|
Author
|
Topic: Anyone else Rethinking the NV112?
|
Tony Prior Member From: Charlotte NC
|
posted 07 August 2005 06:17 AM
profile
Tracey, it's not a question of what was done back THEN as compared to NOW..The Music has changed...Bands are different, Shows are different... A full force Hi energy Country band with blazing Telecasters and an ALL ELECTRIC lineup is not the same as the SWING bands of the era. It always gets back to a very simple equation.. bring the gear that matches the venue. I have been to shows where there were 1000 folks in attendance, and I can say this from some of the experiences, many of the times I could hardly hear the band from the back of the room...
Inadequate sound systems, small amps etc.. The bands in these situations were not equipped for the rooms...the sound systems were not correct either... There is no one shoe fits all... [This message was edited by Tony Prior on 07 August 2005 at 06:18 AM.] |
Jack Stoner Sysop From: Inverness, Florida
|
posted 07 August 2005 07:13 AM
profile
I'll agree that for the "Rock Country" we are being force fed and for the local bands that play it and play loud it probably isn't enough, unless it's miked.But for traditional country music, most steel shows, etc it's perfectly adequate. As I play primarily traditional country music and mostly to older audiences the 112 is perfect. The big venues I've worked all mike the amps, such as Silver Springs (Park) and several major winter festivals and fairs here in Florida. |
George Redmon Member From:
|
posted 07 August 2005 11:58 AM
profile
i wrote Mike Brown an e mail. Told him what i play, the tuning i play, how i play, the type of music i play. He wrote back and told me..DON'T BUY THIS AMP. But i must admit, the weight, size, the word "Nashville" i just couldn't help myself. Thank goodness, it only cost me $50.00 almost 4 hours of driving time, and a little embarrassment. What Mike tells you, you can take as gospel... |
Leslie Ehrlich Member From: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
|
posted 07 August 2005 11:53 PM
profile
Is this amp designed for clean country playing or can it be overdriven for a good rock 'n' roll sound too? |
Mike Sweeney Member From: Nashville,TN,USA
|
posted 11 September 2005 08:09 AM
profile
While I haven't changed my mind about the 112 I have started using a Nashville 400 on some jobs for a couple different reasons. Number one, A couple of the groups I play with play entirely too loud for the size room and bandstand and although the 112 is great for the room I'm haveing to push it too hard just to hear it. And at those kinds of levels the amps compression tend to kick in too much and the tone goes to hell in a hand basket. It really shows on the C6 tuning but also on the E9. The 400 allows me to keep up with everything without pushing the amp to it's limits. I think the 112 is one of the best sounding amps there is out there now but, it's got it's limitations as to what it's power capacity will handle. Mic,ing the amp will get you out front but if the rest of the band is too loud you'll still have to push the amp too hard on stage and as a result not be happy with your sound. It's not the amps fault it's the environment. As far as a recording amp goes the 112 is perfect and for gigs where you don't need tons on volume you'll not find a better amp. Thanks to the folks in Miss. for providind us steel players great amps and litening to our suggestions.Mike Sweeney www.freewebs.com/steelguitarmusic/ |
Fred Shannon Member From: Rocking "S" Ranch, Comancheria, Texas
|
posted 11 September 2005 08:18 AM
profile
Mike S. certainly knows the truth and shows it in his post. The little rascal will surely perform in a decent sized room and in the studio, but if a "big sound" is needed, it has to be miked or put out front on the mains. I noticed the 'compression' Mike indicates when playing a street dance in the open air. Push the output and inputs above 7 and you can hear it. I have two of them and when 'stacked or placed side by side' one can get more headroom. Two of them move a lot of air, but a single when pushed will definitely hit its head on the floor. However,as Mike pointed out, it's a delight in the studio or a quieter environment. Phred------------------ "From Truth, Justice is Born"--Quanah Parker-1904
|
Donny Hinson Member From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.
|
posted 11 September 2005 11:13 AM
profile
quote: I agree, the top venting is a bad idea---it's a bad idea with Marshalls, too...
Yeah, it's a real bad idea with any amp! (So, why do they hold onto it?) Half a teaspoon of beer a "fan" of mine spilled wiped out 2 output transistors on my Peavey amp. Even a stray staple or piece of metal can do the same thing. Top venting...Bad Idea!!! |
Eric West Member From: Portland, Oregon, USA
|
posted 11 September 2005 02:07 PM
profile
Donny.I can see why for the "heat rise" the top vent reasoning. However. the same thing could be accomplished by a couple internal sidemounted 1x2" "convection channels" with side "out" venting. I've always found the heat sink on my Nvl 400 hot after a 5 hour night, and I'm sure the 112 passes a lot of heat. I played last night with my 400 disconnected due to a loose jack. I naturally push the pedal until things sound right, and I noticed that certainly for 80 watts it was "right up there', but I found the compression kicking in, and a lot less "reserve". Still, for the money, it is the best little package I've found. I leave the 400 on the couch by the basement door between gigs, though I admit I bi-amp with my "Floor Mount" Session 500 Mark IV and the 112. My poor neighbors.. I"m getting GREAT use out of it for the Tele and a Blackface Podxt model. All that mentioned and reading every post even before they "fix" the top venting, and maybe the knobs, it's the best amp money I have spent since my Nvl400, and the Nvl the best I'd spent since the 500 MkIV. I think Mike Brown here interacting with us, the trench users, is one of somebody's best ideas. Like I said, he works cheap at almost any wage below a couple hundred grand a year.. Actually, the memory of the logos I took off are kind of growing on me too..  EJL |
Jeff Lampert Member From: queens, new york city
|
posted 11 September 2005 05:54 PM
profile
quote: I have two of them and when 'stacked or placed side by side' one can get more headroom. Two of them move a lot of air
If you really like the 112, a pair of them is the solution to having enough power. To me, they sound noticeably better than the N400 and N1000, so it's worth it, since they are relatively light, to take two of them to a gig when you think you'll need the extra "oomph". ------------------ Jeff's Jazz
|
Steve Howard Member From: High Ridge, Missouri, USA
|
posted 12 September 2005 05:22 AM
profile
Guys, I kind of have a follow up question to all of this.I currently use guitar amps for my steel (a combo for guitar and steel) but will be purchasing my first (and only steel amp soon). Therefore I will be lugging a guitar amp (Vibrolux) and a steel amp to every gig. Our deal however is that we almost exclusively play gigs with professional sound and our amps are always miced. Is headroom the only main knock against the 112? If all I have to do is carry my stage volume with it because the PA will take care of the room, why would there be a point to have more watts? If it is just a preference of a 12" to a 15" than I can understand that, but as far as anything else, wouldn't a 112 work rather well in my situation? |
Webb Kline Member From: Bloomsburg, PA
|
posted 12 September 2005 06:05 AM
profile
Steve, it depends, of course on what everyone else is using on stage. But, you say you have a Vibrolux. If that works well, then I can't imagine the 112 not being sufficient.Personally, I won't play on stage with a loud band. I play steel, piano, acoustic guitar, Dobro and mandolin besides electric guitar and lap steel. Those instruments all sound terrible and some can't even be heard if the stage volume is too loud. To my way of thinking, volume is what the PA is supposed to do. I already have a 60% hearing loss; I don't need to make it worse because of of playing with a bunch of headbangers. That's both unnecessary and ridiculous in this day and age. Jeff said buy two of them if you don't think one will always handle it. I agree. If you think you might have some situations where you won't be miked or DI'd to the mains and the venue is big, then 2 should do the job. Elsewise, one should suffice. The older I get, the more I find myself foraging for leverage (looking for ways to reduce lifting) and also devising ways to eliminate volume. The best volume reduction trick is to find a drummer that is good enough to play dynamically and in-the-pocket no matter how quietly he must play. I've been lucky to have a couple of drummers like this to work with for many years and they are a blessing. With them, I would never need more than a 112 for volume and great tone. |
Fred Shannon Member From: Rocking "S" Ranch, Comancheria, Texas
|
posted 12 September 2005 06:44 AM
profile
Steve, what Webb Says. If you're miked and the band can be "controlled", the NV112 is the way to go IMHO. I don't think you'll beat the tone from the little booger. phred.------------------ "From Truth, Justice is Born"--Quanah Parker-1904
|
Ron Randall Member From: Dallas, Texas, USA
|
posted 12 September 2005 01:47 PM
profile
FWIW. Yes, I have rethought the NV112. Own 2 of them! One for small gigs, lapsteel, 6 string, practice, studio, headphones, CD input. The second for bigger venues. A little stereo delay between them and it is a sweet setup. A pair is still economical and very versatile. IMHORon |
Michael Garnett Member From: Fort Worth, TX
|
posted 12 September 2005 04:35 PM
profile
It seems everyone's touting this little booger because it's smaller, lighter, and can still do _most_ everything a larger (NV400, session 400, vegas, session 500, NV1000) amp will do. I hear what y'all are saying, but my question is this: How would carrying 2 of them solve any of just one of their big brothers' problems? Now you've got 85 pounds of amplifier to carry, right? And you're pushing 2x12's at 80W each, instead of 1x15 at 200+ watts? You're moving more air with less power. Plus, 2 of those amps is going to run you a cool grand. You can get 2 NV400's for around $700. I understand the guys that are playing low volume though, and I've heard Johnny Cox play his. Of course I won't be the caliber of picker he is for many years, and he'd sound good through any amp. Also, I don't know if I'd ever use a balanced output on anything but maybe my bass rig, because it has a tube preamp. I'm not knocking it at all, just asking a few questions. -MG |
DIETMAR WAECHTLER Member From: RAUNHEIM,GERMANY
|
posted 14 September 2005 09:38 AM
profile
Hi NV112 Fans, I tryed the NV112 before and I was not complete assured.I missed the tone warmness and so on. Try a RE 200 Evans amp and you'll get everything from both worlds. The RE 200 is positiv different. A step in a higher class. A very light, small amp. I'm sure, it's the smallest amp you can get for steel and guitarwork with that kind of watts !! Without any compromise.Nice warm tubelike rich tone, great tone-setting possibilitys AND the best point small/light WITH 200 WATTS!!! All musicians who tried or listen are amazed about the sound from this custom amp. Crisp,warm-bassfull powertone tone with a perfect string separation. You can hear everything. Great ability to assert. I use also from time to time 2 15 cabinets with a two 80 watts poweramp and also I worked longtime in the passed with two Nashville 400's,a mesa boogie studiopreamp rack between. I tell you, the little RE 200 is the WINNER in tone, sound, features,custom quality and of course the light weight. contact: www.evansamps.com or for european players: www.wbssteelguitars.com
------------------
|
Jack Stoner Sysop From: Inverness, Florida
|
posted 14 September 2005 10:04 AM
profile
My NV112 has more "loudness" (power) than the SE-200 Evans I had. It has better tone, too. I tried for 7 months and could not get the one I wanted. I got the tone I wanted immediately with the Peavey's.There are a lot of people that like Evans amps, however Evans amps is not the subject of this thread. |
DIETMAR WAECHTLER Member From: RAUNHEIM,GERMANY
|
posted 14 September 2005 10:27 AM
profile
Hi Jack, I think the topic is also good to speak about different brands than Peavey. I talked about the RE 200 (Dimensions are 16.5H x 14.5W x 10.5D,10" Speaker,weight 26 pounds) Not the SE 200. The SE have a normal size cabinet with a 15"Speaker and a diffent tone character. Please don't missunderstand me. I like all Peavey products and is still a part of my equipment. But now I'm a big EVANS Fan! All this is very personal taste and subjective.
------------------
|
Fred Shannon Member From: Rocking "S" Ranch, Comancheria, Texas
|
posted 14 September 2005 10:30 PM
profile
Heck I thought the topic was about the NV112. I didn't realize it was a comparison thread. Oh well, such is life. I like my NV112's and I guess that what matters to me. I also have an evans. phred------------------ "From Truth, Justice is Born"--Quanah Parker-1904
|
Michael Garnett Member From: Fort Worth, TX
|
posted 15 September 2005 06:09 AM
profile
Well, Phred, it's entitled "Anybody else Rethinking the NV112?"Only way to rethink any piece of gear without comparing it to something else is to sell off all your gear and quit picking!!  -MG |
Jim Peters Member From: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
|
posted 15 September 2005 06:32 AM
profile
Steve Howard, do you want to try my NV112? Shoot me an email, your welcome to give it a try. JP |
Jeff Lampert Member From: queens, new york city
|
posted 15 September 2005 09:52 AM
profile
I think b0b should open up a "re-think" topic area. Then we can have a "Re-thinking a Webb amp". And a "Re-thinking an Evans". And, what about "Re-thinking a Push-pull". That ought to be good for 300 posts. And "Re-thinking a Boss TU-12 tuning box"..... And please, I know this is a fantastic idea. No need for everyone to flood my e-mail with compliments on my brilliance.  ------------------ Jeff's Jazz
|
Michael Garnett Member From: Fort Worth, TX
|
posted 15 September 2005 01:29 PM
profile
Heh.Anyone else rethinking playing steel for a living? I must get frustrated and quit at least 5 times a day.  -MG |
Franklin Member From:
|
posted 16 September 2005 05:50 AM
profile
Micheal, Because the NV112 has a different cabinet size and speaker size it offers a different tone than any other Peavey, Both cabinet design and speaker size affects the tone of any amp. The Evans, other Peavey's, and the Webb amp all use 15" speakers. Two twelves will give you less honky transister mids than the single 15" speaker. 15" speakers are inherently more honky and its a myth that One 15" gives more bottom than two 12" speakers. If bottom is desired a cabinet with four 10" speakers will wipe the floor over two 15" speakers. Paul
|
Waisznor Member From: Berlin, Germany
|
posted 16 September 2005 09:04 AM
profile
Dietmar,I think your replay belongs very well to this topic!! I bought a NV 112 because I read in the past in other "NV 112 Topics"that different players prefer her NV 112 over her Webb, Evans or other Peavey products. Nobody complained that the name of these amps are not subjekt of these threads. I´m with you about the NV 112. Loudness (power) wasn´t the reason for me trying a new amp. If it comes to "tone" I prefer my other amps (Nashville 400, Evans LV Webb). Horst
|
Michael Garnett Member From: Fort Worth, TX
|
posted 16 September 2005 10:05 AM
profile
Paul-Thanks for your input. My bass instructor sure made a believer out of me with the "several smaller speakers" idea. SWR's been making a fortune designing multiple 10" speakers. I've got a 2x10 myself and it shakes the walls. You've got me thinking about plugging the steel into that amp and seeing how it sounds... I get what you're saying though. Better high end response, because the speaker is less massive, so it's easier to accelerate by the voice coil. And two still move plenty of air to get the low end. I guess I could have worded my other post a little better. Still not knocking anything Peavey does, I have my 400 at the house and there's 3 Session 500 Mark IV's, and a Session 400LTD at school. -MG |
David Doggett Member From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 16 September 2005 10:20 AM
profile
What PF says is true in a sense. I have been trying to puzzle out why some bass players like multiple 10s, yet most steelers prefer a single (or maybe two)15s. A 10" or even smaller speaker can reproduce the lowest notes played on both steel and bass guitar. But if you play the same amp EQ settings through a single 10 and a single 15, you will hear that the 10 is much more efficient (louder) in the highs, and the 15 is much more efficient in the lows. They have a different EQ voice. If you add enough 10s together, they can equal the loudness of the single 15 in the lows. But at the same time they will add way more highs than the 15. This will sound shrill for pedal steel. However, if you just play the low strings on steel, you will hear that they sound less muddy. The high overtones that the 10s reproduce more efficiently give better clarity and string separation for the low strings. That is why some bass players like multiple 10s. But bass doesn't have any high strings to play. On steel if you play the high strings through 10s, it sounds too shrill. Try playing through a Fender Vibrolux (2x10) and you will see, or hook up to a bass speaker with 10s. Another option for bass is to use a 15 (or even an 18) along with a tweeter. The tweeter adds the highs that keep the bass from sounding muddy. But this speaker combination will sound shrill for steel.What it comes down to is that the speaker has the last say on EQ. No matter how you set the amp EQ, a 15 will roll off the highs and boost the bass, and 10s will de-emphasize the bass compared to the highs. There is a shift in the mids also. A 12" speaker is a good compromise. In a dense mix, 12s will cut through for steel better than a 15. But a 15 sounds better to most steelers when playing steel alone, and I think that's why so many of us like 15s. We like the mellower mids and lush lows, when you can hear them. It seems like rockers tend to prefer 12s (Dan Tyack, Buddy Cage), but many country steelers who play with quieter and less dense mixes like the more mellow sound of 15s. I played a pedal steel gig once (rockabilly and country, all tube amp) where I used a 4x12 cabinet for the first set, then switched to a single 15 (in a large reflex cabinet) for the second set. Everybody agreed the 15 sounded better for steel, even the experienced pro sound man doing the mixing out front (everything was miked by a top pro sound company - a rare luxury for me). I think it was because of how the mids sounded. But it was a four man group. In a denser mix, the 12s might have worked better. I know that the extra lows of the 15 (that I love when playing alone) get lost in the mud at the bottom of a dense mix. But I feel like I can always dial up the mids and highs with the amp and cut through with a 15. So for me a 15 seems more versatile. What it comes down to is how the speaker sounds with your amp and guitar. There's a lot of personal preference involved. Maybe with a 10-band EQ you could make 15s and 12s sound almost the same. But with just the typical amp controls, you can't get them to sound exactly the same, and some people prefer one, and others prefer the other. And the same person might prefer one or the other for different situations. [This message was edited by David Doggett on 16 September 2005 at 10:29 AM.] |
Mike Sweeney Member From: Nashville,TN,USA
|
posted 16 September 2005 10:22 AM
profile
Paul hit the nail right on the head with his post. The tone of the 112 is different than the other Peavey amps. They have got a sound that puts me in mind of the old Sho~Bud single channel amps [Cain models]. Playing through two of them would give you much better low end response and less honk than say a 400 with a 15 inch speaker. Curly Chalker told me the same thing once. He said, " Think about it Mike, If you have two 12 inch speakers that's 24 inches of air you're moving at the cabinet, 4 tens is 40 inches. That is going to produce a much bigger sound than a single 15." As we talked about this, we discussed his tone from the early sixties with the Fender Bassmans with 4 tens in each cabinet and we concluded that that was probably his biggest sound.Mike |
David Doggett Member From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 16 September 2005 10:48 AM
profile
But Mike, the lows aren't the only thing being kicked out by that extra air. 10s and 12s are more efficient than 15s for the highs, so they will be kicking out much stronger highs than a 15. I doubt many steelers would like the shrill sound coming out of four 10s (try a Super Reverb or a Vibrolux sometime). Two 12s are a good compromise, so the highs can be tamed and you can take advantage of the slightly more low air being moved. Its the balance of highs, mids and lows that makes us prefer one size speaker over another, not how much air is move.By the way, the amount of air moved is roughly according to the area of the speaker, not the diameter. Ignoring the fact that it is really a cone, not a flat circle, the amount of air moved is approximately Pi x r sq. The areas are 10" = 78.5 sq. in., 12" = 113, 15" = 177. Four x 10 = 314 sq. in., 2x12 = 226. The ratios compared to a single 15 are 1.77 for 4x10, and 1.27 for 2x12. [This message was edited by David Doggett on 16 September 2005 at 11:00 AM.] |
Mike Brown Member From: Meridian, Mississippi USA
|
posted 16 September 2005 01:34 PM
profile
Eric, I was reading your post about my salary and became 'dazed and confused' about the pot 'o' gold that I take home every Friday! Ha! |
Jeff Lampert Member From: queens, new york city
|
posted 16 September 2005 04:55 PM
profile
Just to say, everyone who likes the sound of the N112 should try a pair of them at least once. Do them stacked. IMHO, it positively cooks and as has been pointed out, the low end is incredible. And if you play C6, you gotta try the pair and play a lot of chords with the 9th and 10th string. The bass player will give you dirty looks. Also, it's easy to carry a pair, one in each hand and they're not heavy.------------------ Jeff's Jazz
|
Sidney Ralph Penton Member From: Moberly, Missouri, USA
|
posted 16 September 2005 09:29 PM
profile
i have a perminatly broken leg and my back will never get any better. i use a nash 400 and a session 400. i did the smart thing i put casters on both of them. then i have a 2 wheel hand truck that i use to transport my psg seat and what ever is left to bring in. the 112 might not be as heavy but with these two amps i know i got enough to get the sound out. the 112 might be a great little amp i am not knocking it but i like the bigger things. if your backs are so bad that you can't cary why not move your things with a hand dolly or something. surly you can pick it up to set it out of a vehicle or something if not then your in real trouble. you know its like this the bottom line. some guys like red heads some like blonds etc i am not picky just give me one of each. i guess you have to do what suits you best. but don't be afraid to experiment with these things. thanks doc. ------------------ zum SD10 peavy vegas 400 peavy session 400 steelseats they are great at sales@steelseats.com if its not a zum steel it isn't real
|
Jim Peters Member From: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
|
posted 16 September 2005 09:40 PM
profile
Ampeg went to the tens for bass because tens don't give the fundamental as much emphasis as a 15. Instead of overemphasising the lower bass notes like a 15, the tens DEemphasise those same notes, making for a more balanced response on a bass guitar. that is the theory, anyway. I truly love my 112, but I would have loved a NV400 just as much, except for carrying, which the older I get, every pound counts! Jim P (53 and feelin' it!) |
Mike Sweeney Member From: Nashville,TN,USA
|
posted 16 September 2005 10:11 PM
profile
David, You're right about lows not being the only thing pushed. If you re-read what I quoted Curly as saying it was a BIGGER sound. That doesn't mean all low end. As far as the shrill highs, listen to how Curly sounded on the Merle Travis album and see how his highs sounded. He was using two Fender Bassmans with two 4-10 cabinets. Mike |
Steve Dodson Member From: Sparta, Tennessee, USA
|
posted 22 September 2005 10:52 PM
profile
As for the Nashville 112 being able to hang with the 400's and 1000. Would there be an over all improvement if it was a 100 watts rms with a 12" B/W speaker in it? Would 20 more watts and a 12" B/W do it? Even if you used two of them.??? |
Alan Harrison Member From: Murfreesboro Tennessee, USA
|
posted 30 September 2005 10:35 AM
profile
I use a pair of 112's with 1203-4 Black Widow speakers, I know the BW's add a little more trouble for by bad back but they are very efficient. Even with the gain up to seven or so, they are still kleen and clear even using only one. Opinions are like belly buttons, everyone has one.------------------ Emmons LeGrande II.D-10, 8 & 5, two Peavey 112's, Profex II and Hilton Pedal.
|
Roger Francis Member From: Indiana, USA
|
posted 30 September 2005 12:20 PM
profile
just ordered my 2nd one yesterday from Bobby S., love the sound, and now for the first time in years , once set up, i only have to fool with the volume once in awhile. rains sd10, 2pv112s,hilton pd,bb |
Jack Stoner Sysop From: Inverness, Florida
|
posted 30 September 2005 02:46 PM
profile
WE had two NV112's set up for our recent Florida Steel Guitar Club show. We used a POD XT and two NV112's for "stereo" and everyone used them except one picker (and he used a NV1000). The majority of our club members seem to be using NV112's (including me) and there wasn't any complaints (at least not to me) about the amps.One was mine and the other was Don Sulesky's. Although I'm not planning on using two in stereo (I have a rack system if I want stereo) the two amps did sound great. We had the pre gain on 3 or 4 and the post gain on 5 and that was LOUD. |
Tony Prior Member From: Charlotte NC
|
posted 30 September 2005 03:51 PM
profile
I carry a pair of larger Peavey amps, N400 and Session 400 LTD..it takes me 4 trips back and fourth to get them both into the gig...  4x10's yes..my favorite for guitar and of course for Bass..
don't pass on trying a Peavey Classic 50..4x10 or a Fender Hot Rod Deville ..4x10...you may just turn your whole attitide around...again.... oh..this thread is about the N112.. Nice little amp.. but I prefer the big brothers |
Ricky Littleton Member From: Steely-Eyed Missile Man from Orlando, Florida USA
|
posted 30 September 2005 06:12 PM
profile
I recently had to use my 112 due to a blown BW speaker in my Session LTD. It was an outside gig and I was unmiked, but even though I was cranked and asking all the 112 would do, it came through AOK and sounded great.It was a close one, but the 112 worked in this pinch for me. rdl ------------------ Emmons LeGrande - 8x4 Session 400 Ltd, Nashville 112,Hilton Volume pedal, Peterson VS-II Tuner Dan-Echo, E-Bow, Ibanez Distortion, Bo-Bro, Ibanez Auto-Wah, PX4 Pandoras Box |
Eric West Member From: Portland, Oregon, USA
|
posted 02 October 2005 02:41 PM
profile
Another "top vent" experience..I was hand trucking my 400 and 112 under a shrub with a small overhang in light rain Friday nite to the gig, and a few drops fell into the top vent. It crackled and hissed, pulling the speaker in and out for the first set, and made the master gain knob noisy, and then finally just cleared up.. I'm thinking a gore-tex filter. Maybe just duct tape for transit etc.. Still kicks butt for what it is. I recorded with it the other day and they used the XLR line out over a mike preference they had to begin with. Worked fine. EJL |