Author
|
Topic: annoying sitar effect
|
Earnest Bovine Member From: Los Angeles CA USA
|
posted 13 May 2006 08:10 AM
profile
Now, I've got nothing against the sitar. I thought it was great on "Norwegian Wood". but....In another thread, Richard Burton wrote quote: I've noticed an annoying tone problem on the fourth (E) string on every steel I've had. It's not an increase in volume, it's the tailing of of the note into an irritating whine.My solution, which I've used for many years, but may not be applicable to the Fender 2000, was to put a thin sliver of plastic between the string and the changer finger, to shorten the decay of the note.
I have the same problem, especially after the note decays for a second or so. It's worst on string 4 around fret 8, but it happens on all the little plain strings to some extent. It's better on the Franklin and GFI, worse on the Zum and Sho-Bud-Marrs. Bruce Zumsteg says he has looked unsuccesfully for a solution. A drop of oil doesn't help. Temporary solutions include: 1. Pushing the string sideways (good for one take or so until it slides back.) 2. Sanding/polishing the finger surface with 1500 sandpaper, and a wadding polish. This may allow some hours or days of better sound, but of course you must be careful to keep what you scrape off from getting in the bearing. And you must be very careful to maintain a round shape lest you make it even flatter somewhere. I think a smaller radius on the finger would be a better solution, but surely this has been tried and rejected, because all my steels seem to have the same radius. I am reluctant to try Richard's solution because I can't find a really thin piece of plastic just now and I think it must spoil the sound. Richard, have you any other ideas? Anybody?
|
Jon Light Member From: Brooklyn, NY
|
posted 13 May 2006 08:22 AM
profile
Adjust the drag. [This message was edited by Jon Light on 13 May 2006 at 08:24 AM.] |
Ken Metcalf Member From: San Antonio, Texas, USA
|
posted 13 May 2006 08:31 AM
profile
EarnistI have had this whine as most probably have. Recently I played with some other guys that play a much higher volume in a different room and it made it sound better. amp settings, room acoustics, picking habits, I have had problems tuning then figured out I was sitting near a ceiling fan causing an out of tune effect wah wah wah wah Remember a fine whine will get better over time. P.S. Loved your work in Mc Hales Navy Ken Metcalf D-10 Carson Wells
|
richard burton Member From: Britain
|
posted 13 May 2006 08:32 AM
profile
Earnest, It took me quite a while to find plastic with the right qualities, ie, soft enough to muffle the decay of the note, but not so soft that the initial picked sound was compromised.Another method that works equally well, but is messier, is a thin smear of grease on the string/finger interface. Please don't laugh, it really does work !!  Apply a bit of grease, and pluck the string. If the string is too muted, wipe a small amount of grease off, and pluck again. Eventually, you will arrive at a happy medium, with a nice initial string tone, and no residual whine.  |
Earnest Bovine Member From: Los Angeles CA USA
|
posted 13 May 2006 08:52 AM
profile
Grease? How long does that last? Do you need a grease supply nearby as you play? It might be better than oil, but harder to find. Let me see if I can find some. Under the truck, maybe? When I tried oil, it didn't stay on the guitar. It went from my hand to other places. My clothing looked better, but the wife didn't like it on the furniture. OK, I am looking around the house for some thin flexible plastic. I dont' see any. |
Jon Light Member From: Brooklyn, NY
|
posted 13 May 2006 08:54 AM
profile
The suggestion of grease does not surprise me--since people often suggest oil but since (machine) oil lacks the viscosity to address any but the slightest vibrations, grease does make sense. But why, Earnest, do you think it is worse on some guitars? Softer metal on the fingers? |
Lee Baucum Member From: McAllen, Texas (Extreme South) - The Final Frontier
|
posted 13 May 2006 08:55 AM
profile
Thin plastic, like what the dry cleaning comes wrapped in? |
Earnest Bovine Member From: Los Angeles CA USA
|
posted 13 May 2006 09:02 AM
profile
quote: But why, Earnest, do you think it is worse on some guitars? Softer metal on the fingers?
I don't know. My newer ones aren't better than old ones. The old Franklin is better than the new Marrs fingers. Does every builder use the same material? When I saw grooves appearing in my almost-new Zumsteel I asked Bruce why he didn't use a harder material, and he said it sounds worse. But I wonder if the real reason is that it is harder to work with. |
richard burton Member From: Britain
|
posted 13 May 2006 09:29 AM
profile
The plastic containers that Kodac films come in have about the right properties. |
Barry Blackwood Member From: elk grove, CA
|
posted 13 May 2006 09:35 AM
profile
Earnest, Jon Light's fishing reel solution seems tailored to your sensibilities - I'd go with it. |
Larry Bell Member From: Englewood, Florida
|
posted 13 May 2006 09:53 AM
profile
I like the fishing reel too. I think Jon was just 'fishing' for complements on his easy string changer design.  I haven't noticed that problem on any new guitars. I believe there are two causes: 1. crud under the string 2. microgrooves in the radius of the finger Whenever I notice that problem I change the string. B4 installing the new one I examine the top of the finger. I always rub it out with a pencil eraser. If I can SEE a groove I'll get a bit more aggressive and either use a typewriter eraser or a Dremel with a little buffing wheel and some buffing compound. B4 putting the new string on I'll polish it out with semichrome or a Blitz cloth. Sometimes those little grooves are REALLY HARD TO SEE. Run your fingernail across the finger perpendicular to the direction the string goes across it. You may be able to feel it even if you can't see it. Crud under the string can also be sneaky -- you may not see it easily. I've found that when my guitar starts playing 'Norwegian Wood', loosening it and cleaning it and the top of the finger with a Blitz cloth then a clean cloth USUALLY solves the problem unless the string is ANCIENT. In that case, I'll break down and change the string. As with all things pedal steel: YOUR MILEAGE MAY VARY.  ------------------ Larry Bell - email: larry@larrybell.org - gigs - Home Page My CD's: 'I've Got Friends in COLD Places' - 'Pedal Steel Guitar' 2003 Fessenden S/D-12 8x8, 1969 Emmons S/D-12 6x6, 1984 Sho-Bud S/D-12 7x6, 1971 Dobro, Standel and Peavey Amps
|
Mike Ester Member From: New Braunfels, Texas, USA
|
posted 13 May 2006 10:31 AM
profile
Jon, you have WAY too much time on your hands.  |
Earnest Bovine Member From: Los Angeles CA USA
|
posted 13 May 2006 10:55 AM
profile
How would you make the metal or plastic strip adhere to the round finger, so it doesn't rattle agianst the string?Maybe we could paint the metal with something sticky that dries extremely hard.[This message was edited by Earnest Bovine on 13 May 2006 at 11:00 AM.] |
Eric West Member From: Portland, Oregon, USA
|
posted 13 May 2006 10:57 AM
profile
EB. MY PIII after 24 years of hard use had been sanded, degrooved etc so many times that I finally realised that they were out of round and would no longer pull or return true.All of the suggestions except putting dunnage under the strings are worthy for temp fixes. Had I to do it over again, after "regrooving" it a few times after a few years it's easy enough to just replace the offending changers. I got a couple extras for my poor old PIII and when and if I get time I'll put them in. It was only the B and G#s. I reckon my Marrs has a few years on it before it starts happening. Also mentioned a while ago was that most "grooving" happens when something slams into the strings and drives them into the fingers. Early on I isolated a lot my buzzing to the nut and foolishly peened the aluminum next to the rollers. It worked though. Then I thought about winding the strings so they pulled at an angle. A lot of it is like "fret buzz" on a tele. It goes away at beer glass melting volume... I have to keep myself away from my allen wrenches when I'm at home for that reason, and at the gig and stage or recording volume it goes away. What's wrong with "annoying"?  EJL
|
Stu Schulman Member From: anchorage,alaska
|
posted 13 May 2006 04:29 PM
profile
if you are going to try to glue plastic to metal try elmer's ultimate glue,It dries really hard. |
Cliff Kane Member From: Long Beach, CA
|
posted 13 May 2006 04:47 PM
profile
Here's a thought: you could try a "tooth patch" or "bite patch" for a saxophone mouthpiece. These are made out thin plastic that is flexible, yet hard enough to resist being punctured by biting teeth. These have adhesive on the back, and could be cut to shape or size. They come in different thicknesses, and some are harder than others. You can get these at music stores that sell woodwind gear.Or, maybe a little piece of black electricians' tape will work?[This message was edited by Cliff Kane on 13 May 2006 at 04:49 PM.] |
Leila Tuttle Member From: Wheat Ridge, Colorado, USA
|
posted 13 May 2006 09:15 PM
profile
Jon,Yours is the best looking guitar I've seen on the forum. A steel w/o a reel is like a day w/o sunshine. |
Bobby Boggs Member From: Pendleton SC
|
posted 13 May 2006 11:00 PM
profile
This is not a problem for me. Unless I get a bad string or maybe lint caught bewteen the string and roller. I have seen guys use tape.Masking tape. Maybe Duck tape would work?? |
Bo Borland Member From: Cowtown NJ
|
posted 14 May 2006 07:23 AM
profile
I noticed my G# 3rd string will get twangy, then it breaks. So I always change it as soon as I hear the twang & have never had a broken string since. It does not work the same for my low B (.38) it just sounds like breaking wind and breaks at the changer. |
Donny Hinson Member From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.
|
posted 14 May 2006 11:15 AM
profile
I think what causes most all these problems are the players. They hear a little "buzz" (caused by a bad string, or a piece of something stuck under the string, or a loose roller-nut) and then they go to work. Instead of just replacing the string a few times, to see if that will fix the problem (the easiest, and best solution), they work on the problem with emery paper, a buffer, or something else. In the process of trying to fix the thing, they screw it up for real, so that the problem re-occurs with every string they install, no matter how perfect it might be. Then, they try more sanding, polishing, even re-designing and re-machining, only to finally trade the (now totally "botched-up") guitar in a fit of desperation.Moral: You're the only one who probably hears all those little overtones, buzzes, and whines, anyway. Your time would be better spent trying to learn to play, and not worrying about those thousands of "little quirks" that you think keep you from sounding like Buddy or Lloyd. It only takes about 10 seconds of well-intentioned "fixing" to totally ruin a changer finger, and I'd advise resisting that temptation as long as you can. |
Jimmy Gibson Member From: Cornwall, England
|
posted 14 May 2006 03:40 PM
profile
Why has no other steel builder used the same idea that ZB`s used,IMHO it would solve nearly all the problems with the fingers having to be sanded and pollished.and i have never seen a ZB changer finger with a groove,and if one side started to wear,just turn it around,JUST MY 2PS worth. JG..
|
Larry Petree Member From: Bakersfield. Ca. USA
|
posted 14 May 2006 03:58 PM
profile
Jimmy, the very early ZB's had an aluminum top part of the changer. Zane really took a giant step forward with the stainless top part(half moon)of the changer. Like you, I would think other builders would try that. Maybe they have, and found it hurt the tone. It sure didn't hurt the tone of the ZB, did it? |
Bill Ford Member From: Graniteville SC Aiken
|
posted 14 May 2006 04:47 PM
profile
Maybe someone could come up with a stainless "cap" to fit on the fingers. It should work ok if you bend it like an inverted "J" with a hole to go over the string pin/stud.Or use a piece of thin stainless instead of plastic.Bill |
Cliff Kane Member From: Long Beach, CA
|
posted 14 May 2006 06:38 PM
profile
The fingers on my Sho-Bud look like they're chrome, they're really shiney....they don't look like aluminum. Chrome must have good tone, my bar is chromed steel and it sounds good. |
David Wren Member From: Placerville, California, USA
|
posted 15 May 2006 01:33 PM
profile
I'm with the idea of string fatigue (or some just bad ones from the package). I know that finger grooving certainly does occur, but there have been time when I have accidently overtensioned a string when first putting it on, and immediately there was Ravi Shankar!Since I started changing the strings at shorter intervals the probelm has diminished for me. Would be interesting to hear from a builder on this.... must be a major consideration in design. I've noticed some changers on the newer makes of PSG have the rear of the finger slanted at angle, rather than a vertical 90 degree... this seems like a good idea, but haven't heard anyone on this forum comment on this design change? Hey Jon, no need to tell you to "get reel"  ------------------ Dave Wren '96 Carter S12-E9/B6,7X7; Twin Session 500s; Hilton Pedal; Black Box www.ameechapman.com |
Rick Johnson Member From: Wheelwright, Ky USA
|
posted 16 May 2006 04:32 AM
profile
Jon I love that pic. Its good to laugh first thing in the morning, ha. I have a '75 push/pull and I don't have any problems with grooves on the fingers but would a thin piece of copper work as well as the plastic? www.rickjohnsoncabs.com
|
Donny Hinson Member From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.
|
posted 26 May 2006 05:40 PM
profile
quote: some changers on the newer makes of PSG have the rear of the finger slanted at angle, rather than a vertical 90 degree... this seems like a good idea, but haven't heard anyone on this forum comment on this design change?
Most breakage takes place right at the apex of the finger. What angle the string is taking slightly past there would, it seems to me, make little difference in string life. The radius of the finger does, however, make a difference, both in sound and in string life. Harder finger materials (used on some steels) would give the guitar a harsher, sharper, sound. (Not everyone is fond of the tones of the old Fender and Z-B guitars.) |
David Mason Member From: Cambridge, MD, USA
|
posted 27 May 2006 02:21 AM
profile
Regarding tone and finger material, there seems to be a cycle going on between amp manufacturers and steel makers. The amps are made to sound best with "traditional" steels, the steels are then made to sound best with "normal" amps, and back and forth. If you gave me a steel with solid stainless steel fingers, I know I could EQ my way out of trouble with a parametric or graphic EQ - you cut off the highs you don't like, and leave the rest - but "traditional" amps made for "traditional" steels just don't have the tonal precision to EQ a steel that puts out a wider range of high frequencies. |