Author
|
Topic: multiple raises/lowers on a Fender 400
|
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 14 March 2006 10:16 PM
profile
Well, I got most of the underside "rigging" done - cales hooked up, knee levers installed, changer installed etc.But now a puzzle that hadn't come up in discussions with my parts suppliers. I'm sort of surprised, since they knew what copedent was being used. Situation: the first stringis lowered from D3 to D by pedal 6....but also now needs to lower from D# to C# via the LKL. One the 4th string, pedal one raises from F# to G#; The RKL is supposed to raise from F# to A. This is Sneaky's setup for the knees. I kno some people have done it - but I don't know how to make it work. Knee lever stops wouldn't work, since in each case the knee makes the larger change. Is there some simple method of stopping the pedal cable assembly at a certain point that doesn't affect the knee lever assembly? I'm puzzling over this one. I *know* there's a way to do it, I just don't have the knowledge. Ideas/pictures welcomed. |
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 15 March 2006 06:23 AM
profile
^^bump^^A couple ideas using loops on both the raise and lower fingers have come up, but I wonder if there are any other ideas? The raise/lower loop combination would only work if one of the loops was free - but on each pedal in question, each loop is used on a different string, so it looks like that type of system won't work. The actual copedent is on the forum - it's Sneaky's with the 9th string changes ommitted.[This message was edited by Jim Sliff on 15 March 2006 at 06:31 AM.] |
Dave Zirbel Member From: Sebastopol, CA USA
|
posted 15 March 2006 08:32 AM
profile
I thought about this too. I haven't been able to set up my guitars yet because they are being refinished. I thought about putting a threaded extension on the hoops and making a plate with holes and screw stops, or just drilling holes in the end plate under the existing screw stops. It can work if the original changer stops have the longest pulls on them. My guitar already has been drillied in various places so I'm not concerned about modifying the body. Dave[This message was edited by Dave Zirbel on 15 March 2006 at 08:52 AM.] |
Russ Tkac Member From: Waterford, Michigan, USA
|
posted 15 March 2006 08:43 AM
profile
I was wondering about this as well when I was looking at your Knee Lever thread. Let me know when you figure it out. |
Steve Zinno Member From: Spring City, Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 15 March 2006 10:55 AM
profile
Jim, do you think it would be possible to create the stops for the pedals instead? I'm thinking of the pullers at the top where the cables and pedal rods connect. Tune that one to the short throw, and the changer stops to the longer throw. I don't have one in front of me at the moment, but there might be something there you can work with. |
Russ Tkac Member From: Waterford, Michigan, USA
|
posted 15 March 2006 01:32 PM
profile
Jim,How about setting the knee for the full step lower and pedal 2 for the 1/2 step raise. Then connect pedal 6 to the raise and the lower and it should lower it a whole step and bring it back a 1/2 step to D on pedal 6. It is the same concept when you pedal with two feet. Russ[This message was edited by Russ Tkac on 15 March 2006 at 01:36 PM.] |
ebb Member From: nj
|
posted 15 March 2006 03:37 PM
profile
maybe someone could ask anita how pete did it http://steelguitarforum.com/Forum5/HTML/011850.html
|
basilh Member From: United Kingdom
|
posted 15 March 2006 03:53 PM
profile
Putting stops on the pedals won't work as the cables are somewhat inconsistent in their length, due to temperature etc. BUT Here's the workaround to allow double flattening or sharpening on a "1000" NOT cables on the knee lever just rods with loops and the old Sho-Bud halfstop barrell. and Baz
------------------ quote: Steel players do it without fretting
|
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 15 March 2006 04:29 PM
profile
Unfortunately I wouldn't know a Shobud half-stop part if it bit me, nor where to find one or how to hook it up, so I think it'll have to be more basic than that - if not, it's going to sit for quite a while until I can afford to have somebody build or install those things.Russ - I really want to keep the changes where they are rather than reverse the pedals/knees. Hopefully. Steve's thought about a pedal stop is what I was thinking (it must be what Basil's thing is as well). I do have some short cylinders with holes thru the diameter that a cable could run through, and a screw on top to set them - If I put those on the pedal cables and set them where they smack into some sort of bracket/stop at a predetermined (but adjustable) point, maybe that would work? Is that the general idea of the Shobud thing? Another thought is setting the knee change, and then adjusting the pedal's pull using a combination of the turnbuckle and rod adjustments. I *might* be able to limit the pull there by loosening things at the turnbuckle and resetting the pedal height via the rod, which wouldn't affect the knee lever pull at all. I seem to recall reading a note on that method somewhere...and it would certainly be the simplest solution. Comments? Remember this is a vintage mechanism and pull system, and no matter what it's not going to be as deadly accurate as modern high-tech steels (I get a kick out of the tuning debates - sheesh, we Fender guys are happy to see a tuner needle point somewhat straight up at all...).[This message was edited by Jim Sliff on 15 March 2006 at 04:30 PM.] |
Donny Hinson Member From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.
|
posted 15 March 2006 05:00 PM
profile
Simple, just have an adjustable knee-lever stop, and tune the knee lever from there, and then tune the floor pedal at the endplate. (the old k.i.s.s. principle) This would function in the same way as the old "barrel tuners" used on Sho~Buds and Emmons' guitars for decades. When you can't tune at the endplate or the keys, tune somewhere else! |
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 15 March 2006 05:04 PM
profile
Donny - the problem is, though, that the knee lever has to pull *farther* than the pedal....so that idea doesn't work, unless you can set the pedal for a shorter pull (it would if the knee lever stop was for a lesser pull than the pedal). Which is what I'm thinking MAY be possible using the turnbuckle and basically slacking the pedal cable off a bunch. |
Russ Tkac Member From: Waterford, Michigan, USA
|
posted 15 March 2006 05:17 PM
profile
Jim, I think you missed my point. On string 4 set the RKL to raise a step and a 1/2 or (+++)F# to A. Set pedal 5 to lower a 1/2 step (-)F# to F. Now hook pedal 1 on the raise and the lower. Pedal 1 will be raised a step and a 1/2 (+++)F# to A but the lower will be dropping a 1/2 step (-)A to G# so what you get is a full step raise (++) F# to G#. My other example was for string 1, one raise and two lowers. Test this by raising F# to G# on string 4 with pedal 1 then push pedal 5 down while holding pedal 1 down. It should lower the raise by the 1/2 step to G. I believe it's on the forum some place. All the best, Russ
[This message was edited by Russ Tkac on 15 March 2006 at 08:03 PM.] |
ebb Member From: nj
|
posted 15 March 2006 07:45 PM
profile
i would be very wary of the 4th string split as it is such an important/basic move and the split is very sensitive to string guage/wound vs plain etc since there is no way to fine tune the split. the rkr pedal in sneaky's tuning is the equivalent of the pete drake version of the a pedal f lever inversion http://steelguitarforum.com/Forum5/HTML/007456.html and is available with the 8th pedal and a modified grip
|
Russ Tkac Member From: Waterford, Michigan, USA
|
posted 15 March 2006 08:02 PM
profile
Ed,You're probably right. I have no KL's on my guitar and pedal 1 is very important. Your sugesstion of asking Anita would be a good one or Tommy Spurlock as he has the same setup. Jim, I guess it's back to the drawing board. |
basilh Member From: United Kingdom
|
posted 15 March 2006 08:19 PM
profile
Jim you said quote: and no matter what it's not going to be as deadly accurate as modern high-tech steels
Whilst that may be correct with regard to the very latest guitars , I find that that's not an issue if implemented like I've done it.. 1. The fender most definitely does NOT suffer from 'Cabinet drop' 2. Whether there is little or a lot of slack in the cables the way the mechanism works takes cable slack out of the equation. 3. I've found my Fender 1000 and 400 to be equal to either of my 1970 Emmons D-10's with regard to pitch retention. (Which incidentally also require a workaround for the single raise and lower changer design)
|
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 15 March 2006 09:24 PM
profile
Basil, your points are well taken...but mine have not been that accurate. I guess they're just not dialed-in perfectly yet. they are very playable though, and don't sound out of tune - and after years of playing "regular" guitar that's NEVER in tune, it seems close enough.ebb - I apologize for my ignorance, but this one: "the rkr pedal in sneaky's tuning is the equivalent of the pete drake version of the a pedal f lever inversion http://steelguitarforum.com/Forum5/HTML/007456.html and is available with the 8th pedal and a modified grip"... ....completely lost me. I'm afraid I don't know what you mean or how that thread applies to what I'm doing - it's not "who invented what" I'm worried about, it's getting the darned changes to operate. It HAS been done, so there has to be a way to do it. I thought I was getting a complete setup with the knee levers based on info I supplied, but found out that's not the case. Russ - did your example mean you have to also push the #5 pedal to get the change? I'm still not clear on it.
[This message was edited by Jim Sliff on 15 March 2006 at 09:25 PM.] |
ebb Member From: nj
|
posted 16 March 2006 04:11 AM
profile
rkr gives an inversion of any grip using 1 2 4 5 6 8 at 2 frets above. p8 would give the same inversion for 2 4 5 on strings 2 4 6 at 4 frets above. tommy spurlock did not use this change when i saw him as it wasn't working properly then |
basilh Member From: United Kingdom
|
posted 16 March 2006 04:58 AM
profile
Jim, I've just checked the Sneaky Pete Kleinow's B6th copedent.. Those changes are NOT possible with a stock Fender 400/1000 changer system.. Somewhere there is a mistake in the assumption that this tuning was on a Fender 400...The 800/2000 changer CAN do it.Are there ANY pictures ANYWHERE of the endplate and undercarriage of the guitar in question ? (Sneaky Pete Kleinow's)
|
Donny Hinson Member From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.
|
posted 16 March 2006 05:19 AM
profile
quote: Donny - the problem is, though, that the knee lever has to pull *farther* than the pedal....so that idea doesn't work.
So, if that's what you want (more pull on the lever), just put adjustable stops on the pedal cables, and then tune the knee lever at the endplate! It's not that big a deal, really. Any good mechanic or steel builder can do this, even using cables for everything. |
Russ Tkac Member From: Waterford, Michigan, USA
|
posted 16 March 2006 05:20 AM
profile
Jim,I'm sure I'm not making myself clear. Here is all I was thinking on string 4: RK Raise: +++ P5 Lower: - P1 Put one loop on the raise and one on the lower: ++ It should balance out the raise and the lower. But as Ed pointed out Pedal 1 is very important, so it may not work out right. The good news is you can try it and put it back in 5 min. |
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 16 March 2006 05:31 AM
profile
Basil, I talked to Anita and it is stock with the exception of some kind of stop for the strings in question. She's trying to get a picture of it for me, and thinks Duane Marrs (is that the right name?) made the parts.ebb - thanks for trying, really, but you still lost me. I'm not sure what your trying to tell us. Donny - That's correct - more pull on the knees. We're on the same track...with a stop on the pedal cable it seems like it should be simple. I just need to figure out how to make one with my limited fabrication skills (like - none. Need to find off-the-shelf-stuff and adapt it like I did with the lever stops). Russ - Still confused. It stil seems like you mean two pedals have to e pushed to essentially make the math work. Right? Or does the change addition/subtraction work even without touching the other pedal? |
Russ Tkac Member From: Waterford, Michigan, USA
|
posted 16 March 2006 05:39 AM
profile
jim,Just one pedal. When pedal one is pushed it is hooked to the raise and lower and addition/subtraction = the sum of the two. But, being that Anita says it is done with a stop...never mind. |
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 16 March 2006 04:31 PM
profile
^^bump^^I'm stalled. Aren't there any kind of off-the-shelf parts used to make rod stops that could also be attached to cables? Basil's general idea seemed right, but I'm not familiar with what was in the picture or how to get/hook up something like that. |
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 16 March 2006 09:03 PM
profile
Another idea by email - a couple small crosshafts, each with a lever. Hook a cable from the turnbuckle, around the pulley and attach it to each lever with a hook, turnbuckle or something.; then another cable in the other direction, attached to the same lever, to a normal loop attached to the changer. Then use a stop to tune the pull and limit the travel.That seems like the most solid and simplest system. Easier than the adding/subtracting of multiple raise/lower pulls (and I'm math phobic!!), less strain, and very similar visually to the knee levers, keeping it somewhat decent in appearance. Some parts I have, the rest are coming in I think. I can try the "L" bracket stop first since it's worked for other people, but if it seems not strong enough I'll have to find something heavier - what, I don't know. Comments? |
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 18 March 2006 01:19 PM
profile
Getting closer - electronics are killer. It's VERY strong with both pickups on!Just need to get the pedal stops worked out and it's ready except for a few cosmetic things. |
basilh Member From: United Kingdom
|
posted 18 March 2006 03:07 PM
profile
Jim, I just saw the picture with the TWO pick-ups.. Check with Jody, but as far as I know, they never made a twin pick-up 400.. I have two pick-ups on one neck of my 1000, but had to do it myself. The Jaguar style pick-up IS correct for the 400 but the control plate seems to be from a 'Telecaster'. |
Russ Tkac Member From: Waterford, Michigan, USA
|
posted 18 March 2006 04:28 PM
profile
Bas,I think Jim got the body with the two pickups and swapped the original body. I wouldn't put the tele switch plate past him though...he's such a Fender guy! |
Patrick Ickes Member From: Upper Lake, CA USA
|
posted 18 March 2006 07:34 PM
profile
Hi Jim, You guys are all over-engineering the guitar. My 50's Fender 400 is tuned to E9 from low to high: B,E,F#,G#,B,E,G#,F#. My 3rd pedal raises string 3 to an F# and string 4 to and C#. My 4 pedal raises both strings 3 and 7 to an F. Instead of complicating the undercarriage of the guitar, I just adjust the rod length of pedal 4 so the pedal hits the floor at the same time the string pitch reaches F. It don't get any easier than that. I have to adjust for hardfloor, carpet, dirt, etc., but it works great. Hope this helps get you out of the drawing room and playing your guitar!! Patrick
|
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 19 March 2006 04:24 PM
profile
Patrick - that's generally what I was thinking of doing using the turnbuckles and rod adjusters in combination. I read of something similar on the Fender Forum a while back. Worth a try, anyway - if it dosn't work, I can still install the stops.Basil - you would be correct - Fender didn't make them with two pickups. I did. I took a beater body,routed it for the extra pickup, routed out the control cavity to fit the switch in a Tele control plates configuation, wired it up...and wham! Works like a charm. Normal bite on the bridge pickup, a mellower but louder sound with some punch in the middle position, and a throatier, mid-enhanced sound from the neck pickup. That's the basics - I'll probably do more to the electronics later, but I want to get everything working first and this type of wiring I can do in my sleep. |
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 19 March 2006 10:51 PM
profile
Well, here it is with the pedals set to hit the floor in a fake-stop mode until I can make real stops. It plays fairly well that way, but I'd like them up a little higher. Knee levers work great except for the right one being tough with a volume control for tall dudes like me. But then, I don't usually use one with it anyway.Some tuning difficulties I haven't figured out - the changer fingers are randomly distributed under the guitar now, and when one pedal pulls two strings OR one string is pulled by two pedals I'm having a heck of a time getting them both in tune. Back and forth dozens of times, and they'll only get close - each time I set one string the other pull goes out of adjustmen. I've got to be doing something wrong, but it's all following the Fender manual. Must be some unwritten trick to it that's driving me nuts. |
Donny Hinson Member From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.
|
posted 20 March 2006 10:20 AM
profile
quote: each time I set one string the other pull goes out of adjustmen.
Either you have the cables over-tightened (not enough slack, and they're activating when you're not pressing a pedal), or whatever you're using as a "stop" is moving. If you're using the floor as a stop for the pedals, and the guitar moves any at all (like the rubber leg-tips compressing), you'll never get it "right". With all it's shortcomings, the Fender changer is one of the most simple, accurate, and stable ever invented. Do you have the same problems with pedals you haven't added or modified? They should be pulling the loops firmly against the stop-plate at the end of their travel.
|
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 20 March 2006 04:24 PM
profile
Donny - they're all a bit whacked out, even the ones without extra "stops".What I'm not sure of...and what isn't defined anywhere...is how the changer screws should be set at the *start* of the whole hookup process. I have nothing binding, smooth as silk...but tune one pull and the other goes out. Then retune the string again, and both are out. I keep going until I run out of turns on the screw - and the turnbuckles are set just at the very edge of tautness - no real tension at all. Really baffling. And the fingers for the loops are scattered all over, while the ones on my 1000 are all neatly in a row. I'll probably take it all apart and start over. But I wish I could figure out what to do differently. |
Russ Tkac Member From: Waterford, Michigan, USA
|
posted 20 March 2006 06:04 PM
profile
Jim,When I did a new setup on my 8 pedal Fender it was a bit difficult to get right. I finally lubed the parts and got it to work right. It took a while though. Russ |
basilh Member From: United Kingdom
|
posted 20 March 2006 06:38 PM
profile
Jim, I think you have the screws on the flattening section turned in too much.. The fingers for the loops should be in a neat row, that's for sure.. |
Donny Hinson Member From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.
|
posted 20 March 2006 08:08 PM
profile
quote: And the fingers for the loops are scattered all over, while the ones on my 1000 are all neatly in a row.
As Basil said, the fingers must be all in a row (solidly against the stop-plate) when at rest. Everything starts there! It could be that your lowering springs are too weak, or they've been stretched, and that would also cause the situation you have described. Another forumite had this photo on posted, and your changer should look exactly like the one at the top of the picture! [This message was edited by Donny Hinson on 20 March 2006 at 08:41 PM.] |
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 20 March 2006 08:12 PM
profile
Donny - that link doesn't work...sorry.Taken 2 minutes ago - you can see my dilemma. BTW, the angle is disconcerting, but there's plenty of clearance between the knee lever shaft and the cables/loops. The lowering springs are very tight. In fact, I was planning on installing lighter ones to make the lowers a bit quicker. So - suggestions? How do I line them up and tune things without them ending up all catywhumpus again? [This message was edited by Jim Sliff on 20 March 2006 at 08:16 PM.] |
Donny Hinson Member From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.
|
posted 20 March 2006 08:30 PM
profile
Jim...looks like you've got the cables too tight on all your raises. The fingers aren't supposed to move from the stops when pedals aren't activated! If the cables are adjusted too tight, the fingers will move - they don't belong tight!SLACK OFF THEM CABLES!!![This message was edited by Donny Hinson on 20 March 2006 at 08:44 PM.] |
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 20 March 2006 09:09 PM
profile
That's exactly what I did before reading your post - loosened the turnbuckles and then retuned the guitar. Everything is lined up now. Next I'll try adjusting pedal changes on the ones that don't have a conflicting knee lever.Lining up those fingers is something sorta glossed over in the old Fender manual - I'm having to fake it as I go...thanks for the help. Edited - OK, everything is working except the 8th string lower on pedal 1. Just can't get enough pull before it hits the floor, and if I have that one right the 4th string pulls sharp. So I'll live without the 8th string pull for a couple days while I make real stops. I have a couple short cross-shafts with levers mounted - so I'm planning on clipping the single cables for pedals 1 and 6 before the small pulley, and adding a small turnbuckle on each side of the levers. Then use stops similar to the ones for the knee levers (but probably a little heavier) and that should work to tune the pedal pulls where they need to be. I think....[This message was edited by Jim Sliff on 20 March 2006 at 10:41 PM.] |
Lee Jeffriess Member From: Yucca Valley California
|
posted 21 March 2006 10:06 PM
profile
Jim,did you clean,and relube the changer?. I know its not the cause of your problems, but it makes a world of difference. I had a 61, and a 66 1000, that were both sluggish, until i degunked them. Herb stiener, told me he was putting softer return springs on the lowers, said it helped out, i think like donny and bashil, are saying the cables, dont have to be that taught,its a can of worms, you will get it. When there working, imho, there great. Lee |
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA
|
posted 21 March 2006 10:38 PM
profile
Yep, cleaned and lbed everything and it's now working fine. I just need to install the pedal stops for the 1 and 6 pedals, working the first and fourth strings.thinking about it, it seems like th stops need to go *after* the small pullies so they only affect one string, not both. Means I need to make them fairly small - it means my idea of turnbuckles on each side to hook them up is out. I need some small hooks to pull the stop levers that I can solder cable to. Any suggestions? Seems like somebody should make such a thing, even for a rod setup. That would work as well, I think. I just don't have any contacts for parts - tried Marrs email days ago, but got no reply.[This message was edited by Jim Sliff on 21 March 2006 at 10:40 PM.] |