Steel Guitar Strings
Strings & instruction for lap steel, Hawaiian & pedal steel guitars
http://SteelGuitarShopper.com
Ray Price Shuffles
Classic country shuffle styles for Band-in-a-Box, by BIAB guru Jim Baron.
http://steelguitarmusic.com

This Forum is CLOSED.
Go to bb.steelguitarforum.com to read and post new messages.


  The Steel Guitar Forum
  Pedal Steel
  PP on eBay (Page 1)

Post New Topic  
your profile | join | preferences | help | search


This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   PP on eBay
Cartwright Thompson
Member

From: Portland, Maine, USA

posted 22 August 2006 03:34 AM     profile     
I saw this, and not knowing much about push pulls was wondering about a few things. http://cgi.ebay.com/Vintage-Emmons-Ste el-Guitar...

What kind of pickups are those?
What about the switches?
What year is it?

I'm not looking to buy it. It just looked a little odd and made me curious.

[This message was edited by b0b on 22 August 2006 at 09:18 AM.]

Mike Shefrin
Member

From: New York

posted 22 August 2006 05:34 AM     profile     
Don't know about the pickups or the toggle switches. The price seems low for a double neck Emmons and makes me wonder,
although it looks to be in decent condition.
One would have to see and play it ultimately to really know I suppose.

[This message was edited by Mike Shefrin on 22 August 2006 at 05:08 PM.]

Donny Hinson
Member

From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.

posted 22 August 2006 05:46 AM     profile     
I can only see one picture, but it has the older-style cast pedals, so I'll guess early '70s. Can't really tell for sure, but that looks like George-L pickups, and the switches/knobs are probably all standard Emmons stuff.
Bruce Hamilton
Member

From: Vancouver BC Canada

posted 22 August 2006 06:15 AM     profile     
Get your check books out- this a wrap around!!!
Probably one of the most sought after guitars in the world.
Mike Shefrin
Member

From: New York

posted 22 August 2006 07:18 AM     profile     
You're probably right Donny. I didn't notice those older cast pedals.

[This message was edited by Mike Shefrin on 22 August 2006 at 05:08 PM.]

Henry Matthews
Member

From: Texarkana, Texas, USA

posted 22 August 2006 07:31 AM     profile     
I saw the guitar also and was wandering what the controls were on each neck. Looks like maybe volume and tone controls for each neck. This is a very rare and different looking guitar.
Mike Vallandigham
Member

From: Concord, CA

posted 22 August 2006 07:58 AM     profile     
That thing is beat up, molested and bastardized. looks like some Sho-Bud knee levers, a few extra springs (looks familiar) and the red velvet (puke) and the center control removed and covered up w/ a plate.

I seem to remember a really early emmons that had the controls like that on the neck...
Maybe it's wraparound necks put onto a regular body, then set up by a baboon?

nice color though.


Thenk again, I could be totally off base.

[This message was edited by Mike Vallandigham on 22 August 2006 at 08:00 AM.]

Daniel J. Cormier
Member

From: Lake Charles, LA, USA

posted 22 August 2006 08:10 AM     profile     
If we had a serial number we could possibly pin point the year model. Knee levers are not rightfor any year Push Pull I've ever seen. Let's send these Pictures to Bobbe Seymore and see what the Guru of Emmons Poo Poo says

------------------
Daniel J. Cormier
Mullen D-10 .
EVans FET 500 LV ,ProFex II
http://www.cajunsteelguitar.com email at djcormier@cox-internet.com

Mike Vallandigham
Member

From: Concord, CA

posted 22 August 2006 08:13 AM     profile     
1164010W

that's the serial stamped on it... looks weird... dosent look like the format of my PP.. bobbe will know, he's da man. I'm sure he'll see this soon.

Donny Hinson
Member

From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.

posted 22 August 2006 08:37 AM     profile     
Yes, now that I can see all the pictures, it is indeed a "wrap". Worth a lot of money if someone hadn't smootched it all up by moving the switches and controls.

(I'm pretty sure Bobbe knows about this one. Don't let the low bids so far fool you, it will wind up going for a few grand!)

Tore Blestrud
Member

From: Oslo, Norway

posted 22 August 2006 08:47 AM     profile     
How abouth that other P/P on eBay right now: http://cgi.ebay.com/ Vintage-1966-Emmons...

[This message was edited by b0b on 22 August 2006 at 09:19 AM.]

Duane Reese
Member

From: Salt Lake County, Utah

posted 22 August 2006 09:39 AM     profile     
Any way you look at it, this guitar will go for a lot I'm sure. We could use Bobbe's input on this though.
Bobbe, where are you buddy?!
Erv Niehaus
Member

From: Litchfield, MN, USA

posted 22 August 2006 10:30 AM     profile     
Would that serial number indicate that it was built in November 1964?
I see that it is a "red belly" but it seems to me that it is a little light in the hardware dept. I believe there are some rods missing on the bottom side.
Why would anyone take the controls off the control panel and mount them in the neck? I think that I'd be a little scared of this one!
Mike Shefrin
Member

From: New York

posted 22 August 2006 10:39 AM     profile     
So would I. Definitely suspicious.
John Fabian
Member

From: Mesquite, Texas USA

posted 22 August 2006 10:57 AM     profile     
Herb Steiner will probably correct me on the mistakes I might make here. (and should) This is not meant as verification as I only could see 1 picture. Just some food for thought.

I beleive these all came with decal logos and this appears to have been replaced by an emblem

The neck controls could be indicative of this guitar originally being an Emmons Stereo guitar. (Check out pictures of #1 that were posted by Bob Knight)

The serial number indicates that it would be #10 from November of 1964

These guitars had no knee levers and consequently some owners "did their thing" when adding them.


Here is an after undercarraige shot of s/n 764005 which is in my possesion.

[This message was edited by John Fabian on 22 August 2006 at 11:05 AM.]

TRAP TRULY
Member

From: mobile,al

posted 22 August 2006 11:17 AM     profile     
good info here:
p/p/ date info
Mike Vallandigham
Member

From: Concord, CA

posted 22 August 2006 01:14 PM     profile     
Is the red flocking standarn or really early Emmons'?
Erv Niehaus
Member

From: Litchfield, MN, USA

posted 22 August 2006 01:21 PM     profile     
I believe so, they called them "red belly".
Herb Steiner
Member

From: Cedar Valley, Travis County TX

posted 22 August 2006 01:25 PM     profile     
Sad to see this guitar in this shape.

The serial number (W at end) indicates that this is was originally a wood neck guitar, assembled in November of 1964, also evidenced by the missing control panel in between the necks, now covered by a plate.
It was the 10th guitar serialized by the Emmons company.

Sometime in its history, the woodnecks were replaced with Emmons wraparound necks for a stereo guitar. The pickups are original Emmons with the diagonal pole pieces. Very early, I've only owned one guitar with pickups like that.

The controls in the necks were tone, volume, and neck selectors controls for a stereo guitar, though I doubt it's a stereo now. Could be, though.

It looks very similar to 1164007W and 1164008W, both of which I owned at one time and are both wood neck guitars. I still own 1164008W. This guitar has the crossbars with the shorter actuator arms, like #008W.

It probably went back to Emmons in the early 70's and had the chevron decal replaced with a logo plaque, another mistake, IMHO.

I agree that the guitar is heavily botched and probably would be time-consuming and expensive to bring back to any type of showroom condition.

An yes, there's a Sho-Bud knee lever on there. I don't know who's spinning faster in his grave, Shot Jackson or Ron Lashley.

------------------
Herb's Steel Guitar Pages
Texas Steel Guitar Association

[This message was edited by Herb Steiner on 22 August 2006 at 02:01 PM.]

Chris Lucker
Member

From: Los Angeles, California USA

posted 22 August 2006 01:41 PM     profile     
Herb

And that is the first Emmons changer with the half inch axle rather than 9/16ths; the cast fingers rather than stampled aluminum; and with only one leverage hole rather than three, right? I would like to have that changer on my parts shelf.

Chris

------------------
Chris Lucker
Red Belly, another Red Belly, Bob Tucker and Vance Terry

[This message was edited by Chris Lucker on 22 August 2006 at 01:44 PM.]

Bruce Hamilton
Member

From: Vancouver BC Canada

posted 22 August 2006 07:26 PM     profile     
If that is the case with the changer then all the E9 pedals would have very long non adjustable pedal travel. You probably could not even put a c pedal on. There isn't one on it now. I suppose you could drill the extra holes but that would mean taking off the necks and removing the changer. With all the knees currently being home made a minimal renovation would involve buying new kits and installing them along with all the extra brackets and crossrods. Yikes!!! That is scary.
Herb Steiner
Member

From: Cedar Valley, Travis County TX

posted 22 August 2006 07:35 PM     profile     
It would be an expensive job, for the parts as well as the labor.

------------------
Herb's Steel Guitar Pages
Texas Steel Guitar Association

Jay Ganz
Member

From: Out Behind The Barn

posted 22 August 2006 07:47 PM     profile     
I can tell the P/P tech who worked on this.
I recognize his work anywhere!
His name is Rube Goldberg.
Tom Quinn
Member

From: Sacramento

posted 23 August 2006 06:29 PM     profile     
Bet it sounds like a million bucks!
Henry Matthews
Member

From: Texarkana, Texas, USA

posted 28 August 2006 10:18 AM     profile     
$3400 dollars?? Wrap arounds are that pricy?
Tony Prior
Member

From: Charlotte NC

posted 28 August 2006 12:35 PM     profile     
I can't decide if I am more impressed with Herbs/Johns knowledge being shared or the photo's of an EBAY 1964 #10 Red Belly PP !

It's good day at Sea !

t


[This message was edited by Tony Prior on 28 August 2006 at 12:35 PM.]

[This message was edited by Tony Prior on 28 August 2006 at 04:46 PM.]

John Fabian
Member

From: Mesquite, Texas USA

posted 28 August 2006 02:18 PM     profile     
$3400 would be cheap if it hadn't undergone the changes it had.
chas smith
Member

From: Encino, CA, USA

posted 28 August 2006 02:32 PM     profile     
I can't help but think that $3400 is cheap, changes or not. It's still what it is regardless of the cosmetics.
Jerry Roller
Member

From: Van Buren, Arkansas USA

posted 28 August 2006 03:47 PM     profile     
I bid on this guitar early on but lost interest so I have not bid any more. In the last hour I have received (bogus, I'm sure) an offer asking me to contact the seller to speed up the sale and another which was a second chance offer at about half what is presently bid on it. This offer stated the auction had ended and the winner bidder could not finalize the sale. SO, beware and don't get excited over this kind of stuff. I am confident it is a legitimate auction and someone is probably going to get a pretty good deal on a rare collector item. I am just turned off by the big hunk of aluminum between the necks and the fact that the serial number shows it to have wooden necks which it does not. Just too many unknowns for me. My reason for this post is to just remind everyone one who is interested that there are a bunch of scam artists out there trying to capitalize. I would love to have this guitar and rebuild it into a showpiece but just can't afford it as I am a player and not a collector.
Good luck guys and beware of the scam emails many of you are probably receiving.
Jerry
Herb Steiner
Member

From: Cedar Valley, Travis County TX

posted 28 August 2006 05:09 PM     profile     
I thought about making a serious bid, but there's too many question marks for me, and too many extraneous parts... like the corner brace on the front apron by the changer with the rod running through it, and the metal covering the underside by the changer, etc... plus I already own 3 wraparounds and an even earlier woodneck, all cleaner than this guitar, so I'm just gonna lay back and see what happens. I predict it will go over $3600, but will need several hundred more to make it a clean guitar.

But there's probably a rich guy out there that will say money is no object... and I know of one already.

------------------
Herb's Steel Guitar Pages
Texas Steel Guitar Association

Pat Burns
Member

From: Branchville, N.J. USA

posted 28 August 2006 05:54 PM     profile     
Herb, excuse my ignorance, I don't know what a wraparound changer looks like with wooden necks....do you have a picture?

Also, what are those two wheels sticking out of each neck in the Ebay guitar for?

Tom Quinn
Member

From: Sacramento

posted 28 August 2006 06:08 PM     profile     
Lucker is going for the guitar -- please don't part it out! -L-
Pat Burns
Member

From: Branchville, N.J. USA

posted 28 August 2006 06:14 PM     profile     
3 minutes to go...curiousity has me hooked.
Pat Burns
Member

From: Branchville, N.J. USA

posted 28 August 2006 06:18 PM     profile     
$3600 on the nose.
chas smith
Member

From: Encino, CA, USA

posted 28 August 2006 06:19 PM     profile     
$3600, there you have it, or someone has it. Congratulations.
Bruce Hamilton
Member

From: Vancouver BC Canada

posted 28 August 2006 08:02 PM     profile     
I might be totally off the mark but I think the purchaser already has a wrap around and the guitar is going to a northern state. Congratulations.
Pat Burns
Member

From: Branchville, N.J. USA

posted 29 August 2006 06:35 AM     profile     
quote:
Herb, excuse my ignorance, I don't know what a wraparound changer looks like with wooden necks....do you have a picture?
Also, what are those two wheels sticking out of each neck in the Ebay guitar for?

...anybody?


Herb Steiner
Member

From: Cedar Valley, Travis County TX

posted 29 August 2006 07:31 AM     profile     
Pat
There are no wraparound changers with wood necks. The wood neck guitars have bolt-on changers.

The wafer knobs are tone controls I believe. I've never owned or operated a stereo Emmons, it wasn't a popular design and there were probably less than a dozen made, according to Buddy. He said it seemed like a good idea at the time, but then they realized very few steel players played through two amps in those days.

When I owned 1164007W, it had original pickups and was monaural. Guitar 1164008W was totally trashed when I got it, but it was originally a woodneck stereo. It has a longer-than-normal control panel and that's where the stereo controls were placed. It had been converted to mono years earlier, but still had the "stereo" chevron decal. All the non-stereo guitars had decals with the "stereo" word cut out. This is why you see wraparounds with the "window" decals (as Ron Elliott called them).

Mike Cass needs to chime in on this thread, since almost all the info I have on these guitars came from MC, who helped me find most of my vintage horns and worked on all of them at one time or another.

I do have a series of 20 letters, correspondence between Ron Lashley and Paul Graupp from 1962 to November of 1964 that pretty much explain in first hand/real time the genesis and development of the Emmons guitar. Not covered in these letters are a lot of the design changes happened in late 64 to early 65, from some of the guitars I've seen and owned. Axle diameters, length of changer fingers, length of crossbar actuator arms, placement and spacing of holes in the endplates, etc. Things like that.

------------------
Herb's Steel Guitar Pages
Texas Steel Guitar Association

[This message was edited by Herb Steiner on 29 August 2006 at 08:15 AM.]

[This message was edited by Herb Steiner on 29 August 2006 at 08:15 AM.]

Jerry Roller
Member

From: Van Buren, Arkansas USA

posted 29 August 2006 07:31 AM     profile     
Pat, Herb is much more up on vintage Emmons guitars than I am but I will try to help. The tone and volume controls are mounted under the necks and those wheels are the control knobs. I didn't know there was such a thing as a wood neck wraparound but I am sure it would have the same wraparound changer housing which is a one piece housing that is cut out for the pickup and changer pillar blocks which are mounted to the body of the guitar and the changer housing just fits around the changer without making contact with it. The changer does not bolt onto the housing and there is no cut out end on the housing. It would be like a wraparound aluminum neck that has been cut off about 1 1/2 inches past the pickup cavity and the wood neck placed between the changer housing and the keyhead. It seems to me that most modern guitars other than Emmons are patterned after the wraparound. The present day Emmons has the back of the neck or changer housing cut out and a heavy block is attached to the changer pillars and fills that cutout space. This gives the Emmons a terrific strong boltdown of the changer at the backend where most of the hold down is needed. This would be even more so if not for the weakening of that area caused by the cutout for the changer.
Sorry, rambling again.
Jerry
Jerry Roller
Member

From: Van Buren, Arkansas USA

posted 29 August 2006 07:35 AM     profile     
It looks like Herb was giving you a good quick answer while I was rambling. I have never heard of a wood neck wraparound but I thought perhaps it was possible and if it did exist I think I described what it would look like.
Jerry

This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 

All times are Pacific (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Pedal Steel Pages

Note: Messages not explicitly copyrighted are in the Public Domain.

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46

Our mailing address is:
The Steel Guitar Forum
148 South Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Support the Forum