Author
|
Topic: Recording PSG
|
Frode Bjoernstad Member From: Oslo, Norway
|
posted 08 September 2004 12:20 AM
profile
Hi! I am doing my first Studiosession for my band with my pedal steel guitar this week, and I am wondering if anyone here has any good advice on playing PSG in a recording situation. I have only been playing PSG for 5-6 months, so I guess I won’t be dominating in the mix, but I am going to lay down a couple of themes and some fills. Any tips on recording PSG is much appreciated. I think I will be limiting myself to the A and B pedals.I am gonna use a Fender Deluxe Hotrod amp (40 watts tube), Boss RV3 (settings?), Boss volumepedal and my MSA Semi Classic psg Frode
------------------ Msa semiclassic psg, 74 Fender champ Lap steel, Fender Telecaster, Norwegian custombuilt Weissenborn, roland re201 tapeecho, 78 Fender deluxe reverb amp |
Jim Phelps Member From: just out of Mexico City
|
posted 08 September 2004 12:49 AM
profile
.[This message was edited by Jim Phelps on 17 November 2004 at 09:01 PM.] |
Ron Steenwijk Member From: Greensburg,PA
|
posted 08 September 2004 01:15 AM
profile
And don't forget to inform the engineer about your settings on your Amp.Most of the Engineers can't mix a steelguitar properly.They ad to much reverb or to much high and not enough low.My advice also is to ad a little delay so you get more body on your sound.Ron |
Tony Prior Member From: Charlotte NC
|
posted 08 September 2004 01:28 AM
profile
If possible, have the engineer take a look at your amp for EQ positions,only as a point of reference. The board should be relativley flat for EQ and mixing. I would record with the amp dry and use the board reverb and delays.Perhaps try an Early reflections reverb and a delay of about 280 ms ..slap only, no repeats. The Early Reflections will separate the Steel in the mix and give it some definition of it's own.Good luck..sounds like fun. t |
Joey Ace Sysop From: Southern Ontario, Canada
|
posted 08 September 2004 05:13 AM
profile
Most engineers have no Steel experience. They will request you to set a level and not vary from it.I've even been asked not to use the volume pedal by an inexperienced engineer. You need to explain nicely that the pedal is used for espression and sustain, and you can deliver a consistant level when using it. I've practiced at home with a preamp that has a VU Meter. Work on not driving the VU meter into the red while you increase volume as your sound decays. |
Ron Randall Member From: Dallas, Texas, USA
|
posted 08 September 2004 09:16 PM
profile
Mic the amp. Sometimes folks use 2 or mics on one cabinet. Your best sound comes from the amp. USe it. I agree on a dry signal to the recorder. Then one can add all kinds of effects and choose later. Shure SM57,Shure Beta58, Sennheiser 421(?number) are very good, tried and true, dynamic mics. Try a dynamic up close and a condensor mic several feet away. Ron |
Billy McCoy Member From: Arlington, Texas, USA
|
posted 08 September 2004 11:14 PM
profile
Yes Frode,R. Randall is correct....anytime you can use your amp in the studio USE it! If by chance you are told to go direct (God forbid),...use the POD XT. I have had great luck with these units. Best answer to going direct. Nevertheless, going with the amp should always be your first thought. U67, MD421 or 57 on your amp should work nicely. I agree you should have the engineer put verb and delay on your playback tracks...so you can record with it in your ears..but it is tracking DRY. You can add effects on mix down. Rock ON! b ------------------ MSA Millennium D10, Walker Stereo Steel, Stone Tree Custom Tele, LINE 6 Vetta II and POD XT PRO |
Frode Bjoernstad Member From: Oslo, Norway
|
posted 08 September 2004 11:47 PM
profile
Thanks for the good advices. we started recording last night, and we decided to close mic the amplifier with a Shure sm57, and that sounded great. I used some of the reverb on the amp, and a touch of slap echo. Kept the volume pedal at a pretty even level. No pumping. I had a little trouble with keeping the notes in good enough pitch, but I got to lay down a couple of lines. I guess my ears got a little tired after a while. Does anyone have a “tempered” tuning chart that shows the cents (+/- 440 khz ) for each string in a standard E9 tuning ? , or should I start off in 440khz and tune the guitar by ear. I am kinda self thought and I have never quite got the hang of getting it in “perfect over the marker” tuning , but my ears work well so I have let my hands decide where to play.My band will have a website up soon, and we will put some of these songs out as Mp3’s when they are done. I’ll post the link as soon it’s up. Then you guys can hear what kind of steelguitar monster(?)you have created.... (95% of all I know about PSG is from this forum). Please keep the good stuff coming at this thread! Frode
------------------ Msa semiclassic psg, 74 Fender champ Lap steel, Fender Telecaster, Norwegian custombuilt Weissenborn, roland re201 tapeecho, 78 Fender deluxe reverb amp |
Hans Holzherr Member From: Ostermundigen, Switzerland
|
posted 09 September 2004 12:49 AM
profile
In the studio, tune your E's to your standard pitch (I use a440), tune the rest by ear, using harmonics.Hans |
Bob Hoffnar Member From: Brooklyn, NY
|
posted 09 September 2004 08:06 AM
profile
Changing how you tune your guitar is NOT going to help your intonation at all if you don't have your hands and ears together. Check out Joe Wright's method for getting your hands in shape and if you want to learn how to fine tune your ears check out my drone CD.Congrats on your first session ! I hope you have thousands more. ------------------
Bob intonation help
|
John Billings Member From: Northfield Center, Ohio, USA
|
posted 09 September 2004 08:28 AM
profile
I split the signal coming off the volume pedal with a Boss LS-2. I set my amp the way I like it, and put a SM 57 on it. I send a direct to the board from the splitter. That way you have two tracks recorded to work with. A wet nice-sounding signal from the amp, which is what I listen to, and a dry, direct signal which the engineer can do whatever he wants to with. I like listening to the wet signal, because a dry signal can be very uninspiring and I play better when I'm hearing what I like to hear. If it's an engineer with whom I've never worked, I always carry a couple of cds, Lloyd Green and John Hughey, so the neophyte engineer can hear what a steel is supposed to sound like in a mix. This has helped many engineers who have no clue about steel. More times than not, the wet signal from my amp is what is chosen as the best. JB |
Mark van Allen Member From: loganville, Ga. USA
|
posted 09 September 2004 08:33 AM
profile
Frode, in case you haven't run into a copy on your side of the pond, I'm emailing you a copy of my article from Pedal Steel.US magazine on going into the studio for the first time. Hope there's something helpful there, best of luck!------------------ Stop by the Steel Store at: www.markvanallen.com
|
Jerry Hayes Member From: Virginia Beach, Va.
|
posted 10 September 2004 11:40 AM
profile
No major sessions under my belt but I did do quite a few demos and local artist recordings while I lived in the SoCal area. My experience was never to record the steel first unless all the instruments were there. Maybe it was my intonation, but I did a couple of sessions once and a couple of other instruments were added later and I became out of tune. Before they were added I sounded fine. I think that the steel needs to be intonated (is that a word?) to the entire sound of the band to be perfectly in tune. That's why I prefer recording with everyone there instead of overdubbing other instruments later, overdubbing the steel last is OK IMHO. Those tracks that I mentioned which became out of tune with the other instruments added, were re-recorded and the steel tracks sounded fine then. Have a good 'un..JH------------------ Livin' in the Past and the Future with a 12 string Mooney Universal tuning. [This message was edited by Jerry Hayes on 10 September 2004 at 11:41 AM.]
|
Jonathan Mitguard Member From: San Rafael, California, USA
|
posted 10 September 2004 04:16 PM
profile
That sounds familiar Jerry. I did a CD with my brother once where I laid down all my steel tracks over his acoustic guitar and voice. This was in Colorado then I went home to California. When I finally heard the finished recording I was kind of bumped out of tune with all the other instruments. My rough mix with just the Guitar sounds fine. Conclusion, It's like you say Jerry or at very least don't add steel before the Bass is there. JM |
Joey Ace Sysop From: Southern Ontario, Canada
|
posted 10 September 2004 04:38 PM
profile
Absolutly Steel Last!Steelers adjust to play in tune with the other instruments. Other instruments don't do that for us. I insist on a Bass track already being down. Once a producer said a scheduling conflict caused the Bass to not be available. I did the Steel anyway. A week later I was called back because I sounded out of tune. I did the retake for free, since that's my policy, but I reminded the producer of what I said the week before. I don't think he understood. Now my policy is firm. A thing like that could damage your reputation. PS No major sessions under my belt either,none expected. The big guys I talk to tell me they usually record with a full band. I wish that was the case for us little guys. I never have a band in a studio. Just an engineer, the artist, and machines.
|
Bob Hoffnar Member From: Brooklyn, NY
|
posted 11 September 2004 08:19 AM
profile
It happens all the time. I just got a CD from a band that does pretty good where they changed the bass and a couple other things after I did my parts. Its a nightmare ! I try to do my best and not worry about it. Imagine what the Nashville studio guys have to go through with those Antares happy producers squeezing every drop of wiggle room out of every track. Thankfully the NYC producers I deal with are way over the auto-tune thing except for emergencies.------------------
Bob intonation help
|
C Allen Member From: BEREA, KENTUCKY, USA
|
posted 11 September 2004 09:45 AM
profile
I DISAGREE STRONGLY......GO DIRECT TO CONSOLE..POLITELY, BUT FIRMLY ASK THE ENGINEER TO GIVE YOU AN "AVERAGE LEVEL", OR HE WILL BE RIDING THE GAINS TRYING TO BE A HUMAN COMPRESSOR..FIRMLY TELL HIM TO LEAVE THE LEVELS ALONE !!(BUT POLITELY) (THEY HAVE BIGGER EGOS THAN GUITAR PLAYERS)......AS FAR AS AMPS GO, THE AMP IS THERE ONLY FOR YOU! WHEN THE ENGINEER GETS DONE WITH THE EQ, YOU WON'T RECOGNIZE IT ......SO WHY COMPLICATE THINGS WITH GEAR..... |
Billy McCoy Member From: Arlington, Texas, USA
|
posted 15 September 2004 10:39 PM
profile
Mr. Allen,I strongly disagree.... The amp is not for the player...it is for the TONE. Most studio engineers don't know how to set EQ for Steel ....so, that is the reason you use the amp......TONE BABY!!!. All the Engineer has to do is RECORD. Add a little compression, a little sweet delay if needed. Most Engineers if not all that I have worked with love it when the TONE for Steel is set for them....and all they have to do is leave the channel set FLAT (EQ). Easier for mix-down as well. b ------------------ MSA Millennium D10, Walker Stereo Steel, Stone Tree Custom Tele, LINE 6 Vetta II and POD XT PRO |
Tony Prior Member From: Charlotte NC
|
posted 16 September 2004 02:20 AM
profile
Well I would say there is no right or wrong..only what works for certain situations. I record direct..
We have just completed our bands DEMO CD , I recorded direct but the Tele' was recorded LIVE with an amp / mic. being a small Peavey Backstage with an MXL 2000 Condensor. We actually preferred this final tone over the recording with a 57. BUT..I have written several effects and EQ patches on my YAMAHA Aw2816 specifically for the Steel so it wasn't like I was searching for the desired tone. I do record thru a tube preamp before the digital input though. One thing I do fully support is to laying down the final Steel tracks at the end...or at least after all other Instruments are FINISHED...The pitch thing can become a nightmare. There is no right or wrong..just what works for you and what your ears hear at the end. But one thing is for sure..recording anything without the rhythm section completed first is total amateur hour .Who in there right mind would start recording tracks without a Bass? Thats nuts..I'm with Joey in this one. How would the other Instrument players know when or when not to play and add fills or notes or anything without hearing what space the Bass is playing in ? Sounds like conflict City in my mind. Another small tip..and this won't work if you have a band full of ego's.. Although we have 6 players in our band..only 3 of us played Instruments on our DEMO CD tracks. This made for very consistent even tracking with a very clear understanding of maintaining simplicity and space in the rhythm tracks . Not to mention that we got it done fairly quickly with minimal overdubs. It's not that each player cannot play..it just made more sense to have less activity per tune which in the end resulted in MORE on the tracks if you know what I mean. t[This message was edited by Tony Prior on 16 September 2004 at 06:05 AM.] |
David L. Donald Member From: Koh Samui Island, Thailand
|
posted 16 September 2004 07:54 AM
profile
There are a number of great suggestions here, and a few I wouldn't go by. But there are no really hard and fast rules. Many situations are different.Bring a CD of the sound you are looking for to play the engineer, he WILL love you for it... IF your rig can give out something close to what your example shows. Your volume pedal will give an inexpirenced engineer fits, but there are ways and there are ways. Give him a pedal down, full strum, loudest level from your steel. C6 neck if your using it, E9 if not. Then he can set you for maxed out. Then play a bit at normal SOLOING levels, which aproximates your real world loudest level, then a bit of backing track comping level. He should then have a good idea where to set your level for no distortion, but also minimal hiss. If you amp sound is really great, or it's REALLY you, go with that and a High Quality mic or two. I don't consider an SM57 in that catagory, it is a presencer boosted vocal mic, which will give a "certain sound", but not an acurate reproduction of your amp. If you want it's sound, fine, use one. Open back cabs in a controled environment can really benifit from multi micing. But it depends on the song and style you're looking for. If you can comfortably play dry through your amp, this is prefered, especially if you don't have precicely programmed recallable effects on the amp sound. You could have the engineer patch your effects unit into his post recording chain if you want, thought this is less common. It would let you hear your sound, but AFTER the sound of your amp and speaker. A triffle different, but not far off. Also go direct and dry. IF you want some effects like reverb and delay, the engineer can give you those in the headphones. But if you lay tracks WITH effects, and have to do a punch later, after doing other songs for instance, you might not be able to duplicate the sound. Same goes for your amp position vis a vis the room and the mics used, and even the air moisture content. 5 hours laterwith a storm rolling in, the sound might not be the same, but your dry /direct track will be the same. If you're a new player, and sometimes aren't sure of your intonation, try to play your lines, and leave a small space before the next line. Then they can punch you in and out cleanly. This can really be the difference between redoing most of the track and just the little part you botched. Yes, do your steel part as late in the mix as possible. At least with the basic chord / bass harmonic base to play to. As Bob H. said, if you haven't got a pitch reference that will NOT be changed, you can never get properly intonated with the track. I often use Protools Line6 Amp Farm or other amp / speaker emulators on the dry signal, AND use the amp sound too. Like the Pod XT, but again AFTER the recorded signal. If you use it before, then you must match to it for any dubs or replacement parts. [This message was edited by David L. Donald on 16 September 2004 at 08:10 AM.]
|
John Macy Member From: Denver, CO USA
|
posted 16 September 2004 09:15 AM
profile
quote:"THEY HAVE BIGGER EGOS THAN GUITAR PLAYERS)......AS FAR AS AMPS GO, THE AMP IS THERE ONLY FOR YOU! WHEN THE ENGINEER GETS DONE WITH THE EQ, YOU WON'T RECOGNIZE IT " Wow, don't know what kind of studios you're hanging out at, but having been a serious pro engineer for 30+ years, and in the community of pro engineers I hang with, that's pretty far off base... |
Gabriel Aaron Wynne Member From: Dallas, Texas, USA
|
posted 20 September 2004 07:31 AM
profile
Try practicing. |