Steel Guitar Strings
Strings & instruction for lap steel, Hawaiian & pedal steel guitars
http://SteelGuitarShopper.com
Ray Price Shuffles
Classic country shuffle styles for Band-in-a-Box, by BIAB guru Jim Baron.
http://steelguitarmusic.com

This Forum is CLOSED.
Go to bb.steelguitarforum.com to read and post new messages.


  The Steel Guitar Forum
  Steel Players
  Bar Slants (Page 3)

Post New Topic  
your profile | join | preferences | help | search


This topic is 4 pages long:   1  2  3  4 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Bar Slants
Stephen Gambrell
Member

From: Ware Shoals, South Carolina, USA

posted 19 June 2005 06:03 PM     profile     
Listen to Stacy Phillips play three-string slants on the dobro. The 2 outside strings are in tune, and he chokes the string in the middle, to bring it up to pitch. I think Mike Auldridge calls 'em "hockey-stick" slants.

[This message was edited by Stephen Gambrell on 19 June 2005 at 07:37 PM.]

Marty Pollard
Member

From: a confidential source

posted 19 June 2005 10:20 PM     profile     
Yeah, I've seen guys do that; aMAZing!
George Redmon
Member

From:

posted 19 June 2005 11:40 PM     profile     
hehehehehe.....at HowardR, my sides hurt! here is to egg in your beer howard! no matter how you.."Slant" it!

------------------

Whitney Single 12 8FL & 5 KN,keyless, dual changers Extended C6th, Webb Amp, Line6 PodXT, Goodrich Curly Chalker Volume Pedal, Match Bro, BJS Bar..I was keyless....when keyless wasn't cool....


Chris Scruggs
Member

From: Nashville, Tennessee, USA

posted 20 June 2005 12:36 AM     profile     
Marty,

Isn't the entire scale length of a steel guitar a "tangent point"? I consider that an advantage the steel guitar has over its Spanish cousin, it can be played out of tune!

But seriously, a friend of mine once said,"Life's to short for bar slants". I them witnessed him spend 10 minutes screwing in legs, attaching a pedal rack, setting up pedals, tuning pedals, tuning knee levers, tuning open strings, and then he hit his B pedal and snapped a 3rd string. I then decided life was two short for that, so I took my Fender Dual 8 (and the beard I grew watching him set up that guitar), went home and played the exact same song but with some bar slants and string pulls.

CS

Marty Pollard
Member

From: a confidential source

posted 20 June 2005 07:57 AM     profile     
Yeah, well I stood and watched you play at Bobbe's shop last summer. You know how to do it properly cuz you put in the time.

You have my official permission to use bar slants in public.

Also, it just occurred to me that slants would be so much easier on the wrist (and the ears) if the scale length were SO much shorter. On my dobro, to slant from a I triad to a IV triad on the first three strings requires too radical a slant to be used effectively (especially at speed).

[This message was edited by Marty Pollard on 20 June 2005 at 08:00 AM.]

Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 20 June 2005 08:04 AM     profile     
If you slant the bar with your wrist, you're doing it worng. You should control the bar with your fingers, not with your wrist.
Chris Scruggs
Member

From: Nashville, Tennessee, USA

posted 20 June 2005 08:40 AM     profile     
You are right, Marty, about short scale guitars. Most players who use alot of slants use the 22.5" scale. This was pretty much the standard scale for electric steel guitar in the 30's through the mid fifties. A short scale makes it alot easier on you. A smaller bar helps as well.

CS

P.S. And thanks you on the allowance of public slanting.

[This message was edited by Chris Scruggs on 20 June 2005 at 08:43 AM.]

[This message was edited by Chris Scruggs on 20 June 2005 at 08:44 AM.]

Dave Grafe
Member

From: Portland, Oregon, USA

posted 20 June 2005 09:02 AM     profile     
I just had no idea that asking "who does this" should turn into a conversation all about whether or not we have permission to do so and if so from whom!

Thanks to all who have posted on-topic, and my profuse thanks to b0b for not closing the thread when he received permission to do so.

dg

Klaus Caprani
Member

From: Copenhagen, Denmark

posted 20 June 2005 09:25 AM     profile     
And once more thanks to you Dave, for opening my eyes for this.
It seriously added a whole new dimension

------------------
Klaus Caprani

MCI RangeXpander S-10 3x4
www.klauscaprani.com


David Wren
Member

From: Placerville, California, USA

posted 20 June 2005 09:28 AM     profile     
Hey Dave, not to lesson the passion in this discussion but BTW, I know those licks in the Brumley version of that song, although I play 'em differently. I still remember how impressed I was with the originality of this move, and Tom Brumley in general... gee, that was way back when the album was released.... amazing ain't it?

------------------
Dave Wren
'95Carter S12-E9/B6,7X7; Session500; Hilton Pedal
www.ameechapman.com

Dave Grafe
Member

From: Portland, Oregon, USA

posted 20 June 2005 09:43 AM     profile     
Amazing that it's still setting a standard of sorts forty years later!

I'm sure if I had that 9-string D>C# move on a lever I'd play it differently now, too. With my little 3+2 I do what I have to do and so far I haven't run out of good notes on it.

Of course I never seem to run out of bad ones, either -- I can play out of tune just fine WITHOUT using bar slants.

dg

[This message was edited by Dave Grafe on 20 June 2005 at 09:48 AM.]

Marty Pollard
Member

From: a confidential source

posted 20 June 2005 09:45 AM     profile     
God Dave, you seriously need humor enhancement surgery dude.
Dave Grafe
Member

From: Portland, Oregon, USA

posted 20 June 2005 09:52 AM     profile     
Ahem, Marty, your manners are showing again....!
George Redmon
Member

From:

posted 20 June 2005 10:53 AM     profile     
hummm..."on Topic"...? EVERYONE posted "On Topic"...if it were anymore, "On Topic"..no one would read it. A little humor to move things along is always nice...you got your point across, your question was answered, you got tips, hints, humor, replies, nice pictures, history from our good friend Al Marcus, we got a lesson in music theory, cultural enhancement,...my goodness all in one post...and you're still not happy? does the word "Complainer" ever come to mind?lighten up just a weeeee tad bit my friend Dave...i just know you are way to nice a guy to be nasty,........

------------------

Whitney Single 12 8FL & 5 KN,keyless, dual changers Extended C6th, Webb Amp, Line6 PodXT, Goodrich Curly Chalker Volume Pedal, Match Bro, BJS Bar..I was keyless....when keyless wasn't cool....


[This message was edited by George Redmon on 20 June 2005 at 10:56 AM.]

Carlos Polidura
Member

From: Brooklyn, New York, USA

posted 20 June 2005 10:59 AM     profile     
i slant the bar when i play "LAP STEEL"... AND I SLANT THE BAR WHEN PLAY "PEDAL STEEL"......................................
as needed.........
thanks

carlos

Bobby Lee
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, North California, USA

posted 20 June 2005 11:11 AM     profile     
quote:
Also, it just occurred to me that slants would be so much easier on the wrist (and the ears) if the scale length were SO much shorter.
The strings are too close together on pedal steel to slant on adjacent strings. When you have a string between the strings you're playing, slants aren't as radical and the shorter scale isn't really necessary.

For example, a non-pedal player E7 player will slant to get harmonies between the middle E and the middle G#. On pedal steel there's an F# string in between, so the angle isn't as great even though the scale is longer.

And again I'll point out that slanting is done with the hand, not with the wrist. People who move their wrist to do a bar slant don't have as much control and are more likely to play out of tune.

Someone earlier criticized the "out of tune" reverse slant to get a diminished chord on strings 5,6 and 8. I agree that the interval between strings 5 and 6 will be a bit out, but if you tuned JI this interval (a minor third) is 15 cents wider than ET anyway. The slight slant between strings 5 and 6 narrows the interval, bringing it close to ET. Our ears can tolerate that as not being "out of tune". Besides, the tension of the diminished triad is the effect we're going for anyway. The chord will always want to resolve to something sweeter, even if the intervals are "perfect".

I don't use that particular slant (the F lever is so much easier) but I defend those who do. It's a valid musical effect, IMHO.

------------------
Bobby Lee - email: quasar@b0b.com - gigs - CDs, Open Hearts
Williams D-12 E9, C6add9, Sierra Olympic S-12 (F Diatonic)
Sierra Laptop S-8 (E6add9), Fender Stringmaster D-8 (E13, C6 or A6)

Dave Grafe
Member

From: Portland, Oregon, USA

posted 20 June 2005 01:05 PM     profile     
Thanks for the excellent words, George, I am always glad to see what you have to say here on the forum.

I'm far from being unhappy with this thread, for all the reasons that you mention and more. and I appreciate the fabulous tangential information that has been generated here, there are so many very knowledgeable and eclectic minds in this community that one never knows what one will learn today.

peace - dg

[This message was edited by Dave Grafe on 20 June 2005 at 01:09 PM.]

Herb Steiner
Member

From: Cedar Valley, Travis County TX

posted 20 June 2005 02:05 PM     profile     
One thing that may or may not have been mentioned about the 8-6-5 diminished slant... or any of the Jerry Byrd slants that involve two notes at one fret and one note on another adjacent fret... is that the notes are all "equalized" if a small amount of vibrato is used.

------------------
Herb's Steel Guitar Pages
Texas Steel Guitar Association


Al Terhune
Member

From: Newcastle, WA

posted 20 June 2005 10:48 PM     profile     
Ditto what b0b said -- no wrist action, please. Just fingers. Warning: The bar will fly from your hand at times...I lost her twice yesterday while recording! Fortunately, my Red Rajah didn't lose any of it's coating (I use vinyl tile in my "studio"). I always have an extra bar when playing live just in case...so far, never had to use it...which means next time out I'll throw it out to the third row...
David Mason
Member

From: Cambridge, MD, USA

posted 21 June 2005 03:46 AM     profile     
quote:
The strings are too close together on pedal steel to slant on adjacent strings.

Huh? This problem goes away the higher you go up the neck. Three and even four string slants are easy to reach with the bar above the 12th fret. However, a new problem is introduced, called "intonation" or something like that. You might want to look around for a guy named "Marty", he seems to have an opinion about it.

In relation to this, I've heard of something called "practice", but I'm way too busy dicking around on my computer to figure out that that is.

Frank Parish
Member

From: Nashville,Tn. USA

posted 21 June 2005 12:27 PM     profile     
It never took me ten minutes to set up my guitar with all the pedals and knee levers. I very seldom have to tune anything but the open strings so the time thing isn't a factor. I use bar slants as much as I need to and sometimes instead of the F lever just because but try playing Highway 40 Blues like Bruce without pedals and knee levers. I think not! If the pedals weren't so cool then why did BE and everybody else run out and start working on their guitars to try to get that sound? Pedals are definitely better and if you don't want to use them for that old timey sound then don't!

[This message was edited by Frank Parish on 21 June 2005 at 12:28 PM.]

Chris Scruggs
Member

From: Nashville, Tennessee, USA

posted 21 June 2005 01:13 PM     profile     
Frank,

That was supossed to be a joke. I geuss it wasn't. Still, I always prefer raw technique to mechanics. Now if you'll excuse me, I have to walk across the room and change the channel on my TV. My rabbit ears need adjusting, too.

Buddy Emmons can also play all night long on a straight T-8 Fender. Thats part of why he's so good. He got as good as he was without them, and then the pedals took it to another level. He's not dependant on his pedals. He is in control of his instrument. Sure, one might not be able to play the exact same thing without them, but Kayton Roberts doesn't sound "old timey" (though he can if the song calls for it). He plays that old red Fender as a musical instrument, not a lick machine (a nasty habit many steel players, pedals AND non, easily fall into).

CS

[This message was edited by Chris Scruggs on 21 June 2005 at 01:20 PM.]

[This message was edited by Chris Scruggs on 21 June 2005 at 01:21 PM.]

Frank Parish
Member

From: Nashville,Tn. USA

posted 21 June 2005 03:31 PM     profile     
No problem Chris. I'm enjoying having the windows open today with fans in them.
Chris Scruggs
Member

From: Nashville, Tennessee, USA

posted 21 June 2005 03:53 PM     profile     
The most impressive part is how us non pedal players post on this forum with manual typewriters.
Joe Savage
Member

From: St. Paul, MN

posted 21 June 2005 08:34 PM     profile     
Chris,
Have a good show at Lee's this week. Wish I could come hear ya, but I've got a gig.
I've been doing a house gig @ Lee's every Monday for the past 3+ years. (pedals w/ occasional slant)
Have fun.
Joe Savage
HowardR
Member

From: N.Y.C.,N.Y.

posted 22 June 2005 05:01 AM     profile     
Yeah, I slant...


Terry Edwards
Member

From: Layton, UT

posted 22 June 2005 08:28 AM     profile     
Man, we all have got to get together and buy HowardR some new curtains!


Terry

Roy Ayres
Member

From: Starke, Florida, USA

posted 22 June 2005 08:34 AM     profile     
Thanks, Howard R, -- I had no idea what they were talking about until your photo explained "slants" on a steel guitar.

------------------

Visit my Web Site at RoysFootprints.com
Browse my Photo Album and be sure to sign my Guest Book.

Donny Hinson
Member

From: Balto., Md. U.S.A.

posted 22 June 2005 08:56 AM     profile     
The worst "bar slant" I ever experienced was Slim Brow's. (LOL!)

Any old player from Baltimore will know exactly what I'm talkin' about!

The rest of you will just have to guess...for awhile. (It's an east Baltimore triva question.)

Franklin
Member

From:

posted 22 June 2005 12:44 PM     profile     
Not mastering the bar slant is like a magician not mastering slight of hand tricks.

Mastering bar technique should include the slant.

If the tuning of triad slants is bothersome try what I prefer, slant the bar using two strings, instead of three. This way both slanted strings can be brought to perfect intonation.

When you listen to your favorite players, notice that most of those greats slant the bar for small measures of time. Such as sixteenth, eighth, and at the most quarter notes, not whole notes. Utilizing the slants this way leaves the tuning issue a non-starter.

Paul

Eric West
Member

From: Portland, Oregon, USA

posted 23 June 2005 11:30 PM     profile     
Beating chords played with a time span less than the beats..

That'd tie those beatless players' panties in a knot..

I suppose Mr Mudgett's theorum would apply.

quote:
A*cos(w1*t) + A*cos(w2*t) = 2A*cos{(w1-w2)*t/2}cos{(w1+w2)*t/2 -D Mudgett-

I might ask or suggest that he make a couple more cyphers dissallowing notes in the mix above or below a certain range as just not being part of the overall equation, and as well giving that at a certain percentile of the notes being in unison, that a minor number of dissonant ones be omitted, or not figured in. After all, Shinola doesn't make S#it any shinier.

Then a note value less than the beats of the dissonant chords might be added in the equation.

BTW, I went to Duff's Garage tonight and heard Dave G play, and all his slants sounded good to me.

EJL

[This message was edited by Eric West on 23 June 2005 at 11:35 PM.]

Terje Larson
Member

From: Rinkeby, Spånga, Sweden

posted 24 June 2005 12:52 PM     profile     
Originally posted by Marty Pollard

For your information Dave, the tones you're referring to are nothing more than the flatted third and flatted seventh, not the flat flatted third or flat flatted seventh. Yes Dave, I most certainly DO know what I'm talking about.

And to think that I would have to read such nonsense in a slide guitar forum... boggles the mind...

------------------
If you can't hear the others you're too loud, if you can't hear yourself you've gone deaf

Marty Pollard
Member

From: a confidential source

posted 24 June 2005 01:21 PM     profile     
You don't HAVE to read it Turgid. Unless there's some kind of law over there forcing you to face the truth.

And if you don't understand it, warn me before you play in my neighborhood so I can find some other place to be.

Dave Mudgett
Member

From: Central Pennsylvania, USA

posted 24 June 2005 07:51 PM     profile     
As usual, Mr. Franklin nails it on the head. I can't think of anything to add, the formula stands on its own. The idea is to get the notes 'close enough' so you don't hear the dissonance over the note interval.

BTW, the trigonometric sum formula is hundreds of years old, and definitely not something of my origination. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to take credit for it, but it wouldn't fly. It can be shown using a theorem of Leonhard Euler (1707-1783), and probably goes back further than that.

Terje Larson
Member

From: Rinkeby, Spånga, Sweden

posted 24 June 2005 10:02 PM     profile     
Originally posted by Marty Pollard

You don't HAVE to read it Turgid.

Get my name straight will you. I really appreaciate people making fun of it.

------------------
If you can't hear the others you're too loud, if you can't hear yourself you've gone deaf

Marty Pollard
Member

From: a confidential source

posted 25 June 2005 12:24 AM     profile     
So sorry General Turgidson!

Yes, Paul is correct of course. It's that darned middle note I was referring to...

I haven't watched the 'Players' video to catch how much Paul slants; I'm primarily watching Brent.

How about it Paul? Do you slant much or do you mostly let the pedals/levers do the 'talking'?

Terje Larson
Member

From: Rinkeby, Spånga, Sweden

posted 25 June 2005 06:56 AM     profile     
Nope Marty, not good enough, I don't have that kind of humor.

You're just gonna have to call me by my real name, which is what I'm using for a moniker, and stop making fun of it. You're gonna have to show me that respect or I can't really respect you.

I do not agree with your opinions on blue notes, which was what I was expressing in my first reply to this thread and you may or may not want to discuss this, but first we're gonna have to get over this hurdle.

------------------
If you can't hear the others you're too loud, if you can't hear yourself you've gone deaf

[This message was edited by Terje Larson on 25 June 2005 at 07:44 AM.]

Marty Pollard
Member

From: a confidential source

posted 25 June 2005 07:47 AM     profile     
whatever...

turgid - adj 1: ostentatiously lofty in style; "a man given to large talk"; "tumid political prose" [syn: bombastic, declamatory, large, orotund, tumid]

And General Turgidson is a character in Dr. Strangelove who, like you, well... just watch the movie.

edit:

quote:
And to think that I would have to read such nonsense in a slide guitar forum... boggles the mind...

Hey pal, maybe 'nonsense' means something different translated from Swedish but in MY neck of the woods it's disrespectful.

And since you understand the usage of the term 'boggles the mind', then I'm pretty sure you understand the meaning of the word 'nonsense'.

If you don't like my responses then what can I say? Do they have a term for rubbery feces in Sweden?

[This message was edited by Marty Pollard on 25 June 2005 at 07:53 AM.]

Terje Larson
Member

From: Rinkeby, Spånga, Sweden

posted 25 June 2005 12:37 PM     profile     
Originally posted by Marty Pollard:

Hey pal, maybe 'nonsense' means something different translated from Swedish but in MY neck of the woods it's disrespectful.

Point taken. Although I must say that I'm not making fun of you or your name, just saying that I think your opinion in this matter is nonsensical.

So, what do you say, let's be civil here shall we. Just please drop the name thing, OK. It's a raw nerve since childhood (it's a Norwegian name, I grew up in Sweden, get the picture?), I just don't get along well with people who make fun of that part of my person. Anything else is pretty much fair game, I'm not very sensitive otherwise, just try me.

And yes, I did perhaps come on too strong about something that has already been discussed in this thread, I just think that your statement on blue notes, and the few sentences that followed it in that post are very wrong. Blue notes, in order to sound right have to be "out of tune". And no, they don't always have to resolve to sound good either. But when blues became rock and roll and rock became popular the blue notes got polished up not to frighten the kids.

But most important right now perhaps, none of this means that I don't respect you as a person, I just disagree with you. For now. Feel free to argue over the subject at any given time and if you prove to me I'm way off here then I'll gladly admit to that too.

------------------
If you can't hear the others you're too loud, if you can't hear yourself you've gone deaf

[This message was edited by Terje Larson on 25 June 2005 at 12:38 PM.]

Steinar Gregertsen
Member

From: Arendal, Norway

posted 25 June 2005 12:51 PM     profile     
quote:
(it's a Norwegian name, I grew up in Sweden, get the picture?)

Yep.

Steinar

------------------
www.gregertsen.com



This topic is 4 pages long:   1  2  3  4 

All times are Pacific (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Pedal Steel Pages

Note: Messages not explicitly copyrighted are in the Public Domain.

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46

Our mailing address is:
The Steel Guitar Forum
148 South Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Support the Forum