Steel Guitar Strings
Strings & instruction for lap steel, Hawaiian & pedal steel guitars
http://SteelGuitarShopper.com
Ray Price Shuffles
Classic country shuffle styles for Band-in-a-Box, by BIAB guru Jim Baron.
http://steelguitarmusic.com

This Forum is CLOSED.
Go to bb.steelguitarforum.com to read and post new messages.


  The Steel Guitar Forum
  Steel Players
  Robert Randolph on Letterman (Page 4)

Post New Topic  
your profile | join | preferences | help | search


This topic is 5 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Robert Randolph on Letterman
Bill Moore
Member

From: Manchester, Michigan

posted 19 December 2006 10:37 AM     profile     
I have seen Robert Randolph's show and I think he is a very good player, that know how to use his gear.

Jim suggested a "universal" beginner's course for the pedal steel.

So, what does a beginner need to learn?
The notes of the tuning, the basic operation of the pedals and levers, what they do and why. You would need to learn to use both hands and feet together, smoothly while playing. You would need to learn to hold the bar properly, and be able to move it around on the guitar, accurately. You would have to know how to use your picks, and how to be able to only play the notes you want to hear: blocking. You would need to learn some scales, both single note scales and harmonized scales. Learning the chords would help learn the harmonized scales.

You would need to learn some music theory, what it means when someone refers to the I, IV and V chords, for example. You would need to see how this theory relates to the music you want to learn to play. You really can't play any music whitout this, IMHO.

Actually, I believe that someone could learn all these things from Winnie Winston's book, or Scotty's "Deluxe Method" book.

So, the instructional material is there already, the real problem is that a person that wants to learn this must realise that it WILL take practice, and they may never be the best player in world, no matter how hard that they try.

Maybe the real issue is: some just don't have the talent that others have, and some are not willing to work harder to compensate for their lack of natural ability.

Jim, there isn't an easy way to learn the pedal steel. If you want to learn to play rock, or blues, first learn the basics above, then learn how to play some pentatonic scale stuff, and will will be able to shock and amaze most of the average guitar players out there. If you don't give up out of frustration, in a couple of years, you might just agree with me.

[This message was edited by Bill Moore on 19 December 2006 at 10:42 AM.]

Mark Eaton
Member

From: Windsor, Sonoma County, CA

posted 19 December 2006 11:18 AM     profile     
This thread, like so many others starring Robert Randolph, has had its share of tangents, one of which is the question of playing rock and roll on E9th.

The following You Tube video may have been posted on the Forum in the past, but it's worth another look, to see, in the words of Mark Knopfler, "the best pedal steel player in the world-Paul Franklin!" take a ride toward the end of the Dire Straits song, "Walk Of Life."

Click on the link below:
http://tinyurl.com/wenn8

------------------
Mark

[This message was edited by Mark Eaton on 19 December 2006 at 11:18 AM.]

David Doggett
Member

From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

posted 19 December 2006 12:04 PM     profile     
quote:
As a newb, Ive often wondered about RR, why not a lap steel instead of PSG? I dont see alot of pedal action in his playing
For the more blues derived jam band stuff you mostly see RR play, he does play his pedal steel like a glorified lap steel. He does so little pedal work that he can stand up and dance while he plays. But the 13 strings and all the pedals and levers allow him to play other stuff that you don’t see much of in his shows for rock audiences and late night TV. He can play some beautiful gospel hymn-like stuff that goes way beyond the simple pentatonic blues stuff. In the same way you might see a D10 or uni player play country all night and never take his left foot off the A and B pedals. You would only see all the other pedals come into action when he played western swing or jazz.

Mark, that clip of PF playing with Dire straights highlights one of the problems we are talking about in this thread and the new thread on a blues/rock starter. That version of Walk of Life has a very country type beat and progression. That’s no big surprise, because rock came from both country and blues. PF’s playing causes it to sound very much like a ‘70s country-rock era song. He is playing very classic rockin’country E9 pedal steel licks. For many in metal, punk and hardcore rock, that is way too country – just as someone above said RR’s stuff is the kind of blues jam stuff their parents would listen to, but not young hardcore rock fans. Of course there are plenty of young hardcore fans that appreciate blues and country in their pure forms, but want a completely different sound for hardcore rock. In some of the other Dire Straights stuff, PF sounds more rock and less country. But to me that also sort of proves a point in this discussion. It takes one of the best pedal steelers alive to make a country or swing tuning not sound like country or swing. It is really hard for a beginner to play something that sounds different on E9 or C6. That’s one reason the Sacred Steelers invented the SS E7 tuning. Just as country is easiest to play on E9, and western swing is easiest to play on C6, there must be some tuning that is easiest for rock. Maybe it’s SS E7, maybe something else. It seems to be worth searching for.

Donny Hinson
Member

From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.

posted 19 December 2006 12:06 PM     profile     
While that's a nice ride and also some smooth backup work by Paul (and nice exposure as well), I hear it as mostly "stock country licks". (No offense, it just comes off as more "Nashville" than New York, L.A., or Detroit.)

I think that RR is actually much closer to the sound and style that blues and rock lovers would go for. They're looking for a "sound" and feeling, not technical expertise.

IMHO, of course.

Chris LeDrew
Member

From: Newfoundland, Canada

posted 19 December 2006 12:59 PM     profile     
I'm less than 10 years in on pedal steel, so I'm not blaming it on the tuning...... but as much as I try, I can't get into the rock & roll or blues headspace with the E9 neck. It seems like everything's arse-backwards for that kind of soloing. Rhythm is no problem, but those nice blues runs and rock riffs just don't jump out of that tuning and make themselves easily accessible. It doesn't seem as easy to improvise rock and blues on E9 as it is to wing country-flavored riffs.

The C6 neck was a lot easier for me, in this respect, because so much is laid out in the open tuning, and with pedals 6 and 7 offering tasty intervals of 7th and 9th chords, it's much more rock/blues friendly in my opinion. I don't have the back neck these days, but when I did, that's where I'd go when we were doing rock stuff.

David Doggett
Member

From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

posted 19 December 2006 03:14 PM     profile     
I don't agree, Chris. As an E and A 6-string and slide player, E9 open E, or A with the pedals down, were just way more natural to me than the C6 neck. And once I moved to ext. E9 and then to uni, with the extra octave of E or A chord at the bottom there was no contest. I only shift into B6 mode for the occassional jazz chords, on something like Stormy Monday.
Bill Hatcher
Member

From: Atlanta Ga. USA

posted 19 December 2006 03:57 PM     profile     
Mark. The groove on the Dire Straits tune is more country rockabilly. The E9 is fine there. You have a link of a pedal player doing some Led Z, or ZZ Top or Hendrix on E9?
Pete Burak
Member

From: Portland, OR USA

posted 19 December 2006 04:02 PM     profile     
For single note soloing there is a huge overlap where "E9 A+B" position and B6th open position are the same exact notes, scales, "pockets" (if you prefer), only the string position and fret position are shifted.
Both voicings are equally effective when applied with a liberal "Fram" of WWRRD!
[what would robert randolph do]
Maybe you guys do agree?
Ben Jones
Member

From: Washington, USA

posted 19 December 2006 04:38 PM     profile     
I saw Larry Behm do some rock stuff on C6. He seemed to be saying close to what Chris is about it being well laid out for rock.

Bill, this is nitpicking your point, but lotsa folks do ZZ Tops LaGrange on E9th. Still no Voodoo Chile tho

Greg Simmons
Member

From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

posted 19 December 2006 04:46 PM     profile     
quote:
Still no Voodoo Chile tho

That's why they make Strats

David Doggett
Member

From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

posted 19 December 2006 05:22 PM     profile     
I once sat in briefly with my uni with a Hendrix playing rock group. Much as I love Hendrix, I had never tried his stuff on steel. To my amazement it was scary easy to play some Hendrix style lead on the uni. He slides bar chords around a lot, and plays octave leads a lot. It turned out it was way easier for me to play that stuff on steel (at least on a uni) than on regular guitar. Everybody there was really impressed with my steel Hendrix, moreso than anything else I did. Okay, the next day I woke up straight and sober and forgot about it until now. In good time I should try that again. So many songs, so little time.

[This message was edited by David Doggett on 19 December 2006 at 05:24 PM.]

Jim Sliff
Member

From: Hermosa Beach California, USA

posted 19 December 2006 07:27 PM     profile     
"You would have to know how to use your picks, and how to be able to only play the notes you want to hear: blocking. You would need to learn some scales, both single note scales and harmonized scales. Learning the chords would help learn the harmonized scales."

Bill, respectfully, you're thinking like a pedal steel player. A kid playing hard rock and power chords needs a different approach to learning. You're also assuming the E9 tuning is the way to go, and as has ben previously discussed it might NO be - a SS variant, especially an 8-string one, might be a far better choice for the hardcore, metal and hard rock players. Again, it's thinking outside the box.

A lot of the "kids" have seen the Winie and Scotty books, and while they do have their place for MOST players, they don't fit everyone. A kid with seven piercings, 9 tats, a girlfriend named "Shade" and a preferance for no-thirds power chords in front of a mosh pit looks at just the pictures in those books and giggles...much less the music. That's not an insult - it's just reality. young rockers DO have an interest in the instrument, but those materials are NOT going to hook them, and as I've said previously they've laready SEEN those, since they are all that's commercially available. And looking at those, they see country all the way and bail out on the idea. And I'm not talking about ME learning steel - we're talking about 13-30 year olds playing much harder, buzzsaw stuff than I do.

They see potential...they fiddle around with mine and get stoked...then look at the resources (I have both those books still, even though I don't play E9 at all) and the immediate reaction is "but those are country books - where's the "regular" stuff?

they're not going to play harmonized scales, or learn scales necessarily (at least how most steelers think ot them) - they're going to play in "pockets", or positions, like on guitar. At least that's what they'll look for. "Red River Valley" isn't the door-opener for them; some variant of "Smoke on Water" (a classic rock tune known by almost all of them, because it was the precursor to most of the rhythm riffs in use by them today) is the ticket for entry.

If you can work with copyrights and toss in "Smells Like Teen Spirit" that's another "hook" almost all of them know, even though it's not "new".

Honestly, there's not a single example in Winnie's or Scotty's books that would interest a hard rock player. I'm not saying some of it might not be *useful* - but if you don't have their interest through relevant examples, you're right where you started.

Which is WHY there's no action now, except among young country players and a few SS players.

I can't stress enough thinking outside the box. some established players will have a hard time with that idea, or resent it, or feel "threatened" that it will undermine the "purity" of pedal steel.

Look - it's just an instrument for making music. A VERY versatile one. There's an interest, the iron is hot - so why not figure out how to strike NOW with materials (and possibly) instruments that can exploit and expand that interest?

Tucker Jackson
Member

From: Portland, Oregon, USA

posted 20 December 2006 02:38 PM     profile     
Bill Hatcher, as requested, here as an example of a ZZ Top song played on E9... from the Carter website, Billy Phelps playing "La Grange" on a Carter Starter.

http://www.cartersteelguitars.com/csplayvideos/lagrange.wmv

Enjoy

b0b
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, California, USA

posted 20 December 2006 05:01 PM     profile     
I love that clip of Billy Phelps!!
Chris LeDrew
Member

From: Newfoundland, Canada

posted 20 December 2006 05:53 PM     profile     
Wow, Billy........sweet playing.

Well, that's solid proof that it's not the E9 tuning holding one back from playing rock or blues. Time to re-evaluate my thinking with regards to rocking on the ol' E9.

Ron Page
Member

From: Cincinnati, OH USA

posted 20 December 2006 06:51 PM     profile     
Billy's rock steel still sounds like a PSG without a hint of country. Not just a bunch of 6-string slide licks. You can even see him rocking the pedals.

BTW: Seems like the highest paid steel player might like to play at the most highly regarded steel event... and perhaps donate his fee to the Steel Guitar HOF and take the write-off. Just a thought, but someone will have to get it past the manager.

------------------
HagFan

Mark Eaton
Member

From: Windsor, Sonoma County, CA

posted 20 December 2006 06:55 PM     profile     
quote:
Mark. The groove on the Dire Straits tune is more country rockabilly. The E9 is fine there. You have a link of a pedal player doing some Led Z, or ZZ Top or Hendrix on E9?

OK, Bill, I'll grant you that. But if Knopfler told the band during rehearsal that he wanted the feel to be more straight ahead rock, I don't know that Paul would have changed his playing much-if at all. The rest of the band could have sounded more "power chord-like" for lack of a better term, and Paul's playing may not have had much of a country feel-because the direction of the band was more straight ahead rock.

I enjoyed Billy's clip myself-but if there weren't a video portion, and I didn't know better-then I might have thought that he was playing the thing on a Strat with a slide on his finger.

Which brings to mind one of the standard criticisms of RR-why play a 13 string steel guitar that has a bunch of pedals if the same thing could be accomplished on a six string lap steel, or a Strat with a slide on your finger?

I'm not the guy asking that question, because I have heard Robert play some beautiful stuff: backing the Blind Boys of Alabama, and an effort earlier this year on the most recent Carlos Santana album on a track called "Trinity," which also features Kirk Hammett of Metallica. there is no question in my mind that the guy has the chops-but he also has the whole frontman thing going, and it's a lot to bite off and chew.

I think Paul Franklin added a lot to those Dire Straits tours BECAUSE he was playing E9th-it made it SOUND like a pedal steel was in the band. But I don't think that it automatically made one think: Hmmm...Straits sounds really "country-like" with Paul Franklin on board.

The argument for a different copedent for rock playing has its merits-but it seems to me that there are an awful lot of notes-and combinations thereof, on the typical Emmons setup.

The discussion reminds me of those that say that the high bass open G on dobro is only for bluegrass. As I have written here before-I've seen Rob Ickes play Stevie Wonder's "Isn't She Lovely?" and later the same evening, The Allman Brothers "Midnight Rider," along with a couple of Gypsy jazz pieces by Django Reinhardt. All in open G-and none of those tunes sounded anything like bluegrass.

------------------
Mark

[This message was edited by Mark Eaton on 20 December 2006 at 06:58 PM.]

[This message was edited by Mark Eaton on 20 December 2006 at 07:00 PM.]

Jim Sliff
Member

From: Hermosa Beach California, USA

posted 20 December 2006 09:57 PM     profile     
"why play a 13 string steel guitar that has a bunch of pedals if the same thing could be accomplished on a six string lap steel, or a Strat with a slide on your finger?"

Because it can't - at some point, he uses all that stuff. Not continuously, but there's certainly a very specific point to a 13-string guitar in that tuning with those changes. It's not a random thing - and you can't do the *same* thing on a Strat or lap steel...you can do some of the same type of stuff, but it's not going to be the same.

Why does anyone question RR's choice of guitar/copedent at all? What difference does it make to anyone NOT playing it?

I use a B6, 10 string 3+4 copedent with no chromatics on my GFI. And it really only matters to me...or anyone else interested. But anyone who would criticize it would sound rather hollow - because it's not THEIR music being made on it.

Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 20 December 2006 10:21 PM     profile     
13 is one more than 12!

[This message was edited by b0b on 21 December 2006 at 10:27 AM.]

David Mason
Member

From: Cambridge, MD, USA

posted 21 December 2006 01:01 AM     profile     
I've heard Earnest Bovine play Bach violin partitas on 12 string E9th, Dave Easley play Ornette Coleman and John Coltrane saxophone licks on 10 string C6th, and Debashish Bhattacharya play Mahavishnu John McLaughlin guitar licks on 4 string NON-pedal - shouldn't somebody out there be practicing, instead of arguing about tunings?
David Doggett
Member

From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

posted 21 December 2006 08:20 AM     profile     
Why does Earnest choose E9, and Easely chooses C6, and Debashish choose a 4-string non-pedal? I believe they have their reasons. I'm sure each of them could play something impressive on each of the other tunings. But still they coose one particular tuning that they feel works better for them. Why then can't other people choose a tuning that they think works best for them? Thank goodness Jerry Byrd, Bud Isaacs, Buddy Emmons, Jimmy Day, Ralph Mooney, and Lloyd Green didn't feel compelled to stick with the more limited tunings the tuning police demanded.
Mark Eaton
Member

From: Windsor, Sonoma County, CA

posted 21 December 2006 09:20 AM     profile     
David, I don't think it's a "tuning police" thing. I think it is more a point of the average steel player being able to survive in treacherous waters, because they have a reasonably solid familiarity with the different aspects of a popular tuning, like E9th.

Of course you make an excellent point about the above mentioned masters not restricting themselves.

The vast majority of us are average players at best (and I have a good ways to go before I even make it to that) and would be well-served to come as close as we can to mastering a tuning for which there is copious amounts of information, rather than re-configuring our steels to a radical departure from the norm.

Many players of regular 6-string guitar have never ventured out of standard tuning to DADGAD and the like, and it works just fine for them.

It seems to me that there is plenty going on with E9th, and most anything can be played on it. Obviously, becoming familiar with a tuning that is designed for a certain feel, like C6th for jazz/swing, is an advantage-but it doesn't appear to be an absolute necessity. Remember, it was Lloyd Green who got rid of the C6th neck on his guitar many years ago, and it hasn't seemed to limit him as a player.

Though I have read where Lloyd has said that one has to think more, not less, to limit themselves to one neck and one tuning. But if you already know your way around "the neigborhood," maybe it's easier to remember all the addresses?


------------------
Mark

Mike Perlowin
Member

From: Los Angeles CA

posted 21 December 2006 09:38 AM     profile     
"Tuning police?"

Look at the appendix of tunings in Winnie's book. Just about every player has something slightly different from everybody else.

The thing to bear in mind is that today's tunings are the result our instrument's pioneers experimenting and collaborating, and it took them a while to figure it all out, but they got it right. My E9/B6 U-12 which is more or less standard, can handle anything from Debussy to Hendrix.

It's not a matter of being politically correct, it's a matter of practicality.

------------------
Warning: I have a telecaster and I'm not afraid to use it.
-----------
My web site


[This message was edited by Mike Perlowin on 21 December 2006 at 10:43 AM.]

Mike Neer
Member

From: NJ

posted 21 December 2006 10:08 AM     profile     
As Robert Randolph so eloquently put it:

"Play what you feel and don't let anyone discourage you from being the musician you want to be."

Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 21 December 2006 10:25 AM     profile     
There aren't any heavy metal or punk autoharp players. Why is that?

I wrote a punk-ish song a few years ago, and laid it down in my home studio. I'm a good steel player and a horrible guitarist, but I chose to play guitar on the tracks. I could have played exactly the same part on steel, but the steel didn't feel or sound right in that context.

My point is that sometimes pedal steel just isn't a good match if you're trying to fit a specific genre. I believe that one of the first rules for commercial record producers and pro studio musicians is "Don't try to invent a new kind of music."

I'm not saying that we should stifle our creativity. I'm saying that we shouldn't delude ourselves into thinking that pedal steel will fit in all kinds of music. RR and other Sacred Steel musicians have built on a long tradition of sliding guitar sounds over an electric folk/blues framework. I don't see a similar tradition in punk, rap or hip-hop music. It just doesn't fit, IMHO.

Jim Sliff seems to think that "if you build it, they will come". But "it" needs to be tailored (dumbed down) to a tuning that a typical 13-year-old with NO music training can understand. Given statistics of new autoharp sales to punk musicians, no steel manufacturer is willing to tool up for the task.

------------------
Bobby Lee (a.k.a. b0b) - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts
Williams D-12 E9, C6add9, Sierra Olympic S-12 (F Diatonic)
Sierra Laptop S-8 (E6add9), Fender Stringmaster D-8 (E13, C6 or A6) My Blog


[This message was edited by b0b on 21 December 2006 at 10:29 AM.]

Mark Eaton
Member

From: Windsor, Sonoma County, CA

posted 21 December 2006 10:46 AM     profile     
And in the spirit of Bobby's post, it is also the reason why I have been trying to get back into regular six string acoustic after many years of neglect, and become comfortable on the thing.

As a worship leader in my church band, I do a lot of lead singing, on a lot of Contemporary Christian rock songs. The instrument I'm most comfortable on is dobro, but Jerry Douglas or Rob Ickes I'm not. So try as I might, the thing just doesn't jive with a lot of the songs. We used to have a pethora of regular guitar players, but church bands, especially in smaller churches, often have an accordian effect that shrinks when folks move out of the area, etc.

It behooves me to sharpen up my six-string playing to help out the cause. When you think of the dobro as a cousin to pedal steel-it makes you realize that for certain songs-the thing just doesn't fly-so I take it off and put it on its stand. Not to mention the part about singing and trying to play competent dobro at the same time, which is a whole other thread.

But I have managed to utilize it in many songs without everyone in the building thinking that they are now hearing a bluegrass or country gospel song. One of these days, on a Sunday when I'm not in the "frontman" role, I'm going to bring my GFI-but I may not use it on all the songs-since some of the licks I know might sound too much like the cliched country steel licks-and not everyone in the congregation agrees with my love of country music!

------------------
Mark

Herb Steiner
Member

From: Cedar Valley, Travis County TX

posted 21 December 2006 11:09 AM     profile     
What an incredible groove "Walk of Life" had in that performance!

Repetitive 8th notes on the rhythm guitar pushing along a solid 2/4 from the bass/drums... YEAH, BABY!!!

That, my friends, is plain old GOOD rock 'n roll. And you can feel the exchange of energy from the mega-huge audience with the band. Back in the 70's, I played in a several huge concert situations like that. It's actually easier to play when you've got thousands of people waving their arms in sync to your music and telling you to GET AFTER IT!

------------------
Herb's Steel Guitar Pages
Texas Steel Guitar Association

David Doggett
Member

From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

posted 21 December 2006 11:17 AM     profile     
Actually, I tend to agree with Mark and Mike, and in fact that is why I have settled on an S12 uni 8&5. I actually bought a D12 Carter with the idea of putting an E9/B6 uni on one neck and an SS E7 on the other. But that turned out to be a much bigger project than I realized, and I never got around to it. As I got better at playing blues on a uni, I decided it would be crazy to carry around a big heavy D12 with two E necks.

But over on the blues/rock starter thread we are talking about something for young hardcore players with no previous E9 or C6 baggage, and absolutely no country or jazz intentions. An S12 uni is too complicated and expensive for them. Some kind of 8- or 10-string E tuning on a 3&4 or 3&5 starter would seem to be the ticket. There are 6-, 8- and 10-string SS E7 proposals. I propose a 3&5 uni - drop the top two "chromatic" strings for a 10-string, and also drop the high G# and the F# for an 8-string. Then it is a very basic E tuning, and you could later move up to a full 12-string uni or a D10. The core strings and pedals and knees would be the same.

Mark Eaton
Member

From: Windsor, Sonoma County, CA

posted 21 December 2006 11:19 AM     profile     
Herb, you articulated it much better than I could. Paul sure looked like he was having a good time to me-and they was rockin'!

------------------
Mark

Jesse Pearson
Member

From: San Diego , CA

posted 21 December 2006 11:37 AM     profile     
"Play what you feel and don't let anyone discourage you from being the musician you want to be."

Don't tell Pat Metheny that Mike, you'll get thrown out of his private club?

Dave Mudgett
Member

From: Central Pennsylvania, USA

posted 21 December 2006 12:32 PM     profile     
quote:
"Don't try to invent a new kind of music."

I understand that comment fits in the context of studio players working in a specific genre. But in general, why not? I don't think everything worthwhile has been invented. Why not try to reinvent new styles of music where PSG has a central role? I think it's infinitely more versatile and interesting than autoharp.

The styles that are now heavily copied were invented sometime. I suppose if we just view music as a short-term cash cow for record companies and their investors, OK. But I think new blood is critical, or the whole thing will just cease to be relevant - that may have already happened. You can't milk a cow forever without repriming the pump every once in a while, so to speak.

The Dire Straits clips with Paul are great, I agree. That is rock and roll. I'm just crazy enough to not understand why all those rock bands aren't jonesin' for a PSG. I agree that it's different from a guitar - Vive la difference.

Ben Jones
Member

From: Washington, USA

posted 21 December 2006 12:59 PM     profile     
This guy rocks and still sounds like a pedal steel. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sn8z2HIJsA
Donny Hinson
Member

From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.

posted 21 December 2006 01:45 PM     profile     
quote:
Why does anyone question RR's choice of guitar/copedent at all? What difference does it make to anyone NOT playing it?

Oh, that's simple. Because everyone has an opinion, and given the "politically correct" mindset nowadays, every opinion is equally valid and to be respected. (At least, that's what a some of us found out a few pages back! )

quote:
But "it" needs to be tailored (dumbed down) to a tuning that a typical 13-year-old with NO music training can understand.
That sounds a little judgemental, to me...almost condescending. I don't consider it "dumbing down", I consider it as offering a simpler alternative. Contrary to most beliefs here, you don't need a minimum of 10, 12, or 14 strings to play most music. You also don't need 14-19 pedals that permit every possible chord and inversion. All the notes are there, and if you can't find a certain chord or voicing, you do something else!
(I believe that's what violinists do.) Also, know that if you play 3,4,& 5, and just mash the A&B pedals, it's going to sound country! That move is ubiquitous in most country music. However, making the judgement that "You can't play certain types of music on pedal steel, or on the standard E9th tuning is what's called a "hasty generalization".

Maybe you can't...and maybe I can't. But I can guarantee you that somebody out there can.

Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 21 December 2006 02:48 PM     profile     
Donny, the "dumbed down" comment was directed at those who believe we should change the copedent, remove chromatic strings, etc., to make an instrument that's more punk-rock friendly. I don't think there's a business case for that. That's my point.

Anyone who buys a standard pedal steel is free to do whatever they want with it, of course. But there's no commercial momentum behind any movement to simplify the standard copedent. The rants and wishes of 6000 steel guitar fanatics on this forum aren't going to change that simple fact.

------------------
Bobby Lee (a.k.a. b0b) - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts
Williams D-12 E9, C6add9, Sierra Olympic S-12 (F Diatonic)
Sierra Laptop S-8 (E6add9), Fender Stringmaster D-8 (E13, C6 or A6) My Blog


Mark Eaton
Member

From: Windsor, Sonoma County, CA

posted 21 December 2006 03:09 PM     profile     
The rants and wishes of 6,000 Steel Guitar Forum members, I would think, could have a legitimate shot at getting it done.

But the actual rants and wishes of members here may be closer to that number minus the last two zeroes-more like 60. And that obviously isn't going to get it done.

If Paul Franklin could go on the road in the past with a legitmate world class rock band like Dire Straits, with the usual copedent-then I can't imagine that there is any real need-or desire-for steel builders to market a special rock and roll version of a pedal steel guitar.

------------------
Mark

[This message was edited by Mark Eaton on 21 December 2006 at 03:12 PM.]

[This message was edited by Mark Eaton on 21 December 2006 at 03:34 PM.]

Eric Jaeger
Member

From: Oakland, California, USA

posted 21 December 2006 03:16 PM     profile     
Autoharp in rock? John Sebastian? Geoff Muldaur? (OK, I'm reaching).

I have to agree with Jim Sliff on the Winnie Winston & DeWitt Scott books. I'm enough of a beginner that both books are well-worn, but "Red River Valley" isn't going to float a rocker's boat, and to be effective teaching of any kind has to offer rewards along the way. Like being able to play something recognizable, even if it's the PSG variant of "Gloria". I don't think it's "dumbing down" to adopt good teaching methods.

I'm really not facile enough on PSG to try copedants beyond E9, especially since I can barely survive on E9. But on 6-string there are a bunch of useful tunings beyond standard: drop-D, D-modal, Keef's open G, open G/A/E/D, DADGAD... I'd think someone would want to learn standard first, but you can get to music pretty quickly in non-standard tunings.

This thing about pushing instruments into different styles of music starts to break down if you look at history. Guitar wasn't very common until Charlie Christian. "Traps" didn't do much until Krupa. Piano changed with Fats Waller. Bass with Mingus. For that matter, I don't remember who brought "hawaiian" into country, but people probably couldn't imagine it until it happened.

Most of us aren't going to create new genres of music (certainly not me!). Or even new styles within existing ones. But if we tell ourselves it can't happen it won't.

-eric

Jim Sliff
Member

From: Hermosa Beach California, USA

posted 21 December 2006 05:22 PM     profile     
"Jim Sliff seems to think that "if you build it, they will come"."

Well, sort of.

See, the thing is, they already WANT to. I've seen enough interest to know it's not unique to the few dozen young players I know pretty well.

They're already knocking at the door, have looked at the forum, have looked at the books.

That's why I think, especially with RR's impact, the time is right to move on this.

BTW, as far as Paul's playing - I agree it sounds like good OLD Rock and Roll, ads Herb said - but not like good NEW hard rock...and there's a HUGE difference.

I also seem to recall Paul saying somewhere that for more rock-oriented things in the studio he uses a C6 neck.

Steinar Gregertsen
Member

From: Arendal, Norway

posted 21 December 2006 06:27 PM     profile     
How about a 6-string PSG? The sight of 10-12 strings, even 8, can be pretty intimidating for a newbie with a background in rock guitar. A 6-string could be a good place to start, more like a lap steel with a couple of pedals and a knee lever, could tune it to open-E and take it from there.
After a while the need for more strings and possibilities would probably come naturally, and he would be on his way to a 'grown up' PSG...
Or not?

Steinar

------------------
"Play to express, not to impress"
www.gregertsen.com
Southern Moon Northern Lights

Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 21 December 2006 07:27 PM     profile     
You know, it's a chicken and egg sort of thing. Nobody will publish a book for anything but 10-string E9th because 90% of the steels made today are E9th. Nobody will develop a 6- or 8- string pedal steel because all of the instructional material for 10-string.

Frankly, I don't see anything wrong with that. You can play any kind of music on the E9th. All the notes are there.

------------------
Bobby Lee (a.k.a. b0b) - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts
Williams D-12 E9, C6add9, Sierra Olympic S-12 (F Diatonic)
Sierra Laptop S-8 (E6add9), Fender Stringmaster D-8 (E13, C6 or A6) My Blog


Jim Sliff
Member

From: Hermosa Beach California, USA

posted 21 December 2006 09:10 PM     profile     
I tend to agree - I like the idea of an anlternate tuning for the "rockers" that fits a little better...the changes and chromatics really tend to be kind of country-sounding in their most basic form - but getting a steel manufacturer to make an 8-string SS E variant that is more naturally "rock-sounding" is kind of problematic.

So I don't see a huge issue with a *basic* steel intro course that's more generic, gives general tuning (based on E9) and instrument details, and then instruction in more of a generic format with snippets of different styles..again, that's how many beginner guitar books are put together.

But the assumption that exisiting materials have served the market well for years, while not wrong, assumes the market is fairly static, and in no way accomodates younger players in styles way outside country...or even classic rock. ZZ Top examples prove you can play classic rock on pedal steel - but 25 year olds aren't pumping ZZTop through their iPods, they're listening to band like (this is a short list, contributed to by several 24-25 year olds (all of whom work in some part of the music industry) and a couple middle-schoolers who play guitar:

Gojira
Nile
Mastodon
The Mars Volta
Killswitch Engage
dillinger Escape Plan
The Descendants
Pennywise
AFI
The Offspring
Alice in Chains
Nine Inch Nails
Linkin Park
Jane's Adiction
Re Hot Chili Peppers (one comment - 'oh, they're classic rock")
Coldplay
Nickelback
And the everpresent Ozzy and Metallica...and Zep.
Hendrix was mentioned
Surf music was mentioned
Yes and Pink Floyd as well
And yes, Robert Randolph was mentioned. They had never heard of the Campbells.

I mentioned Green Day and they laughed...

*That's* what you're looking at if you want to appeal to younger players- not the "rock" of Paul's playing on Dire Strait's stuff, which is entering the Classic-Rock phase. Not the ZZ Top of the "carter Starter demo". That stuff is great - but meant for an older crowd, which seems to be a sort of inherent problem with pedal steel market perceptions - because the "buying crowd" IS older, they cater to it. But as that crowd dwindles (we don't live forever) either the builders and producers of instruction materials will have to change with it or fade away.

Obviously there will be still a country market - but eventhe country players complain that *that* market is losing groud, with less steel being used on recordings....and all it takes is a viewing of a video of a major steel show to see the amazing lack of younger players.

I still think it will take more than JUST new instruction materials...it will take manufacturers interested in marketing to the potential players outside the "comfort zone", and perhaps (if not changing tunings) adding features other musicians are accustomed to - multiple pickps, tone/volume circuits, etc.

That's probably enough to ponder for now.


This topic is 5 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5 

All times are Pacific (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Pedal Steel Pages

Note: Messages not explicitly copyrighted are in the Public Domain.

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46

Our mailing address is:
The Steel Guitar Forum
148 South Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Support the Forum