Author
|
Topic: C6th lap steel modal theory site
|
Jody Carver Member From: The Knight Of Fender Tweed. Dodger Blue Forever
|
posted 27 July 2003 07:09 AM
profile edit
I will confer with my Financial advisor at Merril Lynch. I wanted to see this thread reach 280. Where is the C Position on an E tuning? I forgot 280 posts ago. |
Gene Jones Member From: Oklahoma City, OK USA
|
posted 27 July 2003 09:22 AM
profile edit
Jody, I don't believe there is a "C" position on an "E" tuning....at least I never found it! www.genejones.com [This message was edited by Gene Jones on 27 July 2003 at 09:23 AM.] |
Jody Carver Member From: The Knight Of Fender Tweed. Dodger Blue Forever
|
posted 27 July 2003 09:33 AM
profile edit
Gene By jove I think I found it,,if so, I'll mail it to you FedEx. Oh Say Can You "C". |
HowardR Member From: N.Y.C.,N.Y.
|
posted 27 July 2003 09:46 AM
profile send email edit
Gene,....you got roped into being the straight man for Jody.Better you than me this time.... |
Jody Carver Member From: The Knight Of Fender Tweed. Dodger Blue Forever
|
posted 27 July 2003 10:56 AM
profile edit
Howard The Forum Photgrapher writes......... Better you than me this time....
You're Next Wise Guy. Gene works cheaper,I cant always afford you besides you are not a COWBOY. You are part Indian, I know I have seen your "feathers" I forget which part
[This message was edited by Jody Carver on 27 July 2003 at 05:39 PM.] |
David L. Donald Member From: Koh Samui Island, Thailand
|
posted 12 November 2003 03:04 PM
profile send email edit
bump for newbies |
Andy Volk Member From: Boston, MA
|
posted 12 November 2003 05:12 PM
profile send email edit
Now cut that out!! No reviving 8-page threads. Help - Brad - Help! |
David L. Donald Member From: Koh Samui Island, Thailand
|
posted 03 March 2004 02:24 PM
profile send email edit
bumped for historical reference of newbies |
Harry Williams Member From: Duncan, Vancouver Island, BC, Canada
|
posted 03 March 2004 03:07 PM
profile send email edit
Well, I learned a MESS of stuff on this thread, and I'm still referring to it. Thanks to all the contributors!!!Harry ------------------
|
Denny Turner Member From: Northshore Oahu, Hawaii USA
|
posted 05 March 2004 10:37 AM
profile send email edit
Well shootz; I might as well update my excited experience with the modal substitution / navigation system as well.Even though I discovered and wrote the darn system ...simply passing on a gift from the cosmos that litterally jumped off the fret board one night after several months searching for it, and attacked my face and brain like an octopus in heat....; What it affords continues to excite and amaze me and truely did open the barn door to the music cosmos for me, where I can now play along with just about anyone and any style of music; ...which affords a profound freedom to learn from cumulative experiences and experimentaion in that realm. A current case in point: A Friend that stops by the shop and house several times a week is one of those guys that carries some type of guitar with him just about everywhere he goes, even if it's just his midget baritone-ukulele-size classical guitar; ...and he rather subconciously can and does carry on a normal conversation while playing free-form chord voicings to tonal passages that seem to be always floating around in his head, ...a subconcious ambience of background music that's disconnected from the ongoing verbal conversation, if you will. A number of great and famous guitarists are/were that compulive about music. For about a year now I have been greatly enjoying casually jamming with this Friend around the shop and house when I have to time to do it. He will play delicious extention chord voicings to melodic tones that drift in his head or particular tone-center lines or patterns he had mentally cataglogued and come to mind at the moment. Most of what he hears in his mind is modally-grounded melodic even if it's not of the church-mode parent scale; Allowing whatever parent scale he is hearing at the moment to drift through the modes of the parent scale in his head ...which he applies the delicious and exotic chord voicings to without much concious pre-thought about it. He himself did not know that his brain was processing tones modally until I explained it to him; Actually meaning nothing more than his brain having a great ear and processing notes that are all harmonic to each other via a master scale of notes as an armature to work from ...which is the amazingly SIMPLE meaning of modes in the first place (with everything else applied to modes being the complications most Musicians shy away from due to the complexity of the historically vast accumulations of discussions and ideas applied to the SIMPLICITY of modes). I would have been quite lost on Steel Guitar prior to my finding and working with the modal approaches. But having now worked with it for a few years as THE foundation of my Steel playing, I am usually able to follow right along with whatever comes out of this Friend's head / fingers; And quite amazing to me is that doing so up and down the Steel fretboard usually happens ever-increasingly with fewer seams the more I use the modal approaches (which of course is normal to practice and exposure more than to any approach), ...with my subconcious moving my hands and fingers to usually correct modal fret-box positions way ahead of my concious thinking that's often way behind in trying to figure out the positional math of what my auto-motor sub-concious and hands are finding. Of course this is what we all strive for in developing seamless translation from our ears and/or brains to our hands ...and a darn good gauge of how well that is occuring in our learning curve. I might also mention that if my hands move to an incomplete modal box, the old 1/2 step trick comes into play, of knowing that ANY "wrong" note (inharmonious) is only 1/2 step away up or downscale to a harmonious note that will make the inharmonious note sound like it was intended. Another technique I have noticed that my brain has picked up with the modal methods, is that I can carry several simultaneous notes up / down the fretboard by drifting the Tone Bar until those several notes become harmonic, usually in the fully modal fret box, ...but if not when the other fret in the box is moved to, then the old 1/2 step trick comes into play on one or two notes that can be slanted into harmony, and the hand resumes carrying several notes somewhere else in search for the fully modal box. In these brain-motor processes, whatever my hands are playing can usually be carried up and down the neck in a remarkably convincing manners ...particularly by walking slant bar positions that also help the brain register on the fully modal fret-box, ...which is afforded by the brain hearing and knowing the modal connections in whatever tonal voicings are being followed / sought in the flow of the music. As I encounter particularly interesting places my subconcious goes to, I can remain and experiment in that fretboard box long enough for my concious brain to catch up analytically and experiment long enough to try to slip some of that interesting place into my memory ...although recalling from that memory is allot less succesful than putting it there in the short time spent in that fretboard box before moving along to what might come next from my Friends tone / chord passages; But repetition builds those experiences into ability. In any event, ...I continue to be often amazed and excited about the barn door to the music cosmos that the modal substitution / navigation concepts have afforded me on the Steel Guitar ...and even carried back over to spanish and bass guitar where my use of modal concepts began many years ago. A very simple exercise a person can immediately do to realize the treasure of modal approaches (a demonstration and NOT a playing technique until it is fully understood and developed), is to pick up a bass guitar and play NOTHING more than ANY combination of notes in the mode a simple and familiar song is written upon. If the song is written around Dominant 7 scale / chords, then just play the IVMaj7 scale notes (because IVMaj7 = I7) ... nothing more; And if the song is written in min7 like most all blues are, then play nothing but bVIIMaj7 scale notes (because bVIIMaj7 = Imin7). When the chords change, STAY on the 1 (one / I) chord throughout the song. Although taste and flavor come from the manner in which notes are played in passages, the ability to make ANY combination of notes work by playing nothing more than the mode scale, is quite revealing of what the SIMPLE armature of modal approaches is all about and affords. Aloha, Denny T~ |
David L. Donald Member From: Koh Samui Island, Thailand
|
posted 02 May 2004 09:46 AM
profile send email edit
bump |
W Franco Member From: silverdale,WA. USA
|
posted 11 May 2004 09:59 AM
profile send email edit
This really is great stuff. I've had a lot of trouble thinking of the scale for each chord in a song. Not only is it incredible difficult for me...you need to know the song cold to do this. But also its not easy to play nice long flowing lines with this process. One of the first things I learned is to take a series of chords and find the proper major scale they all fit in. A perfect example is All the Things you are. For brevity I'll just mention the first I believe 5 measures Fm7,Bbm7/Eb7,Ab/Db,Fm7-5/C Etc....All use the Ab major scale until you C. It is so much easier to just think Ab major scale when jaming on this. I kinda thought it was cheating in a way because it was so much easier. I think it does allow you more time to be creative and certainly a lot smoother. To me that is why this modal approch is so cool. The freedom to "just play" is such a wonderful and rewarding thing. |
David L. Donald Member From: Koh Samui Island, Thailand
|
posted 11 May 2004 11:37 AM
profile send email edit
WF. You got it. That is the main issue with modes, once they get into your head, they make things easier, not harder.I also look at that Ab maj scale as it's Fminor / relative minor scale too. So I can play off of either, as well as slipping those 1/2 note on or off mode/scale blue notes in there. Since this thread, my C6 6 string work be came very natural. But also on the 10 string w/pedals it became less of a Serengehttli plain of notes, and more a nice bunch of cool places for licks. I was using similar stuff on my 6 string bass, but this thread expanded that too. Said it before, I'll say it again. MERCI DENNY!!! And I'll keep bumping this from time to time. |
W Franco Member From: silverdale,WA. USA
|
posted 11 May 2004 12:32 PM
profile send email edit
One thing that is interesting about this subject is the way you mostly hear steel guitar. A lot of the music played seems to be very worked out, precise stuff. You know the best players probably sound that way even if they are "jamming". Playing at a Show would certainly not be a jam unless it is set up like that in advance. I've not been to any Jazz festivals but I would imagin that playing what you feel at the time would be way more prevelent just because of the nature of the music. |
HowardR Member From: N.Y.C.,N.Y.
|
posted 11 May 2004 04:30 PM
profile send email edit
So what happens when your tuning is C6/A7 where the 6th string is C# instead of C? I imagine that you have to adjust for the half step, but how bad does it throw a monkey wrench in the works?Also, from the ist page (I'm really forging ahead).....John Steele writes: (quote) When I refer to the "melodic minor" (jazz minor) above, the scale is identical to the major scale except the third tone is flattened.. whether going up or down. In classical theory it's different ascending than descending.[/quote] I thought the melodic minor was basically a natural minor scale with the 6th and 7th notes of the scale raised 1/2 step (ascending). I'm not clear on the flatting of the 3rd note of the scale.[This message was edited by HowardR on 11 May 2004 at 05:08 PM.] |
W Franco Member From: silverdale,WA. USA
|
posted 12 May 2004 08:09 AM
profile send email edit
As I sit here this morning, eating my oatmeal and looking at this mother of all threads , Seeking the mushroom of meaning in this wonderful information. A question about practice comes to mind. When I started practicing scales I found it useful to learn the different scale off the root note in the different positions. That was especially when new at this I could more easily identify the scale tones. To me, starting with the important tones that for me are more easily recognized out of the major position is a good "set up" for flowing into the mode area. At least starting out. Once you have it under your hands and know the tones one could obviously start anywhere they wanted to. Any feedback on this. Also wouldn't this apply going in and out from church mode scales to non church mode scales as your taste dictates. |
Rick Aiello Member From: Berryville, VA USA
|
posted 12 May 2004 08:19 AM
profile send email edit
quote: To me, starting with the important tones that for me are more easily recognized out of the major position is a good "set up" for flowing into the mode area. At least starting out. Once you have it under your hands and know the tones one could obviously start anywhere they wanted to. Any feedback on this
Thats exactly how I taught myself modes years ago ... as stated way back in this "monster" somewhere. Instead of huntin' it down in this thread ... have a look at my approach here .. Church Modes in C6 Howard, I always play C6/A7 and as you said ... just bump up that 6th string ... no biggie ------------------ www.horseshoemagnets.com [This message was edited by Rick Aiello on 05 January 2005 at 06:49 AM.] |
W Franco Member From: silverdale,WA. USA
|
posted 12 May 2004 10:24 AM
profile send email edit
Thanks Rick...I did look at your site and it is really great. I have a lot of woodsheding to do. What fun |
basilh Member From: United Kingdom
|
posted 18 May 2004 02:41 PM
profile send email edit
Is this a 'Record' yet? Baz------------------ quote: Steel players do it without fretting
http://www.waikiki-islanders.com |
David L. Donald Member From: Koh Samui Island, Thailand
|
posted 18 May 2004 03:37 PM
profile send email edit
Basil I think this one has been the record for sometime. And will likely remain so. So much good stuff always worth a bump! |
Dwayne Martineau Member From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
|
posted 19 May 2004 09:29 AM
profile send email edit
(Edited to add this question)So, what exactly is meant by "church modes"? Just a family of common modes or something? Are they all built on the same sequence of intervals? I'm fairly versed in theory, but I've never heard this phrase before. Etymology, anyone? -Dm[This message was edited by Dwayne Martineau on 19 May 2004 at 12:01 PM.] |
Andy Volk Member From: Boston, MA
|
posted 19 May 2004 10:21 AM
profile send email edit
As the "father" of this thread I respectfully suggest that you don't take up b0b's bandwidth with any more "wow this the biggest thread" posts. If you can add musical content - great. Personally, I think it would make it easier to follow if it were closed and split into a couple of threads. |
Denny Turner Member From: Northshore Oahu, Hawaii USA
|
posted 19 May 2004 03:17 PM
profile send email edit
Hi Dad. If I'm not badly mistaken, bandwidth is used only for a page displayed (with the remaining pages still sitting on the HD just like the other thousands of SGF pages), although a smidgin of server HD space of probably around .0001% would be used by this thread. If I'm wrong please let me know and I'll darn sure send bOb a check for $20 to pay for the overload; You've probably already made up any difference in commissions to bOb for your excellent publications.And hey, what's up; Mom sent me to the store this morning for a loaf of bread and when I got back home you guys had moved ! Didn't have anything to do with my new "big" biker chick girlfriend I brought home last night did it? She is gonna get her nose and teeth fixed, you know. Aloha, RHRF, DT~
[This message was edited by Denny Turner on 19 May 2004 at 03:28 PM.] |
Denny Turner Member From: Northshore Oahu, Hawaii USA
|
posted 19 May 2004 03:52 PM
profile send email edit
Dwayne,Church modes is a not-uncommon slang word meaning modes derived from a Major 7 scale. We inherited modal approaches to the Maj7 scale from about 400 years of Classical Music theory. But when jazz guys during the be-bop era started experimenting around with "moding" more exotic scales and moding each of the modes of the Maj7 scale off of each other; Then the term "church modes" appeared "tongue in cheek" to mean modes of the Maj7 scale like this discussion chain is based upon, and to differentiate those simple first generation modes of the Maj7 scale from exotic modes such as the Super Locrian discussed earlier in this discussion chain. Aloha, Denny T~ |
Jeff Lampert Member From: queens, new york city
|
posted 02 June 2004 08:08 PM
profile send email edit
.[This message was edited by Jeff Lampert on 02 June 2004 at 10:30 PM.] |
David L. Donald Member From: Koh Samui Island, Thailand
|
posted 13 November 2004 05:05 AM
profile send email edit
Reference bump |
Jesse Pearson Member From: San Diego , CA
|
posted 31 May 2005 11:35 AM
profile send email edit
I was surfing the net for aeolian polytonal theory apoproaches and came upon a heated discussion we had. **I said a guitar player would not play the G major scale against the band playing A dorian because the scale tones of G major don't fall on the 1,3,5 and 7 chord tone degrees of A minor/dorian like A dorian would if the band was playing in A minor chord/dorian, which is why we have certain modes for certain chord types as a first choice. Playing related modes of a parent major scale does work and sound good just by accident, so I want to clarify that statement and clear this up for Denny and Rick. I do use related modes/etc. for smooth jazz and it comes up with some nice sounding stuff that I'm not worrying about the theory of it, go figure? Thanks <[This message was edited by Jesse Pearson on 01 June 2005 at 02:27 PM.] |
Denny Turner Member From: Northshore Oahu, Hawaii USA
|
posted 01 June 2005 05:07 AM
profile send email edit
JESSE MON...... GREAT to hear from you. HOW YA BEEN GUY!? We been missin' ya and wonderin' where ya been and whatcha doin' .I hope and trust all is going well for you and yerz in Sandy Eggo. ------- Last Saturday night I hosted a beach party for 25th Infantry guys coming back from the oil / heroin war. Late in the evening we were sitting around with a few guitars and a harmonica picker. He could wail on dom7 cross-harp Blues ...but was lost on minor progressions. So I did a little cross-harp mental math (a real brain strain) to translate / transpose his harp key selection so it would sub for minor mode even though he was still "sucking dom7" cross-harp licks. It worked like a charm. With just a little note & technique surfing, he's suddenly blowing minor harp he had just said he couldn't do. We wound up doing cross-harp subs for all 7 modes to show him what he COULD do! Of course it wouldn't have got him into Berkelee ...but that's not the point! Aloha, DT~ [This message was edited by Denny Turner on 01 June 2005 at 05:09 AM.]
|
Larry W. Jones Member From: Kingwood, Texas, 77339 The Liveable Forest
|
posted 01 June 2005 06:08 AM
profile send email edit
Not many posts get this many replies so soon. It's a gold mine worth the time! Many thanks.------------------ Return to Paradise! Visit Island Song Lyrics
|
Charlie McDonald Member From: Lubbock, Texas, USA
|
posted 01 June 2005 07:00 AM
profile send email edit
Holy Modal Rollers, Batman!Just one reply from a small brain, regarding Sleepwalk chorus: Chorus F Fm C F C F Fm C Bb C G7 Shouldn't the Bb be Eb? Anyone? Anyone? Sure, there's a Bb in Eb, different voicing.... but much can be implied when not overstated. I am happy to have grown up with piano theory, which explains why I can follow threads by Chas Smith and Mike Neer more easily, thinking linearly rather than vertically. The first time I heard of the different modes--I mean, Ionic and Doric were column capitals to me--was from young guitar students, fluent in this manner of speaking; and I wondered: do they actually use this in practice? I grew up playing Blind George Shearing, not Blind Lemon Jefferson. And Bird, he was just playing different lines over old changes. Thus it is no wonder that I failed so badly with pedal steel, having reach the Peter Principle of music. Mr. Smith: if you are still reading, could you get in touch with me? I'm still trying to find some work of yours from the 80's, solo steel that caused me to fall in love with the sound. There is a missing tune you may be able to help me find, and the album it was on. This has been fascinating stuff. I hear the swansong, for the present. Charlie |
Charlie McDonald Member From: Lubbock, Texas, USA
|
posted 01 June 2005 07:04 AM
profile send email edit
Didn't bear repeating.[This message was edited by Charlie McDonald on 01 June 2005 at 12:35 PM.] |
Jesse Pearson Member From: San Diego , CA
|
posted 01 June 2005 01:50 PM
profile send email edit
Hi Denny, good to hear from you too. I've been working out on the alto sax and transcribing 16 Maceo Parker and current smooth jazz hits, it's all minor and major blues scale / aeolian tonality based stuff. Horizontal aeolian scale over the entire progressions relative to the tonic key, way simple but catchy. Works on non pedal steel and sounds way smooth. It's wierd how hard old school jazz/bebop can be and this smooth jazz with the hip hop beat is so simple and catchy, all about phrasing. |
Denny Turner Member From: Northshore Oahu, Hawaii USA
|
posted 01 June 2005 03:20 PM
profile send email edit
Ah yes, Jesse. I sense some pleasant waters flowing in yer camp. GLAD to hear it.You sure describe Carlos' (and a number of others') formula for a long time! I'm just an old jam-band nut(case). Many years now of rather casual exposure to academia has come full circle and left the simple modal structure as my loose / simple road-map and armature for all the other years of fortunate / valuable mumbo-jumbo to flow upon with the least amount of a-do. I guess the "keep it simple" / "note & brain budgeting" / alter ego of academia is a path to the freedom of reasonably accomplished laziness! (Watt'd he just say? ) aholA, DT~ [This message was edited by Denny Turner on 01 June 2005 at 03:23 PM.] |
Denny Turner Member From: Northshore Oahu, Hawaii USA
|
posted 01 June 2005 04:25 PM
profile send email edit
Charlie,I can't tell what context and/or SGF posting (?) of the Sleepwalk bridge you're referring to. My brain is too often like a pea lost in a shell game! It would help if you reference the posting or expound upon the context you are referring to with the whole bridge progression in measures so my pea can grasp the space/time you're referring to. Example: The chorus in simple terms is: 4/4: F - - - / Fm - - - / C - F - / C - C7 - / F - - - / Fm - - - / G - Bb - (A>Ab) / G - - - /
Sleepwalk is indeed a good song to demonstrate and use scale / chord / position / voicing substitutions ...and connect those meanings to the scales'/chords' simple & congruent modal structure. For instance, the G#6 position subs for the Fm in the bridge because G#6 is also an Fm7 voicing. Sleepwalk is also a good example for brain exercise (for those so inclined) because it changes keys for the bridge ...giving us some simple song-familiar insight into the mechanics of I IV V key changes vs I IV V tone center movements within the same tonic key. So I am most interested in what you are referring to, to take a look at and discuss. Thanks, Aloha, DT~ [This message was edited by Denny Turner on 17 October 2005 at 01:45 AM.] |
Charlie McDonald Member From: Lubbock, Texas, USA
|
posted 02 June 2005 06:09 AM
profile send email edit
Denny,I see what you mean; searching back thru the posts on this topic, my brain is starting to feel like Swiss cheese.... Nonetheless, I think I have answered my own question, through the quest. Terry Farmer, back on page 4, wrote the Sleepwalk chart this way: Sleepwalk Verse - C Am Fm G etc..... Turnaround C F C G7 Chorus F Fm C F C F Fm C Bb C G7 You corrected the last line: F Fm G Bb G etc. So, looking for the thread, I missed the cloth. The G makes the Bb work for me. Thanks for taking the time to ease my mind. The above shows how linear my mind is. So what I find is that, over the years, in my head sometimes, and without the background in string theory, I've been making these chord substitutions on my own. Thanks for the brain teasers, and I'll keep reading. Perhaps on steel, I can look at it differently. That's why I play, for the challenge. Charlie "The only thing I really share with George Shearing is he didn't learn to read music." |
David L. Donald Member From: Koh Samui Island, Thailand
|
posted 15 October 2005 11:48 PM
profile send email edit
Bump |
Rick Alexander Member From: Florida, USA
|
posted 16 October 2005 01:12 AM
profile send email edit
This is a wonderful thread - rich in knowledge and insight. I didn't see it before, sure am glad it got bumped! RA
|