Steel Guitar Strings Strings & instruction for lap steel, Hawaiian & pedal steel guitars http://SteelGuitarShopper.com |
Ray Price Shuffles Classic country shuffle styles for Band-in-a-Box, by BIAB guru Jim Baron. http://steelguitarmusic.com |
This Forum is CLOSED. |
|
The Steel Guitar Forum
![]() Steel Players
![]() Attention "Drift" (Page 2)
|
| This topic is 3 pages long: 1 2 3 |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Attention "Drift" |
|
Doug Beaumier Member From: Northampton, MA |
Yes, but the guitar has a wide range of tones, bright yet full, lots of low end, very clean. My bandmates say it has a nice old-time sound, like guitars heard on 1950s country records. When I play guitar gigs I take the X-350 and my Telecaster. The Guild is excellent for chording and for swing/jazz, and old time country. It sounds best with medium gauge strings. The Tele is tops for country snap n' pop, string bending, etc. Different tools for different tones. ------------------ [This message was edited by Doug Beaumier on 05 December 2006 at 11:09 PM.] |
|
Doug Beaumier Member From: Northampton, MA |
Back to the topic...
quote: You can say that again! Nothing interferes with my practice sessions. That's because I practice in my teaching studio, not at home. When I go there I shut out the world for a few hours and do the woodshedding that needs to be done. No phone calls, no TV, no internet, no one around, no distractions. It's amazing how much one can accomplish without distractions. ------------------ |
|
David Mason Member From: Cambridge, MD, USA |
There are two books available FREE on the Gutenberg Project website that have extensive sections dealing with practice habits, memorization, concentration etc. One is "Violin Mastery" by Frederick Martens, a collection of interviews with various teachers and concert studpuppies written in 1919, and "Piano Mastery" written by Harriette Brower, ditto. The classical violin and keyboard traditions have a three or four hundred year head start on these kinds of topics; ignore them if you wish. You can save the "txt" versions to Microsoft Word in a matter of seconds, and keep a window open and skim the books whenever you're waiting for the @#$%& computer to catch up to something else. Piano Mastery [This message was edited by David Mason on 06 December 2006 at 02:17 AM.] |
|
Bob Hickish Member From: Port Ludlow, Washington, USA |
A wandering mind can raise havoc with an avowal to maintain regular sessions.!!! Not only practice !! Did you ever drift out , wile in the middle of a song on stage ? We had a guitar player set in one time ! And if you ever heard a rocker go off |
|
Bill Hankey Member From: Pittsfield, MA, USA |
Bob H., the player who implements rock oriented modifications into a celebrated country song is an irksome "interloper" on shaky ground. No doubt, his musical influences consisted of a voluminous pile of screaming and yelling lyrics, that portrays a disoriented musical freedom. Waylon Jennings once said, when a renowned guitarist, with a mediocre voice suggested that he might sing, "If you see something getting smaller, hoss, It'll be me leaving". His approach to not relishing the idea of an infringement, by threatening to walk, might be the answer to not absorbing incompatible genres, night after night. The distinguishable differences in musical tastes, may prove to be the most reliable means of proper selectivity, in maintaining designated musical preferences. Ed. to correct implement... early morning posts have stalled my ability to avoid careless errors. [This message was edited by Bill Hankey on 07 December 2006 at 08:10 AM.] |
|
Bob Hickish Member From: Port Ludlow, Washington, USA |
Bill " irksome "interloper" !! That part I understand ! " in maintaining designated musical preferences. " In other words ! we really %&*# up in allowing
Hick |
|
Bill Hankey Member From: Pittsfield, MA, USA |
Bob H., I can't cope with those crazy antics, such as smashing guitars on stage, and carrying on like a wild bull in a rodeo. String stretching in place of the use of tremolo bars is another irksome mistreatment of musical instruments. Actually, for those who stretch strings, they've missed their calling. Learn to play the steel guitar and avoid having to replace frets on the guitar. I'm aware of this new country sound that has developed into a string stretching contest of witty tonal changes. I've felt from day one, that the flamenco guiarists are light years ahead of string stretchers, both in tone and maneuverability. Borrowing from that concept, and by creating sounds that are better suited for traditional country music, may very well satisfy a need for change. [This message was edited by Bill Hankey on 18 December 2006 at 05:52 AM.] |
|
Susan Alcorn Member From: Houston, TX, USA |
To return (ahem . . ) to the topic of discussion, a sense of focus is really of vital importance when practicing and also when playing. I think whatever you can do to keep your mind on your instrument is a good thing. As someone who practices (or at least sits behind my instrument) for significant periods of time every day, I think about this a lot. It's easy to be practicing something and then thinking about what you need to do later, or who said what, etc. Another, and even worse, problem is thinking, "Oh, here comes that difficult part again. I hope I don't mess it up -- oops, I just . . ." Or when you are playing, "Oh my God, look who just waled in." Once many years ago when I was starting out, Paul Franklin walked into the room when I was playing, and I turned to jelly. I was sweating, My foot kept wobbling up and down on the volume pedal, and I couldn't seem to hit the right string. An awful experience, but why? What good did all that anxiety do? Itzhak Perlman once said that he practices watching a baseball game. Sometimes I think you need to vary your routine, or work on a new song or technique -- something to keep your mind pre-occupied. Or meditate which is even better. When I toured France and Switzerland with Le Quan Ninh and Sean Meehan, we would split up for a half an hour or so before each performance and find a place to sit quietly. When it was time to perform, I really felt we were focused -- we played and improvised for an hour or more without stopping (in other words without pausing between "songs"). When the performance was over, we never discussed it, nor did we discuss it the next day. I feel that this gave us a really nice added dimension to our music together. To do anything well, you need to be in the right frame of mind. And to navigate those waters, you can only rely on yourself. [This message was edited by Susan Alcorn on 07 December 2006 at 05:47 PM.] |
|
Bill Hankey Member From: Pittsfield, MA, USA |
Susan A., thanks for sharing some of your musical experiences. The thought of Paul Franklin entering the building where you were playing stirs the imagination. Any reasonable stretch of the imagination would envision total chaos of emotions. The sensitive components of our electrical signals are apt to short circuit, causing a total failure of memory, and ability to perform in the norm. It's always an honor when any steel guitarist attends a gig or performance, but to experience an entry by Paul would be the most any player could hope for. Territory can at times produce happenstance, whereby a circulating professional will be out on the town with friends who "know" of a particular club featuring a steel guitarist. Much to the delight of the house steel guitarist, excitement mounts to a fever pitch, and time melds into a night to remember. Much has been said about Buddy Emmons' entrance where a steel player such as Ralph Mooney was setting up his steel. In any reference point, there will always be a nervous excitement to overcome, should the eyes of steel guitar greats cast upon your stage presence. |
|
Alan Miller Member From: Carlisle, England |
Does anyone think having a good memory in general helps with good practice or is it solely repetition? I sometimes cant remember what I have just played for the tenth time, forgot which fret to play on, which strings to pick, I knocked the tab book over, put my bar down to pick it up and cant remember where the bar is ! |
|
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA |
I'm not quite sure how this wandered into the topic of "string stretching", but... "String stretching in place of the use of tremelo bars is another irksome mistreatment of musical instruments." Bill, are you saying that players who bend wtrings...or use vibrato...or use a Stringbender...are all somehow inferior? If so, to who? Are you stating this just as your personal taste in guitar playing, or trying to convince the reader that a 6-string player who bends strings lacks talent? Considering that six-string players from Chet Arkins to James Burton to Clarence White to Brent Mason have bent strings as a normal part of playing, any way I read your comment it seems quite a reach. And it's hardly a "new country sound". It's a little difficult to decipher whther you're dissing country players who bend strings...or rock players...or both. But perhaps you could list some examples of who you do/don't like to define things more clearly. |
|
Bill Hankey Member From: Pittsfield, MA, USA |
Jim S., I have a distaste for rhetorical outbursts, misquotes, and misinterpretations. I met Chet Atkins in person, and he allowed me to question him in a one on one interview. Why? Because he more than any of the many outstanding guitarists, interested me the most. Do you think that perhaps the tremolo bar was left out of the discussion? If you go there, please be assured that it was not. From a practical standpoint, I appreciate your responses, so long as you are not of the type that refuses to budge in the face of errors on your part. By no means, am I hinting that you've erred in contentious endeavors, but I must respond in a civil manner to your inquiries. I'm not totally in the dark on the 6 string guitar. I've owned several brand name guitars in the past, including a Fender Jaguar with a tremolo bar. I used the tremolo bar and volume pedal to simulate a steel guitar. It's interesting to note that some entertainers have done very well in spite of their adherence to the absence of string stretching. It may constitute a sort of fishing behind the net, since the new trend implies stretching a string's intonation a full tone and more. The technique produces mellow tones by plucking neighboring strings, while darting in and out of harmonic effects. Of course, the referred to method is just one of a bag of new and clever means to excel in establishing levels of expertise. What else is worthwhile for hours spent woodshedding? [This message was edited by Bill Hankey on 19 December 2006 at 02:04 AM.] |
|
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA |
"since the new trend implies stretching a string's intonation a full tone and more." I just don't understand 1) where the idea of "new" comes from, since "stretching" or "bending" strings has been around in country and rock since the 50's, and the Stringbender since the 60's., and 2) whether you are saying you don't like it in country, rock...or both. Also, if you could give an example of what you mean, it might be put in a clearer context. I'm not arguing with you - just trying to clarify precisely what you're referring to. The tremolo (or vibrato, depending on who you talk to) bar is a quite different effect than the bending or "stretching" of one or two strings. It seems you're comparing the two - is that correct? |
|
Bill Hankey Member From: Pittsfield, MA, USA |
Jim S., I can't in good conscience deliberately cause excessive wear and tear on an instrument; by some manipulative gymnastics. Surely you are aware of the additional friction caused by the incessant scrubbing of strings on the frets and maple or rosewood fretboards. It would be disappointing to learn that the costly repair is not a consideration, any more than totally smashing a playable instrument on stage. Supporting such acts smacks of a crack in good judgment. The care of a musical instrument is a prerequisite to respecting the precise construction, and its need for extended care in and out of the case. To point out one important chink in the string stretching armor, would be to note that the advocates surrender minimal tonal qualities, when they opt for thin flimsily gauged strings. Hand the stretcher's a factory recommended gauge set, and they will hem and haw to be sure. The steel player's enigmatic association with instrument abuses are commonplace; particularly when exposure to the elements cannot be avoided. |
|
Steve Hinson Member From: Hendersonville Tn USA |
I'm fairly sure that I have now heard everything. ------------------ |
|
Pete Finney Member From: Nashville, Tn. |
And think how much longer a pedal steel (and it's strings) would last if we would only quit stepping on the pedals! It's criminal if you ask me! [This message was edited by Pete Finney on 18 December 2006 at 02:16 PM.] |
|
Pete Finney Member From: Nashville, Tn. |
I've gone back and deleted the indignant part of my posts that Bill refers to below, they do no one (especially me!) any good. I believe that an "incredulous amusement" is a healthier and more appropriate response to some of the incredibly strange opinions and ideas in this thread... [This message was edited by Pete Finney on 18 December 2006 at 02:21 PM.] |
|
Bill Hankey Member From: Pittsfield, MA, USA |
Pete F., There is no need to become indignant. I can't recall ever attempting to belittle a fellow musician for any reason. For that reason, any seemingly surmised negative thoughts will be treated as an indication of misunderstandings. It takes a positive attitude to build your own steel guitar with a few simple tools. The fact that it plays in tune, and stays in tune will support my intention to follow the good life. Speaking of how things were done 50 years ago, please know that there were many country musicians here in New England at that time. Country music is not something new to this part of the country. Your input is appreciated. It helps to know how I may be judged. [This message was edited by Bill Hankey on 18 December 2006 at 01:05 PM.] |
|
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA |
Bill, like Steve, I guess now I HAVE read everything. I've seen no proof EVER that stringbending - manual or mechanical - causes "excessive wear and tear" on an instrument. "Benders" also don't use light strings any more than anyone else; I tend to use 10's even 11's (common 6-string nomenclature for describing a set based on the 1st string); I know a few who use 9's but not many anymore. Stevie Ray Vaughan used huge strings. The gage issue...well, isn't one. Additionally, some of the biggest "offenders" in bending are known for stellar tone: James Burton, Clarence White, Jeff Beck, Eric Clapton, Stevie Ray Vaughan, B.B. King.... As far as "wear and tear", Bob Warford bends both using a mechanical B-string bender and manually; the Tele he plays he's played since 1967 - he got it from Clarence White, who got it from Buck Owens, who had the frets installed. They were installed in about 1962 and show zero wear. None. Neither does the fretboard, save a small bit of lacquer wear. No wood loss. I doubt they are the only frets like that. I recently sold one of my Stringbender guitars, and I did lots of 1st, 3rd and 6th string manual bends. I had the guitar custom-built to specs in 1993, and after 13 years and thousands of hours of playing rock, blues and some country-rock, the frets were like new and I didn't even need to dress them prior to sale. But even when wear does occur, it's considered a natural part of the instrument's life cycle. Frets are like tires on a a car - do you not drive because you'll put wear on the tires? Leo designed the Esquire (later Broadcaster, later Telecaster) originally with the thought of a bolt-on neck for one reason - when the frets showed wear, the player could simply replace the neck with a new one. As it happened, almost nobody followed through with that method, but it was an anticipated part of an instrument's life cycle by one of the innovators of electric guitar. I find it fascinating, though, that keeping an instrument "pretty" would be more important than making music the way you want to with it. I get the feeling it's more a negative preference regarding string bending rather than an instrument wear issue. But if it's truly a wear problem that concerns you, I'd advise against playing fretted instruments at all - even the slightest pressure causes friction, and the most wear I've every seen on any guitar is on various Martin and Gibson acoustics - all below the 5th fret, and all not the result of bending, but instead the so-called "cowboy chord" wear. And the "guitar smashing" description was another non-issue. Yes, Hendrix and Townsend smashed guitars back in the 60's, but your average club player isn't going to take one of his two electric guitars and turn it into firewood, then explain to Mrs. Guitar Player that they're eating noodels for a month while saves up for a new guitar. It's as isolated as cases of smallpox in Brentwood. "Jim S., I have a distaste for rhetorical outbursts, misquotes, and misinterpretations." Uh, OK. Where does this come in - in the context of this discussion? |
|
Bill Hankey Member From: Pittsfield, MA, USA |
Jim S., honestly, you made my day. I really needed the humor to brighten my day. I'll just say, pick up the marbles for winning by points in this round of exchanges. If you will permit me to report that I've been very disappointed at times, when after examining guitars in bygone years, I noticed extensive groovings in the lower frets. It can be better viewed by forcing the string to move from its positioning. You are correct by stating that there is unavoidable wear brought about by normal pressure. Thanks for maintaining a civil "tone" in your response. |
|
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA |
Thanks Bill - I'll have the marbles back now. Those groovings have nothing to do with string bending or "stretching" They have to do with simply playing the guitar. Ooohhh - loook! An aggie! Pretty! ;-) |
|
Bill Hankey Member From: Pittsfield, MA, USA |
Jim S., the excitement of playing marbles, peaked for me, many years ago; but it was a lot of fun. I've noticed more recently, that for those who combine playing the Spanish guitar with steel practice, may NOT be "guilty" of topic drift after all. Take for example, a player who is afflicted with stubborn tendonitis. If the pain is located in the ring finger joints, playing the steel can create discomfort by trying to outstretch the middle and index fingers to hold the bar. After a time the exercise will gradually improve the affected joints. Playing the "six" string Spanish guitar requires the affected finger to grip the neck of the instrument. More pain is experienced as the finger joints are called upon to perform a new exercise. The two opposite exercises will hopefully prevent a much greater problem, which could lead to discontinuing practice sessions. The six string may be relevant after all in the relationship with steel guitars. The bond traces back to the half round allowing a quick change to a semblance of the "straight" steel. |
|
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA |
"Take for example, a player who is afflicted with stubborn tendonitis. If the pain is located in the ring finger joints, playing the steel can create discomfort by trying to outstretch the middle and index fingers to hold the bar." Oddly, steel playing does not aggravate mine at all, nor create any discomfort. Only when the ring and index bend past about 120 degrees does the pain kick in, and at 90 degrees I have about 5 minutes of 6-string playing available before the index revolts and refuses to cooperate further. Of course, that would mitigate any further damage to my already-relic'd "54-ish" Tele should bending actually be as "groovy" as you think, so you may consider that a positive. The positive for me is that I end up playing steel almost exclusively. |
|
David Mason Member From: Cambridge, MD, USA |
A) Interesting enough, Duane Allman and Carlos Santana both used "9's", string gauges starting with a .009" E and usually a .011" B and a .016" G. It would be howling, drooling madness to accuse the Black Magic Woman-era Santana or the Live at the Fillmore-era Allman of having a "thin, flimsy" tone. (Note: please try not to howl and drool simultaneously, as the end result is often "projectile gargling.") B) I have some slight nerve damage to my hands resulting from some neck discs going tilty (since corrected) and I find that six-string playing is a great way to work out my left hand kinks, thereby enabling me to hold a bar some more; right-hand steely banjo rolls are a great way to work out my right-hand kinks, thereby enabling me to hold a flatpick for some more six-string playing. I haven't tried playing marbles, but I will take your suggestions under advisement. |
|
Bill Hankey Member From: Pittsfield, MA, USA |
David M., I'm not up to standards on who's who in folk/rock genres. The guitar strings are another matter. My eyebrows raised ever so little upon reading that a proficient guitarist would choose a .016, rather than the popular .015 for the 3rd string. I find that most singers who strum rather than play lead, quite often are a bit remiss in selecting string gauges. More often than not, the larger gauged strings have distorted the action to a small degree. Those acoustics tend to ring out very well once the chords are "clamped" down on the fretboard. I prefer the sacrifice of absolute clarity by selecting lighter gauges, that have considerably less stress on the instrument. If the action is correct, the playing ease contributes to a much better performance. The thin wood in acoustics accounts for better resonance. Flamenco guitars feature thin wood construction, which resonates as the nylon strings are picked finger style. Most electric guitars feature assembly line construction. I think that the 50's and 60's produced the best of the lot. There is no substitute for quality workmanship and materials. Good luck with the finger exercises on both steel and guitar. |
|
Darryl Hattenhauer Member From: Phoenix, Arizona, USA |
Bill raises two interesting points. First, it's worth asking if string bending adds more wear, because it adds more stress and friction. As several here point out, I suspect that this wear would probably be undetectable. On the other hand, Bill's point makes me wonder how much bending I'd do on a collector that I wanted to preserve. Second, heavier guages put more stress on acoustics. Here I suspect Bill is giving good advice: lighter guages probably reduce the chances for needing to reset the neck or flatten the top. ------------------ |
|
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA |
"the larger gauged strings have distorted the action to a small degree. " It's often a good idea to not just choose strings based on size, but on tension. It's not uncommon for a .015 to pull more than an .016, depending on string construction and various alloy types. That's why some sets of identical gages can have a totally different feel. |
|
Darryl Hattenhauer Member From: Phoenix, Arizona, USA |
Jim, VERY important point. I didn't know that until a few years ago. You can get a set of 12s that pull less than a set of 11s. Do you know of a site that gives both the gauge and the tension of most brands of strings? Juststrings.com has some info on that, but not enough. A couple of years ago, I searched the net to find complete info but no luck. ------------------ [This message was edited by Darryl Hattenhauer on 19 December 2006 at 11:10 PM.] |
|
Bill Hankey Member From: Pittsfield, MA, USA |
Jim S., the string tension theorem has caught my attention. Thanks for introducing new thoughts that border on connotations of great value; should your statements be supported by actual pounds pressure testing. It may not be a difficult task to build a makeshift testing device to double check such claims. The mother metal utilized in plain strings is steel. The mere mentioning of alloys denotes increases in values, negating affordable purchases. Would you stress the information that supports such claims of an available plain string in the marketplace? It would be interesting to pursue these claims made by whomever. Retaining the original resistance to breakage would be the feature to focus upon. Jim, this is not an attempt to disprove theories, but rather on the contrary, a thank you note for information that would be very useful. |
|
Bill Hankey Member From: Pittsfield, MA, USA |
Darryl, perhaps you would be so kind to provide additional information on this "purported" claim of less tension resulting from different properties of a string. My question posed to Jim S. has bounced like a RICOCHET. At least I've made progress in ascertaining who's who at the response level. Therefore, if you have a brand name address, or a phone number that depicts an association with such claims, I'd appreciate having it forwarded to me. |
|
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA |
Bill, I don't have it handy but will try to find the information for you. FWIW I do not recall it being true of the plain strings, but instead of the wound ones; the most imporant factor being the relationship between core diameter and wind diameter. |
|
Bill Hankey Member From: Pittsfield, MA, USA |
Jim, thank you for the response. I appreciate your wide range of interests, which of course includes written material pertaining to the steel guitar. |
|
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA |
Bill, I didn't have time this morning to really dig, but here's a link to an eBay-sales related site talking abou the difference in tension between round and hex-core strings. No actual test data herein, but it does give a basic overview. I'll look for the backing data when I have a chance. http://reviews.ebay.com/Round-Core-vs-Hex-Core-Guitar-Strings_W0QQugidZ10000000002183130 |
|
Darryl Hattenhauer Member From: Phoenix, Arizona, USA |
Bill, Here's something I was surprised to find. I've always heard that silk and steel is less tension. But here is a GHS silk and steel set with a .26 that has more tension than than the .26 in GHS bronze sets. http://juststrings.com/ghs-345.html http://juststrings.com/ghs-ccbb10.html http://juststrings.com/ghs-vn-ul.html ------------------ [This message was edited by Darryl Hattenhauer on 21 December 2006 at 07:08 PM.] |
|
Darryl Hattenhauer Member From: Phoenix, Arizona, USA |
More weirdness. This pb .26 is 29 lbs, and .42 is 14 lbs. http://juststrings.com/ghs-605.html But this 80/20 .26 is 17 lbs, yet the .42 is the same 14 lbs. This is the kind of head scratcher that makes me want to quit thinking and start playing. But a real expert could probably understand all of this very easily. ------------------ |
|
Bill Hankey Member From: Pittsfield, MA, USA |
Darryl, the main focus is upon any such tension claims that apply to plain strings exclusively. I'm not that unreasonable, whereas to assume a contrariness to the possibility of altering string tension, should wound strings be the consideration. Specifiable data is the link to making claims that hold true under a wide range of scrutiny. I've always had a lingering hope that the "plain" strings could be subjected to improvement. I appreciate receiving information that suggests the availability of a better guitar string. |
|
Jim Sliff Member From: Hermosa Beach California, USA |
What I've been able to find in my brief search is the same sort of thing Darryl notes; results from the manufacturer, and all pertaining to wound strings, as I said before. I doubt there is any difference in tension among plain strings, unless there's an unusal type of steel used I haven't heard about. However, it is clear that the wound-string tension does vary by string construction. As far as bending and making it less dmaging - you could always go to as short a scale guitar as possible, making require less effort; that owul likely lessen the pressure needed on the frets and fingerboard. I still think it's such a non issue - maintenance vs music - that I would choose the music first and deal with fretwear, if any (which does not seem to be a proven issue related to stringbending) later. As far as fingerboard wear, if musch of the wear seen is in the "cowboy chord" positions, it would seem unrelated to beinding strings and simply to playing in the same positions repeatedly. So my overall response is "bend away!" ;-) |
|
Bill Hankey Member From: Pittsfield, MA, USA |
Jim, I'm willing to drop the string stretching issue, since it has become molded into virtually all of today's virtuosities. Imagine Gene Autry sitting on Champ and stretching strings on the short neck acoustic. I find that hard to picture. Trying to identify the technique as an original method of producing unique sounds, is too farfetched to accept as factual. I remember visiting Pete Menaker who owned a spacious farmhouse in Hartsville, MA. He also owned a beautiful Mexican guitar. He brought it out and handed it to me to play. My confidence started to build as I heard the resonate tones emanating from the fine instrument. He then asked me if I ever tried playing a guitar with just the left hand. I said no, and he proceded to demonstrate with unbelievable accuracy. Needless to say, I was pleased to be treated to such creativity. I've made some interesting discoveries on the steel guitar as well. It would be a safe bet that the string stretching guitarists will turn there heads,if a slightly changed 9th tuning is combined with a proven string stretch. So, I agree, live and let live. |
|
Bob Hickish Member From: Port Ludlow, Washington, USA |
Bill I hope you will except my apology for bringing up a subject that I found offensive - and that was , a person interjecting there genera of music into your own ! effecting " mind wandering " . I understood your reply perfectly . From what I'm reading here ! your opinion , has been misunderstood . enjoy your Christmas [This message was edited by Bob Hickish on 22 December 2006 at 10:33 AM.] |
|
David Mason Member From: Cambridge, MD, USA |
Since we have drifted entirely tangentally into string gauges: There is a set of GHS Boomers named GB-LOW that is designed with the intent of being tuned low and still ringing out - I have found them to be really good for tuning up to normal (EADGBE) on short-scale guitars like my Warmoth Mustang variant. The gauges are 11, 15, 19, 33, 43 and 53, but the wound-string core wires are different. quote: They don't sound all wierd and tubby like you would expect a short, fat string to sound. |
This topic is 3 pages long: 1 2 3 All times are Pacific (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
|
|
Note: Messages not explicitly copyrighted are in the Public Domain.
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46
Our mailing address is:
The Steel Guitar Forum
148 South Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA
Support the Forum