Steel Guitar Strings
Strings & instruction for lap steel, Hawaiian & pedal steel guitars
http://SteelGuitarShopper.com
Ray Price Shuffles
Classic country shuffle styles for Band-in-a-Box, by BIAB guru Jim Baron.
http://steelguitarmusic.com

This Forum is CLOSED.
Go to bb.steelguitarforum.com to read and post new messages.


  The Steel Guitar Forum
  Pedal Steel
  Core guage of wound strings

Post New Topic  
your profile | join | preferences | help | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Core guage of wound strings
Michael Dene
Member

From: Gippsland,Vic, Australia

posted 11 September 2003 07:09 PM     profile     
Can anyone tell me if there is any/much variation in the guage of the core on wound strings of a given overall guage from one brand to another?

I recently replaced a .030w 8th string on E9 with the same size but of a different brand. It threw the raise and lower out by so much that I immediately took it off and swapped to one of the original brand. This meant breaking up a new set which of course was what I was trying to avoid. At this point everything was fine and all adjustments were back to normal.

So....are there variations in core size or did I just have a crummy string?

Michael
LeGrande II
Session 500

Earnest Bovine
Member

From: Los Angeles CA USA

posted 11 September 2003 09:48 PM     profile     
Yes, there are significant differences in core diameter. Also some windings are steel while some are nickel. Nickel windings require more changer (pedal) movement.
Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 12 September 2003 09:16 AM     profile     
I did not know that, Ernest. I always thought the amount of travel was determined by the properties of the core, not of the windings.

------------------
Bobby Lee - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts
Sierra Session 12 (E9), Williams 400X (Emaj9, D6), Sierra Olympic 12 (C6add9),
Sierra Laptop 8 (D13), Fender Stringmaster (E13, A6),
Roland Handsonic, Line 6 Variax

Dennis Detweiler
Member

From: Solon, Iowa, US

posted 12 September 2003 11:46 AM     profile     
Does anyone know the core guages of the wound strings for each brand?
I've run into this a few times when I couldn't get the GHS singles that I need and bought a few different brands. Not the way to go if you need to change one in the middle of a set.
Dennis
Earnest Bovine
Member

From: Los Angeles CA USA

posted 12 September 2003 12:21 PM     profile     
quote:
I always thought the amount of travel was determined by the properties of the core, not of the windings.
Could be. Maybe there are cases where a steel would string requires more changer movement than a nickel would one. But I haven't noticed that yet.
A few months ago I put nickel wound Jagwire strings on the Franklin instead of Georgle L steel wound, and the pulls were about 10 percent short until I tightened the tuning nuts.
With other brands I had noticed a much bigger diffence steel-vs-nickel.
Michael Johnstone
Member

From: Sylmar,Ca. USA

posted 12 September 2003 02:08 PM     profile     
I wanted to do that same survey a few years ago when I was playing my 25" Sierra and had a couple 1&1/2 step pulls on my 9th and 10th strings(.038 & .046).The strings I used to get from Sierra that made the pull easily,and without breaking constantly,were distributed by Kaman(the parent corporation of Ovation guitars etc). When I tried other strings the pull was much longer and was up against the limits of the Sierra mechanics and the tensile strength of the strings themselves. Then I examined the various strings' cross sections under high magnification and realised the Kaman strings had a larger diamter core than the other brands I had tried(S.I.T.,GHS and Ernie Ball)I didn't measure them,however.I told Don Christiansen at Sierra what I had discovered and he just basically said "I'll be damned - I never knew that" and asked me to keep him abreast of my survey.He also said that Sierra no longer used the Kaman strings anyway so I was on my own.At the NAMM show that year(1999 or so)I went from one string manufacturer to the next including Kaman asking for the core/winding specs and not one of them knew what I was talking about.Of course they were salesmen - not engineers.I suppose that somewhere within the bowels of these companies,someone knows the answers to these questions and if you were really on a mission,you could put together a comparitive analysis. Anyhow,shortly after that,I started using Jagwires and they didn't break,and made the pulls within the Sierra's capabilities easily which meant they had larger cores as well. Now that I had high quality,readily available strings which would make all my pulls,I quit obsessing on the issue at that point. I'm here to tell you though - there are significant differences between strings. -MJ-
Michael Dene
Member

From: Gippsland,Vic, Australia

posted 12 September 2003 05:59 PM     profile     
Do any of the manufacturers actually put out the relevant stats for their strings or does one have to get out the micrometer and check them one by one?

It may stretch the patience of the nice man in our local music shop for me to work my way through the entire range on his shelves.

So has anyone put together any info on core guages? It sure would be useful.

Michael

[This message was edited by Michael Dene on 12 September 2003 at 06:00 PM.]

Larry Bell
Member

From: Englewood, Florida

posted 13 September 2003 08:17 AM     profile     
Just get a micrometer and a new set of strings. For the wound ones, just measure the unwound bit at the end.

EB and b0b, when I visited the GHS plant, many years ago, I was told what b0b asserted -- that the pull or physical distance to move a given musical interval is inversely proportional to the core diameter for wound strings. The bigger the core, the shorter the travel required to achieve 1/2 or full tone change.

I have also seen variation between nickel and stainless that Earnest mentions. I would be curious to know if anyone has any info on how the winding material affects the distance to interval relationship.

Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 13 September 2003 10:59 AM     profile     
I think that the core diameter of wound strings is considered to be a "trade secret" by the various string vendors.

Here's what I think is happening. There are very few actual manufacturers of musical instrument strings (3 or 4, I think). The difference between brands of strings are basically the difference in specifications supplied to the manufacturer. Those specifications include things like the core gauge and the alloys used for core and winding.

If I'm worng, someone can correct me (please!).

------------------
Bobby Lee - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts
Sierra Session 12 (E9), Williams 400X (Emaj9, D6), Sierra Olympic 12 (C6add9),
Sierra Laptop 8 (D13), Fender Stringmaster (E13, A6),
Roland Handsonic, Line 6 Variax

All times are Pacific (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Pedal Steel Pages

Note: Messages not explicitly copyrighted are in the Public Domain.

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46

Our mailing address is:
The Steel Guitar Forum
148 South Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Support the Forum