Steel Guitar Strings
Strings & instruction for lap steel, Hawaiian & pedal steel guitars
http://SteelGuitarShopper.com
Ray Price Shuffles
Classic country shuffle styles for Band-in-a-Box, by BIAB guru Jim Baron.
http://steelguitarmusic.com

This Forum is CLOSED.
Go to bb.steelguitarforum.com to read and post new messages.


  The Steel Guitar Forum
  Steel Players
  The Elements Of Tone! (Page 9)

Post New Topic  
your profile | join | preferences | help | search


This topic is 9 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   The Elements Of Tone!
Miguel e Smith
Member

From: Phoenix, AZ

posted 24 November 2006 06:24 PM     profile     
Just seeing how many comments and responses to Reece’s original post seems to be evidence of the subjective nature of what makes up tone. Ironically it also seemed as if the subject got morphed into a discussion on “The elements of GOOD tone”.

I think it’s ALL “tone”…good, bad or indifferent, but I also think what is “good” is completely based upon our own perception. I’ve heard tones that I personally thought were very crappy and not something I’d go for, but because the player using it was executing something so amazing, well, I sorta ended up liking the tone after all.

I tried to read all the posts about this but it reminded me of when I took up golf and realized there were soooo freakin’ many elements of the swing. Something that was supposed to be smooth and almost effortless ended up looking like I was having a seizure and all because I was thinking about it too much. I do the same thing with my sound and I know I think about it too much (although, I really appreciate the stuff I did read which means a lot of thought has gone into what makes tone tick). I do believe the (both)hands, the ears, the gear, tuning, humidity, temperature and all the hundreds of other things come to play (no pun intended).

Well, if you all figure it out, let me know the short version as that is all I can probably handle. Thanks for starting this interesting post Reece.

Mike


Bob Hickish
Member

From: Port Ludlow, Washington, USA

posted 24 November 2006 07:43 PM     profile     
Reece

I would like to thank you for posting this topic ,
I for one have made some changes in my approach to
playing and examined how I was doing thing , and it has
made a difference . So Maybe knowing ! it was not a wast
of your time or effort ! it helped someone ! Me .

And maybe you will post other ideas or what ifs in the future .
Thanks

Hick

Jimmie Martin
Member

From: Ohio, USA

posted 24 November 2006 07:52 PM     profile     
i'm learning from this too. i would like to have a tape and tab on different licks. beginnings and endings to learn. if i could go over them enough maybe i could get my own act and tone together.
Tracy Sheehan
Member

From: Fort Worth, Texas, USA

posted 24 November 2006 08:09 PM     profile     
Hope i am not jumping too far off topic here.I know exactly what Reece is tryng to get across.It is in the hands.I started on piano at a very young age then changed to fiddle.I played pro fiddle for a few years before taking up steel.
After i had been playing fiddle for many years i happened to get in to a band that the fiddle player was actually a classicial violinist.He had studied in Europe and taught music in the state college.
We would play twin fiddles at times and at times he played my fiddle and it sounded nothing like it did in my hands.After i had played all these years he started helping me.He corrected the angle that i was holding the bow and had me play closer to the bridge with a different pressure,etc.
The hard part was unlearning the bad habits i had pickd up on my on.
He also taught me what he called first and third scales up the neck and the correct fingering positions.
I had always wondered how a violinist could play so high on the neck and always know where they were as a violin has no frets as every one knows.
So back to steel.I wonder if steel players hated to see me coming because i was always asking one,how did you do that.
Stephen Gambrell
Member

From: Ware Shoals, South Carolina, USA

posted 24 November 2006 09:36 PM     profile     
"Awright, at the end of the first quarter, and the score is:
"ZB Pedal Steel Guitars - Please Help!" Thread: 1273
The Elements of Tone! Thread: 318

Yeah, but the ZB guys started 10/28/02---over FOUR years ago! Come on guys, we're kickin' some SERIOUS butt here!
And Mike Smith said three pages worth!

Darryl Hattenhauer
Member

From: Phoenix, Arizona, USA

posted 24 November 2006 09:43 PM     profile     
Following this thread, I feel like Danny De Vito trying to keep up with the New York Knicks.

There's a story about a guitar pull in which great but distinctive guitarists (Let's say Hendrix, Page, and Buchanon) all took turns on the same guitar. Hendrix made it sound like Hendrix, Page made it sound like Page, and Buchanan made it sound like Buchanan.

------------------
"The less I was of who I was, the better I felt." -- Leonard Cohen

b0b
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, California, USA

posted 24 November 2006 09:59 PM     profile     
Super long topics make the server work harder with each post. I'd appreciate it if y'all would wind it up soon.
Kevin Hatton
Member

From: Amherst, N.Y.

posted 24 November 2006 10:22 PM     profile     
When Clapton played his Gibson SG with Cream in the sixties he sounded like he was playing a Gibson SG. When he later switched to a Fender Strat he sounded like he was playing a Fender Strat. No amount of hand technique is going to change that. If you put Buddy Emmons, Buddy Charlton, Buddy Cage, Buddy Merril, Buddy Hackett, Little Buddy, my buddy down the block, or any other Buddy on a Fender 400 they will all sound like they are playing on a Fender 400. No amount of hand technique will change that either. Thats tone. That being said, if you can hear it, tone is largely in the equipment and not in the hands. If you are talking acoustic instruments thats different.

[This message was edited by Kevin Hatton on 24 November 2006 at 10:25 PM.]

[This message was edited by Kevin Hatton on 24 November 2006 at 10:28 PM.]

[This message was edited by Kevin Hatton on 24 November 2006 at 10:33 PM.]

Darryl Hattenhauer
Member

From: Phoenix, Arizona, USA

posted 24 November 2006 11:20 PM     profile     
Kevin and everybody,

If somebody made an audio tape of Clapton playing his SG and then handing it to Santana, and then Santana playing it and handing it to Cippolina, could you tell that all three cuts were back to back with only the guitarist different?

I'm just asking for what your hearing is like. I suspect some can hear it and some can't. I don't think I could hear it, but some people like Gruhn could probably hear a sound difference when Clapton opened and closed his eyes.

------------------
"The less I was of who I was, the better I felt." -- Leonard Cohen

Jody Cameron
Member

From: Angleton, TX,, USA

posted 25 November 2006 12:44 AM     profile     
"Buddy Hackett, Little Buddy, my buddy down the block, or any other Buddy on a Fender 400 they will all sound like they are playing on a Fender 400. No amount of hand technique will change that either. Thats tone."

So Kevin, if you and "Buddy" were sitting side by side on Fender 400's, a listener would not be able to tell the difference, because the tone would be the same? I don't think so...something tells me there's a difference between "Buddy's" hands and yours...call it a hunch.

Kevin Hatton
Member

From: Amherst, N.Y.

posted 25 November 2006 01:09 AM     profile     
You are confusing tone and playing Jody. Yes, given the same rigs we would both have the same tones coming out. Of course someone could tell the playing difference. It wouldn't matter what player is on the rigs. They all sound like Fender 400's and playing styles or hand manipulation wouldn't change it. Just like James Burton on his Telecater. He sounds like he's playing a Fender Tele. Same with Gretsch guitars, or when Paul Mcartney plays his Hofner bass. It sounds like he's playing a Hofner bass whether he's playing it or anyone else is. Its the signature tone of the instruments.

[This message was edited by Kevin Hatton on 25 November 2006 at 01:11 AM.]

[This message was edited by Kevin Hatton on 25 November 2006 at 01:13 AM.]

[This message was edited by Kevin Hatton on 25 November 2006 at 01:14 AM.]

David L. Donald
Member

From: Koh Samui Island, Thailand

posted 25 November 2006 02:18 AM     profile     
One hugely intructional incident for me was in Newbury England.

They had a TV camera close-up live on both
Doug Jernigan and Joe Wright's hands.
It really, REALLY showed two very clear ways
to get 'good tone'.
On divergent styles of music also.

I went home and tried to duplicate what I saw, in both styles.
it helped.
It might have helped MORE if I had read
Reece's listing above, before I went.

One thing I don't remember in the original list is pick-blocking
and it's effects on tone.

i.e. the touch of a plam or fingertips,
is much different than the hard surface of a pick.

I certainly think the advice from seasoned and aclaimed pro's
is more valid than the input from average hackers,
or beginners.

But that said, that superior knowlege
is not EXCLUSIVE to the pros.
Yet it may, in the totality, be better applied globally by them,
and hence giving their advice more validity.

An arbitrary line like 5 years does nothing to distiguish
technical accomplishment.
But I will note many with large numbers of years,
seem to debate more, and ask fewer cogent questions on topic,
than the rank beginers...

These days it is often better to get the tone a player is looking for in the recording headphones,
more than in the output of his equipment.

You must think is the AMP sound the reality,
or the recorded sound.
In most recordings it is what comes out of the recording system that counts most.
If it is neccesary to modify something
in the chain tpo get the player
the sound HE prefers in the control room,
Then so be it.

This would, during the recording process,
allow him the best feedback for his ears
and hands to play his best, and get his tone.

**************** To get back to topic more,
I take the liberty of quoting Reece's original post in it's entirety
Since it seems to have been lost a bit over time and debate.

*******************************************
" Much has been said and written concerning tone over many years, yet to my knowledge the specific elements which comprise tone have yet to be collectively identified.

What makes each of us unique in the sound we get, and why is it when we play someone else’s guitar it sounds different than when they play it?

Most will agree tone begins with the hands, so I will confine my thoughts only to that which comes in contact with the strings. (hands, bar and picks)

LEFT HAND:

1. Amount of downward pressure exerted on the bar.

2, Weight of the bar.

3. Mass of the bar.

4. Bar Alloy.

5. Diameter of the bar.

6. Bar vibrato manipulation.

7. Weight distribution on the bar across the strings.

8. Bar weight manipulation when changing positions.

9. Finger weight of middle, ring, and little finger on strings behind bar.

10. Spread distance of the fingers trailing the bar.

11. Finger placement when gripping the bar.

12. Tightness of the bar grip.

RIGHT HAND:

1. Finger positioning relative to distance from the pickup.

2. Finger pick material.

3. Finger pick thickness.

4. Angle of attack on the finger picks when entering the strings.

5. Pick depths on fingers and thumb.

6. Distance thumb is moved away from the fingers.

7. Material and thickness of thumb pick.

8. Weight distribution of the right hand on the strings.

9. Amount of “pull” pressure exerted on the finger picks.

10. Amount of “push” pressure exerted on the thumb pick.

11. Placement of the picks into the strings.

12. Depth in which the picks go into the strings.

Each element listed (and I’m sure more will be added) could be a topic of discussion while trying to analyze, evaluate and reach a general consensus.

I believe acquiring an overall mental perception of the many elements involved, provides the positive potential of change and rapid improvement."

************************************
On #12 Depth of pick going into the strings.

How many re-file their picks shorter,
and also how many round the angle
or concave the angle,
or generaly make the tip more pointed?

Also do you file the picks to change the apparent angle relative to your fingers
or thumb, resting strictly parallel to the strings/neck?

[This message was edited by David L. Donald on 25 November 2006 at 02:22 AM.]

Tony Prior
Member

From: Charlotte NC

posted 25 November 2006 03:26 AM     profile     
but Kevin you are missing something here,yes of course, EC played a few different guitars for there inherent timbre, just like many here chose the PP.

EC, Jeff Beck and Stevie Ray all played Strats, how came they all sound totally different ? And an entire planet full of young gun's are buying Strats everyday in the attempt to sound like EC, Jeff Beck and Stevie Ray..a few will, most will not, ever.

So here is the big Q

IF YOU picked up EC's Strat, could you SOUND like EC ?

IT's no different than the most commonly asked question..

How come when YOU play MY Tele it dosen't sound like when "I" play my Tele.."

thats what Reece and others are talking about here..

Put the exact same Push Pull in 12 peoples grasp..and ONE will shine like no tomorrow, the others will be chasing the shine beyond tomorrow, asking the pervervial question...

"How come when YOU play MY Push Pull it doesn't sound like when "I" play my Push Pull"?

This entire subject is alive and well because of the many who believe and have the mindset that if they BUY a certain brand of Instrument it elevates them automatically to GREAT TONE without actually putting in the hours to achieve great tone.

The actual Instrument, yes , of course is part of the greater picture..but the greats choose an Instrument because they KNOW that a certain Instrument , Electric or Acoustic, will allow them to stretch the envelope.

Jazz Violinist Stephane Grappelli was not GREAT because he played a Stradivarius, he was already great and the Stradivarius allowed him to accentuate what he already had.

earlier in this thread a I made comment which probably needs to be repeated..
we go to gatherings with other players, sometimes one of them is smiling mighty because they now have a brand X ( pp) and they tell us how GREAT it sounds, when they play, the first thought that comes to mind is calling WEBSTERS and telling them they need a new definiton for the word great, because the current one isn't working.

The Instrument does not make the music, it produces the music that the musician creates.
The Instrument can define the timbre and thats where it ends, in my OPINION of course.

t

[This message was edited by Tony Prior on 25 November 2006 at 05:58 AM.]

Reece Anderson
Member

From: Keller Texas USA

posted 25 November 2006 04:58 AM     profile     
Concerning the finger pick angles......we have discussed variances which translates to pull pressure.

We have not however considered that when the hand is in the playing configuration of most players, the finger picks are not entering the strings at an angle which will allow the entire surface of the pick to come in contact with the string.

When placing your hand in the playing configuration, notice that your fingers are at an angle to the strings, and were you to align the angle and allow the fingers to run parallel with the strings, you must bend your wrist to the right.

To counter this, accomodate the right hand configuration, and allow more pick surface to contact the strings, I put a slight clockwise twist on each pick which insures full pick surface contact.

Examination of the wear points on the finger picks you are now using will tell you if you have full pick contact.

Considering the many elements of playing, this may appear to be insignificant, but what if this slight angle adjustment felt very natural to you.

If it did, I have no doubt both your tone and technique could dramatically change for the better immediately. It takes only a minute to try, and it could possibly be "the" difference in feel your sub-conscious mind has been searching for!

Randy Beavers
Member

From: Lebanon,TN 37090

posted 25 November 2006 05:41 AM     profile     
I've heard stories that Buddy Charleton would strap a students right arm to his side if he wouldn't keep his elbow into his side. With Buddy's method of palm blocking you can't "chicken wing." Think how much that also changes the angle of the picks on the strings.

If you're having trouble palm blocking you might want to consider this.

Tony Prior
Member

From: Charlotte NC

posted 25 November 2006 05:55 AM     profile     
Randy, thanks alot, my wife read this and now has recommended that I practice with BOTH arms strapped to my sides..

Actually I had heard that Buddy C has some very progressive methods for getting things done correctly.

t

[This message was edited by Tony Prior on 25 November 2006 at 05:56 AM.]

Al Collinsworth
Member

From: Lexington, Kentucky, USA

posted 25 November 2006 06:02 AM     profile     
Thank you Reece and Randy!!

[This message was edited by Al Collinsworth on 26 November 2006 at 04:06 AM.]

Dennis Detweiler
Member

From: Solon, Iowa, US

posted 25 November 2006 06:03 AM     profile     
Another angle (question)
How many of you have changed your right hand technique after you began playing steel? And how soon after? And why?
I played for 9 years until I was forced to concentrate on my right hand technique. I realized I couldn't play as fast and mute as well with my original right hand technique and position. Hence, to try and keep up with the band I was working with, I had to get my palm closer to the strings (pinky out) or roll my hand over to the left. After experimenting, pinky out felt better, but was a struggle for several nights in the dexterity department. After getting settled and comfortable, I realized my picks were no longer contacting the strings at a "fat" sounding angle or approach. Each night, I would slightly bend the finger picks until, several nights later, they felt comfortable and solid on the stings at nearly 90 degrees of angle. This concluded in my grip being "cupped" and the palm tight on all of the stings. Many aspects of my playing changed for the positive. One result that I hadn't considered at the time, my tone had changed. Notes were "fatter". Chords were "bigger". So much so that I had to make slight adjustments to my amp. The timbre of my guitar didn't change, but my tone did. In my opinion, it enhanced the natural tone of the guitar. Putting descriptive words to the changes of sound is hard to do...fatter, bigger, rounder, etc..? Any time you alter your right hand technique, which covers many aspects, you'll find a chain reaction of change in your tone, blocking, speed, etc. And like someone in a previous post said, you'll find correcting right hand technique challenging.
My late mentor once told me many years ago, "try to pick your single notes with your thumb and middle finger. Middle finger tone matches the thumb tone closer than the index finger."

[This message was edited by Dennis Detweiler on 25 November 2006 at 10:29 AM.]

Jim Sliff
Member

From: Hermosa Beach California, USA

posted 25 November 2006 06:13 AM     profile     
"EC, Jeff Beck and Stevie Ray all played Strats, how came they all sound totally different ? "

For the same reason they each have Strats that sound different. Clapton on Blackie sounds like Clapton on Blackie - Clapton on Brownie sounds different. It's a subtle difference, but it's there. They have all been interviewed where they talked about differences in the same model of guitar. SRV was the least vocal about it, as he was the worst at dialing in any kind of tone himself - it took Cesar Diaz to "fix" his overall sound...but he still recognized the tonal difference between Strats.

Would you sound like Clapton if you played Blackie? No. And neither would Clapton sound like he was playing Blackie if he played your Strat (if you have one).

He would sound VERY close, but how close would depend on the inherent tone of the particular instrument. Once you baseline that, then the hands and Reece's excellent list come into play. As I've said repeatedly, Reece's list of things that influence how a player sounds is tremendous, and ranges from extreme to subtle effect. The effect, though, is still dependent on the baseline tone of the instrument.

i.e. Clapton playing Blackie doesn't sound (tonewise) like Clapton playing the (in)famous painted SG. At all.

Tony Prior
Member

From: Charlotte NC

posted 25 November 2006 06:17 AM     profile     
Jim, your making my case...

if you put all 3 players on the exact same Instrument aka: Blackie, they would STILL sound different.They would each go after the TONE that they have developed.

Nobody is attempting to say that the Instrument is NOT part of the equation, it is, a very important part of it.

I play 6 stringers with NO PICKS..my execution on the exact same Instrument as others is TOTALLY different and produces a totally different sound..is it better or worse ? I don't know, I like it better so I guess that is the reference point for me. It has taken me my entire tenure on Guitar to bring in the tone and style that "I" like and want to hear with my rig. But I guarantee that if others play my exact rig very few will achieve the same results that I have. Will it be good, ? Sure, will it be the same? probably not.

approach, execution , style , gear. Each worthy.

Gear may be a constant, but approach, execution and style may vary considerably.

I think they each have a part in the grand plan.

and yes, I have a few Strats and would love for EC to come over and play them..I wouldn't care if he come over and didn't play them !

With my style and execution , each of them, very different guitars mind you, all sound the same to me.

t

[This message was edited by Tony Prior on 25 November 2006 at 06:38 AM.]

Jim Sliff
Member

From: Hermosa Beach California, USA

posted 25 November 2006 06:18 AM     profile     
I have a question regarding bar diameter - I primarily use 1" - 1 1/4" bars, the main one being chromed steel tapered from 1 1/8" - 1/1/4"; others being Delrin, moly/nylon and acrylic. Tossing aside the obvious effects of weight, what...other than in vibrato, which is fairly obvious...effects on the sound would a larger diameter bar have.

Again, I realize the weight and vibrato are affected, but I'm curious if other large-bar players have noticed anything else? I have, but I'd like to see the response to see if it's the same thing.

Reece Anderson
Member

From: Keller Texas USA

posted 25 November 2006 08:18 AM     profile     
I believe that which is the most physically comfortable to be the most logical approach relative to achieving the best results.

I ask my students to simply relax their arms to their side, and from that relaxed position we begin constructing the hand configuration, pick angles and etc. while remaining relative their their natural tendencies as much as possible.

As I believe I mentioned earlier in this thread, I never tell anyone they must do something a specific way. In my opinion doing so has the potential of stiffling creativity. However when I do see what I consider to be an approach which has the potential to be detrimental, I provide them with what I believe to be the odds for success should they continue in that direction.

Over the years of my experience I have seen some amazing things accomplished musically which were out of the ordinary, and when I do I always think to myself, "what if their instructor had been successful in discouraging them". Had they done so the world would have been deprived of a great artist. I have personally never took that risk with a student.

The name Thumbs Carlisle comes to mind as a perfect example. He played regular guitar, but everything he done opposed every physical approach I have ever seen.

He laid his Fender Telecaster across his lap, fretted it with his fingers pointing downward, used his left thumb so fast it was a blur, and used a thumb pick that was as fast as his left thumb.

Eric West
Member

From: Portland, Oregon, USA

posted 25 November 2006 08:57 AM     profile     
Jim. I've noticed when I tried them that larger bars, (I use a standard smaller 7/8" Shot Jackson cut/filed/buffed bar I got from BS, alternate with a 7/8 I got in 79.) there was a funny point where the sustain of a larger mass/weight, and a deadening of the strings from an increased point of bar contact seemed to cancelled eachother out. I don't imagine that a larger radius increases the contact point that much. If the bar were lighter I could imagine a lessening of sustain. I don't know.

I think the way I've held the bar, as Bob Hofnar said because we had the same source, is helped more by a smaller diameter bar. A larger bar has always tended for me to encourage a "grab" grip, instead of holding it in a more relaxed manner.

Since it's a measureable quality, someone lke Ed Packard would have to do some sonograms (sp?).

Myself I'd like to see the results of other than metal bars.

A lot of it since we're working with the subconcious "edge" might be plain superstition. I know that for some reason, problems I've been having during any given night seem to go away when I use my "Shot J" bar. Same diameter/weight, different "mojo". Kind of like a guy that's using a BJS bar with the wrong birthstone..

JMHO.

EJL

Reece Anderson
Member

From: Keller Texas USA

posted 25 November 2006 09:00 AM     profile     
Jim S....You've made some very good points, and you're question concerning different bar weights and materials will be helpful when a consensus is formed!

Dennis D....Concerning the point you raised about picking with the thumb and middle finger....I am of the opinion more efficiency of movement can be accomplished when playing single string if the picking is alternated between the thumb and index finger, because in so doing it provides for the middle finger(which normally plays the highest string) to be "held in reserve" to make a quick transition to a higher string.

You also posed a very good question....does the thumb and middle finger pressures more closley match?

I believe most will agree, equal and consistent pressure matching is very important to sound/tone, which is why I use two fingers when playing two notes at the same time unless they are so far apart I lose my natural feel.

I find it very easy to match the pressure of two fingers pulling together in the same direction, than I do with two picks of different material, mass and weight, going in opposing directions. (thumb and finger picks)

Jim Sliff
Member

From: Hermosa Beach California, USA

posted 25 November 2006 09:22 AM     profile     
Eric, I've found the opposite to be true for me. Maybe it's my huge meathooks, but I have a more relaxed grip with a larger bar. That *was* the point I was looking for, though - differences in grip, i.e. a more relaxed playing "feel".

The other thing about the big steel one is it causes a completely different approach from a "slinding into a note" stanpoint (or sliding into a chord). Any movement requires more acceleration and you have to slow the movement sooner than with a light bar. It's not a huge effect, but there is a marked difference in style.

I noticed it in Sneaky's playing after I got my big bar (which was his old spare). There's a slight, but perceptible difference, and if you could chart out a "curve" of speed, the big bar would have flatter spots at the start and end, while a lighter bar would climb and descend more rapidly.

You really don't hear it until you try it, and then once you DO notice it's one of those "light bulb" moments...

Gary Steele
Member

From: Orient, Ohio, USA

posted 25 November 2006 10:47 AM     profile     
I need to read all this before i post much. But i will say my Revelation tube pre, My Mosvalve 1500 amp and my T.C. Electronics G-Force sounds much better than anything i'v ever played thru. So it seems to me that your rigs has to make a lot of difference. And your steel really being in tune with its self make it sound much better also, ETC ETC ETC. I will post more after my Mothers funeral is over and i get to read all this.
Great post Reece.You are at the top of the finest in all aspects in my book.
Gary Steele.
Jimmie Martin
Member

From: Ohio, USA

posted 25 November 2006 01:25 PM     profile     
b0b wants everyone to hurry up with this topic because of band with, but what about the zb topic? my question is if you get used to a certain bar. if you change bar size and weight doesn't that require some changing of how you handle the bar as far as pressure and etc. to get the same sound or (tone) as you had before. in a sence saying shouldn't we stay with the same bar as we started with. i use a bjs bar and i don't see me wearing it out anytime soon as long as i take care of it. thanks
Calvin Walley
Member

From: colorado city colorado, USA

posted 25 November 2006 01:42 PM     profile     
some of you here on this thread need to spend more time picking and less time typing
bet you $10.00 your tone would improve

------------------
Mullen SD-10 3&5 / nashville 400
Hilton volume pedal


b0b
Sysop

From: Cloverdale, California, USA

posted 25 November 2006 02:01 PM     profile     
Jimmie, the ZB topic isn't generating 20 new posts every day. See http://steelguitarforum.com/Forum7/HTML/004063.html for a complete explanation.

Watch for "The Elements of Tone, Part 2", coming soon to a computer near you.
Jimmie Martin
Member

From: Ohio, USA

posted 25 November 2006 03:23 PM     profile     
sorry i'll quit posting. i sure would like to learn but here isn't the place. i'll try to use my time more wisely.
Jimmie Martin
Member

From: Ohio, USA

posted 25 November 2006 07:22 PM     profile     
by the way thanks for the words of wisdom calvin
Reece Anderson
Member

From: Keller Texas USA

posted 26 November 2006 03:40 AM     profile     
Calvin W....Thats quite a bold bet you've made....If players who read this forum take you up on it, be prepared to get a 2nd lien on your home.

Practice does not make perfect, perfect practice makes perfect!

Misdirected practice is time consuming, frustrating, and the possibility of achieving success is slightly better than zero, provided one lives to be 100 and has the capacity to still be playing.

Unfortunately, far to many recognize too late the futility in misdirected practice and quit playing. When they do, both the individual and steel guitar itself are the losers.

Jimmie M....Following what some may believe to be "words of wisdom", is like deciding to drive from your home to a destination in San Francisco California, refusing to read the road signs, and the only known direction is......"west". The only thing you would eventually find is the ocean.

Tony Prior
Member

From: Charlotte NC

posted 26 November 2006 04:02 AM     profile     
as Reece writes:
-----------------------------------------------
Practice does not make perfect, perfect practice makes perfect!

Misdirected practice is time consuming, frustrating, and the possibility of achieving success is slightly better than zero, provided one lives to be 100 and has the capacity to still be playing.
----------------------------------------------

No finer words on the subject have been expressed...

Reece Anderson
Member

From: Keller Texas USA

posted 26 November 2006 06:46 AM     profile     
As an accomodation to Bobby Lee while also acknowledging his technical problems with this thread, (as explained within the link he provided)I'm happy to accomodate him by continuing this discussion on another thread in the "Steel Players" section called...."The Elements Of Tone part 2".

The presenting of new ideas and questions by many who are participating in a positive manner on this thread is appreciated by those truly interested in learning.

Without question, we are collectively making a positive contribution to those who have a sincere desire to push the envelope of new ideas of learning while enjoying playing.

I will open the new thread soon as possible, meanwhile I understand your comments, questions, and suggestions may continue here.

Reece Anderson
Member

From: Keller Texas USA

posted 30 November 2006 02:15 PM     profile     
Since this was the beginning thread in which most comments were made, and the technical issue no longer exists for Bobby Lee, I believe this to be the best place to provide my personal opinion about what is believed by most to be intricacies of the “Elements Of Tone”.

The following list corresponds to the numbers on the first page of this thread…..

LEFT HAND:

1, The amount of downward pressure should be just enough to overcome bar/string rattle!

2. The weight of the bar is proportionate to the weight required to overcome bar/string rattle!

3. The mass of the bar is also relevant to number 1 and number 2!

4. Different bar alloy was not discussed enough to form a preliminary consensus!

5. Diameter of the bar is discretionary provided the needed control and downward pressure is considered!

6. Bar vibrato of differing speeds and lateral distance can provide emotion and enhanced tone!

7. Weight distribution of the bar can be variable across the strings as long as the strings being played do not have bar/string rattle!

8. Bar weight manipulation has not reached a preliminary consensus!

9. No additional downward pressure is required other than the resting weight of the ring and little finger!

10. Finger separation of the ring and little finger is less inhibiting relative to bar vibrato!

11. As long as the bar is secure both front and back, and the ability has been acquired to slightly raise the back of the bar and execute controlled vibrato, the configuration is meeting the requirements of achieving a good tone!

12. The grip pressure on the bar should be as relaxed as possible provided bar security is not compromised!

RIGHT HAND:

1. This has not been discussed enough to form a preliminary consensus!

2. Metal finger picks are likely best!

3. Finger pick thickness is not critical unless the picks are of such light gauge it allows them to change pick angles while playing!

4. The extent of the excitement of the strings can be varied by changing the pick angles. It is generally believed the “bite” on the string which results in added pressure exerted, provides a better tone!

5. The depth of the picks is a matter of personal feel, but as long as it meets the criteria specified within number 4, any depth is acceptable!

6. A wide separation between thumb and fingers usually results in added pressure on the strings!

7. The thickness of a plastic thumb pick has the propensity to provide a more bass like sound when compared to metal finger picks, which makes pick selections very important!

8. The weight distribution of the right hand when touching the strings should be only that which is required to dampen the strings!

9. Pull pressure on the finger picks may vary relative to pick angles, but generally if the pressures are balanced it will contribute to a good tone!

10. Same response as #9!

11. A specific area on the neck in which to insert the picks when playing, has not reached a preliminary consensus!

12. Depth of picks into the strings varies depending on the angles, but the deeper the pick goes into the strings, the farther it is to remove and strike the next string, which could be detrimental to some!

Some of the elements listed above have not reached a consensus, and some require further discussion to fully validate.


This topic is 9 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 

All times are Pacific (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Pedal Steel Pages

Note: Messages not explicitly copyrighted are in the Public Domain.

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46

Our mailing address is:
The Steel Guitar Forum
148 South Cloverdale Blvd.
Cloverdale, CA 95425 USA

Support the Forum