Steel Guitar Strings
Strings & instruction for lap steel, Hawaiian & pedal steel guitars
http://SteelGuitarShopper.com
Ray Price Shuffles
Classic country shuffle styles for Band-in-a-Box, by BIAB guru Jim Baron.
http://steelguitarmusic.com

This Forum is CLOSED.
Go to bb.steelguitarforum.com to read and post new messages.


  The Steel Guitar Forum
  Pedal Steel
  3rd And 6th String Dilemma (Page 1)

Post New Topic  
your profile | join | preferences | help | search


This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   3rd And 6th String Dilemma
Bill Hankey
Member

From: Pittsfield, MA, USA

posted 06 September 2006 09:39 AM     profile     

Speaking of the E9th tuning, my experience has been that the G# strings are the most troublesome. The snapping 3rd and the detuning 6th are both part of the steel guitar experience. Am I alone in making this observation?
Ron Sodos
Member

From: Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA

posted 06 September 2006 10:05 AM     profile     
Not sure what you are talking about. I have no problem with either 3rd or 6th string. I own 3 steels a Zum, A Fessy and a Shobud. There may be something wrong with the guitar.
richard burton
Member

From: Britain

posted 06 September 2006 10:43 AM     profile     
I solved the snapping third string by using a .010, and using a wound .022 sixth fixed the tuning problem.
Lee Baucum
Member

From: McAllen, Texas (Extreme South) - The Final Frontier

posted 06 September 2006 11:15 AM     profile     
I agree, Bill, that the 3rd string is more prone to breaking than the others. Also, an unwound 6th string can easily drift from its desired tuning when subject to minor changes in temperature. I also think that an unwound 6th string does not "sing" quite as well as a wound string.

Lee

Mark Ardito
Member

From: Chicago, IL, USA

posted 06 September 2006 11:37 AM     profile     
Bill,

Yes, if I do break a string it is usually a .11 G# string. I also do have tuning issues with my 6th string. I think that is because it is a .22p. However because I also lower a whole tone on that string I need the plain on it. My Sho~Bud doesn't have enough to lower a wound string a whole tone on the G#.

This is a pretty common problem in the steel guitar community.

Mark

Dan Beller-McKenna
Member

From: Durham, New Hampshire, USA

posted 06 September 2006 01:19 PM     profile     
Well,
I have an .012(!) on my Dekley 3rd string and it never breaks. I make sure to give it 5 or six turns around the tuning post. I also change strings pretty often (every few weeks).

I too prefer a wound sixth, but since I'm dropping the sixth a whole tone I have to use a plain.

Dan

------------------
Dan Beller-McKenna
Big Red
Durham, NH

richard burton
Member

From: Britain

posted 06 September 2006 02:24 PM     profile     
A wound sixth can be lowered a full tone on an all-pull changer, with a bit of inginuity.

Most changers will raise the string a full tone, at least, so there is spare capacity in the raise finger if you only want a half-tone raise.

The following sketches illustrate my mod easier than I can explain it:


Bill Hankey
Member

From: Pittsfield, MA, USA

posted 06 September 2006 04:38 PM     profile     

Richard B.,

Thanks for the illustration which points to ingenious forethought on your part. Thanks to each of the forum members who have written interesting input, which for the most part, hints of 3rd and 6th string dilemmas. For what its worth, I've considered how friction and tensile strength share in the mixed bag of tuning/breaking events, as they can become overwhelming to say the least. Stressing the tensile strength of the 3rd string numerous times by pounding the "B" pedal causes a gradual breakdown of the G# to "A" raise. After a multiple series of raises, the string commences to enter the whiny hard to tune stage and in its subdued state, becomes faulty, and snaps. The wound 6th "B" string, with its thin bronze or nickel wrapping, is subject to constant bar wear, and the tensile strength changes gradually. This change would make necessary a readjustment to "compromise" the slight change of pitch. A more complex problem ensues, due to the delicate responses of the 6th string, when for some reason all moving parts do not return to the absolute original positioning. Each string is like a thermometer, that is, absorbing cold or warm conditions, and moving up and down with the changes. I might add that each reacts differently to extremes of hot and cold temperatures.

[This message was edited by Bill Hankey on 06 September 2006 at 06:48 PM.]

Sonny Priddy
Member

From: Elizabethtown, Kentucky, USA

posted 06 September 2006 05:11 PM     profile     
I Have No Problem With 3rd or 6th Strings. On My GFI or My Rittenberry and I Use Jagwire Strings. SONNY.

------------------

Bill Hankey
Member

From: Pittsfield, MA, USA

posted 06 September 2006 06:45 PM     profile     

Sonny P.,

Sonny, have you ever had string breakage on your steel guitars? How often do you tune your instruments? Do you lower the 5th and 6th strings on the E9th setup? Do you raise the 1st string a full tone? Does the second string lower 2 half steps accurately? I'm curious, perhaps you could answer a few of those questions. Thanks...

Tony Dingus
Member

From: Kingsport, Tennessee, USA

posted 06 September 2006 07:35 PM     profile     
Richard, are you using a Emmons bellcrank or that style of bellcrank? I use a GHS Boomer W22 on my JCH and I used too lower it a whole tone but it was stretching the life out of the return spring so I took it off. I'm going to try this. Good job Richard.

Tony

richard burton
Member

From: Britain

posted 06 September 2006 10:13 PM     profile     
Tony,
I made all the bits for the mod myself, as I couldn't find any stock items in my parts bin.

However, this mod is for an all-pull changer mechanism that hasn't physically got enough movement to drop a wound string a full tone.

If the changer has got enough movement, then another mod of mine is the simpler option.

I used this idea on my Carter for many years.

Basically, if you want to drop a full tone, there is excessive spring stretch, maybe 50% of the original spring length.

This translates into excessive pressure required at the knee lever.

If a longer spring is used, it might only be stretched 10% of its original length, thus less pressure at the lever.

Edited to add:
In the first sketch below, note that the bell crank is only used to retain my mod, the bell crank does not rotate.



[This message was edited by richard burton on 06 September 2006 at 10:18 PM.]

Bill Hankey
Member

From: Pittsfield, MA, USA

posted 07 September 2006 05:45 AM     profile     

Richard B.,

I've wished that I could have viewed your inventiveness at close range. The combination of introducing new ideas, to be carried out by a capable machinist, is the formula for better steel guitar performances. Struggling to maintain a melody line, commonly experienced with maladjustive steel guitars, can be "supplanted", when a little motivation to eradicate the nuisance is employed. I have found a means of counteracting the 6th string's atypical disassembly from E9th tuning chordal structuring. It's called the GOLO.

[This message was edited by Bill Hankey on 07 September 2006 at 07:56 AM.]

Charlie McDonald
Member

From: Lubbock, Texas, USA

posted 07 September 2006 07:35 AM     profile     
The GOLO?
Bill Hankey
Member

From: Pittsfield, MA, USA

posted 07 September 2006 09:30 AM     profile     

Charlie M.,

"Golo" ? Yes, the Golo is a subtle technique of positioning the 6th string in a forced reciprocating alignment, which reduces the annoyance of detuning to virtually nil. I can easily lower the 6th G# string 3 half tones with little effort. Amazing, but true!

[This message was edited by Bill Hankey on 07 September 2006 at 09:33 AM.]

Bill Hankey
Member

From: Pittsfield, MA, USA

posted 08 September 2006 02:38 AM     profile     

This post was introduced in hope of reviving the old "kick the tires" approach on this forum. But the apparent refusal of knowledgeable steel guitarists to engage in, or become supportive of viable ideas, is not conducive to musical interests, or morale. I find it appalling that a simplistic post, such as, "I've got one" "he has one" "mine is black" "his is blue" etc., etc., etc. and leaves much to be desired. Certainly, it is not fair to those who wish to acquire further knowledge through information posted on this forum.

[This message was edited by Bill Hankey on 08 September 2006 at 02:42 AM.]

Charlie McDonald
Member

From: Lubbock, Texas, USA

posted 08 September 2006 05:25 AM     profile     
Bill, can you add more about the reciprocating alignment on str. 6?
I'm going for a whole step lower on that string.
Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 08 September 2006 07:29 AM     profile     
The 3rd string has a lot of tension on it. I use a Jagwire .0115. It doesn't break, but the tightness makes me nervous sometimes.

I'm in the minority in that I use a wound 6th string - a .022w. While it requires more pedal travel and has less tension, it also has no tuning problems at all.

I don't lower my 6th string to F#. The travel of the lever would be extreme, I think.

I would switch to a plain 6th string if the tone was pleasing to my ears. It is not. The .020 or .022 plain strings just don't sound right to me. I guess I always expect a certain sound when I pick that string, and if it's not there it disturbs me. I know that the plain 6th works well for most players - it just doesn't work for me. Old habits sometimes aren't worth breaking.

------------------
Bobby Lee (a.k.a. b0b) - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts
Williams D-12 E9, C6add9, Sierra Olympic S-12 (F Diatonic)
Sierra Laptop S-8 (E6add9), Fender Stringmaster D-8 (E13, C6 or A6) My Blog

Bill Hankey
Member

From: Pittsfield, MA, USA

posted 08 September 2006 01:24 PM     profile     

Charlie M.,

Reciprocating alignment denotes measures taken to harness the intonation discrepancies I've experienced with the G# 6th string. Many steel guitar finishes are beautiful, but when it comes to the tuning aspects, many fall short of expectations. I use a piano tuning fork to check vibrations. It is more accurate than electronic tuners. Try this little test on any steel guitar, by pressing the "A" pedal and E-F knee lever. Pick the 6th string first before the changes. Tune the 6th string at 440 for the test. Please let me know if the G# 6th string goes flat. If you see a drop, join the conundrum of the E9th tuning albatross. I've managed to find a method of circumventing this problem, by resorting to quasi-radical changes unrelated to standarized designs.

[This message was edited by Bill Hankey on 09 September 2006 at 01:45 AM.]

Charlie McDonald
Member

From: Lubbock, Texas, USA

posted 08 September 2006 02:04 PM     profile     
I see what you mean, Bill.
I'm finding not so radical solutions here lately, such as extra rods for compensators, etc., and hopefully will stumble into my own secret solution.

By the way, without knowing it, you may have solved a dilemma in choosing between a mica MSA and a maple one. I remembered that I used a tuning fork to select wood for speaker baffles.
Resonance counts.

[This message was edited by Charlie McDonald on 08 September 2006 at 02:06 PM.]

Dag Wolf
Member

From: Bergen, Norway

posted 09 September 2006 01:22 AM     profile     
I lower my 6th string a whole tone with a wound .022w. I have a Zumsteel and I guess it could lower it close to a F if I wanted.

Bruce`s design are maybe the best changer you can get.
Even the older Zum changer are great an allow just about anything you will need.

Dag

Bill Hankey
Member

From: Pittsfield, MA, USA

posted 09 September 2006 02:29 AM     profile     

b0b,

I had erred by typing the 6th G# string a B# in one part of my last message to Charlie. I noticed the error this morning, and made the correction. Your last input is excellent, and well stated. I am drawn to your sincere regard for the membership on this forum. You've given readers of the forum the best opportunity to introduce their views, and insights. I know of no other medium that equals the
good that is realized on this forum.

[This message was edited by Bill Hankey on 09 September 2006 at 02:31 AM.]

Bill Hankey
Member

From: Pittsfield, MA, USA

posted 09 September 2006 02:55 AM     profile     

Dag W.,

I recall when Buzz Evans praised the Mullen at a steel guitar show. His expertise as a guitarist, and steel guitarist, is acclaimed to be some of the best in America. I appreciate your message, and I will take into account your 6th string experience. You may have noticed, that others have indicated that a problem does exist in lowering the 6th a full tone.

Edited for correction of Buzz's steel preference.

[This message was edited by Bill Hankey on 09 September 2006 at 08:10 AM.]

Curtis Mason
Member

From: Ohio, USA

posted 09 September 2006 06:41 PM     profile     
I do not have problems with the 3rd and 6th strings since I switched to a .115 3rd and a wound 6th .22, I use the Jagwire Stainless (Lloyd Green) artist series. I prefer the smoother sound of the wound 6th string, and the pitch is so much more stable than using an unwound 6th string. I have a 1978 Sho-Bud LDG, I keep it well lubricated and do not experience problems with measurable cabinet drop, or strings not returning to proper pitch...I use a Peterson VSII Tuner.
Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 09 September 2006 10:31 PM     profile     
Thanks, Bill.

I agree with Curtis, that the Lloyd Green string gauges from Jagwire provide a solution to most complaints about the E9th G# strings. Breakage is minimal on the 3rd string, and there are no tuning problems on the 6th.

Much is made of the fact that the 6th string goes slightly flat when A+F is engaged. This is normal cabinet drop. It does not prevent the guitar from being well tuned. The secret to sounding in tune with A+F is to compensate for the flatness of the position by moving the bar to the right by about 1/6 of a fret.

Guide the bar with your ears, not your eyes, and your 6th string will not sound flat.

------------------
Bobby Lee (a.k.a. b0b) - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts
Williams D-12 E9, C6add9, Sierra Olympic S-12 (F Diatonic)
Sierra Laptop S-8 (E6add9), Fender Stringmaster D-8 (E13, C6 or A6) My Blog

Bill Hankey
Member

From: Pittsfield, MA, USA

posted 10 September 2006 04:23 AM     profile     

Curtis M.,

Keenness of perceptibility must be taken into account whenever a statement made is contrary to popular consensus. The 6th string detuning enigma may very well require steps taken beyond string selections. Different levels of players do not share the same levels of insight. Becoming more aware of an instrument's noncompliances, requires "becoming" properly introduced at inopportune moments. Slippages, breakages, detunings, electrical failures, temperature changes at poorly managed air-conditioned bookings, sun, winds, and rains; all are part of the steel guitar experiences. Extended practice sessions should invariably lead a player to zero in on the ever so slight detuning of the 6th G# string.

Edited for correction of plurality error.

[This message was edited by Bill Hankey on 11 September 2006 at 02:35 AM.]

[This message was edited by Bill Hankey on 11 September 2006 at 02:43 AM.]

Bill Hankey
Member

From: Pittsfield, MA, USA

posted 11 September 2006 04:16 AM     profile     

b0b,

Why is it that some things escape notice on one day, only to be focused upon the following days? The 6th G# string detuning, however slight, would be an example of an overlooked "entity". You suggested advancing the bar "1/6 of a tone" to compensate for the harmonic dissonance of the erratic detuning found by pressing A + E-F changes. The optative maneuvering of bar placement, may very well fall second best to compensatory mechanical additions. The simplistic nudge to bring the 6th into harmonic pitch, may outweigh any method that could create complexities never to be resolved. The detuning enigma is subject to further study, as it applies to all stringed instruments, by greater or lesser degrees.

Craig A Davidson
Member

From: Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin USA

posted 11 September 2006 06:53 PM     profile     
What would I use on a push-pull for a string guage on my sixth string if I want it wound and only raise it?

------------------
1985 Emmons push-pull,Evans SE200,Fender Twin, Hilton pedal, Jag Wire Strings


Michael Johnstone
Member

From: Sylmar,Ca. USA

posted 11 September 2006 07:43 PM     profile     
You could always play a keyless Excel.They break absolutely zero strings even with a 25.5" scale. I use Jagwires and use an .011 for my 3rd string and I pump Mooney licks with impunity for 3 or 4 sets a night for weeks and weeks before the string goes dead and I finally change it. Also,their anti-detuning device works amazingly well and does away with a myriad of tuning and tempering issues - the 6th string return,whole step lower among them.
Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 11 September 2006 07:57 PM     profile     
Craig, when I played a push-pull I used a wound 6th (.022). I raised it a half step on one pedal and a whole step on another. No problem.

Bill Hankey wrote:
quote:
You suggested advancing the bar "1/6 of a tone" to compensate for the harmonic dissonance of the erratic detuning found by pressing A + E-F changes. The optative maneuvering of bar placement, may very well fall second best to compensatory mechanical additions. The simplistic nudge to bring the 6th into harmonic pitch, may outweigh any method that could create complexities never to be resolved.
I suggested moving the bar "about 1/6 of a fret". A fret respresents a semi-tone on the steel guitar, not a tone.

I believe that a mechanical compensator is neither necessary nor desirable to resolve the 6th string detuning problem. Proper tuning and bar placement provides the more elegant solution, in my opinion.

------------------
Bobby Lee (a.k.a. b0b) - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts
Williams D-12 E9, C6add9, Sierra Olympic S-12 (F Diatonic)
Sierra Laptop S-8 (E6add9), Fender Stringmaster D-8 (E13, C6 or A6) My Blog

Bill Hankey
Member

From: Pittsfield, MA, USA

posted 12 September 2006 03:46 AM     profile     

b0b,

Of course, I have been aware of the semitone terminology for years. It can be referred to as: 1/2 tone, or 1/2 step as well. To recite my awareness, and escape embarrassment for the misquote, I'll refer to the 4th string raise of the E9th tuning. Found at the "C" pedal location, (I also have been using the change on the RKL for more years than is believable.) Time passes so quickly, and memory is strained at times when concentration goes astray, by dwelling intently on single issues. Pointing out my inadvertent typo error, is another example of the good you are doing, by exacting your leadership in scrutiny. In an attempt to save face on my part, I would point out one of the full tone uses (E-F# C pedal) while playing "Apple Jack", Tom Brumley's exciting instrumental. To play it properly, requires some fancy "C" pedal work. One part of the instrumental necessitates "walking down" four 1/2 steps, or 1/2 tones. Just for example, use F# as the beginning note of the four 1/2 tone changes. Then it can be recited as F#-F-E-Eb. As anyone might imagine, standing corrected is not the end of the world. It helps to keep me a little more on my toes, as the saying goes. Looking back on past postings, would remove any doubt that my awareness of the potential effects of 1/2 or full tones are in good hands here at my home. BTW, my steel features an array of differentiated additional features. Contoured maple arm rest, "Lucky 7", "Golo", 5th & 6th short pedals, fretless fretboard, HUF, padded knee levers, and more. Yesterday, I watched a tape of Frank Caruso's East Coast (Boston area) Show made in 1992. It is topped off by some excellent steel guitar performances, and vocalizing in Texas. What a treat! It perked up my inspiration to spend more time practicing.

Charlie McDonald
Member

From: Lubbock, Texas, USA

posted 12 September 2006 05:39 AM     profile     
Do I understand correctly that most 'cabinet drop' comes from the use of pedal A (with E & F levers?
I would think that the moment arm of the C lever would produce more deflection (unless I misunderstand the nature of the malady).

What if the A pedal and F lever were lowers?
Would #6 detune still?

Would like to see a picture of your gui, Bill.

Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 12 September 2006 08:08 AM     profile     
Yes, Charlie. Lowers can cause the inverse of "cabinet drop". I am aware that my 5th string raises slightly when I lower my E's. I tune the D# to the G#, and have a compensator that pulls my F# up to be in tune with the slightly altered B. (My F# is normally tuned to the pedaled C# - an odd personal preference of mine.)

My compensator was not installed to correct for the "cabinet raise", though. It is the standard F# compensator in reverse. Most people lower their F# slightly to be in tune with the pedaled C#. I raise it to be in tune with the E lever instead.

It's another one of those things that I'd change if it weren't for the fact that I have 28 years of playing this way under my belt.

------------------
Bobby Lee (a.k.a. b0b) - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts
Williams D-12 E9, C6add9, Sierra Olympic S-12 (F Diatonic)
Sierra Laptop S-8 (E6add9), Fender Stringmaster D-8 (E13, C6 or A6) My Blog

Bill Hankey
Member

From: Pittsfield, MA, USA

posted 12 September 2006 03:01 PM     profile     

Charlie M.,

It is impractical to accept as factual, the trending toward specific string gauges for the 6th string. A wound .022, according to reports, seems to be a popular choice. I use a plain string to avoid a few of the shortcomings found in the .022 wound version. For one, the wound doesn't match the tonal qualities of the .O11, .014, and .018 strings. This small difference equals brighter tones for selected triads. The flimsy windings of the .022 wound are not stable, and the stability is questionable. I've become selective with the plain 6th string. Gauges above .020 plain, resembling stiff wire have been avoided. A similar problem exists with the 3rd string of the Spanish guitar. Many who play very little lead, will become vociferous, claiming that a wound "G" string is better. A problem ensues when a "lead" player picks up the instrument. There is a world of difference in strumming and playing lead. No doubt, a plain .014 would be a better choice for a hot lead player on the Spanish 3rd string. Trying to succeed with keeping a steel guitar tuned for pleasurable playing isn't easy if maladjustments abound mechanically. The Spanish 3rd, G string, is the equivalent problem of the 6th string on the steel guitar. Tuning a Spanish "open" and then playing anything but "bar" chords reveals discrepancies on the tuner. The same rule applies to the steel guitar, and it's troublesome 6th, G# string.

Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 12 September 2006 03:14 PM     profile     
I don't accept the premise that the 6th string is "troublesome". I've found it to be among the most stable strings on the guitar, especially when using an .022 wound.

The tonal difference between wound and plain must occur at some point. I find that placing the difference between the B and G# strings improves tonal separation, creating two distinct voices in harmony.

------------------
Bobby Lee (a.k.a. b0b) - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts
Williams D-12 E9, C6add9, Sierra Olympic S-12 (F Diatonic)
Sierra Laptop S-8 (E6add9), Fender Stringmaster D-8 (E13, C6 or A6) My Blog

Charlie McDonald
Member

From: Lubbock, Texas, USA

posted 12 September 2006 03:26 PM     profile     
Very interesting.
Paul Redmond
Member

From: Illinois, USA

posted 13 September 2006 02:59 AM     profile     
C'mon guys. This old 6th string debate is like the Chevy vs. Ford thing!! Use what works for you. THEN use that thing called a "bar" to "tweak" out the differences. Works every time. FWIW, the major problem the poor ole "22-plain" has is it's conformance to way-too-small diameter rollers or, should I say, the lack of conformance to them. It's a stiff little bugger that just doesn't want to bend easily. Yet bend it must and most rollers on most guitars are simply too small in diameter to help this little guy out.
PRR
Bill Hankey
Member

From: Pittsfield, MA, USA

posted 13 September 2006 04:55 AM     profile     

b0b,

Thanks for engendering your steadfast thoughts on proper usages of string types, and gauges. I have purposely focused on the 3rd and 6th strings, for reasons that point to a lack of elemental consistencies. The Nashville sound comes highly priced, considering the evasive chromatics involved in the E9th tuning. Just for the sake of disputatious endeavoring, and to make a point, the tuning could be called the "stumbling block" tuning. There are quite simply, too many disorganized tones, that can easily disrupt the train of musical thoughts. There is no room for performance errors, as the E9th tuning is unforgiving, and announces with a blaring outcry, its dissent for incorrect melody lines. The E9th was formulated over time, by the masters of the instrument, and articles have been reported in numerous postings, supporting their concepts. The differences in knee levers arrangements, combined with pedal nonconformances, ideally reflects a lack of cohesion in accepted methodology. This generalization applies to string gauge selections, as well as methods of coping with minimal detunings. A significant realization comes to mind, whenever the tuners differ slightly in rotations required to bring a given string to the desired pitch. The plain 6th string is outstanding, due to the sudden change of pitch, requiring the least amount of rotations. I suspect that many turn to the .022 W. to rid their instrument of the subtle problem, and by doing so, surrender a brighter tone.

[This message was edited by Bill Hankey on 13 September 2006 at 05:00 AM.]

Charlie McDonald
Member

From: Lubbock, Texas, USA

posted 13 September 2006 07:20 AM     profile     
It may be an old debate, but I've learned more than most on this topic.
You take a theory and you put it into practice.
For example, would a .022 wound, with its long throw, be a good companion for a .012 on string 3 if you want full step lowers?
Putting two and two together is fun for some of who lack experience.
Bill Hankey
Member

From: Pittsfield, MA, USA

posted 13 September 2006 08:13 AM     profile     

Charlie M.

I should opine at this time that "close" counts while playing the game of horseshoes, not steel guitars. The same rule applies to tuning and detuning. It requires "horse sense", as you have hinted, in making heads or "tails" of nuisances, occurring as animate or inanimate sources. Thanks for your input on this subject matter.


This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 

All times are Pacific (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Pedal Steel Pages

Note: Messages not explicitly copyrighted are in the Public Domain.

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46

Our mailing address is:
The Steel Guitar Forum
148 South Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Support the Forum