Steel Guitar Strings
Strings & instruction for lap steel, Hawaiian & pedal steel guitars
http://SteelGuitarShopper.com
Ray Price Shuffles
Classic country shuffle styles for Band-in-a-Box, by BIAB guru Jim Baron.
http://steelguitarmusic.com

This Forum is CLOSED.
Go to bb.steelguitarforum.com to read and post new messages.


  The Steel Guitar Forum
  Pedal Steel
  D-10 vs U-12 (Page 1)

Post New Topic  
your profile | join | preferences | help | search


This topic is 3 pages long:   1  2  3 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   D-10 vs U-12
Calvin Walley
Member

From: colorado city colorado, USA

posted 03 February 2006 08:23 PM     profile     
i had been thnking of buying a D-10 but today i had the chance to play a U-12
i really liked the U-12 but have not played a D-10 as of yet .other than the weight can some of you that have played both give me the pros and cons of each

thanks

calvin

Dave Van Allen
Member

From: Doylestown, PA , US , Earth

posted 03 February 2006 08:29 PM     profile     
Calvin, If you use the search function on the forum You will find this topic has been well covered... try a search with U-12 or universal in the subject field...
or your topic line D-10 vs U-12....
Calvin Walley
Member

From: colorado city colorado, USA

posted 03 February 2006 08:30 PM     profile     
hey thanks
Billy Carr
Member

From: Seminary, Mississippi USA

posted 04 February 2006 01:02 PM     profile     
I'm a S-12U player. Played D-10's for years and years though. Jeff Newman and Cowboy Eddie Long were playing S-12U's when I met them. It's all there. E9th and C6th stuff. I think if someone's familiar with the C6th neck, then the S-12U will probably be simple to figure out and play. Getting back to JN & CEL, I played steel shows with them here in Mississippi and I would actually sit and watch these guys play everything on 12 strings and then they would laugh about how easy it was. To me, the biggest difference I see in the D-10's and S-12's is in the feel. The S-12U to me, doesn't have that certain feel that a D-10 does. But I don't play for comfort like I used to. Nowadays, playing is business. The S-12U works for me. Lightweight, easy to move around w/flight case, plus I've got another one ordered from CARTER, so I can switch guitars around when I need to change strings,etc.
Calvin Walley
Member

From: colorado city colorado, USA

posted 04 February 2006 01:49 PM     profile     
thanks for resopnding, when i played the
U-12 it had a good feel to it but on the other hand i have always loved the looks of a D-10 but have never even sat down at one. i think my best bet would be to find one and play it to get a feel for it . but i'm not sure how hard it will be to find one in my area . so that might not be an option. i think what i need is opinions on the feel of one vs the other

calvin

John Billings
Member

From: Northfield Center, Ohio, USA

posted 04 February 2006 02:46 PM     profile     
This answer will be no help at all, but,,,,,, I used to get the snaps from my fancy western shirts caught in the strings of the C6th neck all the time! I switched to a Kline U-12. Not because of the shirt sleeve problem, but because the Kline is an awesome guitar, and I wanted the extra low range in the E9th mode. Really helped in situations where some bottom was needed in a small band. But I soon came to think of it as not one neck with two tunings,but as one neck with a lot of stuff available.
Jim Phelps
Member

From: just out of Mexico City

posted 04 February 2006 02:59 PM     profile     
It's about time someone asked this question...

Sherman Willden
Member

From: Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA

posted 04 February 2006 04:34 PM     profile     
Calvin;

My name is Sherman Willden and I live in Colorado Springs. I have a Carter S12 7x5 that I haven't learned to play yet but I am using the courses listed below I like the E9/B6 S12 for the closer finger grips. Tabbed strings 9 and 10 reside at the same place. In the B6th on my S12 pedal 4 is what pedal 8 is on C6th and I can bounce back and forth between pedals 5 and 4 for closer footwork.

With the Jeff Newman CD course I find holding the E to Eb lever in all the time tiresome. I have to go to E9th for awhile to let my leg rest. It seems that Joe Wright mixes in all the levers more than Jeff Newman and thus doesn't rely on the E - Eb lever as much. Joe Wright mixes it up more. My E to Eb lever is on my RKR.

- Jeff Newman
- - The Universal E9B6 Course Book 1 and Cd
- - E9B6 Universal Introductory Video
- Joe Wright
- - DVD #5 which includes the following related E9B6 videos
- - - - Video #9
- - - - Video #10
- - - - Video #5

Sherman L. Willden

[This message was edited by Sherman Willden on 06 February 2006 at 06:24 AM.]

Larry Bell
Member

From: Englewood, Florida

posted 05 February 2006 08:53 AM     profile     
Sherman (and all)
The solution I found to the knee fatigue problem you mention is to examine the C6 tuning and determine the most often used change. I believe it is what is usually on P6. The I IV relationship of C6 and F9 (B6 and E9 on the universal) is a signature sound of the tuning and a frequently used change. In addition, it is the conversion to / from E9 and B6, looking at it from the 'two tunings' perspective.

Putting E to D -- string 8 only -- on a lever on the opposite knee from your E to D# will allow you to
* rest the other knee
* get the D usually on string 9 of 10 string E9 AND
* get the P6 function from C6 by letting off your E to D# lever while lowering 8 to D -- so 8 goes down and 4 returns to E giving you the identical change, 1/2 step lower, than the C6 Pedal 6 change.

I've been using this change ever since I started playing a U-12 in the mid 70's and IT WORKS. It also eliminates the need to use both feet on the pedals to get P5 + P7 combination (and other combinations as well).

It is a multi-purpose solution that works very well for me and others. It is not part of Jeff Newman or Joe Wright's setup, so that is probably one reason why few U-12 players use it. Their loss, in my book.

------------------
Larry Bell - email: larry@larrybell.org - gigs - Home Page
2003 Fessenden S/D-12 8x8, 1969 Emmons S/D-12 6x6, 1984 Sho-Bud S/D-12 7x6, 1971 Dobro, Standel and Peavey Amps


Calvin Walley
Member

From: colorado city colorado, USA

posted 05 February 2006 02:06 PM     profile     
hey thanks i'm learning a lot on this thread , are there any problems that come with learning the C-6 on a d-10 or may be a better way to ask is: which would be an easier transition from my s-10

calvin

Larry Bell
Member

From: Englewood, Florida

posted 05 February 2006 02:15 PM     profile     
A D-10 player will tell you to go with a D-10. A universal player will tell you to go with a single 12.

I feel that a S-12 is much easier to understand the sixth tuning on since the sixth tuning key (B) is related to the ninth tuning (E), unlike C6 and E9. I've found that a lot of people have learned a lot of C6 without really thinking about what they are doing or analyzing the changes and chords. A C6 player I learned a lot from years ago had NO CLUE what chords he was playing but played like he knew what he was doing. In a manner of speaking, he did -- he knew what it was supposed to SOUND like, but he had no clue WHY it sounded that way and didn't really care to. I find that universal players who play a lot of sixth style have looked at the changes and realize that C6 (or B6) is JUST A POSITION OF E9 and E9 is JUST A POSITION OF C6 (B6). Many D-10 players don't explore the similarities -- only the differences.

------------------
Larry Bell - email: larry@larrybell.org - gigs - Home Page
2003 Fessenden S/D-12 8x8, 1969 Emmons S/D-12 6x6, 1984 Sho-Bud S/D-12 7x6, 1971 Dobro, Standel and Peavey Amps


David Doggett
Member

From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

posted 05 February 2006 03:05 PM     profile     
I agree with everything Larry said. I have a setup similar to his. The Jeff Newman setup didn't work for me. D10 players will complain about the 10% of things on each neck that they can't get on a uni. But I see it as putting the 90% of each neck on a single big neck for 180% that's available all the time. Plus, you get some things, like the low strings for E9 and high ones for B6, that are not on a D10. You can play country all night on an S10. But, for rock and blues, I couldn't live without my uni.
Sherman Willden
Member

From: Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA

posted 06 February 2006 03:05 PM     profile     
Bobbe Seymour has spoken
Tony Prior
Member

From: Charlotte NC

posted 06 February 2006 03:20 PM     profile     
historically though, D10 players move to a U12 and know why they are doing it..they have already placed the value of the U12 in there own minds.

Calvin, keep in mind, a few weeks back you started a thread about the availability of teaching materials ..and the lack thereof...

If you cross over to the the U12 you will learn that the amount of teaching materials available for the U12 is NOT in abundance..actually way less than that...

------------------
------------------
TPrior
TPrior Steel Guitar Homesite

Calvin Walley
Member

From: colorado city colorado, USA

posted 06 February 2006 04:31 PM     profile     
why does life have to be soooo complicated

calvin

CHIP FOSSA
Member

From: Monson, MA 01057 U.S.A.

posted 06 February 2006 05:13 PM     profile     
Bobbe Seymour's weekly 'newsgram', today, addressed U-12 vs D-10 right off the bat. His vote is with a D-10, and challenged, that he had at least 10 reasons why. Just ask him, he emphasized.

I play a U-12 Williams 8 x 5, and have not,
as yet, asked Bobbe, WHY?

I actually approach the U-12 more in a manner
of a combined tuning. I understand E9 more than I do C6, so I definitely lean towards an E9 style of playing. But I can mix it up.

I'd be curious to know what Bobbe's 10 anti-Uni reasons are. But then again, I'm happy enough with my U-12, and probably would rather NOT know.

[This message was edited by CHIP FOSSA on 06 February 2006 at 05:15 PM.]

Calvin Walley
Member

From: colorado city colorado, USA

posted 06 February 2006 05:42 PM     profile     
one of my main concerns is this; after going thru 3 pedal steels the only one that ever felt right ( or maybe fit me might be a better term ) was my Zum and i don't want to buy something thats not going to feel right. in the end i think the only way to resolve this problem is going to be to drive however far it takes, sit and play a couple of each before deciding , when i played the U-12 it felt like i had been playing it for years, no superises. if i find a D-12 like that i am going to be very torn between the two
Dave Mudgett
Member

From: Central Pennsylvania, USA

posted 06 February 2006 08:51 PM     profile     
As someone who has gone through a lot of steels in the fairly few short years since I started playing steel, I wish I had been more patient before jumping on new steels. I've done a lot of long-distance wheeling and dealing to get into what I have now because, well, steels aren't exactly household commodities around here in Central PA, to say the least. But I can't tell you how much trouble not having the right steel was for quite a while with me.

I have been playing a universal the last year, and right now am playing a Zum U12 8+5 that I love. I find the universal approach easier to get my brain around, but maybe I'm just weird. For me, the strongest arguments against universal are:

1. The forced compromise of the "tampered" or nearly-just tuning between the E9 and B6 modes. I struggle with that, and still have trouble getting both modes to sound right. I play more E9, so I bias in that direction, but I still work on it.

2. The mechanics are more difficult on the universal, since there are more changes piled on many pedals and levers. This can make some of the pulls pretty stiff. A high-tech modern steel like the Zum (and I'm sure many others like Carter, MSA Millenium, Fessy, Mullen, etc.) helps this, I think.

But otherwise, I resonate with what David Doggett and Larry Bell said on this. I have trouble doing gigs with an S-10 now, since my bandmates expect me to whip out some blues/slide licks on the low strings, and the universal makes that easy.

I'll be honest, if I really develop my 6th mode skills, I may consider a D-12/10 - with the front 12-string neck in ext E9 and the back 10-string neck in C6. That would get me everything. But for right now, I prefer universal to learn 6th on. BTW, my Zum has a E-to-Eb lever lock, which I don't use right now, but could if I wanted to focus on B6 more.

Charlie McDonald
Member

From: Lubbock, Texas, USA

posted 07 February 2006 06:27 AM     profile     
I get the feeling that pedal steel is going to be moving more and more to universal.

Whether true or not, Dallas will be a great place to play lots of steels and try and get a good fit. I hope to be there doing the same.

David L. Donald
Member

From: Koh Samui Island, Thailand

posted 07 February 2006 07:36 AM     profile     
quote:
when i played the U-12 it felt like i had been playing it for years, no superises.

I think this comment says a lot.

I have both and like both (D-10 and S-14) for each's strengths.

Erv Niehaus
Member

From: Litchfield, MN, USA

posted 07 February 2006 07:53 AM     profile     
If you want the definitive word on universal

verses D-10, you need to read the latest

epistle from Bobbe Seymour!
Erv

Larry Bell
Member

From: Englewood, Florida

posted 07 February 2006 08:25 AM     profile     
yeah right

------------------
Larry Bell - email: larry@larrybell.org - gigs - Home Page
2003 Fessenden S/D-12 8x8, 1969 Emmons S/D-12 6x6, 1984 Sho-Bud S/D-12 7x6, 1971 Dobro, Standel and Peavey Amps


Ray Minich
Member

From: Limestone, New York, USA

posted 07 February 2006 09:35 AM     profile     
I certainly hope the answer is not that one has to own one of each...
There goes my hopes for that triple neck Zum.

[This message was edited by Ray Minich on 07 February 2006 at 09:36 AM.]

Sidney Malone
Member

From: Buna, TX

posted 07 February 2006 10:42 AM     profile     
Well, since no one else has done it...... I suggest you read http://www.b0b.com/infoedu/future1.htm by the true master of the 12 string!

From my own experience....I started on an S-10 just as you. When I was trying to make the decision to go to S-12 or D-10, I did as you and tried out both.

The D-10 seemed very awkward to me, because I wasn't used to the C6 neck being there. I'm sure if I had started on a D-10, I would have never known any different, but I didn't, so it was a major hinderance for me....especially being a beginner, at the time. Learning a new tuning didn't appeal to me either so it had 2 strikes right off the bat.

The SU-12 was much more what I was used to, being a single neck. The extra 2 strings did require a little adjustment.....maybe a month or 2 at the most. The B6 was just an addition to the E9 and I now see it as one tuning. I honestly don't ever think of it as E9 or B6. It's just a steel guitar with way more options than I'll ever use! So, the SU-12 is the tuning that works best for me, mentally & physically.

If I had it to do again, the only thing I would do differently is start on a SU-12. That's just my opinion and this subject will be debated from now on........

I would suggest that you try both S-12 & D-10 and consider the physical as well as mental aspect of playing each. Take your time and consider all the advice you get from both sides.

Ultimatly, I believe that both tunings are capable of far more than we can physically get out of them. This puts the limiting factor on ourselves and not the instrument.

My last opinion on this is that I don't think there's a wrong answer on which is the best. That's a personal choice that you have to make and when you decide which one fits you best, mentally & physically, then you will have made the right decision.

Good Luck!!

------------------
MSA Millennium S-12U
Walker Stereo Steel
Hilton Pedal


Travis Bernhardt
Member

From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

posted 07 February 2006 04:28 PM     profile     
I think the D10 crowd has some really good arguments, but I don't like the limited range of the ten string E9. (BTW, I play a Universal and I really do miss the ninth string D.) My next guitar will almost definitely be a D12.

-Travis

Ken Byng
Member

From: Southampton, England

posted 08 February 2006 05:26 AM     profile     
As a D10 player of some 35 years I would be more personally inclined to go with an extended E9th S12 (with a middle C# string and low A string) rather than go the whole hog with a Universal 12 string. I'm not sure that the time and effort after all these years on two necks to go in the universal direction would be worth it for me. If I was starting from scratch however I would seriously consider a U12 guitar.

Maurice is a great example on what can be achieved using a real universal tuning, but there again his musical knowledge and expertise is not commonplace.

Ken Byng
Member

From: Southampton, England

posted 08 February 2006 05:36 AM     profile     
quote:
If you want the definitive word on universal verses D-10, you need to read the latest epistle from Bobbe Seymour!
.

I read Bobbe's article and it was purely his opinion - quite articulately laid out - but in no way is it the definitive word. There are too many differing views for one person to have the last say on what is correct and what isn't.

Mark Metdker
Member

From: North Central Texas, USA

posted 08 February 2006 05:47 AM     profile     
I don't understand why everyone isn't playing a Universal 12.

------------------
Zum U-12 w/True Tone pickup thru a Nashville 112
Strats thru a VHT Super 30
http://community.webshots.com/album/176544894AuXSmi
jonchristopherdavis.com

www.lonestarattitude.net

Larry Bell
Member

From: Englewood, Florida

posted 08 February 2006 06:16 AM     profile     
To assume that a D-10 is superior to a U-12 because all of the Nashville touring pros play one is poor logic. In 99+% of the cases they could get away with a SINGLE 10 for the material they play with major artists.

Granted, there are many top players who choose a double neck instrument. That choice has history on its side, as well as a lot of inertia because of the new top dogs learning from the old top dogs and the D-10 is the thing. Also, if you really need a half dozen knee levers on each tuning, you're probably better off with a double neck. But most players -- even many top players -- are satisfied with five or six levers which fit very well on a single neck.

BUT, it is very denigrating to players like Maurice Anderson, Joe Wright, and Jeff Newman (and a few others) to assume that you're a lightweight who can't play in tune if you play a single tuning. It just ain't so, no matter what a vendor might want to tell you.

This is a personal decision and everyone has different needs. Buying the same make and model golf clubs will not make you play like Jack Nicklaus and using a different make and model will not prevent you from playing as well. Use what works for YOU. Take the time to find out what that is. Don't rely on the recommendation of ANYONE.

I have actually played many gigs on a D-10. I've also played MANY, MANY, MANY on a U-12. I wonder how many of the most vocal critics of a U-12 have ever played one for more than an hour or two.

------------------
Larry Bell - email: larry@larrybell.org - gigs - Home Page
2003 Fessenden S/D-12 8x8, 1969 Emmons S/D-12 6x6, 1984 Sho-Bud S/D-12 7x6, 1971 Dobro, Standel and Peavey Amps

[This message was edited by Larry Bell on 08 February 2006 at 06:20 AM.]

Tony Prior
Member

From: Charlotte NC

posted 08 February 2006 07:14 AM     profile     
Many players,, now thats not all..many ..respond to the single 10 as being limited on the low end..and of course that has validity..as we all know...

But I wonder how many of those that are seeking that extra music down there under the B string have actually concquered the music available above the B string ?

Count me in the catagory of

NOT

Although a 12 has crossed my mind..but not as a replacement but AN ADDITION to...

just causin' trouble...

oh, and Mark, the reason I'm not on a U12 is..

well... I don't want to be...I'm still tryin' to figure out what those other 9 strings are for

------------------
------------------
TPrior
TPrior Steel Guitar Homesite

[This message was edited by Tony Prior on 08 February 2006 at 07:18 AM.]

Chris LeDrew
Member

From: Newfoundland, Canada

posted 08 February 2006 07:16 AM     profile     
I owned a D-10 and a U-12 before switching back to an S-10 (wanting to concentrate on E9 exclusively for a while.). Having played live and recorded with all three configurations, my conclusion is that the U-12 definitely makes sense if you need the 6th tuning for your work or pleasure and don't want the weight of the D-10. I play strictly country, and when I want the 6th stuff I just go to where I can find it on the E9, but the really nice 6th voicings need a 6th tuning.

In my very humble opinion I find it pathetic when any player publicly puts down another's preference, especially if there's a few thousand dollars invested in that instrument. Who's to say what's better for everybody? There are many fine players on this forum using the universal tuning. I think it takes a lot of talent to play both tunings on one neck, While I did revert to an S-10, I did spend a bit of time gigging with the U-12 and found it very versatile and in no way inferior to the D-10 which damaged my back due its clumsy weight.

ed packard
Member

From: Show Low AZ

posted 08 February 2006 10:00 AM     profile     
I get the feeling that a lot of players (not at the top) change instruments/tunings in search of the "ultimate sound/feel/lick ability"...and with what might be good reason.

1. Feel = if it does not feel good to you, you won't play your best...have the pedals and levers "fitted" to your body.

2. Sound = some folk have a more critical hearing system; some are bothered by things that I can't hear. Then there is the issue of do I want the Chalker sound, the Green sound or? Forget tracking the Emmons (the man) sound as he uses them all plus some.

3. Licks = the last one to come out of Nashville/Bakersfield, and sometimes Austin/LA. P3 on E9 was off a lot of lists until JH played Look At Us.

D10 vs. Uni of some sort is a matter of what fits you best; aside from the tendency to praise whatever you have (brand/type et al) just because that is what you have, it is financially draining to search for what fits you best musically...usually a moving target.

There are lots of ways to configure a Uni...D10 is pretty much fixed plus or minus a pedal or lever or two.

A Uni can be set up to be played as either the E9 or B6 via the LOCK method. Another Lock can be added to Give the B,D string sequence on the middle strings if that does it for you.

The top strings can be arranged in the C6 with top 2/9 order if that does it for you, and give you an added higher pitch string than C6 has (a tension and breakage issue).

Bill Stafford uses the E9/B6 LOCK approach. The M Anderson followers tend to the Bb6/Eb9 arrangement (why not...most non Nashvilleze music is in flats. Al Vescovo uses a 14 string C6 "Uni" setup...he is Big Band/swing/jazz and Show tunes oriented (fresh air here).

I add in the full 13 series musical structure into my Uni at the expense of adding three pedals...chord contest anyone?.

The easy out for the S10, D10, Uni type is probably to pick the sound that you like, by the player(s) that you like, see what they are using, and start there. Get new gear if possible to avoid inheriting someone elses problems...second choice would be from a reputable knowledgeable rebuilder/shop.

The Uni can be used with or without the LOCK approach; if you have long legs like Joe Wright you can reach any of up to 10 pedals hence can have changes available that are not in the cards for us shorter legged mortals.

I personally go for a 14 string Uni based upon an E9/B6 concept (as opposed to a B6/E9 or similar concept). It is a longer neck (added frets) and tuned to C69, top string sequence like C6 with the 2/9 on top, second string being an A.

The reasoning is that with a 14 string unit, I can use it as a 12 string, a 10 string, etc. when I get the urge to tinker. It is easy to change the undercarriage setup on the Uni I have (some are not). The Uni has a larger frequency spectrum than the D10 necks combined....don't need it, then don't use it...you want it, you got it...can't play what you don't have.

If you like plain vanilla, get an S10...French vanilla, get a D10...like Ben and Jerry's tasty concoctions, go Uni of some sort.

Calvin Walley
Member

From: colorado city colorado, USA

posted 08 February 2006 11:10 AM     profile     
just wanted to take a moment to thank each and everyone that has responded to this post
i have a lot to think about, one thing i don't understand very well is this : what is the differance in the extended E-9th and the U-12 ?

calvin

Richard Sinkler
Member

From: Fremont, California

posted 08 February 2006 01:35 PM     profile     
I believe that most uni players don't have the 9Th string D note (without a lever). They also usually have more pedals that are the same changes as what are on the C6th neck of a D10. An extended E9th player (at least the ones I have seen tunings of) has only maybe 4 or 5 pedals that have common E9th changes, but no C6th type changes.

If I was just starting out. I too would seriously consider a U-12 (or 14).

And to criticize any player for their choice of instrument is apalling.

Edited 'cuz I had a cortizone shot in my soine this morning and am flying high on Vicodin. Hard to type correctly.

------------------
Carter D10 9p/9k, NV400, Korg Triton Le88 Synth, Korg CX-3 organ, Yamaha Motif Rack Module, Regal Dobro, Tele, Gretsch Acoustic.

[This message was edited by Richard Sinkler on 08 February 2006 at 01:38 PM.]

Calvin Walley
Member

From: colorado city colorado, USA

posted 08 February 2006 02:01 PM     profile     
thanks richard

calvin

Erv Niehaus
Member

From: Litchfield, MN, USA

posted 08 February 2006 02:56 PM     profile     
Calvin,
The extended E9th (12 string) is just like the regular 10 string E9th except it has two extra low strings. Sounds nice!
Erv
Earnest Bovine
Member

From: Los Angeles CA USA

posted 08 February 2006 03:02 PM     profile     
Calvin

Here is the difference


Uni E9/B6 Ext E9
1 F# F#
2 D# D#
3 G# G#
4 E E
5 B B
6 G# G#
7 F# F#
8 E E
9 B D
10 G# B
11 E G#
12 B E

Some common variations on the U-12 would include tuning the 2nd string to C#, or changing the order of strings 1 2 3, or tuning strings 4 and 8 to D# instead of E, or transposing the whole tuning up 1 fret, or down 1 or 2 frets.
It's easy to put all the "C6 pedals" on ext E9, but still the ext E9 lacks the useful open strings of C6, and the low range of C6 and U12.
b0b has lots of examples at http://b0b.com/tunings/index.html
Calvin Walley
Member

From: colorado city colorado, USA

posted 08 February 2006 09:41 PM     profile     
thanks Earnest ,
that really put it so that even i can understand it

calvin

Steven Black
Member

From: Gahanna, Ohio, USA

posted 09 February 2006 03:32 AM     profile     
I tried out a U12, and I really like it, like everyone is saying the C6th is there all of it, and the E9th is there as well, I have played D10's until my back went bad from carrying them, if you buy a U12 get it with Emmons setup, and with 7 pedals and 5 knee levers.
Alan Cook
Member

From: Manchester, England

posted 09 February 2006 04:05 AM     profile     
Getting back to the Bobbe Seymour newsletter I would also like to know Bobbe's 10 anti-uni reasons.
My 10 pro-uni reasons.
1) Weight
2) Less strings to change
3) Less strings to tune
4) Extended range on E9th
5) Easy to change style mid song
6) Relative chord positions E9th-B6th
7) Looks better
8) Less mechanics to go wrong
9) Less electrics to go wrong
10)My favorite steel players play universal
Jeff Newman
BJ Cole
Robert Randolph
Joe Wright
Mourice Anderson
www.alancook.net

This topic is 3 pages long:   1  2  3 

All times are Pacific (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Pedal Steel Pages

Note: Messages not explicitly copyrighted are in the Public Domain.

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46

Our mailing address is:
The Steel Guitar Forum
148 South Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Support the Forum