Author
|
Topic: Pedal Steels you DISLIKED..
|
Bob Carlucci Member From: Candor, New York, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 05:24 AM
profile
I imagine most of us have had a few mutts over the years.. I would like to discuss reasons why you had a good steel that you disliked. Color ,tone, playability weight,.. whatever. You may have gotten it straightened out later and loved it, but i'm talking about guitars that wouldn't work for you for whatever reason,, I know,I know, Mr Negative, but thats one of my endearing characteristics. WE are not "bashing" anyone's products by the way.. ALL modern steels are good, as well as most older ones, and I love them all, but there is always a clunker or two . b0b has stated more than once that this forum is for discussion of steel PLAYERS.. NOT a manufacturers hype forum. I wouldn't worry about stepping on any toes. 1.. Dekley... It was long ago, but I remember it as being way too heavy.. The biggest problem for me however was the little "D" shaped pedals.. I play in socks, and I remember that steel guitar killing me when I played it.. Off it went.
2 Sho Bud Pro III.. kept this guitar for years, but I was always at odds with it. Although I bought it in mint/ unused cond.,that steel would NOT stay in tune. Open string or pedal stops.. always tuning it up. I kept the wrench right on the guitar.. Also, had problems with lowers... Had to have the changer fingers machined to get some of my copedent,and always fought it. Despite its sweet tone, off she went. 3 Sho Bud 6139[pre Pro I].. actually,a good guitar with a GREAT sound,but the changer was kind of primitive by todays standards and I could not get enough of my copedent.... I always seem to fight buds.. and I fought this one too. 4 Carter.. color... 5 MSA Classic.... color.. actually LACK of color....
6 Sho Bud Pro I... Don't want to discuss this one... 7 MSA D10 XL ..Nice guitar, but you needed 3 good men and a pack mule to move it.. the tone was also "blah",,, I don't think I kept it very long at all.. You get the idea... share a few steels that went off to oblivion because they would not work for you... bob
[This message was edited by Bob Carlucci on 19 May 2005 at 05:59 AM.] [This message was edited by Bob Carlucci on 19 May 2005 at 03:05 PM.] [This message was edited by Bob Carlucci on 19 May 2005 at 03:06 PM.]
|
Tom Stolaski Member From: Huntsville, AL, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 06:07 AM
profile
My second steel. MSA Semi-Classic. Good mechanics but not very good tone. It was a step up from my Sho-Bud Maverick. |
tbhenry Member From: Chattanooga /USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 06:17 AM
profile
My worst one was an LDG Shobud. It looked so good but its undercarriage and pedal rattled like a freight train crossing a bridge. |
Bob Storti Member From: Matthews, North Carolina, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 06:33 AM
profile
My first guitar was an Emmons student model. Could not get this little beast to stay in tune to save my life.My second guitar was a used Emmons P-P S10 model. Great sound, but again, tuning problems all over the place. Bob |
Charlie McDonald Member From: Lubbock, Texas, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 06:44 AM
profile
MSA Red Baron. Need I say more? Fiberglas is great for car bodies, but for a steel....

|
Bob Carlucci Member From: Candor, New York, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 06:57 AM
profile
Bob S.. surprised you had tuning problems with a PP... I have not heard too many guys complain about tuning problems on Emmons... Just goes to show there's always a stinker even among the jewels... bob |
Jim Peters Member From: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 06:57 AM
profile
ZB D10. Great tone, bad beginner guitar. I spent all my time working on it instead of playing. Sold it, and of course wish I kept it to restore.JimP |
Gene Jones Member From: Oklahoma City, OK USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 07:10 AM
profile
A Teisco.....It had bicyle clutch cables to activate the pedals! I eventually took the pedals off and played it without. EDITED to add another guitar. Back in the late 1960's I bought one of the first Rickenbacker Pedal Steels and it would never stay in tune. Fortunately, the music store took it back and returned it to the Company. I guess Rickenbacker could never solve the problem either because they soon stopped making pedal steels. www.genejones.com [This message was edited by Gene Jones on 21 May 2005 at 04:28 AM.] |
Dick Wood Member From: Springtown Texas, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 07:27 AM
profile
ZB Custom SD-10 Great guitar,beautiful finish but would not stay in tune.Absolutely hated the design of the undercarriage.Bob, I played a Dekley for 16 years in socks and thought it was very easy on the feet and I can't hardly stand to walk on grass without shoes on. ------------------ Cops aren't paid much so I steel at night. |
Bill Myers Member From: Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 07:44 AM
profile
My first one was an MCI, not one of the good ones. It was a later one that had the aluminum front. It had the worst shrill tone so I put a georgel's e66 in it and it still sounded the same. It played nicely just sounded bad. |
Ron Steenwijk Member From: Greensburg,PA
|
posted 19 May 2005 08:05 AM
profile
Haven't had a bad steel yet.But I have a couple of questions.
- Was it the steel that was bad?Or was it just bad judgement?
- If you knew then what you know now about the same steel....would you buy it again?
I had several steel guitars and always sold um because there was something wrong with it.But I found out later that it wasn't the steel guitar but it was me.I always changed things back than with out even knowing what I was doing.After i found out that it wasn't the steel guitar but me I bought 2 brands.... I didn't fool around with these steel guitars and never had a problem with them.Ron |
Larry Bell Member From: Englewood, Florida
|
posted 19 May 2005 08:42 AM
profile
From my experiences, the only two modern guitars I would buy are Fessenden and ZumSteel. I personally prefer the Fessy but played a ZumSteel for 20+ years and would certainly buy another under the right circumstances.I personally do not care for older MSA guitars, but have heard some players make them sound great. I'm also not fond of Mullen, Carter, or GFI guitars, but I might not have played 'the right one'. There's a feel thing that is hard to measure or quantify. I can sit down to a guitar and know instantly if it talks to me. It's equal parts feel and sound in my opinion. All new guitars have pretty good mechanics. I love old Emmons, Sho-Bud, and ZB guitars, but they can be a pain to keep running smooth. ------------------ Larry Bell - email: larry@larrybell.org - gigs - Home Page 2003 Fessenden S/D-12 8x8, 1969 Emmons S-12 6x6, 1971 Dobro, Standel and Peavey Amps [This message was edited by Larry Bell on 19 May 2005 at 08:43 AM.]
|
Dick Wood Member From: Springtown Texas, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 08:47 AM
profile
Bob C. While not exactly on topic,You've mentioned playing in your socks and I thought I would take it a step further.I like to get really comfortiable when I play. P.S. I tried to post a picture and it won't print. I can't seem to figure out where I'm going wrong. ------------------ Cops aren't paid much so I steel at night.[This message was edited by Dick Wood on 19 May 2005 at 08:54 AM.] [This message was edited by Dick Wood on 19 May 2005 at 09:04 AM.] [This message was edited by Dick Wood on 19 May 2005 at 09:28 AM.] |
Bob Carlucci Member From: Candor, New York, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 09:00 AM
profile
Dick.. thats really weird.. two players ,same pedals, one loved it the other depised it!!.. I mean I HATED those D pedals..... maybe my feet are bent and i kept hitting the sharp angles!!  |
Jim Cohen Member From: Philadelphia, PA
|
posted 19 May 2005 09:15 AM
profile
I never understood why a manufacturer would sacrifice ergonomic factors for vanity, i.e., making pedals shaped like their initials instead of symmetrical. That's one reason I never bought a Dekley back in the days they were being made. |
Bobby Lee Sysop From: Cloverdale, North California, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 09:23 AM
profile
I've sold several guitars because they didn't match well with my own artistic direction. It's wasn't that I disliked the guitar, just that I was moving on. The exception was a 1978 Emmons S-12, bought new and made to order. It was a wonderful sounding instrument, but I couldn't keep the pedals and levers in tune. Also, it broke a lot of strings. Maybe they were bad strings, I'm not sure. I actually loved the guitar but I hated it too. The Sierra Crown S-12 Keyless that replaced it didn't sound quite as rich, but it was a lot less trouble.------------------
Bobby Lee - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts Sierra SD-12 (Ext E9), Williams D-12 Crossover, Sierra S-12 (F Diatonic) Sierra Laptop 8 (E6add9), Fender Stringmaster (E13, C6, A6) |
Jimmy Gibson Member From: Cornwall, England
|
posted 19 May 2005 09:51 AM
profile
Mullen H/Wallace model,looked great played great,but had a terrible thin sound.Sho-Bud Profesional noisey,a pig to keep in tune and heavy, but had a most beautifull tone.J G.D10 EXCEL.Peavey Session 400 LTD,Ampeg SS70 AND LOADS OF OTHER TOYS. |
Smiley Roberts Member From: Hendersonville,Tn. 37075
|
posted 19 May 2005 10:42 AM
profile
RE: Dekley (1978) LOVE IT!! I'm,still,playin' it,to this day! The "D" pedals don't bother me a bit. It stays in tune,& has a great tone. The action on it is solid & easy.Worst one?........had to be the "MultiKord"! Cables kept bustin',& ya had to have a special "screwdriver/nutdriver" combo to tune the pedals. Piece o' junk!! ------------------ ~ ~ ©¿© It don't mean a thang, mm if it ain't got that twang. www.ntsga.com |
Adrienne Clasky Member From: Florida, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 11:01 AM
profile
You come up with the best topics! I've only had one steel, my little Carter Starter and I love it. My neighbors also love it: "I can't believe you get such great sound out of a giant Zither." I do know what you mean about the Carter's color, though. It's really a woman's color and you should not have to suffer with it! You should send it to me and. . . . Okay. I'll stop. Seriously, I am currently searching for my first pro model. I really appreciate this thread and the honest responses. It is really helping! |
Adrienne Clasky Member From: Florida, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 11:02 AM
profile
I didn't post twice. Stop that![This message was edited by Adrienne Clasky on 19 May 2005 at 11:16 AM.] |
Mark van Allen Member From: loganville, Ga. USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 11:49 AM
profile
Unlike a lot of folks, I really appreciated my Sho Bud Maverick- (Tom's first!) it was all I could afford and got me into playing. I sure wouldn't want it back now though! Other than that the only real dog I had was a Sierra Crown Keyless. b0b loved his, I hated mine. Overbuilt mechanically, and broke strings like crazy. I spent a lot of time getting to know the keyless setup, and still had times on stage where I'd put on 5 or 6 3rd strings before one would stay. Yuk.------------------ Stop by the Steel Store at: www.markvanallen.com
|
Billy Woo Member From: Los Angeles, CA, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 01:09 PM
profile
I had a MSA D-12 which in the case almost broke my foot and was so heavy that it dented my car door. The sound and tone were o.k. but as Dr. Zachary Smith would say " Oh my poor delicate back Dear William"..also early ZB D-10 was my first steel and way too much time & money to get it in tune and hardly any playing time. Bronco Billy
|
Leon Eneboe Member From: Sisseton, South Dakota, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 01:23 PM
profile
The worst steel for me was the one I started out with...a MultiChord 6 string, 4 pedals. The guitar was bad by todays standards, but, I give the Harlin Bros. credit...they probably got a lot of people into starting back in the early early fifties. Building them, like playing them...you start at the bottom and get better. |
Paddy Long Member From: Christchurch, New Zealand
|
posted 19 May 2005 01:42 PM
profile
The worst one for me was way back in the late 70's when I dabbled with a Sierra 12 string Uni -- this guitars pedal action was so stiff and hard it was almost unplayable, no matter how I adjusted it - and it had 3 different holes on the pedal to move the rod attachment, still no joy. You had to jump off the seat with a 40lb bag of cement on your back to get the pedals to go all the way down !! And yet the guy I sold it to loves it, and still has it I believe - although he weighs 280 lbs ha!!! |
Stephen Gambrell Member From: Ware Shoals, South Carolina, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 01:47 PM
profile
Paddy, you bring up a good point---All these steels you guys hated---Where are they now? In the hands of someone who loves the way they sound, or play, or tune??? |
Al Marcus Member From: Cedar Springs,MI USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 02:11 PM
profile
I don't know if I really disliked any of my guitars, but usually I moved on if they didn't feel comfortble to me or I was changing direction from Say D10 to S12 or S12 to D10, or looking for a lighter weight guitar,etc..........al
------------------ My Website..... www.cmedic.net/~almarcus/ |
Jack Stoner Sysop From: Inverness, Florida
|
posted 19 May 2005 02:17 PM
profile
I've only owned 3 pedal steel guitars. I can't say I disliked any, but the Fender 2000 probably came the closest. It only lasted 1 1/2 years. I've owned a 71 PP Emmons D-10 (Black of course) and my present 82 Franklin. |
Daniel J. Cormier Member From: Lake Charles, LA, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 03:01 PM
profile
Guitars I hated .Huuummmm !!!!!! How about a Rayline d-10 that was the most beautiful Bad guitar I ever owned. Oh what may be it was that old Wheeler D-10 I bought for parts.------------------ Daniel J. Cormier Desert Rose Lacquer D-10 EVans FET 500 LV Sessions 400 Limited ,ProFex II http://www.cajunsteelguitar.com email at djcormier@cox-internet.com
|
Randy Gilliam Member From: San Antonio, Texas, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 03:09 PM
profile
I have had a MSA Formica WHite Loved it Black 1973 Formica Love It 2 Mullens One royal precission one regular loved both Derby 2004 D 10 Could not tune This Guitar. Zum d10 I liked It. 1996 D10 Legrande My Absolute Favorite Tone Is Wonderful Plays Smooth Stays In Tune. |
jim milewski Member From: stowe, vermont
|
posted 19 May 2005 03:45 PM
profile
Sho Bud single neck with the pot metal fingers....awful tone, Deckley s12 awful, BMI S12, no sustain, I just stay with Emmons PP with locking nut (virtual keyless), all I could ask for, tone and tuning stabilty, sort of noisy under carriage, but with a little foam rubber in spots on the rods and I love it |
Mike Archer Member From: Church Hill, Tennessee, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 04:04 PM
profile
well for me it had to be my first steel sho-bud maverick it would brake changer fingers just about every time i would mash a and b pedals down and the tone was sounded like shasta for a better word had a blue mullens steel d10 great steel didnt like the color at all |
Rick Garrett Member From: Tyler, Texas
|
posted 19 May 2005 04:43 PM
profile
Sho Bud super pro. Hated that dadgum rattle trap. I like things kind of quiet under the hood. Still searching for my guitar actually. I have that 66 Emmons coming and Im hoping it'll fit me just fine. I seem to be having real trouble finding the right guitar that fits, feels, and sounds like what I want. If this Emmons doesn't do the trick I might hang up the steel all together and just go back to picking 6 string. I never knew it would be so hard finding the right guitar. Emmons legrand came as close as any.Rick |
JW Day Member From: Elizabethtown, Kentucky, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 04:44 PM
profile
in the late 70's I decided I wanted to trade my ZB FOR A NEW P/P.I had Bud Hall order a new blue one for me. We thought it would be a dark blue, but when it got here, it had to be one of the uglyyyyyyist colors ever mfg'd. But . needless to say it had that perfect sound. Now I wish I still had it. Bud has never let me live down. I can't say I blame him. |
Lem Smith Member From: Fulton, MS. U.S.A.
|
posted 19 May 2005 06:14 PM
profile
An Emmons short key-head model. Shrill, thin sounding, and the keys were almost impossible to turn. Had another one that was practically identical looking, and it played/sounded great. No idea what caused the difference though. |
Eric West Member From: Portland, Oregon, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 06:22 PM
profile
quote: b0b has stated more than once that this forum is for discussion of steel PLAYERS.. NOT a manufacturers hype forum. -Bob C-.
Hmm..... naawww..  EJL[This message was edited by Eric West on 19 May 2005 at 06:23 PM.] |
Jerry Erickson Member From: Atlanta,IL 61723
|
posted 19 May 2005 08:04 PM
profile
I can't think of any I've hated. They've all been part of a journey.(choke,gag,LOL) Kind of a technique and tonal stepping stone thing. I've owned a Fender 8 string,Bud Pro 1, MSA D-10, (2)D-12 Emmons PP, a D10 Emmons PP, a Fessy D10 and a GFI D10 and they've all had something to say. |
Scott Denniston Member From: Hahns Peak, Colorado, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 08:13 PM
profile
I really liked my ol Dekley's looks, mechanism, and sound BUT....The strings were a bit closer together than a Sho-Bud and lower to the neck. I could speed pick on it ok it's just that the Bud was more comfortable because of the string spacing and height. I was even used to the D shaped levers on the Dekley. That was one solid steel. I'd still be playing it if it hadn't been for that string thing. |
Ben Elder Member From: La Crescenta, California, USA
|
posted 19 May 2005 10:21 PM
profile
Liked just fine: '69/'70 ZB S-10. (Trouble was, I was not committed enough to playing and didn't know of any teachers in LA. I obviously was unaware of the SGF.)Hate (but want to love, and will not surrender to): **'69 ZB D-10. I see my latter sentiments are far from unique. One fortunate recent difference ("...more time adjusting than playing...") is I've recently borrowed a ca. '69 Sho-Bud S-10 Professional 6139 3+1. While it's no luxury machine and I'm no kinda player and I haven't adjusted the undercarriage yet, it's an exhilarating improvement over being stymied and pummeled by the D-10. Imagine the difference between being chauffeured in a Rolls-Royce with a bucket of Mumm's Extra Dry (my favorite) within easy reach as opposed to being dragged downhill over a gravel road behind a driverless, leaking Port-a-Potty pumper truck.
The disparity between the Sho-Bud and the ZB D-10 is more intense by a factor of two or three hundred times.
|
Johan Jansen Member From: Europe
|
posted 20 May 2005 06:28 AM
profile
wasn't tone in the hands?  JJ------------------ Click on the pic!
|
David Doggett Member From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
|
posted 20 May 2005 10:26 AM
profile
Okay, well I might as well join this bitch session. Some people might think this is all really petty, but I think it is valuable for newbies who are buying used instruments. Also, some manufacturers might learn a thing or two.My first pedal steel was one of the good early wood-neck Mavericks. Around 1974 I had Sho-Bud replace the original undercarriage with the latest Maverick undercarriage, which was not that different from a pro permanent. It was 3 and 2. I stripped off the original puke powder blue enamel and gave it a beautiful natural lacquer finish. But the 2nd string lower lever didn't always return true, and the pickup was a real hummer. Next I got an S12 extended E9 Emmons push/pull. Once I learned the trick of not tightening the neck too much, it has had unmatchable tone. I replaced the single-coil pickup with a TrueTone, and couldn't tell much difference - the original was that good. I have converted it to an E9/B6 3 and 4 universal, and will someday add more pedals and levers. With great difficulty, I have learned to keep it in playable adjustment. But the action is clunky and less adjustable compared to modern all-pulls. It threw a rod or something in the middle of a gig, and I haven't taken the time to repair it yet. But over the long run I will keep this instrument playable for it's great vintage tone. Next I got a used S12 universal Fessy. The BL 412 humbucker was shrill. Some of the string pins on the changer were too short. There was a catch at the end of travel on some pedals, caused by the pull rod twisting. I found setup changes difficult to make. The bellcrank screws were hard to get to, and the pull rods didn't slip into the bellcrank slots without bending the crank, and would sometimes pop out. The nut rollers were not gauged. For various reasons, this is less a problem with D10s, but is a major problem with a uni. When the Fessy got stolen, I took the opportunity to get a Zum uni. This '90s Zum is well designed, looks gorgeous, and has no major problems. I think I've found my true love. I love the V slots in the changer that hold the ball ends without popping out when changing strings. The nut rollers are gauged. Moving the old bellcranks insanely required removing the crossbar, and the bellcrank screws were hard to reach. The new Zum bellcranks are easier to change. Now I have a mixture of the two types, and will eventually replace all the old ones. I got a used Carter D12 to experiment with copedants. I wanted to try a Sacred Steeler E7 tuning on the outer neck, and a universal on the inner neck. But that has turned out to be a bigger job than I imagined. All the knee levers have to be taken off and repositioned, and I have to order a heckuva lot of parts. I'm wondering if I will ever get around to this project. Maybe it's just as well. The Carter mechanics seem good, but the nut rollers are not gauged. The color is somewhere between light turquoise and sky blue. Maybe that would look good out West somewhere, or in Hawaii, but anywhere else it looks silly. The plastic Carter fretboard may be practical, but it looks ugly compared to the brightly painted fretboards of my other steels. The low profile neck is probably a good idea. But it looks and feels strange to play. Most of these problems with the Carter may be unique to me and this guitar. I think Carters are good modern pedal steels. [This message was edited by David Doggett on 20 May 2005 at 10:57 AM.] |