Steel Guitar Strings
Strings & instruction for lap steel, Hawaiian & pedal steel guitars
http://SteelGuitarShopper.com
Ray Price Shuffles
Classic country shuffle styles for Band-in-a-Box, by BIAB guru Jim Baron.
http://steelguitarmusic.com

This Forum is CLOSED.
Go to bb.steelguitarforum.com to read and post new messages.



Thread Closed  Topic Closed
  The Steel Guitar Forum
  Pedal Steel
  Is 24 i/4" scale common? (Page 1)

Post New Topic  
your profile | join | preferences | help | search


This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Is 24 i/4" scale common?
Don McClellan
Member

From: Kihei, Maui, Hawaii

posted 14 September 2006 05:30 PM     profile     
Can somebody tell me if 24 1/4" scale length is common for PSG? Which guitar makers use this size scale? I know Willams Guitars do. Any others? Thanks, Don
KENNY KRUPNICK
Member

From: Grove City,Ohio

posted 14 September 2006 05:58 PM     profile     
Yes!!! Zumsteel, Emmmons, Mullen,Fessenden To name a few.
Billy Wilson
Member

From: El Cerrito, California, USA

posted 14 September 2006 06:15 PM     profile     
Don, that is good news for you because that fret board with ths atoms on it that you like will fit on yer new Williams. Totally molecular dude!
Roy Ayres
Member

From: Starke, Florida, USA

posted 15 September 2006 09:58 AM     profile     
My Excel Superb has a 24 1/4" scale.

------------------

Visit my Web Site at RoysFootprints.com
Browse my Photo Album and be sure to sign my Guest Book.

Erv Niehaus
Member

From: Litchfield, MN, USA

posted 15 September 2006 11:20 AM     profile     
Sho~Buds are 24" along with the Sho~Bud on

steroids, the Fulawka.

[This message was edited by Erv Niehaus on 15 September 2006 at 01:48 PM.]

Kirk Hamre
Member

From: Birmingham, Alabama

posted 20 September 2006 04:56 PM     profile     
Who cares Don...just play the thing.
Kirk
Ronald Sikes
Member

From: Corsicana, Texas, USA

posted 20 September 2006 08:00 PM     profile     
Derby is 24 1/4" scale

------------------
D10 Mahogany Laquer Derby,SD10 Black Laquer Derby,ShoBud LDG, Peavy Session 2000,NV112, Transtubefex

Billy Wilson
Member

From: El Cerrito, California, USA

posted 20 September 2006 08:58 PM     profile     
Yeah, you right Kirk!
Bill Ford
Member

From: Graniteville SC Aiken

posted 21 September 2006 06:38 AM     profile     
Is sustain better on short, or long scale? Or is it just opinion?

BF

Curt Langston
Member

From: ***In the shadows of Tulsa at Bixby, USA***

posted 21 September 2006 07:01 AM     profile     
I believe it is opinion. My 25 inch scale keyless Pedalmaster sustains for days.

IMHO, of course.

Erv Niehaus
Member

From: Litchfield, MN, USA

posted 21 September 2006 07:59 AM     profile     
I've always felt that the longer the string the longer the sustain. That is why I've always preferred the Stringmasters with the 26" scale.

However, when you go to pedal steels there is another thing to consider. It being string breakage. I believe that I read somewhere that when Buddy Emmons and Shot Jackson split company and work began on the Emmons guitar there was some experimentation done on string length. It was determined that 24 1/4" was the maximum string length that would still give you good tone and minimize string breakage.

You need to remember that with a keyed guitar, when you are stretching a sting you are also stretching that portion of the string beyond the roller nut.

Longer scale lengths are successful on keyless guitars because you are eliminating the extra string beyond the nut.

Curt Langston
Member

From: ***In the shadows of Tulsa at Bixby, USA***

posted 21 September 2006 09:07 AM     profile     
quote:
However, when you go to pedal steels there is another thing to consider. It being string breakage. I believe that I read somewhere that when Buddy Emmons and Shot Jackson split company and work began on the Emmons guitar there was some experimentation done on string length. It was determined that 24 1/4" was the maximum string length that would still give you good tone and minimize string breakage.

You need to remember that with a keyed guitar, when you are stretching a sting you are also stretching that portion of the string beyond the roller nut.

Longer scale lengths are successful on keyless guitars because you are eliminating the extra string beyond the nut.


Erv, you're my kind of thinker. I agree totally.

[This message was edited by Curt Langston on 21 September 2006 at 09:09 AM.]

David Doggett
Member

From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

posted 21 September 2006 09:16 AM     profile     
It seems like 24 1/4" is the most common scale length for pedal steels. My Sho-Bud Pro III, Emmons p/p, Zum and Fessy were all 24 1/4". My Carter is 24".

quote:
Is sustain better on short, or long scale? Or is it just opinion?

When considering tone and sustain, you have to consider not only the scale length, but also the string gauge and tension. If the string gauge remains the same, and the pitch remains the same, then a longer scale requires more tension. Higher tension provides louder tone, richer overtones, and longer sustain up until just before the break point.

But tension is limited by the breakage problem. If tension is already optimal for the pitch, then you can use a longer scale at the same tension and pitch by using a lighter gauge string. For a given pitch and tension, a thinner longer string gives richer ovetones and longer sustain than a shorter thicker string. You can demonstrate this easily. Put your bar at some fret, say the 3rd fret, and play a note. Then put your bar on the next lower string and move it up to the appropriate fret to give the same note. The thicker string has a duller tone with less sustain. This is why 7' concert grand pianos have better tone and sustain than 5' baby grands.

So, for a given pitch, a longer scale can improve tone and sustain either by raising the tension while maintaining the same gauge, or by using a smaller gauge while maintaining the same tension, or by a combination of the two (higher tension and smaller gauge).

Erv brought up a related issue about keyless heads. When the changer pulls a string for a raise, it stretches. The extra string between the nut and key (call it the overhang) also must be stretched. That extra stretch requires more rotation of the changer finger, and results in increased breakage at the changer. The short overhang of a keyless requires less stretching, less changer rotation, and results in less breakage. Because of this less breakage, keyless guitars can use a longer neck with higher tension, theoretically resulting in louder tone and longer sustain. But some people claim there is less sustain with some keyless guitars; so there may be other factors at work.

------------------
Student of the Steel: Zum uni, Fender tube amps, squareneck and roundneck resos, tenor sax, keyboards

David Wren
Member

From: Placerville, California, USA

posted 21 September 2006 04:15 PM     profile     
Nice comments Erv! Makes sense to me.

------------------
Dave Wren
'96 Carter S12-E9/B6,7X7; NV 112; Fender Twin Custom 15 ('65 reissue); Session 500s; Hilton Pedal; Black Box
www.ameechapman.com


Curt Langston
Member

From: ***In the shadows of Tulsa at Bixby, USA***

posted 22 September 2006 05:51 AM     profile     
David, I did not realize that the Carter scale length was 24". I assumed it was 24 1/4
You learn something new everyday!

David Doggett
Member

From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

posted 22 September 2006 09:03 AM     profile     
Well, I don't know about all Carters. But before I wrote that, I measured all my guitars and was surprised to see my Carter D12 come out at 24" even. Of course, a quarter of an inch is not that much difference.
John McClung
Member

From: Los Angeles, CA, USA

posted 27 September 2006 01:07 PM     profile     
Don, did you get a Williams? I thought you were getting an Excel. Could be wrong inference from the next post after yours here, but what's the scoop? Still have your Kline?

------------------
E9 lessons
Mullen D-12/Carter SD-10/Webb amp/Profex II+Lexicon MPX-110 OR Line 6 Pod XT

Don McClellan
Member

From: Kihei, Maui, Hawaii

posted 27 September 2006 09:38 PM     profile     
John, Hi brother. Yes, I did get a Williams S12 and I love it so far. I ordered an Excel but there was a mix up in the ordering process and I ended up getting a Williams instead (long story). Yes, I still have my two Klines but one of them might be coming up for sale soon. The reason I asked about the 24 1/4 scale is because I might want to change the fret board on this Williams. The design is nice looking but a little too busy for me. I've been playing Klines for 27 years and the Williams fret board is so different it confuses me a little. I love the Emmons fret board and the Kline. I don't think its too difficult to change fret boards is it? I might just try to get used to this Williams fret board. Who knows?
Robert Leaman
Member

From: Murphy, North Carolina, USA

posted 28 September 2006 10:47 AM     profile     
With respect to string length and sustain, my Sierra Session D10 has a full 25 inch string length and magnificent sustain. It DOES NOT break strings including E9th 3rd G#. Of course, there is little more than 1/4 inch of string from the graduated roller nut to the gearless tuner.

I have no idea about whether or not a geared guitar can support a 25" scale. Many years ago, I worked for Bethlehem Steel and designed motor drive control systems for wire drawing machines. I learned something about high carbon steel wire and its properties. There is a absolute limit to constant tension applied to a specific gauge wire strand. In the case of music wire, this limit applies whether or not the wire (string) has a spiral wrap. There is a website (http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/7049/strmpl.htm) that talks about this. I know that one of the string companies has a website that shows string tension for various gauges tuned to various notes. I saw music wire drawn to as small as 0.001" and we made a stainless steel wire that is silver plated and is used to connect pacemakers to lazy hearts. Such a wire causes problems when it breaks.

[This message was edited by Robert Leaman on 28 September 2006 at 03:01 PM.]

Here is link for an interesting chart: http://www.daddario.com/Resources/JDCDAD/images/tension_chart.pdf

[This message was edited by Robert Leaman on 28 September 2006 at 04:23 PM.]

Curt Langston
Member

From: ***In the shadows of Tulsa at Bixby, USA***

posted 28 September 2006 10:55 AM     profile     
Robert, do you think that a keyed guitar can have a 25" scale? If not, then why not? I have often wondered why a person has to have a keyless guitar to get a 25" scale.
Herb Steiner
Member

From: Cedar Valley, Travis County TX

posted 28 September 2006 11:11 AM     profile     
Curt
A keyed guitar can have a 25" scale, but the scale length just can't support a .011 string tuned to G# and being raised to A. At least by current technologies.

My Bigsby has a 25" scale, but I tune it to D9 tuning. And I use regular E9 string guages. It works fine thataway, and without string rollers at the nut.

------------------
Herb's Steel Guitar Pages
Texas Steel Guitar Association

Curt Langston
Member

From: ***In the shadows of Tulsa at Bixby, USA***

posted 29 September 2006 10:08 AM     profile     
Thanks Herb, for your time and input. So, if I am reading correctly, a guitar can have a 25" scale, but it must be either keyless, or tuned down to D9th. If a keyed guitar had a 25" scale, tuned to E9th, the G# string would not hold up. Why is this? In other posts many have stated that the way the string is anchored to the tuning device (either keyed or keyless) does not matter. It is the scale length that matters. How does the string behind the roller nut come into the equation? Does it matter? If so, WHY does it matter? How does tension on the G# string, scale length, and string length behind the nut correlate? Would the complete length of the string matter? If so, why would it matter?
Thanks for any and all input.

BTW, this is not meant to be a key vs. keyless issue.
My questions pertain to scale length, string breakage, and string overhang.

Also, my 25" keyless Pedalmaster does not break strings any more than my 24" inch scale Carter. Could the reason my Carter has a 24" scale length be to reduce string breakage, by reducing overall string length? Does the 1/4" shorter overall string length,(from bridge to tuning device) have an effect an string breakage? (as opposed to the overall length on a 24 1/4 scale guitar) Could 1/4" make a difference?
Thanks again to all who have input.

Speaking of my Pedalmaster, here she is now!

Click on a pic!

[This message was edited by Curt Langston on 29 September 2006 at 03:14 PM.]

Michael Johnstone
Member

From: Sylmar,Ca. USA

posted 29 September 2006 01:13 PM     profile     
The shorter the string length from anchor to anchor,the less it stretches when pulled up with a pedal and the less it stretches,the less extra travel is needed to raise the pitch to the desired degree. A 25 inch keyless has less string length measured anchor to anchor than a 25 inch keyed guitar so the string on the keyed guitar would have to be pulled further to get up to pitch - thus exceeding the tensile strength of the string. This is really only an issue with the 3rd string on an E9 tuning. All the other strings fall mostly on the safe side of that equation regardless of the scale or keyed/keyless issues. Keyless is by far the better way to build a pedal steel for that and a myriad of other reasons of course. Just had to get that in.... Another factor is the much overlooked design flaw of most pedal steels and that is the rotating cam on the changer axel. If you bend a steel wire back and forth enough times - especially under great tension - it will break. Duh...
To my knowledge only Anapeg and Excel have addressed this institutionalized design shortcoming and gone to a linear pulling changer - virtually eliminating string breakage even on 25.5" scales.
Curt Langston
Member

From: ***In the shadows of Tulsa at Bixby, USA***

posted 29 September 2006 01:31 PM     profile     
quote:
A 25 inch keyless has less string length measured anchor to anchor than a 25 inch keyed guitar so the string on the keyed guitar would have to be pulled further to get up to pitch - thus exceeding the tensile strength of the string.

Interesting.... So, does less overall string length from anchor to anchor=less stretching needed, and therefore less tension on the G# string when pulled up to an A? Resulting in less string breakage? (Whether it be keyed or keyless)

Could this be the reason that you don't see any keyed 25" scale guitars?

Thanks for the input Michael. This is good.

Anyone else?

[This message was edited by Curt Langston on 29 September 2006 at 03:06 PM.]

David Doggett
Member

From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

posted 29 September 2006 03:16 PM     profile     
Curt we went through this awhile back and you finally saw that for a given gauge (say 0.011) and pitch (say A) the tension required will be dependent only on the scale length, not the overhang. A 25" scale will require more tension than a 24 1/4" scale. If both scales are 25", then the same tension will be required to pull to A. The length of overhang is irrelevant to tension. This is an indisputable fact of physics. Since the tension is actually greater on the keyless guitars with 25" scale than on the keyed 24 1/4" scale, why does the 25" keyless not have more breakage? The only answer we could come up with is that because of the shorter overhang, there is less stretch required for the pull to A. This means there is less rotation of the changer finger. That causes less flexing of the string over the changer, and apparently reduces the breakage. I don't have an opinion on keyless versus keyed. I have never tried a keyless. The word is that they have less sustain on the upper frets, but that might just be a myth.
Curt Langston
Member

From: ***In the shadows of Tulsa at Bixby, USA***

posted 29 September 2006 04:03 PM     profile     
Hey David! Thanks for your input. I don't want to start a ruckus or anything, but I just have a few friendly questions. You say:
quote:
Since the tension is actually greater on the keyless guitars with 25" scale than on the keyed 24 1/4" scale, why does the 25" keyless not have more breakage?

I question whether the 25" scale has more tension. From the input on this thread, I am beginning to think that a keyed 24 1/4" scale has MORE tension, since it has a longer overall distance,(changer to tuning device) and is strecthed more, to pull from G# to A.
I know that a 24 1/4 keyed guitar feels tighter when I press my palm down on the strings, than it does on my 25" keyless.

quote:
If both scales are 25", then the same tension will be required to pull to A. The length of overhang is irrelevant to tension.

If you are stretching more string with the keyed guitar to get up to A, then more stretching, means more tension. More tension means you are getting closer to the breaking point of the string.
quote:
The length of overhang is irrelevant to tension.

Is it?
In an earlier post, the general consensus was that the overhang portion of the string was under the same tension as the scaled portion. If these two parts of the string are equal in tension, then a longer overall string(as in a keyed 24 1/4" keyed guitar) will have greater tension, than a keyless 25" scaled guitar with less than 1" overhang.

Imagine this:
We have a guitar with a scale of 24 1/4", but the tuning keys are 12" away from the nut. Could we use the same gauges of strings, and the same E9th tuning? If not, then Why not? Could we even tune the guitar to E9th? Or, would that require too much tension?

Just friendly questions here. I don't want to start a fight or anything.

What do you make of Michael Johnstone's statements?

[This message was edited by Curt Langston on 29 September 2006 at 05:08 PM.]

Michael Johnstone
Member

From: Sylmar,Ca. USA

posted 29 September 2006 10:03 PM     profile     
David - you owe it to yourself to check out a nice long scale keyless guitar,you'll find out that the tired myth of the lack of sustain in the upper register is indeed a load of crap - the sustain is incredible.
In fact,there is harmonic information going on on a 25" or 25.5" that is not available on a shorter scale.This is not a keyed vs keyless thang - it's a short scale vs long scale thang.It just so happens that you can't make a 25" keyed pedal guitar for obvious reasons. -MJ-
David Doggett
Member

From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

posted 29 September 2006 10:27 PM     profile     
Michael Johnson said:
quote:
A 25 inch keyless has less string length measured anchor to anchor than a 25 inch keyed guitar so the string on the keyed guitar would have to be pulled further to get up to pitch - thus exceeding the tensile strength of the string.
For a new string, this is flat wrong. Yes the string has to stretch further, but that does not increase the tension. Repeated stretching does wear the string out, so at some point the weakened tensile strength of the string will be exceeded (even if the tension is not greater), and the string will break. It is the tension over the scale that determines pitch. If the pitch, gauge, and scale length are the same, the tension is the same regardless of the length of overhang. If the pitch and gauge are the same, the longer scale will have greater tension, regardless of the overhang. Tension is measured as force at the end of the string. It doesn't matter how long the string is, or how much it has to stretch, 10 lbs. of force on a 25" scale string with 1/4" of overhang is equal to 10 lbs. of force on a 25" scale string with 6" of overhang, or 6' of overhang. Sure, the stretch is different. But stretch is not tension. We went over this many times in many ways before. Have you developed Alzheimers? Just kidding , but getting frustrated.
David Doggett
Member

From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

posted 29 September 2006 10:34 PM     profile     
Michael, I do believe longer scales are better in terms of tone. That's true of concert grand pianos versus baby grands, and of short scale Stringmasters versus long scale ones, and it's true for pedal steels. But that refers to scale length. I am not clear on the effect of different overhang lengths on tone. That seems to be the issue in the keyless/keyed debate.
Curt Langston
Member

From: ***In the shadows of Tulsa at Bixby, USA***

posted 30 September 2006 05:18 AM     profile     
quote:
Yes the string has to stretch further, but that does not increase the tension.

So, you are saying that it takes equal amounts of tension to stretch an .011 gauge G# string up to an A, with an overall length of 28 1/2", as it does to stretch a 25 1/2" overall length of the same gauge, to the same pitch?
Now, I am confused about that.

quote:
It is the tension over the scale that determines pitch. If the pitch, gauge, and scale length are the same, the tension is the same regardless of the length of overhang.

quote:
It is the tension over the scale that determines pitch.

Yes, but how much force is need to acheive that tension? The overhang part must be stretched as well.

quote:
But stretch is not tension

But tension is needed for stretch!

So, if you had a guitar with an overhang of 12", it would require no more tension to tune to E9th than a guitar with a 1" overhang? Assuming both guitars have a 24 1/4" scale.

How could that be? It just does not seem logical. That 12" length of overhang must be included in the tension, since we have already determined that the overhang part and the scale part of the string have equal tension.

All the tension charts show about a 1 pound increase in tension per inch of scale length.

I know that scale length and overall length are not the same. But you still have to stretch that overhang portion to get the scale part up to pitch!

And a keyed 24 1/4 scale keyed guitar has about 28+ inches of string to stretch, to get the scale portion up to pitch.

And what about Buddy Emmon's statement about not being able to construct a 25" scale keyed guitar? Why was he and Shot not able to do it?
Buddy said:

quote:
In reference to your earlier post, my only experience with the 25” scale other than the Sierra was when Shot Jackson and I were building Sho~Buds. It was during the time the high G# was added to the tuning that we encountered the string breakage problem and had to reduce the scale 24 ½ inches.
To be different than Sho~Bud and possibly reduce string breakage even more, I had fifty 24 ¼” Emmons atom fret boards made in Nashville and gave them to Ron to use on the first guitars. By that time, the Sho~Bud fret board had proven that the longer scale didn’t work so there was no need to experiment with the Emmons guitar. Ron had built a Sho~Bud clone prior to my meeting him and may have been referring to that guitar, but the Emmons guitar started at 24 ¼” and stayed there.


quote:
By that time, the Sho~Bud fret board had proven that the longer scale didn’t work so there was no need to experiment with the Emmons guitar.

had proven that the longer scale didn't work
Why?

Why did he have to shorten the scale to reduce string breakage? A keyless guitar does fine with a 25" scale. Why won't a keyed guitar work with a 25" scale?

I think it has to due with tension on the overhang!

Seems to me Buddy was saying that a keyed 25" guitar kept breaking the G#'s.

Why is Ed's Beast with a 29+" scale unable to be tuned to standard E9th, with the same gauges that we use on 24 1/4 scales?
Could it be that since Ed's beast is virtually ALL "overall" string length (changer to tuning device), and an .011 gauge string will only stretch so far up to tension, before it breaks?
In fact, Ed's Beast virtually has no nut. It is virtually all "overall" length!

I appreciate the input. No need to get frustrated. Just educate me.

I'm listening!

[This message was edited by Curt Langston on 30 September 2006 at 10:24 AM.]

Erv Niehaus
Member

From: Litchfield, MN, USA

posted 30 September 2006 08:24 AM     profile     
I think there is something else to consider with string breakage. The higher in tone the string is, the more you have to stretch it to get it up to tone. On a keyless guiter you don't have to deal with much extra string past the nut. However, on a keyed guitar you have to stretch that part of the string past the nut, which on the 3rd string is considerable. This requires the changer finger to rotate more and you are bending that portion of the string more every time you go from G# to A. The more you have to bend a string, the sooner it will break.
Michael Johnstone
Member

From: Sylmar,Ca. USA

posted 30 September 2006 10:18 AM     profile     
"The more you have to bend a string, the sooner it will break."
Yup. That's why linear pulling changers (Anapeg & Excel) don't break strings and rotating cam changers (all other manufacturers) do.
David Doggett
Member

From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

posted 30 September 2006 12:30 PM     profile     
Curt, you are again confusing stretch with tension, just as you did a couple of months ago. Just because you have to stretch the string more to go from G# to A does not mean the tension is greater. If the scale length and gauge are the same on the two necks, then there will be the same tension on both strings at G#, and again at the end of the pull at A. The string with the longer overhang will have to have a longer pull to take up the extra stretch, but the tension at the end of the pull up to A will be the same. It is a longer but softer pull. The force or tension at the end of the pull is the same on both strings. The longer stretch does not take more force or more tension.
Curt Langston
Member

From: ***In the shadows of Tulsa at Bixby, USA***

posted 30 September 2006 01:05 PM     profile     
quote:
Just because you have to stretch the string more to go from G# to A does not mean the tension is greater.

So, you're saying more stretch does not take more tension?

David, you say

quote:
It doesn't matter how long the string is, or how much it has to stretch, 10 lbs. of force on a 25" scale string with 1/4" of overhang is equal to 10 lbs. of force on a 25" scale string with 6" of overhang, or 6' of overhang.

In that case, we should be able to have 30" scale keyed guitars tuned to standard E9th with the same gauges of strings, as a 24 1/4" scale guitar!.............But we don't!

Why?

(1) Also, why did Buddy and Shot come to the conclusion that a keyed 25" scale was too long?

(2) If your statement is true, then why won't Ed's Beast pull an .011 gauge G# up to A, with out breaking?

[This message was edited by Curt Langston on 30 September 2006 at 03:21 PM.]

Michael Johnstone
Member

From: Sylmar,Ca. USA

posted 30 September 2006 03:04 PM     profile     
Yeah - Why? Not a bad question.
David Doggett
Member

From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

posted 30 September 2006 03:20 PM     profile     
Hunh? I see no connection with your question and anything said above.

Curt, here's the thread where we went through all this back in July: http://steelguitarforum.com/Forum5/HTML/013035.html

Eventually you agreed with everyone else that total string length has nothing to do with tension, only scale length affects tension. Why are you bringing this up again?

Curt Langston
Member

From: ***In the shadows of Tulsa at Bixby, USA***

posted 30 September 2006 03:23 PM     profile     
quote:
Eventually you agreed with everyone else that total string length has nothing to do with tension, only scale length affects tension. Why are you bringing this up again?

Because I question whether I was wrong to begin with. I have unanswered questions.

David, you say

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It doesn't matter how long the string is, or how much it has to stretch, 10 lbs. of force on a 25" scale string with 1/4" of overhang is equal to 10 lbs. of force on a 25" scale string with 6" of overhang, or 6' of overhang.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In that case, we should be able to have 30" scale keyed guitars tuned to standard E9th with the same gauges of strings, as a 24 1/4" scale guitar!.............But we don't!

This question

Why can't we have a keyed 30" scale guitar?

Can you answer it?

I would like to know...................

And how about these two.

quote:
(1) Also, why did Buddy and Shot come to the conclusion that a keyed 25" scale was too long?

(2) If your statement is true, then why won't Ed's Beast pull an .011 gauge G# up to A, with out breaking?


Help me out here. I really want to know. This is not to pick a fight, I just need these questions answered.

[This message was edited by Curt Langston on 30 September 2006 at 03:33 PM.]

David Doggett
Member

From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

posted 30 September 2006 03:34 PM     profile     
And Michael, here is the never ending thread in which your false ideas about long overhang increasing tension were also laid to rest: http://steelguitarforum.com/Forum5/HTML/012971-2.html

Why are the two of you raising this dead horse again?

In those threads we agreed with the two of you that keyless guitars with short overhang may have less breakage because less stretching reduced string flexing at the changer. And everyone agreed that the reduced breakage is not due to less tension. In fact 25" scale keyless guitars have more tension than 24 1/4" scale keyed guitars (for the same pitch and string gauge). In spite of the increased tension, they take advantage of the decreased stretching and flexing, so they don't have more breakage - maybe even less. I think none of us will be surprised that the laws of physics have not changed since July.

David Doggett
Member

From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

posted 30 September 2006 03:40 PM     profile     
Reread those threads. All those questions were answered there. Holding gauge and pitch the same, increasing the scale length increases the tension. That's the answer for each of your questions. Decreasing the overhang length does not decrease the tension, but does decrease the stretching and flexing, and thereby decreases the breakage.
Curt Langston
Member

From: ***In the shadows of Tulsa at Bixby, USA***

posted 30 September 2006 03:48 PM     profile     
David,

Break it down a little more........

quote:
Why can't we have a keyed 30" scale guitar?

Just humor me......

[This message was edited by Curt Langston on 30 September 2006 at 04:32 PM.]


This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 

All times are Pacific (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Open Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Pedal Steel Pages

Note: Messages not explicitly copyrighted are in the Public Domain.

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46

Our mailing address is:
The Steel Guitar Forum
148 South Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Support the Forum