Author
|
Topic: Superiority of Push Pull?
|
David Friedlander Member From: New York, New York, USA
|
posted 10 November 2003 01:15 PM
profile
I'm a newbie to this forum, so this has probably been gone over more times than Gomer Pyle said Shazaam- BUT- Can someone tell me what's so special about Push Pull. Does the mechanism of a pedal steel guitar affect the tone? I have an old Emmons P/P- the tone is great, as is the tone on my Marlen- they're quite different from each other, but both are awesome. I find tuning and maintaining are twice as difficult as on an push pull guitar. Is there some benefit I'm missing?[This message was edited by David Friedlander on 10 November 2003 at 04:57 PM.] |
Jerry Tillman Member From:
|
posted 10 November 2003 02:53 PM
profile
Is this a joke- lakeshrk |
Donny Hinson Member From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.
|
posted 10 November 2003 03:23 PM
profile
Of course! By now, everyone should know...you can't be a real snob unless you play one! You wouldn't want to miss out on that, now...would you?  Common sense should tell you that if any one brand or type were "head and shoulders" above the rest, that would be about the only one you'd ever see being played. And that's not the case, is it? Yes, I've owned one for many years, and I've never been able to understand what all the fuss is about. Yes, they sound good, but so do a dozen other guitars. Next question???[This message was edited by Donny Hinson on 10 November 2003 at 03:24 PM.] |
Jerry Roller Member From: Van Buren, Arkansas USA
|
posted 10 November 2003 03:41 PM
profile
Donny, what year is your push pull? Is it for sale? Jerry |
Brad Sarno Member From: St. Louis, MO USA
|
posted 10 November 2003 04:20 PM
profile
It's a myth. The push/pull really isn't so special. Wanna sell it?Brad Sarno '66 Emmons p/p S10 '69 Emmons p/p D10 '73 ZB Custom S10 '69 Fender Twin '75, '76, '78 Peavey Session 400's Gretsch Nashville Pro amp
|
Larry Bell Member From: Englewood, Florida
|
posted 10 November 2003 04:29 PM
profile
I think you've about got it. It is a great sounding guitar that's not as easy to adjust, maintain, and modify as an all pull guitar. Some of us are delighted to put up with that.  ------------------ Larry Bell - email: larry@larrybell.org - gigs - Home Page 2003 Fessenden S/D-12 8x8, 1969 Emmons S-12 6x6, 1971 Dobro, Standel and Peavey Amps
|
Brad Sarno Member From: St. Louis, MO USA
|
posted 10 November 2003 04:48 PM
profile
OK, seriously, since you asked. The push/pull changer is unique in that the fingers rest firmly against the body or solidly against the endplate depending on what the pedals/levers are doing. This supposedly helps the strings have a more solid contact with the guitar giving more sustain in a key range of overtones that are distinctly "push/pull" sounding. The mechanism is very solid and in tune once set up properly. It's a precision instrument in that it needs to be adjusted very precisely, but once set, can remain good for years. I've had a Sho-Bud, a Mullen, a ZB and 2 Push/Pulls. I dont think I'll ever part with these push/pulls. To my ear they have what I'd describe as a very long and powerful "cry" in the midrange overtones. After you pick the strings, the voice of the guitar "blooms" and hangs out a while. Other guitars have their strengths but the push/pull is unique in its voice. I love other guitars for their strengths too. The ZB is clear as a bell and is agressive sounding and has a sweet top end that rings long. The push/pull has it's own unique voice that many of us love. It's smooth and balanced and really knows how to cry and moan. I feel like the Emmons push/pull, for some reason, responds better than others to subtle variations in picking expression, it'll do what you tell it. Then there's the feel factor. Once used to it, the push/pull is like buttah. And the slack in the pedals lets you tap your feet on them. Really there's some serious mojo in the original Emmons guitar design. I bet there are some secrets we dont know about. Geniuses I tells ya! Buddy and Ron. Brad Sarno
|
David Friedlander Member From: New York, New York, USA
|
posted 10 November 2003 05:19 PM
profile
Hi All, Jerry, it was a typo. Edited to say the push pull is far more difficult to maintain.Donny's point is well taken. At the Norwalk show Zum was used by most players but there were Mullen, Sierra and of course Emmmons too. Brad- thank you very much for the explaination. I took my guitar straight to Ron Lashley Jr. He had the one of the guys who built the push pulls back in the 70's do my copedant, and all the adjustments. I guess that's about as good as it gets. After a about 6 months of gigging the stops are all good- but i am terrified of needing to tune them. Compared to modern all pull mechanisms, it does not look "solid" to me. I know it's all about player preference, or what one gets used to, but I prefer the option of a tight/ short throw action. Is this possible with a P/P. OK- don't all hit me, remember, I'm a newbie- but does the Carter BCT address the contact issue? 'nother possibly stupid question- Is there really any way to know how you're going to like a particular Pedal Steel Guitar in less than...a month? It's not like walking into Sam Ash and trying out a Les Paul. It would seem to me that certain strenths and weaknesses in an axe can only be seen over time. No? ------------------ Rocky S. 1970's Laquer S10 Marlen 2003 S/10 Keyless Lamar email contact@diamondsbylauren.com |
Jody Carver Member From: The Knight Of Fender Tweed~ Dodger Blue Forever
|
posted 10 November 2003 05:55 PM
profile
The length of time I have had ny 69 Emmons pp...No Problems,,time to face the facts,,Emmons is BEST. Since the day I received it in 1969 It has stood up.
[This message was edited by Jody Carver on 16 November 2003 at 07:49 AM.] |
Jimmie Brown Member From: Fayetteville, NC, USA
|
posted 10 November 2003 06:09 PM
profile
ever wonder why Lloyd Green and Tommy White and all the other big time pro's don't play the push pull,,,,,,,just wondering Jimmie
|
Richard Sinkler Member From: Fremont, California
|
posted 10 November 2003 06:34 PM
profile
because they are not the best? (yeah, right). It all boils down to personal preference. If I can get a decent settlement on the house from my divorce, I will get me an Emmons p/p and a good resophonic. |
Damir Besic Member From: La Vergne,TN
|
posted 10 November 2003 06:43 PM
profile
Lloyd plays Sho~Bud (where "Bud" is coming from the name "Buddy" wich would be Buddy Emmons who also build an Emmons PP so there you go,the two best guitars ever made.)Shot was also giving a special deals to the top players who wanted to play Sho~Bud,Lloyd conected with the Sho~Bud ,got his signature unique sound and the rest is history.Tommy White,my guess is,plays whatever pays.If he has a deal with Carter he`ll play Carter,if MSA he`ll play MSA.Not that anything is wrong with that.If Emmons company needed a help to sell their guitars I`m sure Mr.White would play and promote an Emmons.But,as we all know,Emmons can barely keep up with the orders the way it is,so I seriously doubt that they will need anyones help to sell their guitars any time soon. I heard many guitars in my life,great sounding and bad sounding but no other guitar sounds like an Emmons PP,you like it or not.Emmons PP has it`s own sound and color and if someone can`t hear that then,well,realy doesn`t mater to him anyway which guitar he plays. ------------------ [This message was edited by Damir Besic on 10 November 2003 at 06:49 PM.] |
Jerry Roller Member From: Van Buren, Arkansas USA
|
posted 10 November 2003 07:09 PM
profile
Damir, Tommy has made a whole bunch of great music on an Emmons guitar in the past. He has sounded great on at least two push pulls I know of, a blue one at about the age of 14 or so and a great sounding black one that I had the pleasure of working on and setting up recently. They might not be his guitar of choice right now but I betcha he has a warm spot in his heart for them. Mushy? maybe, the truth? you betcha! Jerry |
David Friedlander Member From: New York, New York, USA
|
posted 10 November 2003 07:11 PM
profile
It's true, Emmons guitars are legendary. When I visited the factory, I saw a guitar ready to be picked up, and it was awesome! It's also true that Emmons is so busy that demand probably outstrips supply right now.I LOVE vintage six string guitars. I love to play them out too. But it seems that with all the complexity of a pedal steel, new and solid is desirable. The point abut the top players using newer gear- That was the case in Norwalk, but is it the case all over? Do top guys in ...Nashville use vintage gear? Are a lot of the top guys "sponsered"?[This message was edited by David Friedlander on 10 November 2003 at 07:13 PM.] |
Gino Iorfida Member From: Oakdale, Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 10 November 2003 07:21 PM
profile
Well... why does JayDee Manness use a push pull? or many others. I think if you would look at what is used int he studios vs. what is used on stage you would see different things. Put it this way, I can name dozens of 6 sting guitar players that play vintage collectable Les Pauls, 50's teles, tweed and original blackface fender amps and so on, yet on tour, they are playing off the shelf modern instruments/amps.... why? For the same reason I'm looking heavily into a more modern steel to compliment my push pull--- a LOT of bad things can happen on the road and in bars/clubs/loading in and out of equipment trucks etc... so keep the classic vintage gear safe and sound, use it in the studio, and use the modern more easily replaceable gear where damage CAN happen.
|
John McGann Member From: Boston, Massachusetts, USA
|
posted 10 November 2003 07:25 PM
profile
David, did you get a chance to check out the bolt-on that Tom Cassella had at the show? The undercarriage is beyond belief- Tom is a p/p specialist and rebuilt the whole thing- it looks like a showroom Harley! Tom is an ace mechanic and knows these instruments inside out; he's been doing it for years and years.There is no doubt that these are classic horns, some sound better than others, just like vintage guitars. I play a 2001 Carter and am really happy with it, but I can see, hear and feel what is special about the p/p's...[This message was edited by John McGann on 10 November 2003 at 07:27 PM.] |
David Friedlander Member From: New York, New York, USA
|
posted 10 November 2003 08:13 PM
profile
Shoot, I missed that John. I was kind of in a daze- the first show I've been to. The chops of those guys- holey moley!I have a Carter S/10 on order- I'm anxious to try it out. Gino, really good point. I hadn't thought about that. Probably the differences in tone are less recognizable in a live environment anyway.
|
kyle reid Member From: Butte,Mt.usa
|
posted 10 November 2003 11:26 PM
profile
Damir! Tommy's been playing a Sho-Bud for the last several weeks & they're not around to pay him! so I doubt if he plays what pays! kr[This message was edited by kyle reid on 10 November 2003 at 11:27 PM.] |
Franklin Member From:
|
posted 11 November 2003 08:15 AM
profile
Back in the 70's both the Emmons and Sho-bud companies were giving away endorsements to ALL the professional players. It went like this. If you worked for any touring Nasville based artist you got a free guitar. when you wanted a new guitar every year or so you traded your old guitar in for a new one with no charge.Its interesting to me that after they both folded their distrubution deals and could no longer afford to give away guitars that many of the pro's decided to go else where. pertaining to todays endorsements, No company today could afford to do what they did years ago to dominate the professional community which is why we see so much diversity in guitar choices. Today the chances are that we see artists playing the guitar, or guitars for their own personal reasons, not cause they get them free. Paul[This message was edited by Franklin on 11 November 2003 at 08:17 AM.] |
Jim Eaton Member From: Santa Susana, Ca
|
posted 11 November 2003 08:24 AM
profile
I use my Fessy SD-10 for live gig's and leave my PP at home now. Jerry can make me a new guitar if any thing were to happen to the Fessy, but my 75'PP just could not be replaced. I've had her since she was new and after Mike Cass restored her, she's new again and I plan to keep her that way. JE:-)> |
Stephen Gambrell Member From: Ware Shoals, South Carolina, USA
|
posted 11 November 2003 01:41 PM
profile
Hey Paul, I bet you get a good deal on YOUR guitars! But seriously, I know some acoustic guitar builders who would LOVE to be able to give away a guitar or two, just so folks would see(insert name here)playing their instrument. But they just can't afford it! If a guy builds ten instruments a year, at three thousand each, giving away even ONE is going to tear up the food budget. And that being said, I also know that guitars ARE given away, for promotion, even when the builder can't afford it. And it pays off in the long run. Would Tim Scheerhorn be the biggest name in reso's, if Jerry Douglas didn't play 'em? Would James Olson's guitars be hard to get if it weren't for James Taylor? And what if Peavey made steels???? |
Steve Stallings Member From: Bremond, Tx, pop 876, Home of the fighting Bremond Tigers
|
posted 11 November 2003 02:40 PM
profile
From what I understand, Paul pays full price for his fathers steels. I've had a push pull in the past. I think they are really cool guitars and wouldn't mind having one. However, the vast majority of what you hear on a day to day basis on the radio is not push pull but all pull. To the best of my knowledge, the only significant studio work done on a pushpull is by Sonny Garrish. Paul Franklin and Mike Johnson are both using all pull Franklins. I know that Bruce Bouton was using a push pull but I recently was told he has bought a Carter. Randle Currie just did Brad Paisleys new CD with an all pull guitar. Jeff Peterson uses a Legrande III. Lloyd Green used an all pull for everything. Robbie Turners gorgeous work on Daryl Dodds CD's was an all pull guitar. Let's see... I've got CDs of John Hughie using an all pull...sound good to me. Wimpy is using an all pull. Steve Palousek is using and all pull. One of the best CD's fro steel ever is the Northern Steels CD. It's a mix, but the all pulls sound just fine. The only steel CD's I have which are push pull are my Buddy Emmons CD's. Maybe a couple of the Bobbe Seymour CDs are push pull but I'm not certain. When I bought my push pull in 1990, I bought it because it was cheaper than the current modern all pulls I could find. The current "push pull mania" did not exist at that time or was greatly diminished when compared to todays atmosphere. The current demand for push pulls is a created demand. There is no true vintage steel market similar to the vintage guitar market. Actually they both are wildy inflated but I won't go into the vintage guitar market here. The steel market is a niche market which is demographically shrinking. Look at the average age of the posters here. We are for the most part middle aged or older. Though we make a big deal out of younger steel players, the numbers at steel conventions simply do not back up any resurgent "youth market". Sooner or later, the math will begin to catch up with the number of steels on the market... including push pulls. Heck, they sure aren't rare. Are push pull guitars superior? Only to a few collectors and dealers. The above is my opinion. Yours may differ. I don't care. I'm not trying to get $5k or even more out of an old guitar. Now if I were trying to sell one.... well, nevermind  |
Frank Estes Member From: Huntsville, AL
|
posted 11 November 2003 03:12 PM
profile
If one cannot tell the difference, then a push-pull is not for them!  ------------------ Frank Estes - 1978 Emmons D-10 8+7 #2441D
|
Damir Besic Member From: La Vergne,TN
|
posted 11 November 2003 05:31 PM
profile
you know Frank,you`re right.I was thinking about that and this is what I come up with.There is no point to argue with someone about the PP tone,you can either hear it or not.How to explain to someone who doesn`t hear the differents what IS the differents.How would I explain to someone who can`t see the colors the differents between my red Sho~Bud and wine red Emmons?He can`t see the differents,it looks all the same to him anyway.There is no way you can do that.If someone doesn`t hear the differents then there is no way you can explain it to him what`s different.Right?I can hear that PP Emmons sounds different than other guitars but to someone else it may soud just the same as any other.I`m not arguing here that PP sounds BETTER than any other guitar,I`m saying that it does sound different and some people like that tone and some don`t.It`s all about the personal taste,bottom line.btw.Tommy White would sound great on any guitar,what I said was not ment to be disrespectful in any way,it was just my tought. and btw. 90% of all the players listed above who play all pull guitars have a PP under the bed.Maybe even two of them. ------------------ |
Donny Hinson Member From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.
|
posted 11 November 2003 05:33 PM
profile
Jerry...my p/p is an '80s model, tobacco sunburst w/alum. necks.I do not sell instruments or amps...I only buy them. |
Pat Burns Member From: Branchville, N.J. USA
|
posted 11 November 2003 05:59 PM
profile
..Frank Estes and I have occasionly seen the world from different perspectives , but the only difference between Frank's push/pull and mine is that the serial # on mine is 2714D...and I agree with his perspective that you don't need to waste your money on one if you can't hear the difference.. |
Steve Stallings Member From: Bremond, Tx, pop 876, Home of the fighting Bremond Tigers
|
posted 11 November 2003 06:29 PM
profile
Who said push pulls don't sound different? Heck, I even said I like mine and wouldn't mind another one. I'm trying really hard to see who it is you guys are arguing with. Reminds me of another story about an emperor and his.... oh never mind. quote: and btw. 90% of all the players listed above who play all pull guitars have a PP under the bed.Maybe even two of them
....and the obvious conclusion Damir is that they use their all-pulls to record with. Hey guys... I'm not arguing. The fellow asked if push pulls are superior to all pull guitars. I don't think so. I think they sound different. Some folks really like that sound. But I also firmly believe that current hype associated with them is marketing. If an alternative viewpoint regarding push pulls and the market is so bothersome... jeez guys. It's only an opinion. |
Damir Besic Member From: La Vergne,TN
|
posted 11 November 2003 06:38 PM
profile
how would we know what are they using to record with?I`m pretty sure many of those guys record with their PP guitars.I love PP and I think it is the BEST dang guitar since the Karo syrup,are they superior?Not at all,only fact is that almost every steel manufacturer trys to get as close as possible to their sound....and they can`t... ..get even close to it..now lets think if they are superior------------------ |
John Steele Member From: Renfrew, Ontario, Canada
|
posted 11 November 2003 07:36 PM
profile
Everyone would agree that homemade bread tastes better than store bought. But how many people make homemade bread ?  -John |
PAUL WARNIK Member From: OAK LAWN,IL,USA
|
posted 11 November 2003 08:01 PM
profile
My new MSA Millenium M2 was purchased largely to keep up my interest in the current workings of pedal steel-It is I believe the most significant advance and most radical departure in pedal steel guitar design in at least 20 years-The all pull guitar plays noticeably faster than my old P/P Emmons-Does that mean that I am going to sell the old wraparound and bolt-on? NO WAY JOSE  |
Roger Rettig Member From: NAPLES, FL
|
posted 11 November 2003 08:07 PM
profile
I can say with authority that James Taylor paid for all his four Olson guitars - the only break Jim Olson gave him was to put his order right at the front of the line. JT got his after a few weeks rather than nine months to a year.(At that time - it's nearer three years now)In fact, Olson had a cutaway 'SJ' actually finished that was immediately available (I believe the customer had passed away) - JT bought it on the understanding that he could get a credit when his was finished. When the time came, however, Taylor decided to keep both, as he'd grown to love it! At his concerts you'll see him play the non-cutaway in the first 'half', and use the cutaway guitar (with fresh strings) to finish the show. My apologies for that attack of trivia. Roger Rettig PS: ....but I can't resist adding: JT told JO that he didn't need a cutaway as he never goes that far up the neck - he asked if maybe Olson could place a sort of 'imitation cobweb' across it to prove the point.... ![This message was edited by Roger Rettig on 11 November 2003 at 08:12 PM.] |
Rick Johnson Member From: Wheelwright, Ky USA
|
posted 12 November 2003 05:00 AM
profile
I've seen guitar players use Les Paul's Strat, Tele's...etc all in one show. They all appeared to be in standard tuning. Each guitar has a different tone and they all sound great. Funny how they don't change amps?? Steel players tend to use one guitar at a time. PP's have a great sound, so does a brand new all pull of any make. Tommy has been playing his Sho-Bud lately. It sounds great on my TV. So does the MSA and Carter. I know there are some guitar players who get guitars for endorsements. Thats fine. If I were a guitar builder, I sure would like to see Tommy using it on the GOO. After all, he is the most visible player in the country, what Tommy wants, he should get, within reason. Its great advertising. Lets not take my comments and say that Tommy is better than anyone else that appears in a video or plays in a touring band or is a great session artist. Its just he is in the spotlight every week.
------------------ Rick Johnson
|
HowardR Member From: N.Y.C.,N.Y.
|
posted 12 November 2003 05:25 AM
profile
Mike nice to meet you at the show. How's that Lamar? How does it play and sound?I don't know where I got "Mike" from. Sorry David. Give me a late pass.......[This message was edited by HowardR on 15 November 2003 at 02:51 PM.] |
Brad Sarno Member From: St. Louis, MO USA
|
posted 12 November 2003 06:37 AM
profile
I think that if the push/pull were as easy to alter and adjust as an all-pull then we'd see many more players using them. Most all-pulls are generally pretty simple to tune, tweak, and change copendents. Push/Pulls take some time getting used to and some of the adjustments are critical so you dont damage the changer. There are springs to tweak and the tuning process is different. I think some people are uncomfortable with the mechanics of them. It's like owning an old Volkswagen or Harley. I think the cult factor has to do with mechanical ability or the willingness to have a mechanic available to tweak it. My Mullen and Sho-Bud were so terribly easy to adjust and alter my mom could have figured it out. The push/pull takes some time and understanding to get dialed in. I love the push/pull feel, it just melts into your hands and feet like an extension of your body. And the tone is undeniably special. As others have said, if you cant hear or appreciate the difference then you dont need a push/pull. You can pry my two '60s push/pulls from my cold dead hands  Brad Sarno |
LARRY COLE Member From: COLUMBUS, OHIO, USA
|
posted 12 November 2003 07:08 AM
profile
If Push Pulls are better than All Pulls I think I will Make an All Push. Huh, mine is an all push. You push the pedals and you push the levers. |
PAUL WARNIK Member From: OAK LAWN,IL,USA
|
posted 12 November 2003 08:44 AM
profile
Brad-well said  |
Steve Stallings Member From: Bremond, Tx, pop 876, Home of the fighting Bremond Tigers
|
posted 12 November 2003 09:51 AM
profile
quote: It's like owning an old Volkswagen or Harley.
... My Harley sounds better than any of my guitars  The cult observation is valid. It's not that I'm dissing push pull guitars, there is a small, very vocal minority which is quite fanatical about them. They are good guitars and not nearly as hard to work on as they are made out to be. The slightly springy pedal action is a function of the mechanism and actually is preferable to me as opposed to some modern all pull guitars "hair trigger" action. It's interesting that the market for push pulls is not strong enough to entice any major builder to offer one. They are perhaps a little more expensive to build, but if market demand was present in large enough scale, the cost would not be significantly higher than some of the more expensive all pulls on the market. I don't see it ever happening though for several reasons. The mechanics scare off a sizeable number of folks. They tend to be a little heavier and the initial tooling up costs would be significant. You folks who treasure these steels... enjoy. They most certainly represent an era of steel guitar building that we won't see again. ------------------ God Bless, Steve Stallings www.pedalsteeler.com
|
Herb Steiner Member From: Cedar Valley, Travis County TX
|
posted 12 November 2003 10:06 AM
profile
If a PP has a "slightly springy" action, it's because the owner wants it like that or it's incorrectly set up. My 64 Emmons has action as short, positive, and smooth as my brand new Fessenden.But yes, changing copedents is more involved than an all pull guitar. However, if a removeable bellcrank was designed for a PP, a lot of the hassle of copedent changes would be alleviated, though not all. All modern AP's have these removeable bellcranks. I've discussed earlier why I play vintage guitars (Bigsby, Emmons wraparound), as well as my Fessenden, on gigs. Bear in mind I play retro country and western swing on my gigs. These reasons are: 1) I enjoy connecting with my favorite music of the past by playing the guitars that made the music originally; 2) recreating the vibe of the music of the past is easier for me on an original instrument. The sound of the fifties and sixties is contained within the instruments made during those periods. No modern guitars I can think of sound like a Bigsby, S~B or a PP from that era; 3) "Back to the Future." When I was a teenager first getting into performing, a steel guitar looked either like a ShoBud, an Emmons, a Bigsby, or a Fender. This is why GFI's and Sierra's and all keyless guitars visually turn me off. I can't visualize a mental picture of me behind a guitar like this. I have a photo of Jimmy Day playing a Sierra he was given, and it looks like he's miserable... it wasn't his type of horn. This is why I like lacquer Fessendens for a modern guitar... they look like old Sho~Buds. This is also why wealthy Baby Boomers now pay $15,000 for the 1960 Stratocaster they couldn't afford when they were in junior high school; 4) pure ego, the "cool factor." Vintage guitar pickers go crazy when they see a super clean Bigsby or a wraparound, or an old Tele/Strat/Les Paul/Martin/et.al.; ------------------ Herb's Steel Guitar Pages Texas Steel Guitar Association
[This message was edited by Herb Steiner on 12 November 2003 at 10:25 AM.]
|
David Friedlander Member From: New York, New York, USA
|
posted 13 November 2003 10:34 PM
profile
I can definately understand where both sides are coming from. I'm a real guitar lover- I love everything about....say, a 1960 Les Paul Standard- you know, the one that looks like an SG- I love every detail about that guitar. I really can't stand the way keyless 6 string guitars look. Pedal steel, for me, is totally different. I never craved any pedal steel guitar- I grew up in New York City and hardly knew what a pedal steel looked like. The closest I got to a pedal steel was al the Poco concerts I went to- till I bought a Marlen about 10 years ago. For that reason, the things I love abou a pedal steel have more to do with asthetics and utility.I did buy a Lamar S10 Keyless at the Conn Show. I absolutely love the guitar. I can't say enough good things about it. Beautifully finished- amazing woodwork, and solid, polished mechanicals. There's a tap on the P/U which really gives the guitar an almost "strat like" tone. The benefits of keyless become extremely apparent the first time you change strings- or pick up the guitar. It was nice meeting you too Howard- please call me David
[This message was edited by David Friedlander on 13 November 2003 at 10:35 PM.] |
David Friedlander Member From: New York, New York, USA
|
posted 14 November 2003 01:15 PM
profile
Last night I took out the Emmons to really do a test. It's a SD12 P/P. No question about it, there IS a very unique resonance to the axe. No need for an amp- you hear it clearly just strumming the strings. I used my new Lamar for a comparison. The Emmons shook the room, the Lamar sounded thin- this test done without the amp. Since I play a lot of rock I use Fender Amps. Plug in the Emmons and you really see the need for a 15" speaker. But for me, once you plug them in- I find the Lamar to be much clearer- like comparing a Les Paul to a telecaster. Both awesome- and very different. A lot of guys have told me, and written here, that a properly set up P/P will not feel mushy- one guy said he can get the action to equal his new Fessie- I just don't see how that's possible- the action needs to have much more slack in the rods- it's debatably smooher- but if you're looking for a hair trigger- I don't see how you'd get it with P/P. When you add the added difficulty of learning the different methods of tuning the stops and it seems to be too much of a trade off for day in day out playing.
Just my opinion |