom, I'd agree that sinus congestion or blowing the nose could affect the frequency spectrum one hears, but I'd have to be convinced that it affects your perception of the PITCH of the note, which is the key measurement for tuning. FWIW ------------------ Larry Bell - email: larry@larrybell.org - gigs - Home Page 2000 Fessenden S-12 8x8, 1969 Emmons S-12 6x6, 1971 Dobro[This message was edited by Larry Bell on 06 January 2003 at 12:25 PM.] |
Neil Lang Member From: Albert Lea, Minnesota, USA
|
posted 06 January 2003 01:51 PM
profile
Larry, The Newman charts I am talking about are from back in the late 60's. I've tryed the newer ones, but they just don't work for me. In fact when I first heard of some guys changing that, I thought what for? Does that mean all those recordings in the past were out of tune??????????? Sounds good to me, guess I'm just one of the old dogs! Ha! Neil |
Larry Bell Member From: Englewood, Florida
|
posted 07 January 2003 07:47 AM
profile
Actually, tuning the guitar is not NEARLY as important as PLAYING in TUNE.Neil, The problem I have with tuning the E note to 440 (rather than sharper, like somewhere between 441 and 443, depending on the guitar) is that certain combinations -- like the E to F knee lever change -- is WAAAAAAAY FLAT. Look at the Newman chart -- the current one shows F at 435.5, which is 18 cents flat. (just a reminder, a cent is 1/100 of the distance from one fret to the next) That's pretty far from the note the piano player will come up with for an F. NOW, the important part: The 435.5 value is taken from the NEW Newman chart, which tunes the E's sharp (442.5). If, as you suggest, the earlier ones were based on 440 for the E's, the F WOULD BE SOMETHING LIKE 433. THIS IS 28 CENTS (almost 1/3 of a fret) FLAT OF THE NOTE AN EQUALLY TEMPERED KEYBOARD WOULD PLAY. Yeah, you can tune such that the A+F position C#Maj chord is in tune and fudge it with the bar to be closer, but as soon as you play that open F note along with the piano, you will understand why a lot of folks try to approach 440 as close as possible. What it boils down to is that there are certain combinations that are way off when you tune all the beats out of the open, A+B, and A+F positions. Also, when you add the 9th, 7th, 2nd, and 1st strings, some really interesting (and not always pleasant) things can happen. Just my 2 cents (pun intended). ------------------ Larry Bell - email: larry@larrybell.org - gigs - Home Page 2000 Fessenden S-12 8x8, 1969 Emmons S-12 6x6, 1971 Dobro[This message was edited by Larry Bell on 07 January 2003 at 07:54 AM.] |
rhcarden Member From: Lampe,Mo / USA
|
posted 07 January 2003 08:59 AM
profile
The problems I have with JT is you cannot us all the possible chords in each position. For instance if the A-6th sound good, the E-9th sucks. I find that if I play a 3rd my ear will cause me to move the bar so that I'm in tune with the band, then when I play a 5th and it's sharp. I've been tuning all notes as close to 440 as possible since the mid 70s. Does it sound in tune? No! if I'm alone, but with the band and on recordings, it sound great. I believe, that is where it counts! ------------------ Bob Carden 66 Emmons P/P 8/9 BMI 13 string 7/7
|
Neil Lang Member From: Albert Lea, Minnesota, USA
|
posted 07 January 2003 09:09 AM
profile
Larry, guess I'll have to listen & experiment a bit more with what you are saying. It will be easy, my wife plays keyboards in our Duo. But it seems to me if I tune the E's sharp they will sound sharp to the piano when played open just as the F would sound flat???????? Am I missing something here? Thanks for the input. Neil Sho-Bud Super Pro 8X4, Nashville 1000 |
Bob Hoffnar Member From: Brooklyn, NY
|
posted 07 January 2003 11:54 AM
profile
I tune by ear for the most part. After all music is something that we use our ears to experience.For those of you that think you can use your eyes to tune and sound good walk over to that electric piano and check a few low notes and then middle notes and then high notes. A piano is not 440. Then check the different individual notes in a guitar chord. Its freakin hopeless ! Then throw out your electronic tuner and train your ears and hands to make it sound good. Bob |
Larry Bell Member From: Englewood, Florida
|
posted 07 January 2003 01:36 PM
profile
Neil, The issue is HOW SHARP or HOW FLAT. Our ears can tolerate 1 Hz (4 cents) or more variation without sounding GLARINGLY out of tune. The 5 or 6 Hz (20-24 cents) I described before is noticeable by ANYONE.The point is to bring the E's up some so you don't have to flat the G#s so much. Same holds true with the C#s and Fs. ------------------ Larry Bell - email: larry@larrybell.org - gigs - Home Page 2000 Fessenden S-12 8x8, 1969 Emmons S-12 6x6, 1971 Dobro |