Author
|
Topic: Tubes and Tone
|
Derrick Mau Member From: Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
|
posted 15 March 2006 04:25 PM
profile
What brand of tubes do you like for your amp which gives you the ultimate in sweetness and tone for steel guitar? |
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 15 March 2006 04:44 PM
profile
IMO it completely depends on several variables:What amp What tube types What plate voltage How (hot) you run the amp (i.e. hoe hard you drive it, not necessarily how loud it is) What speaker(s) you use What style you play Beyond that - "brand" may not be your best way to choose tubes. Place of manufacture of the particular tube type is generally more important. For example, you could say "Groove Tubes", "Sovtek", "Fender", Electroharmonix" - and they might all be the same tube. but - if you say "New-Old-Stock U.S. RCA Blackplates" - that's a particular tube. OTOH, "Russian short-base 5881" is a particular tube that could carry any one of about 6-10 brand names. And isn't even a 5881. So - first, post what type of amp you use (including what power and preamp tubes it uses - don't forget the preamp tubes, they can be critical)and what kind of music you play - that's a good starting point for making recommendations.
|
Bobby Lee Sysop From: Cloverdale, North California, USA
|
posted 15 March 2006 05:21 PM
profile
I've always stuck with Mesa/Boogie tubes, but it's probably because I never change my tubes. They work, and I like the way my amps sound. No reason to change.------------------ Bobby Lee (a.k.a. b0b) - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts Williams D-12 E9, C6add9, Sierra Olympic S-12 (F Diatonic) Sierra Laptop S-8 (E6add9), Fender Stringmaster D-8 (E13, C6 or A6) My Blog |
David Doggett Member From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 15 March 2006 08:51 PM
profile
In general, harder, colder tubes give more clean headroom for steel, and softer, warmer tubes give the crunch and early breakup 6-stringers like. Some sellers will rate the tubes so you can choose on that basis. But it seems like it is not a well controlled thing by the manufacturers. The rating seems to be done by taking a whole bunch of tubes of the same brand and trying them out, and sorting them out on a trial and error basis on a hardness-softness scale. But maybe some brands are on average harder or softer than others. However the rating is done, beware of the typical ratings for 6-stringers - it may give the opposite tonal characteristics from what a steeler wants. [This message was edited by David Doggett on 15 March 2006 at 08:53 PM.] |
Donny Hinson Member From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.
|
posted 16 March 2006 05:26 AM
profile
NOS RCA's. |
Andy Zynda Member From: Wisconsin
|
posted 16 March 2006 06:12 AM
profile
I'm with Donny. NOS Mullard, Telefunken, and Amperex are excellent, as well as GE. MESA does not make tubes. They import russian and chinese tubes, and imprint them with their brand. You never know what you're getting, but chances are good that they're Sovtek, and those are generally decent tubes, for current production. Nothing beats NOS (usually)
|
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 16 March 2006 06:42 AM
profile
I still fail to see how "NOS RCA's" can be recommended when we don't know what type of amp and output tubes are being used. For 6L6-types I agree, but not necessarily for others.And Sovteks are truly lowest-common-denominator tubes. Fairly tough, but not even in same ballpark with much of anything tonewise. Certainly not "sweet" sounding, no matter which tube. And their EL84 and 6V6-types are notorious firecrackers. |
Donny Hinson Member From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.
|
posted 16 March 2006 08:56 AM
profile
Jim, I said NOS RCA's because they were always my benchmark for perfection (uniformity). For steel (clean and clear tone), I don't think anything equals them. Some straight guitar players define "sweetness" as mild, smooth breakup and compression characteristics, but for steel, I don't want that kind of "sweetness", I just want a clean, clear, consistent sound.All that said, I prefer to get my tones in other ways than just randomly swapping tubes. |
Dave Zielinski Member From: Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 16 March 2006 09:05 AM
profile
I agree with Jim, Can't really justify "what is best" without knowing more about the amp.I currently am feeding my 59 tweed bassman (NOT a reissue)the reissued Tung-Sol 5881. Yes, this is a Russian reissue. I previously only used NOS Tung sols and Sylvanias. (Because I could get them reasonably) The new tubes are decent, but you get what you pay for. I always rebias after a replacement and check plate voltage. I know what my amp likes, and more importantly know what my ears like. The reissue tubes compress a bit more, but I can live with that. They do sound good. I suspect I won't get the life I get from USA made NOS tubes. This amp gets played at 3 gigs a week, so it is getting ample use. I think Sovteks are ok when the amp is running optimal, but don't expect to get longevity out of them. NOS tubes seemed to be made with better materials and lasted longer in my experience. But, in a gig situation IF I can get the tone out of a $40 set of tubes for 6 months, and have to replace them, that beats spending upwards of $120 on precious NOS Tung Sols each year. That supply will eventually run out, that sthe reality of it. What I have been doing is saving my old NOS tubes while they still have life left. Unfortunately the "best tube" conversation in my experience has been based on a whole lot of opinion, marketing and false claims. Both on so called "expert" repair guys and modern tube manufacturers. Try different tubes, get the amp set up right and your ears will tell you whats good and whats not. When you get the amp biased, make sure you are there with YOUR guitar as the tech adjusts it. A good tech will let you play the amp in between settings around the nominal set up. You can be the judge on the tone in the end. after all, you gotta play the amp! Unfortunately this "game" we are all in isn't cheap, and that makes it difficult to go out and buy $200 in tubes just to "try". good luck and as always, have FUN! |
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 16 March 2006 09:20 PM
profile
Donny - for 6L6's, I agree about the RCA's. but if the amp uses other tubes, that recommendation becomes moot.That's the reason I was asking him for more info about the amp. Hard to define "best" tubes when they could be going in a Fender, Vox, Marshall (or whatever) - all of which can use any of several types of tubes before you even GET to brand and then model. 6L6, 6V6, EL84, EL34, 5881, 6550 KT88...there are a LOT of power tube types. then, a lot of brands. Then, a lot of models of each tube within those brands. So I stand by my earlier statement - not enough info to make ANY kind of recommendation.
|
Derrick Mau Member From: Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
|
posted 16 March 2006 11:46 PM
profile
Hi guys,The amp I have is a Vox Cambridge Reverb from the 60's with a 10 inch bulldog speaker. The tubes are: AX7, 12AU7, EL84/6BQ5, and an EZ81/6AC4 |
Dave Mudgett Member From: Central Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 17 March 2006 12:22 AM
profile
{Edited because I just saw Derrick's reply after I submitted}1. I suggest reading the Watford Valve reports here for current status on EL-84/6BQ5 and 12AX7-style tubes: http://www.watfordvalves.com/reports.asp These guys do pretty serious testing and check out the gamut of what's available these days. It is, of course, their opinion, but I find their reports useful. 2. On preamp tubes, I don't find brand distinctions all that useful. I have to just try different tubes to see what works. They are fundamentally different than the power tubes. With power tubes, there is the issue of reliability under the plate voltage. With preamp tubes, that isn't nearly as big an issue - it's mainly tonal preference. 3. A lot of this really does depend on the style you like to play, what kind of guitar/pickups you have, what kind of tone you like - distorted, clean, etc., and so on. With that said, a lot of people like the NOS Telefunken, Mullard, or Amperex/Bugle Boy 12AX7/ECC83 or 12AU7/ECC82 tubes in Vox tube amps. You can even play around with different tube types. For example, if you want to clean up the sound, try substituting a 5751, 12AT7,12AY7, or 6072 for the 12AX7. Or if you want to dirty it up a bit, perhaps substitute the 12AV7 for the 12AU7. I put a relative nominal-gain chart for these preamp tubes here: http://steelguitarforum.com/Forum11/HTML/006922.html On the EZ81/6CA4 rectifier tube - I assume you mean 6CA4, not 6AC4 - I don't even know if they have been reissued. The main issue with rectifier tubes is reliability - they aren't in the signal path, and only affect tone to the extent that they do or do not deliver a consistent voltage without "sag" as the amp is pushed. You might want to check out Angela Instruments, http://www.angela.com . I have found him to be a good source for NOS tubes in general, but - IMO - do your homework and know what you want before dealing with a source like this. [This message was edited by Dave Mudgett on 17 March 2006 at 12:57 AM.] |
Bill Creller Member From: Saginaw, Michigan, USA
|
posted 17 March 2006 07:28 PM
profile
Derrick's Vox has a 6AC4 rectifier. I have the original schematic here in front of me. I calls out EZ81/6AC4 for the power supply section. I have been using Groove tubes, partly because I can call them and tell them I want tubes in the output that will not break up easily. They have a number system for output tubes, the higher numbers don'r break up as easy. I have 8s in my small 6V6 type amps, and 8s in my Fender Vibrosonic Reverb, which has 6L6s in push-pull parallel. Good luck with all of them so far (four years) |
Dave Mudgett Member From: Central Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 17 March 2006 09:32 PM
profile
Yeah, I see the schematic too - here's one at http://www.freeinfosociety.com/electronics/schematics/audio/voxcambridgereverb.pdf - but I assume that's a misprint. It lists V1 (rectifier) as EZ81 (6AC4). I believe the American equivalent for EZ-81 is 6CA4 - I've never heard of a 6AC4. Try Googling EZ81 + 6AC4. Now try Googling EZ81 + 6CA4. All suppliers list it as 6CA4. Either way, the European version is EZ81. |
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 17 March 2006 10:16 PM
profile
Groove tubes has a simple system for ordering, but they are simply an overpriiced (IMO) marketing machine that sells the same cheap imported tubes as everyone else. Nice if you want simple ordering, but useless from a tonal perspective. When I get an amp with Groove tubes I throw them away. Seriously. Same with Sovteks, which are often the same tubes. Especially laughable are the 6V6's which are usually imitation 6L6's that didn't pass tests.For EL84's you are MUCH better off with Amperex, Telefunken, Mullard etc. Expensive, but worth it. Most of the newly-manufactured EL84's are flat awful. For your "AX7" (I'm assuming that's a "12AX7"), RCA, Telefunken, Sylvania and Philips are all good. JJ makes decent new ones. The Sovtek 12AX7LPS can be good, but half of the ones I've gotten are noisy. For 12AU7's stick with NOS U.S, British and German tubes for sure. And yes, that's a 6AC4. A little tough to find, so you'll be a bit more limited on choices. But I'm curious - what style of steel do you play, and how loud? EL84's are known for aggresiveness, chime and nice distortion....not sweet clean tones. Not my choice for traditional steel sounds, but could be killer for a sound with more bite and an edge to it.... |
Dave Mudgett Member From: Central Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 17 March 2006 11:30 PM
profile
Jim, I'm with you on the NOS EL84 tubes, but respectfully, I don't know where you're gonna find a 6AC4. Every single tube equivalent chart I've seen lists the American equivalent for the European rectifier EZ81 as 6CA4 - here's one that's online: http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/data/valve/tube_equivalents/tube_equivalents.php The venerable Tube Lore - A Reference for Users and Collectors book by Ludwell Sibley also lists them this way. Every supplier I googled, including well known ones I use, also list EZ81 as 6CA4. This includes Angela Instruments, Antique Electronic Supply, The Tube Store, Vacuum Tube Valley, and so on. I have not seen one reputable tube seller that even lists a 6AC4. I really think there is a misprint on the schematic. Please, show me I'm wrong before we send Derrick off looking for a tube that doesn't exist. |
Derrick Mau Member From: Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
|
posted 18 March 2006 02:58 AM
profile
Hi Jim,I play all Hawaiian on the steel and I use a lot of chimes in my playing. I do pump the volume up to a fairly loud level. Here's a pic of the Vox schematic for that tube. Mis-print? Just curious, but does anyone know what brand of tubes that originally came with this model of Vox? I've heard that the Vox Pacemaker circuit is identical but without reverb. |
James Quackenbush Member From: Pomona, New York, USA
|
posted 18 March 2006 05:52 AM
profile
I have a few of these Vox tube amps from the Thomas Organ era ( mid 60's ) and they come with a few different brand tubes, most of which when stock were actually Mullards !!.....I own one amp that came with all the original tubes and rectifier and they are in fact Mullards ...If you see the cost of Mullard tubes, you can surely see why they are no longer in most of these amps ....The tube model Voxes are hard to come by ....I bought them up while I could ... They have a wonderful tone ....BTW, the Gold Bulldog speakers are nothing more than Utah's .... Radio Shack even carried them at one time, but not with the Gold color or Bulldog sticker on them ...GREAT amps !!.....Jim |
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 18 March 2006 06:17 AM
profile
There's even an Allied Radio cross-reference for the 6CA4 - http://www.qsl.net/wa7zcz/area2/page64.html I have a copy of the same Vox schematic. Derrick - I can see where Hawaiian would sound great with that amp. Again, not traditional "Nashville" steel tones. I'll have to try one of my Vox-ish sounding amps with one of my Fenders and see what happens - cool idea! |
Jay Ganz Member From: Out Behind The Barn
|
posted 18 March 2006 07:23 AM
profile
Jim, Actually the Thomas organ era of VOX was into the early 70's. The '63 & '65 VOX AC-30's I've got were still JMI (Jennings Musical Instruments). I've been running 7581A tubes in my old '65 Twin Reverb for awhile now. They're NOS made in west Germany. I re-biased the amp & since their filament current is the same as 6L6 tubes, there's no problem. Alot more headroom now with richer tone. 12AX7's can be changed to reduce gain that tends to overdrive the preamp or disabling one (or more) of the 25uf caps on their cathodes will accomplish the same thing.------------------
My MP3's, Pics, & Video
|
Dave Mudgett Member From: Central Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 18 March 2006 09:31 AM
profile
quote: There's even an Allied Radio cross-reference for the 6CA4
You mean 6AC4? Yes, I saw that. Let's summarize: Allied Electronics equivalents: UU12-6AC4 (doesn't say anything about EZ81) Vox schematic: calls for EZ81(6AC4) But I can't find any source for 6AC4, all the other references cross-list EZ81-UU12-6CA4 together, and every single vendor source I could find sells EZ81/6CA4. That is why I conclude that the Cambridge Reverb rectifier is EZ81/6CA4. Yes, the Vox Pacemaker is basically a Vox Cambridge Reverb without reverb - here's a good source of info on this kind of thing: http://www.voxshowroom.com/equipment/index.html Again, the Free Info Society website has the relevant schematic: http://www.freeinfosociety.com/electronics/schematics/audio/voxpacemaker.pdf Note that this schematic references the EZ81/6CA4 rectifier, not 6AC4. The original tubes were probably Mullard - they were pretty much stock in 60s Vox amps. Yeah, they're pretty ridiculously priced now, but great tubes. The European nomenclature is ECC83(12AX7), ECC82(12AU7), EL84(6BQ5), and EZ81(6AC4?6CA4). The tube number in parentheses is just the standard American equivalent - but the actual European tubes are ECC83, ECC82, EL84, and EZ81. At the very least, 6CA4 is a reasonable choice. If there is, in fact, such a thing as a 6AC4 and if further, it is equivalent to EZ81, well that will work also. Happy hunting, if that's what you want. The other issue is that similar rectifier tubes can often be substituted. Some lists indicate that 6V4/EZ80 can be substituted, but doesn't have quite as high a current capacity - sort of like substituting a 5U4 rectifier for a 5AR4 - they probably sag a bit more, perhaps good if you want a little more compressed sound. Be careful if you do that, however - it's not always a good idea. Jay, I totally agree that the 7581a/6L6GC tubes are a great choice for clean Twin-family applications. I have used the 80s Philips/Sylvania versions made in Emporium, PA. The Watford Valves reports I referenced above lay all this out pretty clearly - they give a lot of test details on a lot of currently available tubes. Obviously, I agree with you about trying different gain mini-preamp tubes to get the sound you want. I also find that 12AX7 tubes tend to have too-high gain for pedal steel, and right now am using a 5751 in the front gain stage of my Dual Showman Reverb. But for lap steel, I usually prefer more distortion/compression. I love to crank up these small EL84 amps with my Ricky Bakelite.[This message was edited by Dave Mudgett on 18 March 2006 at 09:33 AM.] |
John Billings Member From: Northfield Center, Ohio, USA
|
posted 18 March 2006 12:44 PM
profile
Also, look at where a tube was made. I have several quads of EL84s that are labeled "Hammond". Look a little more and you see they say "Made in Holland." Amperex! I have others labeled "Realistic, Made in W. Germany". Other Hammond tubes say "Made in Britain." Mullard. I have a friend who is a retired Hammond repairman. I have gotten his tube collection. Wowie Zowie! |
Bill Creller Member From: Saginaw, Michigan, USA
|
posted 18 March 2006 07:00 PM
profile
After some research of my own, I see that you guys are right-on about the rectifier 6AC4 being a typo on the Vox schematic. Antique Electronics catalog lists the EZ81 as a 6CA4 and not a 6AC4. They don't list a 6AC4 in thier catalog either. |
Bill Creller Member From: Saginaw, Michigan, USA
|
posted 18 March 2006 07:11 PM
profile
Not to stray from this post too far, but I have an Alamo amp with a distortion problem,that sounds OK when one string is used, but sounds over driven or? when two or more are played. I'm wondering if a 5751 in place of the 12AX7 pre amp tube might help calm it ?? any ideas you guys? |
Jay Ganz Member From: Out Behind The Barn
|
posted 18 March 2006 07:18 PM
profile
Yeah....try it and see how it sounds. As far as tube labeling goes, I've pulled alot of "Fisher" 12AX7's out of old stereos which have the diamond shape imbedded in the glass on the bottom between the pins. They also say made in West Germany. These are all Telefunkens. Another British tube which is nice besides the Mullards are Brimar tubes. They say made in England.[This message was edited by Jay Ganz on 18 March 2006 at 07:26 PM.]
|
Dave Mudgett Member From: Central Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 18 March 2006 07:26 PM
profile
Bill - it might. It depends on whether or not the distortion is being caused by a preamp tube overloading. That distortion could be occurring in several places - in the power amplifier, funky output transformer, bad filter caps, whatever. But I sometimes need to tame small amps by using a lower-gain tube, using the chart I referenced in the earlier post. |
Jon Zimmerman Member From: California, USA
|
posted 18 March 2006 10:01 PM
profile
Thanks, Dave for the mention of Watford's site--tube testing, etc. Didn't know that was going on. You tube-heads are 'on the bubble' |
Bill Creller Member From: Saginaw, Michigan, USA
|
posted 19 March 2006 12:25 AM
profile
I know you guys will think I'm a real dummy, but what the hell is "headroom? Is it the area before break-up? |
Dave Mudgett Member From: Central Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 19 March 2006 07:49 AM
profile
Headroom is the amount of signal level above the nominal value that can be input to a device before saturation or clipping distortion occurs, usually expressed in dB. |
Brad Sarno Member From: St. Louis, MO USA
|
posted 19 March 2006 08:00 AM
profile
Dave, thanks for that Watford link. http://www.watfordvalves.com/reports.asp It's a few years old, but has real good data. I like how they review tubes for both hi-fi audio as well as guitar amps. Since steel guitar kind of falls into both categories, the info was very useful. It was very timely to read for me because I've recently been messing with the EH 12AX7, the Sovtek LP (long plate) 12AX7-LPS, and the JJ 12AX7 (ECC83s). The preamp I've been making has a 12AX7 in the gain/eq section. I've been using the JJ and the Watford article confirmed exactly what I was hearing. Recently I've been messing with the Sovtek Long Plate 12AX7-LP and LPS. Now that is also a very nice sounding tube. I had messed with those in my Deluxe and Twin too. As far as preamp tubes go, I'd have to say that two of my favorite new and affordable tubes are these two; Sovtek 12AX7-LPS (or LP if you have DC heater supply) JJ 12AX7 (ECC83s) Both of these have a warm and even top end, and a smooth, sweet sound. Many of the others have a bright upper midrange and a "forward" sound. For me it seems that on steel it's nice to have a smooth and warm tube. The JJ has a more "detailed midrange" and the bass is kind of big and compressed. The Sovtek LPS has a tighter, stiffer bass response. Both have a top end that's easy on the ears and not harsh. The Sovtek Long Plate tube is a bit notorious for microphony and I've experienced this myself. They may be better suited for preamps or positions where they're not physically mounted in the cabinet subjecting it to the vibrations of the speaker. The JJ's are better in this regard. Many other 12AX7's both new and old are bright sounding. The bright, snappy sounding tubes can be a bit much on steel, but that depends on the style and context I guess. If you want to spend big bucks, the Mullards and Telefunkens are hard to beat. You can really change the tone of a tube amp by choosing the right preamp tubes. Read up on them and then you can probably help to dial in the sound you want. Sometimes I hear people complain that their re-capped and re-tubed Twin or Vibrosonic is too bright or edgy. I think that you can really control or tame this with the right selection of 12AX7's. I've learned recently that Sovtek has more than one factory, and the quality of their tubes varies widely. Many of us are familiar with the Sovtek tubes that come stock in many commercially popular amps. These tend to be the lower grade, run-of-the-mill Sovtek tubes. Some of the other Sovtek tubes are actually quite nice sounding and are of good quality. The EH branded tubes are supposed to be the higher grade Sovteks, but they tend to be the brighter sounding ones. Brad |
John Billings Member From: Northfield Center, Ohio, USA
|
posted 19 March 2006 08:39 AM
profile
What about using a 12BH 7 as a phase inverter? Dr. Z put one in my Prescription Combo to give me a little more "hi-fi" type of sound. I don't use that amp for steel, but when I play 6-string, I like it to be very clean. |
Dave Mudgett Member From: Central Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 19 March 2006 04:30 PM
profile
quote: You can really change the tone of a tube amp by choosing the right preamp tubes. Read up on them and then you can probably help to dial in the sound you want.
Absolutely. They can make a huge difference, and you really can tailor the sound. I have a big box full of new and NOS preamp tubes in many varieties. After I get a new amp, I either clean it up and replace caps or give it to my buddy Dave Sarge to do it for me. But then I spend some time figuring out which are the right tubes. It may take an afternoon, but it's worth it, IMO. BTW, some of the Watford Valve reports are from October 05. The preamp tube reports range from 98-02. I agree - the real value is that they evaluate the tubes for both hi-fi and guitar amp application, very useful. It's very expensive to buy tons of tubes to try out these days. |
James Quackenbush Member From: Pomona, New York, USA
|
posted 20 March 2006 11:14 AM
profile
Jay, We are BOTH right ......JMI was bought out by Thomas Organ in 1965.....There were still some JMI amps around at that time, but the Thomas Organ amps were coming into play in 1965 and by 1966 Thomas Organ amps were ALL that were made ...The Super Beatle amps were introduced in 1966 and were Thomas Organ amps ...I know that Thomas Organ went up into the later 60's but how far after that , I can't tell you ....All my Thomas Organ Voxes date mid to later 60's .... JimPS.....FInd me a JMI AC15 and give me a call .... |
basilh Member From: United Kingdom
|
posted 20 March 2006 01:26 PM
profile
Like this one James ? ------------------ quote: Steel players do it without fretting
[This message was edited by basilh on 20 March 2006 at 01:26 PM.]
| |