posted 09 November 2005 01:50 PM
profile
b0b, I think you might be missing the mark - i.e. all the "pickin' on the (Beatles, Stones, Eagles, etc) CD's that are sold, where a bluegrass band plays rock songs. I think you're dismissing the idea far too quickly when the precedent has already been set, albeit not with steel. And "in the style of" means playing close facsimilies of the songs - it's already done with standard guitar...why can't the licks be adapted to steel?Fact - they can.
There is NO reason steel arrangements couldn't be worked out for the real songs either - and it's not as absurd as your oboe or marimba suggestions indicate. Just because the steel's not there now doesn't mean it can't be in some cover band (actually, I've heard cover bands with steel do such material).
Check out Flea Market Music - Jim Beloff has a wide selection of books that have actual songs from the 60's...including Beatles tunes...arranged for ukelele. a truly wide range of material - Surf songs, Dock of the Bay, various Motown hits. Do you think there's a huge market for that?
If he can do it, why can't the teachers in the steel community do it?
"BTW, I can play any Beatles song from the sheet music if I need to. So yes, I can play them note-for-note. That's the route I would recommend to a student who wants to learn Beatles tunes."
Fine for sight readers...but most steel and guitar players don't read music from what I've seen. And that doesn't help the beginning student with educational methodology in a breadth of styles outside country.
It seems to boil down to this - what is the source of your resistance to it?
[This message was edited by Jim Sliff on 09 November 2005 at 01:54 PM.]